SATAN AND HISTORY
© Orest Solyma  
The Church of God in Williamstown
WEB SITE: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index_.htm

THE POWER OF GOD'S OMNISCIENCE
The Plan of the Almighty and omniscient GOD, the God and Father of Jesus Christ, reveals His purposes for man, the means and fulfillment of salvation, in the Sabbaths and three festival seasons of the biblical calendar. The apostle Paul's last epistle, written to his beloved helper and companion, Timothy, has these awesome and glorious words we've all read before:

This totally-devoted servant of God and His Christ uses the same Greek word for "purpose" in the context of predestination of the saints in This purpose and means of salvation, Paul told Titus, was established by the Father before time began, that is, before the creation of the universe (See the Son of Man paper; and the Feast of Trumpets sermon of 30/8/00 for more on the origins of the Plan of God). Yes, I've mentioned this quite a few times, but we cannot underestimate the power and magnanimity of these promises. The door to such promise is opened by the sacrifice of Jesus Christ, and that was foreordained before the creation, as the apostle Peter states in his amazing first NT epistle to us: The Lamb of God was foreordained to be sacrificed at a particular time and place, namely in the first month of the biblical year outside the walls of Jerusalem—and these are contrary to the walls of the New Jerusalem. Those who accept the sacrifice of the only-begotten Son of the Father murdered outside the confines of established religion must then continue by the grace of God to live a Way of life not leavened by sin but by the unleavened Bread of sincerity, truth, and the Life and Power of Jesus Christ. Such saints also seek the Water of Life, the Holy Spirit, promised to all who repent and believe the Gospel of God. Forgiven and led by the Power of God, these saints resist the Devil and zealously pray for the Kingdom of God. The instruction in the Gospel, the warnings and declarations of the Gospel, the promise of the Father to send the Son to harvest the saints and the chaff are all aspects of the meaning of the Feast of Trumpets. Then surely there is also prophecy and parable about Satan in the Festivals?

Although the father of lies and the cause of destruction and death implicitly features in the Passover season, his fate is, I believe, specifically dealt with in the symbolism of the Day of Atonement. The world does not know God and therefore does not know the nature of the Devil, for it doesn't know what is Good in God's eyes, and therefore has poor perception of what is Evil. The final Antichrist, the willing servant of Satan and spiritual leader of the Neo-Babylonian Empire still arising, will not be recognised by the vast majority of religious and irreligious people for what he is. It is God who reveals Himself to us and thus it is God who reveals to us the mystery of iniquity (2Thess 2:3-12; Rev 13:1-18; Dan 11:31-45) which is entirely of Satan ("Adversary"—who brings Death), the Devil ("Accuser"—who is the Liar), that old Serpent, more cunning and far more deceptive than any beastly leader who serves the father of lies and murder—the destroyer of truth and godliness.

The casting of lots in Leviticus 16 indicates that it is God who reveals who is the Saviour of man, the acceptable sin offering for the sins of the world, and who is the Destroyer who must eventually perish in the wilderness. The weight of evidence in the Bible, an in varied and ancient historical sources that deal with Azazel, is so vast that to deny that the goat for Azazel does prophetically typify Satan seems to be willing ignorance (Perhaps you'd care to listen to the audio-tapes of the Day of Atonement sermons of the previous two years).

Just as the omniscient Father knew that the only-begotten God, as John 1:18 renders it (consider also Heb 11:17), would unfailingly be the Lamb of God, so He similarly foreknew what Lucifer would do and what the solutions would be—before the creation of the universe. I am reminded of the lust and envy exhibited by one brother towards his righteous brother: Cain and Abel, Ishmael and Isaac, Esau and Jacob. Do these earthly events reflect the inspiration by the Evil One of sons—Cain, Ishmael, and Esau—who sought what was not promised them out of unrelenting pride and envy? For Satan, originally a son of God Almighty, out of pride and envy sought what was not his and was not content with what he was given. If the created angelic beings around the Throne included the pre-incarnate Jesus Christ and Lucifer, brothers in the angelic realm, did one envy the other? We'll come back to these questions. I will need to explore them further during the Feast of Tabernacles in the sermon, Son of God, the Lamb, the Messiah—The History of Jesus Christ.

