WILL THE MILLENNIUM BE A UTOPIA?
© John Armstrong
The Church of God in Williamstown
WEB SITE: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index_.htm

INTRODUCTION
Les Franklin was a black man born into poverty in America who rose to become an IBM executive, worked for the Governor of Colorado and even ran for Congress. Then tragedy struck when his 16-year-old youngest son Shaka shot himself in his own bedroom. He turned his grief into civic action, and started a foundation for the prevention of youth suicide. His eldest son drifted into depression and, while promising his father that he would never harm himself, was found dead in the garage where he had suffocated himself with car fumes. As reported in the September 4, issue of Time magazine, "Les will remain the Shaka Franklin Foundation chairman, but he is putting aside his work in suicide prevention. For the first time in his life he feels defeated. He is also selling the home he worked so hard to build. 'My two kids died 8 meters apart, one in the bedroom and one in the garage. We thought it was our dream house, but it holds only sad, sad, hard memories.'"

"I thought I was a decent father," he says in the house where the smell of death still lingers. "I've cried so hard my face hurts." And yet something within him still grasps a solution. "Somehow we've got to bring happiness back onto the planet so that people will want to live…" He reaches for a more precise word. "So that children will want to live."

Do you want that to happen too? How much do you want it to happen? Do you hope that the lives, opportunities and well-being of people will get better? For everyone? If so, you are similar to millions of others on this earth who hope and wish for life to improve. There is nothing wrong with that. Indeed, much human endeavour has been fuelled by a deep desire to make life better—even perfect. The stark realities of life are so difficult we don't even want to contemplate them. Do you remember those people in the Philippines who were buried by mud and rubbish when the garbage tip they lived on collapsed due to heavy rain? Their plight was unimaginable! To consider that circumstances might indeed worsen for the vast majority of the world's population is simply too much for many people to bear. Part of the message of this season though is the reality of a world that will go perilously close to destroying everyone, aided and abetted by a demented and enraged demonic horde.

THE NEED FOR HOPE
I was conducting a workshop recently where it became clear that most people there had a deep need to have an optimistic hope in the future, along with an unalterable belief that all manner of things were getting better in a rapidly improving world. Perhaps some of you here are also like that. To contemplate that things are escalating towards mayhem simply undermines people's hopes. And without hope where are we?

I can remember as a student in high school becoming completely disillusioned by the knowledge of impending doom. It eroded much of my will to succeed and strive and produced a gnawing despondency at the time I was meant to strive the most in fifth form high school. Where had my hope gone? Into the 'World Tomorrow!' I had been listening to the morning radio program with Garner Ted Armstrong, had heard the bad news, and then the 'Good News'—that Christ would come and all would be well. Did you hear that too? Was there a place for me? Yes, pay and pray, and you could be there too. Anything else? Not really. God's government would usher in a perfect world: no illness, plentiful food, no pollution, no deserts, animals that don't eat people or other animals (vegetarian apparently!), universal happiness and well-being. At last, a 'world government'—the Kingdom of God.

What did I have to do now? Keep the ten commandments, tithe diligently and obey the present church government, a kind of pre-millennial version of the future one to come. Not as perfect, of course, but it wasn't meant to be, because that was part of the test: to obey imperfect government and remain loyal and unquestioning.

My intention here though is not to extensively re-visit the past, rather to review our assumptions regarding Christ's millennial rule, including those assumptions that were formed in the past which have remained unexamined, and to consider how that past view is affected by our need to know that things will get better—and quickly. I'd like to talk about this notion of utopia, the past, present and future, and re-examine the fundamental truths about how God works in human beings, asking and answering the question: "Will God do something at Christ's return He has never done before?"

NOTIONS OF UTOPIA
Utopia as a term has either of two meanings: 1) 'No place' literally—it doesn't exist, or 2) The place, an environment of perfection.

Incredible as it might seem, the creation of utopia has been behind most governments, technologies, inventions and economic manoeuvring throughout human history. The main difference seems to have been the extent that utopia was explicitly claimed, as opposed to being implicitly promised through symbols and abstractions. Here is one example taken from Ronald Conway's book, Rage for Utopia:

"Robert Owen was a young man full of cheerful benevolence who had become a part-owner of a textile mill at New Lanark, and he was fortunate enough to have substantial capital, even in his late teens. Starting with one hundred pounds, he established a prosperous textile factory and became wealthy enough to put plans for improved industrial conditions into effect. Enthusiastic rather than obsessed, he questioned why there should be poverty, distress and suffering in the world. Owen considered that the cause of every problem in the world was not to be found in genetic inadequacy of the human being. Rather, environment was at fault since people were mostly a product of their environment, and hence environmental change would bring about human change. Here we have a foretaste of the much more radical theory of Marx and Engels. Owen set about using his own factory as a proving ground. Upon arrival in Scotland he had the inhabitants of New Lanark tear down the old workers' hovels and cottages and commenced work on new, clean and tidy houses and streets.

