SPRINKLING THE CONSCIENCE
©  John Armstrong  April 10, 1999
The Church of God in Williamstown
WEB SITE: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index.htm

BLOOD AND LIFE
Today I want to talk to you about a bloody subject.

In ancient Israel, there were many occasions when the high priest was instructed by God to sprinkle something with the blood from a sacrifice: the entrance to the tabernacle, for instance, or the altar that was by the entrance to the tabernacle, or the door of the tabernacle. In addition to this sprinkling, there were occasions when the rest of the blood was to be poured around the base of the altar. These sacrifices symbolized atonement and redemption for trespasses.

Blood is described by God as the essence of life, and therefore was never to be eaten:

Even when the Old Testament speaks of animal sacrifices and atonement, the sacredness of life is emphasised: These sacrifices were bloody affairs, sometimes involving numerous animals, at times of considerable size. Today, we are often appalled by the presence of blood. If you have ever seen a lamb being killed by the slitting of its throat, you would be aware of how forceful the flow of blood from the artery of an animal (and indeed of a human being) can be. Some people feel ill at the sight of blood or panic if they see it flowing. This may not have always been the case, however. Agrarian cultures would regularly slaughter animals for food. You may have seen the film "Not without my Daughter", in which there is a scene where an American women and her Arab husband are welcomed into an Arabic household by the slaughtering of a goat in front of them at the steps to the house. So some will probably not be repulsed by these sights.

SPRINKLING OF BLOOD
There was one time, however, when the sprinkling of blood was not reserved for the altar alone. This was the occasion when sacrificial blood from animals was sprinkled directly onto the people. We have the record in Ex 24:1-8 (NNAS):

(There is another example of people being directly sprinkled with blood, but that is in respect to the consecration of Aaron and his sons: Lev 8:30)

Exactly how this was done is not explained. In the preceding chapters we see that the commandments and ordinances which set out the terms of the covenant had been presented to the people. What we read here is the sealing of the covenant.

Were the people of Israel sprinkled as a whole or only the young men (v 5), or only the elders (v 1), or all the people ( v 7)? Certainly the implication is that the covenant was cut between God and all the people of Israel, so whether others stood in for all the people is actually irrelevant. However, this certainly would have been an awesomely dramatic event, one to be remembered for all time.

SPRINKLING AND POURING
But clearly a willingness to be sprinkled with this blood would need to be in evidence. Blood is not normally something we want to have put on us. Yet sprinkling is gentle, soft and it hits the recipient randomly. The natural human inclination is to escape being hit by flying blood. However, the sealing of this covenant implies a willingness on the part of individuals to be touched by the blood, putting themselves forward irrespective of how much discomfort it causes.

We might contrast this sprinkling with the practice, as mentioned earlier, of pouring blood around the base of the altar, filling it with blood!

Thus the holiness represented by the blood (Lev 6 27) completely saturates the place upon which the sacrifice will be burnt. It is entirely holy, as it stands for the completely holy sacrifice of Christ. In contrast, being only sprinkled implies a sense of being touched by holiness, with only those areas touched being changed or affected by it. Other areas not touched remain unchanged, at least for the moment.

SPRINKLING OF THE CONSCIENCE
Notice how the 'blood of the covenant' being sprinkled is a repeated theme in the Scriptures, one related to our agreement with God by which it is the blood of Christ that is being shed. As with all covenants, blood must be shed (Heb 9:18). It is after all the same covenant (Heb 10:19-20; 13:20) that is being made.

Just like the willingness of the people to be sprinkled physically with the blood of the covenant, there also needs to be a willingness by us to permit our consciences to be similarly touched by the sprinkling of Christ's blood. Why sprinkling? If you have ever been in a light shower of rain, you know you do not get saturated immediately. It takes a considerable time for saturation to occur. It is a matter of one drop at a time. Also, each drop is fairly discernible, whereas in a down-pour or, more particularly, if you are completely immersed (as we are at baptism), it is like a total, single event.

What should the conscience do when it touched by something holy? It ought to realise the difference between its current condition and the nature of that which touched it. But just as the physical sprinkling with blood is uncomfortable-leaving a physical stain-so the sprinkling with the blood of Christ leaves, or at least should leave, if we allow it to, a spiritual mark. This mark or stain indicates that a part of us is at odds with Christ's character; it reveals to us a blemish in us. We experience this blemish as guilt-or we should so do if we have not forced the conscience into submission with excuses, justifications or a refusal to simply listen to it. Guilt is the reaction of our godly conscience when we first register the "sprinkling" that indicates a blemish.

SPRINKLING AND WASHING
My mother had a condition that meant she bled from the nose regularly, and sometimes uncontrollably, leading to a large loss of blood. She had many hundreds of blood transfusions until she died at the age of 56 from an internal haemorrhage, so I grew up in a household quite accustomed to the presence of blood. I regularly soaked the bloodied towels in cold water to rinse the blood out of them before they were further washed. As most of you women probably know, hot water actually seals the stain, preventing the stain of blood from being fully removed.

In the same way, the Scriptures paint this picture for us of sprinkling, a sprinkling that also requires that there be a washing that follows. As the conscience becomes aware of its sin, guilt enters. Unless change occurs and this guilt is washed away, the conscience will remain defiled and compromised and will no longer able to carry out effectively its role as the sentinel to our minds. We see these same allusions used by Paul as he describes the cleansing of the conscience.

CONSCIENCES PRESENTED TO GOD
What is the hope we have? As God works with our minds to change us and make us clean, a collective bride without spot or wrinkle, we understand that our consciences are to be purged, sprinkled and washed. Notice: Now that we have renewed our commitment to the covenant into which God has called us, how are we to present our consciences to God so that He may continue to sprinkle us and purge us of all that is unclean? With a willingness to present ourselves as a living sacrifice- stepping forward and desiring to be sprinkled.

Go back to our Home Page