THE MASKS OF SATAN
There are books we enjoy reading because they are good and pleasurable; there are books that edify and inform us; and a there are a few books that need to be read that inform, but horrify us about the nature of evil! Huxley's The Brave New World, Nietzsche's Thus Spake Zarathustra and Beyond Good and Evil fall into that category. However, Christopher Nugent's The Masks of Satan, The Demonic in History (Westminster: Christian Classics, 1989) is written with such acuity of perception, precision of phrase, and with such urgency that it terrifyingly screams out to protect man: Flee from the Devil! Having first experienced the awareness of evil as a child in the ambiguities of amorality in refugee camps in western Germany from May, 1945 to April, 1950, then in numerous experiences throughout my life, I cannot but strongly agree with these kinds of extraordinary quotes Nugent makes:

"Satan can mask himself as an angel of truth [see 2Cor 11:13-15; Rev 12:9]. He wants us to deny his existence, negate him to a mere psychological entity. Satan wants us to profane the profound" (p ix).
"The reality [of the demonic as opposed to the subtleties of language and other symbols] is less easy to dismiss, and it is recognizable in such things as the compulsion to curse, pleasure in destruction, the self-righteous closure of the heart [i.e., unwillingness to reason and seek reconciliation, as Is 1:18-20 urges; unwillingness to love the brethren, as Christ does and as Paul shows], the ironically vulgarizing divinization of disintegral Eros [e.g., super models are no longer cars but the erotic vulgarization and demeaning of womanhood so that women are viewed culturally as worthy only when supposedly beautiful, bizarre, and erotic], the Faustian lust of the mind for illicit things [i.e., making devilish deals for illicit gains], a certain not entirely subliminal enchantment with evil" [e.g., where beautiful women are used to sell witchcraft; and the tolerance of the demonic] (p 1).
"Elie Wiesel, in Night, speaks of a child with 'the face of an angel' hanged in the Nazi 'Kingdom of Night'. A despairing Wiesel heard a voice behind him cry, 'Where is God now?' And Wiesel heard a voice within him answer: 'Where? He is—He is hanging on this gallows.'
If that was God, who was Satan? Maybe we should have another look. And, if there is a demonology of masks, there is a theology of the face" (p 2).
Wiesel, although a philosopher who survived Auschwitz, is confused theologically, therefore he is confused on the problem of evil and the causes of suffering on the part of the innocent. Satan is the master of disguise and deception. And Jesus Christ is the Face of God, which theology few understand (see Gen 32:28-30; Mt 5:8; Jn 14:9; Col 1:15; 1Cor 13:12).
"[The] demonic … is false spirituality" (p 4), Nugent so accurately affirms.
"Ultimately, if the greatest commandment is love [which it is, for God is love; 1Jn 4:8,16], the procession into the demonic must exist in a procession away from love. In sum, the Adversary is the patron of adversary relationships" (p 5).
Many churches, religious and multi-ethnic groups are splitting into ever-smaller groups with rejection of reconciliation attempts, although 'reconciliation' sometimes results through compromises of truth and integrity. Or there is refusal to live wholeheartedly by every Word of God, for some prefer partial adherence to the Word of God. These are evidence of the cancerous universal growth of the adversarial spirit.
"When all is said and done, history is the story of the conflict of good and evil. … and because in history, which is never 'pure', the wheat and the tare are always mixed" (p 7).
"In the beginning was a rebellion—sure as the Daystar itself, but faint and unfathomable as a forgotten dream. The primal Fall is a mythological event lost in the impenetrable mists of the preternatural. This is the fall of Lucifer, fairest of the angels, to which the text of Isaiah is traditionally accommodated. Lucifer would 'be like the Most High', but fell low, and this archetypal Fall can be the tragedy of us all. … Mythology, as applied to sacred literature and sometimes to secular, is not just a fable but a veiled truth, and it can be so blinding a truth that perhaps it must be a veiled truth" (p 9).
Most of us are unused to the highly-informed and very compact writing of Christopher Nugent, a Catholic theologian and historian. He speaks of modern society's insatiable cultural proclivity to relish good and evil and thus "to rationalize our incognizance of good and evil" (p 187). He says that the "only lasting community is the communion of saints [1Cor 10:16], and it is my faith that its food is the Lamb of God" (p 189). In his last chapter he states:
"Apocalypse expresses the faith that somehow goodness is indestructible, that love has a future, that ultimately our love and the divine love will be one love" (p 191) [as incredibly described by Christ: The Glory which You gave Me I have given to them so that they may be one as We are one; Jn 20:22].
"In the light of our times one might almost say that we must either believe in Apocalypse or believe in insanity. … [Apocalypse] sees a communion of suffering as the prelude to a communion of saints. …. Apocalypse makes the collapse of Christendom, including its non-Christian variants, more meaningful" (p 192).
"Condoning a little evil is like condoning a little cancer, and the glamour or excitement of evil can readily lead to a numbed acquiescence in what might be termed … 'the elect of evil, once started, must go the whole way'" (p 194).
I find such words frightening. But far more fearful are the Words of God for they are certain.