So successful was Owen's experiment that even the future Tsar of Russia stayed with the saviour and urged him to provide two million men to establish his new paradise in the great territory of all the Russias. Ambassadors, parliamentarians, all flocked to New Lanark to admire what Own had done. Proving that he could do as well at another site, Owen gathered together half a million pounds to create another model manufacturing town in the village of Motherwell, after which the industrial wizard journeyed to the United States to address Congress in Washington in 1825. He later established a new foundation in Indiana, where the Rappists, a fundamentalist sect from Bavaria, had already made a similar experiment.

Robert Owen was undoubtedly a cheerful sort of redeemer with sanguine temperament, sufficient practicality, money and energy to make his system work—but only up to a point. He had overlooked the basic cupidity and cantankerousness in human nature, particularly among poor folk, who did not always know what to do with the fruits of their prosperity and their new leisure once they had attained it. When he returned in 1828 to the colony of New Harmony, as Owen called his Indiana settlement, he found the system had broken down, that alcoholism, friction and disharmony had taken the place of his demi-paradise. Even this did not discourage his belief in the essential goodness of mankind. But when he tried to install his system in Texas—then still under the control of Mexico—this too collapsed, and little by little Owen's dream faded.

Robert Owen's experiment had shown that small-scale reform was possible, and that some lasting degree of success in redeeming the industrial and social order could be brought by concentrating on a local microcosm rather than upon obsessively grandiose plans for the redemption of the entire planet. Owen had seen from the beginning that for any economic program to succeed it would do well to avoid partisan political fanaticisms of all kinds. This failure of his plans for his human subjects came from Owen's inability to recognise that the good in humankind is amply commingled with evil and folly. In that sense he was yet another seeker after perfection in an imperfectible world."(emphasis mine) (pp 108-109)

Indeed, Robert Owen is just one of so many reformers: Marx, Jeremy Bentham, Rousseau, Adam Smith and political reformers who dare to put their ideas into practice. Each believes that the system they create will usher in untold physical and social prosperity and happiness for all. Our current political leaders are little different. What seems so astonishing is that people continue to gullibly believe the utopian claims (though disguised in current economic jargon) of various political parties and leaders. Yet as we see from history, each claim contains a fundamental flaw that relates to the belief that a system provides the means to utopia, and therefore fails to apprehend the nature of human nature and its capacity for evil and folly—in the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. Of course, we recognise (or should) that these claims amount to a false god, an idolatrous faith that must be cast down.

FALSE VIEWS OF THE MILLENNIUM?
Our previous view of the Millennium was similarly focussed on the introduction of a system to usher in the 'wonderful world tomorrow'. Indeed, its authors used copious quotes from prominent people to claim that a 'world government' was the mechanism that would bring about peace and prosperity—that is, human nature could be changed by a system. But, as T.S. Elliott wrote:

They constantly try to escape
From the darkness outside and within
By dreaming a system so perfect
That no one will need to be Good.
And, to quote Wolfensberger:
There are, of course, many morally valid ways to be good to others, and to combat humanity's inhumanity to humanity. Even systemic ways of doing it may be morally valid, and there are many personal ways of striving to do it. But we can also say with certainty that systemic efforts in the absence of extensive personal efforts are bound to fail (emphasis mine). Failure to perceive this has been the error at the heart of many social theories and political systems, such as Marxism, which proposed that a good society could be built by force so as to eventually make people more moral, rather than that it takes moral people to build a better society (A Brief Outline of Some of the Most Important Concepts and Assumptions Underlying Citizen Advocacy, The Citizen Advocacy Forum, 1995).
Have we had a Marxist view of the 'World Tomorrow'? Will Christ usher in a world government that will change human nature? How would that work? Would it work via control, an insistence on compliance, or else the use of the 'rod of iron'? Of course, when each of us imagines an utopia, we bring our own preconceived ideas of what that would consist of; for some it might be a totalitarian government, for others, anarchy. Yet what will Christ do, and will this be consistent with the way God has always dealt with human beings? Will it be fair? How will God create a world where children will want to remain alive?