Let's consider sections of two chapters that deal with the beginnings of Lucifer or Satan.

HISTORY OF SATAN IN EZEKIEL 28:11-19
Because of a few obscurities in the biblical Hebrew, scholars translate this section, especially verses 14 and 16, with significant differences. Modern or recent translations I've referred to for these verses are the Moffatt, Amplified, RSV, NRSV, TEV, NEB, NAB, plus the LXX (which is the OT Greek translation done about 250BC, and the citation by Origen, who wrote between 185 and 254AD, of this section of Scripture (in his De Principiis, 1.V.4; [from the ANF, (Eerdmans, 1987), Vol IV, p 258]). The Century Bible Commentary (Ed. John W Wevers, Ezekiel, Thomas Nelson & Son, 1969), The International Critical Commentary, G.A. Cooke, The Book of Ezekiel, (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1960), and Walther Eichrodt's Ezekiel A Commentary (SCM Press, 1970) also support what is here given from the RSV. However, the KJV, NKJ, NIV, NJB and others differ with regard to verses 14 and 16. The RSV reads:

Origen translates this as: "From the day when you were created along with the cherubim, I placed you in the holy mount of God." The TEV or Good News Bible (1976) has: "I put a terrifying angel there to guard you. You lived on my holy mountain and walked among the sparkling gems." The LXX (Brenton translation) has: "From the day that you were created you were with the cherub: I set you on the holy mount of God; you were in the midst of the stones of fire." The question we might ask is: Who was the guardian cherub Lucifer was with? And if you think you know, is your answer consistent with everything else Scripture gives on the subject and other associated matters? And since Lucifer was created, it would seem so also was his guardian cherub. Again, whatever answer we might give, it must not conflict with other Scriptures. Who drove Satan from Heaven? Who will expel Satan? In Lk 10:18, the Greek may be literally translated as: "I [Jesus Christ speaking prophetically] was seeing Satan as lightning from heaven falling" (cf. Bock, Luke; BECNT, 1996; Vol 2, p 1006). Rev 20:1-2 says that an angel from Heaven will bind Satan for a 1000 years. Rev 12 speaks of Michael and the angels involved in a battle with Satan who is cast out of Heaven (vv. 7-9). In Dan 12:1, Michael is the great Prince who watches over the people of God, but we know that Jesus Christ jealously watches over the people of God and has overall responsibility, for He is the author of salvation to all who obey [Heb 5:9]; He is High Priest of God over the Kingdom of priests [Heb 7:20-25; 1Pet 2:4-5]; He is the Shepherd of God's sheep and will never leave nor forsake them [Jn 10:11-16; Heb 2:10-13; 13:5-6]).

In the final rebellion by Satan we are told that he "was cast into the lake of fire" (Rev 20:6)—but we are not told exactly by whom. How is Jesus Christ involved in the overthrow of Satan? [See Rom 16:20; 2Thess 2:8; Rev 17:13-14; 19:11-16,19-21; 20:1-3; 1Jn 3;8; Jude 9; Zech 3:1-2; 1Cor 15:24]. Is it possible that the pre-incarnate Jesus Christ was the guardian cherub who was appointed to keep an eye on Lucifer, called the Morning Star? Yet this is the title Jesus Christ is given in Rev 22:16. Like Ishmael and Esau, was Lucifer going to lose that to which he imagined he had inheritance rights?

Jesus Christ is the prophesied Morning Star. Christ is in us by the Spirit He sends from the Father. It is He who gives us perception of the dawning of the Light which in nature is preceded by Venus, the morning star, then followed by the brilliant rays of the sun across the horizon from the East, typifying the Sun of Righteousness arising with healing in His wings (Mal 4:2)—a prophecy of the healing we receive and then the Life everlasting which follows.

Ezekiel 28 continues:

Satan and his works, and his divine and earthly agents, will be no more in prophetic history!

The Bible reveals God's way of mocking the deceitful counterfeits and parodies of the reality of what happened, is happening, and will happen in Heaven in the Assembly, the Council of GOD on Mt Zion, e.g., Rev 4 & 5; Ps 82:1; 86:8; 89:6-8; 95:3; 99:1-3; 111:1; Jer 23:18-22; Dan 7:9-14; Heb 12:22-23. These Scriptures and many others speak of the Divine Council or Assembly of the Angelic Host around the Throne of the LORD of hosts to which true prophets have access by visions from God; e.g., as John did, in Rev 1:1-3,10-20. In Job 1 and 2, we have Satan involved in discussions in the Council of God. Most scholars and theologians scorn the fact that these are real events in the divine realm among numerous divine entities.

LUCIFER IN ISAIAH 14:12-19
What are the connections between Ezekiel 28 and Isaiah 14? The Oxford Companion to the Bible (editors Bruce M. Metzger & Michael D. Coogan; OUP, 1993), comments: "Lucifer, a name for Satan popularized in the Middle Ages [but the early Catholic fathers generally understood the name!], derives ultimately from the merging of the New Testament tradition of the fall of Satan from heaven (Luke 10.18 [which most modern theologians think is myth and which Adam Clarke similarly derided in the early 1800s]) with the originally separate biblical tradition concerning the Morning Star (cf. Isa. 14.12)" (p 679).

It is common for theologians to think of Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28 in these kinds of words:

"In [Ezk] 28:12-19, the subject is the king of Tyre [possibly typifying world trade and commerce; Babylon more strongly typifies world government and religion, and all these elements are combined in a final Babylon in Rev 13 and 17], who is thought of as a divine being dwelling in the mountain of the gods—clearly in dependence upon a myth similar to what is utilised in Isa. 14—and he is cast down to the earth by the High God because of his pride. … [Is 14] makes use of a myth similar to that in Ezek. 28:12-19, comparing the tyrant with 'Lucifer, son of the dawn' fallen from heaven." (Otto Eissfeldt, The Old Testament, An Introduction, trans Peter R. Ackroyd; Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1966; pp 96-97).
Let's read the text of Is 14:12-19 in the RSV: Theologian and teacher, Alec Moyter, who has devoted most of his life to a study of Isaiah, says in his 1993 commentary:
"Behind the phrase the mount of assembly lies the mythological idea that the gods lived on mountains. The assembly is the gathered pantheon [i.e., all the gods and angelic beings]. On sacred mountain (yarkete zaphon) see the NIV mg. [which says that Mount Zaphon, like Mount Olympus, is considered home and meeting place of the gods; Ps 48:1-2] (The Prophecy of ISAIAH, IVP; p 145)."

14 I will ascend above the heights of the clouds, I will make myself like the Most High.' 15 But you are brought down to Sheol, to the depths of the Pit. 16 Those who see you will stare at you, and ponder over you: 'Is this the man who made the earth tremble, who shook kingdoms, 17 who made the world like a desert and overthrew its cities, who did not let his prisoners go home?' (Jesus Christ sets prisoners free; Mt 25:36-44). 18 All the kings of the nations lie in glory, each in his own tomb; 19 but you are cast out, away from your sepulchre, like a loathed untimely birth, clothed with the slain, those pierced by the sword, who go down to the stones of the Pit, like a dead body trodden under foot.