SPIRITUAL IMAGERY
Let's begin in the Book of Joel:

As we view conditions at the end-time here, we have a description of utter desolation of the agricultural landscape, an environment that should provide nourishment and sustenance. But here it can no longer sustain life. Is this also a parable about the condition of the church? Food (spiritual nourishment and knowledge of God) is cut off before our eyes, there is no gladness in the house of God. How does that compare with the description of events after Christ returns? Well, firstly, let's look and see how the Scriptures use certain imagery to express these different spiritual conditions. For example: Notice how differently a stream of living water represents an image of nourishment, compared with 'fire has burned the open pastures'. A graphic and stark comparison. Compare that to: The question then is, Who comes to be like this? So when we read further references to this imagery in Ps 46:4, we soon realise that these Scriptures are not necessarily, nor solely referring to physical manifestations. Notice: Where else have we heard of a temple being connected to a river and streams? Nu 35:4 talks of a thousand cubits (the Septuagint has 2000; Maimonides proposes that it can only be 3000 cubits if one takes in the whole city) as pastureland—nourishment—for the Levites beyond the city. Does this mean the kings and priests (the resurrected saints) must also receive nourishment? Notice the gradual increase in the depth of water. It is not instantaneous. What has to happen for the depth of water to increase? What is its ultimate depth? SALT AND LIVING WATER
Back to Ezekiel: In areas of stagnation, where there is no flow, salt deposits can build, until only salt is left. If anything less than 100% of the salt is not removed, over time it will become clogged with salt. With water settling, not flowing, but constantly receiving salt, it is inevitable that a large slat bed will develop. If there is anything less than 100% agreement with the truth, in time all truth will be gone. 100% is with all your heart and soul (Dt 30:10). This Scripture also indicates that individuals will still have to thirst and hunger for the Truth—you have to want it, it is still a decision that has to be made. There is a constant demand for and a constant use of fresh water. There is a flow of living waters.

As Christopher Nugent has said: "Condoning a little evil is like condoning cancer—it progresses to grow away from the Truth and finish the race with evil." That's why we have to take drastic action against it, like 'plucking out one's eye'. Why have we thought this would be any different during the Millennium?

Notice this stark contrast found in Jeremiah:

Let's now go back to Ezekiel to see more of this imagery: So what the "trees" produce in turn gives life to others. How badly do we want to be like that? But notice that stagnation and becoming encrusted with salt—which happen whenever our reliance shifts even slightly away from God—can also take place. Anything less than 100% will, in time, lead to encrustation—the desert, wilderness—overtones to the parable of the sower!

PARALLELS WITH ANCIENT ISRAEL
The contrast of a desert condition with that of an ever-flowing stream is made all the more relevant when one considers some parallels with Israel:

In that sense, they wanted the desert. That's why they got to stay and die there, except for those who wanted life—the water (see Rev 22:1,17). God showed His capacity to sustain Israel at the waters of Meribah: The 40 years in the wilderness reflected not only a physical state, but—more importantly—sought a spiritual one. God continually implored His people to seek Him and not to commit idolatry. To not trust in God is to commit idolatry. MILLENNIAL CONDITIONS
So what can be hoped for when Christ returns? Are there promises relating to a physically-reformed earth in which people are incapable of sinning, or will Christ usher in a period where there is knowledge of the Lord and access to His Spirit? People will still have to respond—or become a marsh. What will take place? This month (the month of the Feast of Tabernacles) is the month of Ethanim (1Ki 8:1-2), whose meaning is 'continuous, ever-flowing, permanent', as an ever-flowing stream. What in the entire universe is permanent? Only God the Father and those enduringly faithful to Him! What are these waters, and what do these streams in the desert comprise? Is this physical water, or is more than that, symbolic of something so much more significant? Remember: Back to chapter 35 of Isaiah: Salt in marshes can be eradicated by reeds and rushes; they actually remove salt. However, one would have to want the reeds and rushes to be planted! How these Scriptures have been used to paint a purely physical picture of the 'World Tomorrow'! What was Christ primarily concerned with when He was here on earth? The spiritual condition of people—that which is based only in God's will and which is therefore permanent, not temporary. Yet why were we so attracted to a materialistic gospel? Was it a reflection of what we covet?

But after Christ returns, what will be different? Satan will be removed! What differences will that make to us and to this world? To name just a few:

So with Satan gone, and the streams of living water able to freely nourish those who thirst, what still has to happen?

But of course with people obedient to God, nature will also prosper!

A "HEART OF FLESH"
Let's return to the Book of Ezekiel.
When motivated by a gospel of material covetousness, one overlooks the wonderful spiritual parables reflecting the restoration of good works in human activity, with its obvious consequences upon the environment. More importantly, the spiritual environment is continually improved! How does God put a heart of flesh in us? Isn't our heart already flesh? Of course it's figurative language. A heart of stone resists what is good and cannot be entreated. God wants all to have His Spirit dwell in them, and His laws internalised—not just complied with. But people have to respond, just as the sower spreads the Word. And what determines whether the seed falls on stony ground or amongst weeds that choke it? It is the heart that decides that. What should the response be? We can see why David will have leadership in the Church.

What happens when peoples and nations don't obey God?

This doesn't sound much like a utopia to me! There is not perfection here—not yet!