The Interpreter's Bible (New York: Abingdon Press, 1956; Vol 5, pp 261-2) says in part:
"The use in these verses of material derived from Canaanite myths is unmistakable, and the point is made that the meaning of what the tyrant has done is set forth in the myth of Helal, the Day Star or "Lightgiver" (cf. Vulg. "Lucifer"), son of Shahar, Dawn. … We know that there was a god Shahar in Canaanite (Ugaritic) mythology, the god of dawn or of the morning star and "Helal, son of Shahar, is mentioned apparently in one of the texts from Ugarit. Another clearly mythological element is the mount of assembly [of the gods] in the far north {Zaphon}, the point around which the constellations turned, where was located the summit of the heavenly mountain and the throne of the Most High (cf. Ezek. 28:14; Pss. 48:2 {Beautiful in elevation, the joy of the whole earth, is Mount Zion on the sides of the North (Zaphon), the City of the Great King}; 82:1,6). The passage before us preserves the Canaanite form of the nature myth, telling of the attempt of the morning star to scale the heights of heaven, surpassing all other stars only to be cast down to earth by the victorious sun."
THE WAR OF THE SONS
The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (TWOT, 499) briefly mentions this myth:
"In Isa 14:12-15 there is a Canaanite version of the Greek Phaethon myth as mediated and influenced by Phoenician culture during the "heroic age." The development of the Canaanite version is complex and has affinities with the Ugaritic myth involving Athar, son of Athirat, who was unable to occupy the throne of Baal. It was Phaethon who attempted to scale the heights of heaven and as the dawn star was ever condemned to be cast down into Hades (sheol). Even if one does not accept McKay's argument [McKay is a scholar who claims Helal is the Dawn Goddess], it is important to note the following philological oddities": Then the TWOT speaks of har mo'ed (mount of assembly) in Isa 14:13 which is comparable to the Ugaritic Mount of Lala, also called Zaphon, where the Canaanite gods assembled for council.
In an article on the DEVIL in The Dictionary of Deities and Demons in the Bible, which also makes it clear that Azazel was regarded as the arch demon (pp 130-131,246-247), these extraordinary remarks are made:
"During and after the Babylonian Exile (about 605-538BC), Israel was influenced by the cosmological dualism of Persian Zoroastrianism (Zoroaster, or Zarathustra, was a type of anti-christ in Iran at the time of Buddha in India, Confucius and Lao-tse in China, Thales, Parmenides, Heraclitus in Greece, and Jeremiah, Ezekiel and Daniel were contemporaneous). This system posited two warring camps of spiritual beings headed by twin but opposing siblings, the Zoroastrian God and the Devil, who fought for the loyalty of humans in deadly combat. [Zarathustra, however, was a mix of good and evil; a false messiah disguised by the Devil]. To assist in the battle the two had produced armies of lesser spirits, the angels and the demons. (Other ancient documentations show that each of them organised and appointed hierarchies among their respective angelic servants. See Col 1:16; Heb 1:2-3). In one important text, 'the Evil One' declares to God: "I shall destroy you and your creatures forever and ever. And I shall persuade all your creatures to hate you and to love me." Creation was their battlefield and the present age was the time of spiritual warfare. At the end of this age of conflict, there would be a final battle in which the Devil and his hosts would be defeated and destroyed in a fiery hell, and a new creation and a new age would begin in righteousness." …
"Two types of Zoroastrianism of the period had postulated different myths of origin for the great Spirits of Light and Darkness: the first held that the two were co-eternal twins without source, essentially two opposite gods; the second [myth] claimed that Time (Zervan) as source had generated the two in eternity past as opposing aspects of the original and ambiguous One."
"These [rebellious demons] were led by a great opponent … viewed as a rebellious angel followed by his hosts of demons, who assumed characteristics of the great mythic opponents of the heavenly gods, destined to defeat. He could be opposed by a great champion of righteousness, the angel of the LORD (cf. Zech 3:1; Jub. 17:14-18:16), or Michael the archangel (cf. Jude 9), or in later Christian thought, by Jesus …. The leader of this band of fallen angels, Azazel, … was identified as the Devil" (Editors: van der Toorn, Becking, van der Horst; Leiden: Brill, 1999; pp 245-246).
Some may be wondering why I'm giving so many difficult references which are not from the Bible. The entire Bible is written in God's omniscient context of all history and culture that is 2000 years and more before us. The Bible deals with eternal and divine issues in the knowledge that all peoples of all ages and cultures must be addressed. Pagan beliefs and myths from ancient Babylon, Egypt, Persia, Greece, Rome, India, China, and all nations are all perversions of truths through demonic inspiration of leaders of culture and religion across the ages. Mircea Eliade's Cosmos and History and James Frazer's The Golden Bough are excellent in illustrating this in all major and many smaller cultures. The saints need to at least understand that these parodies of truth existed and then help overthrow all lies and perversions of God's truths of His Plan of Salvation. The writers of the Bible are aware of these myths and counterfeits of truth conceived to turn people away. The myths are designed to distort biblical knowledge and to cause scorn and disbelief, whereas Scripture is designed to reveal knowledge of God and cause belief in what God does and purposes.

In reading the modern translations of the ancient Babylonian myths about Satan and the god (the Elohim) who is his conqueror, one becomes utterly amazed at the many parallels with Scripture. When I first read 1 Enoch I was stunned at the many points of contact with OT and NT and how the nature of God was vastly different to what broad Christianity teaches. Alexander Heidel's The Babylonian Genesis is exhaustive on this subject of the war between the gods. This book gives translations of seven clay tablets found in the excavated ruins of Nineveh, Ashur, Kish and Uruk (in Iraq). I'll quote from this book in the upcoming message, History of Jesus Christ. Eliade's Gods, Goddesses and Myths of Creation (New York: Harper & Row, 1974; pp 100-101) has this quote from the Babylonian epic myth Enuma elish (When on high). It describes the birth of Marduk, a parody of the Messiah, and Kingu, who lusts for what has been given and promised to Marduk:

In the chamber of fates, the abode of destinies,
A god was engendered, most potent and wisest of gods.
In the heart of Apsu [the Deep] was Marduk created,
In the heart of holy Apsu was Marduk created.
He who begot him was Ea, his father;
She who conceived him was Damkina, his mother.
This symbolism reminds me of Rev 12, where the Woman clothed with the Sun, crowned with 12 stars, the moon under her feet, gives birth to the Son of God, whom the Dragon wants to destroy, whom the Dragon wants to seduce by offering Him rulership over the earth, which is already promised to the Son of the Father, but which the Adversary wants all for himself.
From among [rebellious] gods, her [Tiamat's] firstborn, who formed her Assembly,
She elevated Kingu, made him chief among them.
The leading of the ranks, command of Assembly,
The raising of weapons for encounter, advancing to combat,
In battle the commander-in-chief—
These to his hand she entrusted as she seated him in the Council:
'I have cast for thee the spell, exalting thee in the Assembly of the gods.
To counsel all the gods I have given thee full power.
Verily, thou art supreme, my only consort art thou!
Thy utterance shall prevail over all the Anunnaki!' [i.e., all the rebellious gods]
This Babylonian epic, which shows Tiamat, the Earth Mother, as mother and wife to Kingu, also says that Marduk was made head of the Council of the gods, but the Mother of Chaos, suggesting Mystery Babylon, the Mother of Harlots, who sets up her own counterfeit power structures, appoints an Adversary, Kingu, against Marduk, in jealousy against his appointment by the father of the gods as head and favourite. For scholars to accept that the biblical accounts and the parodied heathen accounts reveal real entities responsible for truth and evil would mean that they would have to change their belief systems, change their codes of behaviour, their governmental ideas, their cultures, and make them all conform to what the true God reveals. But like the Devil, their rebellion must go to its conclusion—to destruction and death.

REVELATION 20—SATAN'S ULTIMATE FATE
Just as ancient myths and epics reveal some truths and many errors, it is very evident that they also expose the religious and cultural confusion all over the earth and throughout history as to the true identity of the righteous Father and of His beloved messianic Son who came as the Lamb of God, and who will come as Prince of Peace, King of kings, and Conqueror of all evils. The world still eats from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil and is incapable of seeing and tasting the Tree of Life. The adversarial way breeds confusion, alienation, war, destruction, and death. The Way of the Son of God is Life and Peace, Knowledge of God, Life filled with the Love of God, and Life that lives the supreme excellencies of all that is good, true, and eternal.

How shocking it is that after a millennium of Christ's rule with the saints—this is the result! How bizarre that the forces of evil, after extensive universal evangelism by the Order of Melchizedek, the Kingdom of priests, can besiege the capital city! Is it any wonder that God in His rage then acts in this way? But does it mean 'eternally', without ever ceasing, as in Rev 19:3, which speaks of the smoke of Babylon rising forever and ever? Jude 7 speaks of Sodom and Gomorrah suffering the Divine justice of eternal fire (which is now not visible), whereas 2Pet 2:6, using the same example, states that the ashes (and we don't know where they are today) are a copy or example of God's judgment upon those who afterwards would live unrighteously. In this case, it is the knowledge of this—as an example—which is an eternal witness. Hence there is some allowance of meaning to Rev 20:10 to say that, once the destruction is complete, its memory and awareness will still continue on for as long as there is any threat to righteousness. And we know that when the Holy City comes, and the Father, the earth and heavens will pass away, and there will be new heavens and earth, with no more decay or death. Then there shall be no smoke from fire nor the smoke of delusion.