Why the Feast of Tabernacles? Why is it so important? All of these events have had a single defining purpose:

To have knowledge of the one true God, and of His Son—that continuous, never-ending stream—is imperative. The Feast of Tabernacles commemorates these very events by which the true Name and nature of God will be declared.

GOG AND MAGOG: COMPLIANCE VERSUS INTERNALISATION
Why 'Gog and Magog'? Here we are at the end of a millennial period where the knowledge of God has been fully available under the personal leadership of Christ and His saints. Then Satan is released and everything collapses:

Why? Because the Law of God is not written in their hearts. If it were, they'd tell Satan to leave just as Christ did. Satan can't entice a heart that is not hard, one that has no salt encrustation, one that is not desolate, but instead is well nourished on the Word of God—a 100% righteous heart and soul. The millennium will include people who have been raised in godly culture, who have no experience of Satan, and who are flourishing in an age of abundance where the knowledge of God flows continuously from loving leadership, including that of Christ Himself. But God has never imposed His will on anyone. Is it possible that many will simply comply with the culture in much the same way that people comply with it today? They just behave according to their surroundings. If the samba is being danced, we dance it, if it's the twist, we dance that. If drugs are being taken, we'll take them too or condone them; if others commit suicide, we'll at least not get too upset; if they marry too late or not at all, so will we. If it's a God we worship, well, I go along with that too—but I will not be thirsty! I'm being somewhat sarcastic now.

It will take a thousand years for people to learn the way of God, and many—"a number like the sands of the sea"—will not have it written on their hearts, just like Eve who met the Serpent for the first time in the Garden of Eden and was offered another way. She swallowed it. She and Adam had their chance to take of the Tree of Life, but by their own volition—without being forced, controlled or prevented by God—they took of the forbidden tree. In the same way, the entire population of the Millennium will be offered the Tree of Life, but many at the end will want the other 'tree'.

Will we? Are we having the Law of God written into our hearts now? God hasn't raised stones to be a kingdom of priests in the coming Millennium. He has called us. Do we want Him 100%, or is there reservation about the truth? What is your saltometer like? Is the water stagnant, or is it flowing with vibrant life, flushing all remaining salt encrustations away so that when the water reaches the sea, it is still refreshing and healing?

If Christ could introduce a system that could do all of this, He wouldn't need at least a remnant around. He could just institute a 'system' and all would be well. Remember the principle: systemic efforts in the absence of extensive righteous personal efforts are bound to fail. In this arrangement, the system is not separate from the individuals, but rather is made up of all the individuals seeking nourishment from the same source for the same reasons. Christ will bring peace, but He will also bring the Way of Peace, because He will bring knowledge of the one true God.

The 'utopia' taught in the past painted an unreality born out of an essentially materialistic perspective and a naïve, or at least superficial view of the Scriptures. Great and awesome things are going to occur, and the world will be shaken to its very core. But the trees and blossoms of this present spiritual desert will come from people supported and taught by the priests of the Kingdom with spiritual bodies who have no other god but the true God—without reservation.

Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859), the French statesman and political philosopher who wrote Democracy in America stated:

It seems as if the rulers of our time sought only to use men to make things great: I wish they would try a little more to make great men; that they would set less value on the work and more on the workman; that they would never forget that a nation cannot be strong when so many belonging to it are individually weak.
FINALLY—UTOPIA!
Will we ever have a Utopia? What really is the Kingdom of God? Notice the connection to light. In Isa 14:12, Satan was described as the Morning Star. Yet in Rev 22:16 we see this title attributed to Christ. What is interesting is that the morning star, as a symbol, rolls back the darkness of the night. As a planet, it has no light of its own but reflects more light from the sun than any other celestial object (other than the moon). The morning star as the planet Venus lies between the Earth and the Sun. It therefore ushers in the dawn of the sun. Notice: What a fitting symbol for our Saviour and High Priest, Jesus Christ, who makes our contact with the Father possible! Yet as great and wonderful as Christ is, the Morning Star is eventually drowned out in comparison to the Sun as it breaks over the horizon and the whole earth is flooded with the Light of the world—Jesus Christ in His fullness. What awesomeness, what majesty, what power, what complete perfection in our God!

When the New Jerusalem is established, when there is no need for sun and moon (Rev 21:23), when there is no night (Rev 21:25)—for the Lamb of God is the Light (Rev 21:23)—then there shall be no curse of any kind, for both God and His Christ will rule perfectly over all with no kind of apostasy, no rebellion, no disagreement with God. Only then can we have a world government, made up of those who have internalised and integrated the Word of God into their very being—on the tablets of their heart—bringing more perfection and peace in life, as Isaiah tells us:

Then will be the time when all of God's children will really live. Finally, He will be our God, and we will be His people. A time of no more tears on God's holy mountain, the City of God spoken of in Rev 21 and 22!

Go back to our Home Page