CONCLUSION
May I make a couple of references from I Enoch (the R.H. Charles translation; and please note that there is general agreement among scholars that I Enoch pre-dates Jesus' ministry by more than 100 years). These references confirm Scripture and perhaps add detail to Azazel's fate.

The Day of Atonement reminds us of Christ our Passover Lamb and that the adversarial counterfeit of Jesus Christ, Satan the Devil, who masquerades as an Angel of Righteousness, is exposed by God and is destined to perish. May all those who resist the Devil be witnesses to the final destruction of the author of evil, and may we all rejoice and exult together in the victories over all sins which the God and Father of Jesus Christ provides. Liberty, freedom, safety, peace, harmony, prosperity, love, and worship of God—in their fullest sense—cannot be freely and permanently practised, will forever be interrupted, disrupted, distorted, unless Satan, who is the god of this world—the goat that is not recognised for what it is—is finally destroyed by the Son of God, the One who shall carry out this righteous judgment. If Satan were to be saved, he would have to repent first. None deal with this reality. If Satan, the originator of sin, were to be saved by a merciful God, then no human or spirit could go into the lake of fire. Satan is an unrepentant liar, a deceiver, slanderer, accuser, murderer, destroyer, and blasphemer, whose end is determined. This Day symbolises that coming end and the end of recurring evils. Meanwhile, all those whose names are in the Book of Life are afflicted by the weaknesses of the flesh and the human spirit which Satan so easily exploits. However, we, with repentance and acceptance of Christ's sacrifice, are forgiven by the willing sin-offering of the Son of God. Empowered by the Spirit of power, of love, and sound-mindedness (2Tim 1:7), we must fully recognise our total dependence on the Bread of Life, the Water of Life, and the Power of God. These are the only ways to eternal life that also promise the same to all who will wholeheartedly—with consciences cleaned from all sins by the comprehension of the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ—turn to God. May the grace of God be with us all.

SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES FROM DAY OF ATONEMENT SERMONS IN '99 & '98
THE AZAZEL ENIGMA
It should not be surprising that since there are many gods and many christs (Matt 24:24; 1Cor 8:5; 1Jn 2:18), so there should be many different perceptions of who and what Azazel is—another aspect of the work of Christ, or another perspective on Satan? In The Story of Christianity The Early Church to the Dawn of the Reformation, Justo Gonzalez summarises the beliefs of one of the early Catholic fathers, Origen (ca. 185-254), about Satan, which I'll quote as representative of some persistent modern belief:

"In the present world, the devil and his demons have us captive, and therefore Jesus Christ has come to break the power of Satan and to show us the path we are to follow in our return to our spiritual home. Furthermore, since the Devil is no more than a spirit like ours, and since God is love, in the end even Satan will be saved, and the entire creation will return to its original state, where everything was pure spirit [This concept is derived, says Gonzalez, "from the Platonic tradition" that "all human souls existed as pure spirits—or "intellects", as Origen calls them—before being born into the world"]" (HarperCollins: 1984; pp 80-81). Origen identifies Azazel as "the Averter", and the same as the "destroying angel" in Israel's departure out of Egypt (De Principiis, III.2). A New Eusebius (Edited by J. Stevenson, [SPCK: 1960]) has letters 183-185 (pp 215-217) which confirm these anti-biblical beliefs cited by Gonzalez.
… in 1Enoch reference is made to Semjaza, who is bound by Michael to await Final Judgment, and to Azazel, … in Jubilees (cf. 10.1ff.) he is called Mastema; and in the Testaments of the XII Patriarchs and also in the Dead Sea Scrolls he appears as Beliar (or Belial), who in the end will be bound and cast into eternal fire (cf. Test. Jud. 25.3). The message of writer after writer is that, though these demons and their leaders may array themselves against God in defiance of his will, nevertheless their 'doom is writ'. The 'Day of the Lord' will bring its judgment on men and demons alike (D.S. Russell, The Jews from Alexander to Herod [OUP: 1967], p 139). Also see his The Method and Message of Jewish Apocalyptic [Westminster Press: 1964], pp 249-257, which has similar comments.
Mircea Eliade's Cosmos and History summarises much of the best history on the subject.
In broad outline, the ceremony of expelling demons, diseases, and sins can be reduced to the following elements: fasting, ablutions, and purifications … this expulsion can be practiced under the form of the ritual sending away of an animal (type "scapegoat") or of a man … regarded as the material vehicle through which the faults of the entire community are transported beyond the limits of the territory it inhabits (the scapegoat was driven into the desert" by the Hebrews and the Babylonians) (Harper Torchbooks: 1959; p 53 & ff.).
Frazer's The Golden Bough has numerous examples among peoples in the ancient Orient, in Africa, Asia, the Americas and Europe of "scapegoat" ceremonies. One example is of the ancient Egyptians who slew a bull, formerly divine, and laid their misfortunes upon his head (ibid. Chapters LV-LVIII).

Cirlot's A Dictionary of Symbols (Routledge: 1993) says of the male goat:

"The he-goat is a kind of scape-goat—a symbol of the projection of one's own guilt upon someone else, and of the consequent repression of one's conscience. Hence the traditional significance of the he-goat as an emissary, and its evil association with the devil. It is also, like the bull, a father-symbol" (p 143).
These and numerous other sources identify the Lev 16 Azazel with Satan. But there are many who would disagree. Such disagreement chooses to ignore the cultural background involved and the numerous ancient beliefs and prefers its own ideas imposed upon the Scriptures. Such disagreement does not coherently explain how Satan shall be dealt with. There is bias among scholars against Azazel being identified with the Devil, for Satan, as an entity, cannot exist. Supernaturalism has to be denied, as does the existence of a primary agent of evil—the Dragon, who is the master of counterfeit and delusion.

The Lev 16 goat for Azazel is surely symbolic of Satan, and the entire ritual is a parabolic prophecy of a stage in his ultimate destiny: his being put away in the wilderness. Yet his ultimate destruction occurs after the event of Rev 20:2. Satan is bound for a thousand years. When the 1000 years have ended, he will be released, will gather Gog and Magog, the whole world again led into wholesale deception, but he is cast into the lake of fire (Rev 20:7-10).

"LET IT BE ON YOUR HEAD!"
What can we find in Scripture about the laying of the sins of all on the head of the goat? Is this concept addressed elsewhere, and if so, how?

Anointing, by the laying on of hands, is widely mentioned in the Scriptures and there are many examples: Gen 31:13; Ex 25:6; Jgs 9:8,15; 1Sam 9:16; 16:12; 1K 1:34; Ps 2:2; 45:7; Isa 45:1; Ezk 28:14; Dan 9:24; Amos 6:6; Zech 4:14; Matt 6:17; Acts 10:38; Heb 1:9: Rev 3:18.

However, examples closer to the notion of putting something on the head of someone else are:

The principle expressed here is clear and consistent, as the following verses also show: The following also express the same concept: Deut 5:9; Lam 5:7; Ezk 18:13; Hos 12:14; Matt 23:35-36; Acts 5:38. So it would seem reasonable to suggest that the laying of the sins of the nation upon the head of the goat for Azazel, for removal into the wilderness, signifies removing the guilt and blame from the congregation and putting it upon the goat for Azazel. The guilt and blame for sin is not Christ's responsibility to bear; His responsibility was to be the Lamb of God, the sin offering, the willing sacrifice. Is not blame and guilt upon Satan, the father of lies, of murder, idolatry, rebellion, chaos, destruction, death? Does not Satan's fate have its symbolic place in the Festivals?

"INTO THE WILDERNESS"
What is the significance of the goat for Azazel being sent into the barren wilderness? Israel's 40 years in the howling wilderness was to be a time of victory but was a failure for all those adults who started out of Egypt. Christ and John the Baptist had their victories in the wilderness. But does this apply in the Lev 16 scenario?

The goat that was selected from the herds of the congregation is taken and left in the wilderness away from the congregation. If you resist the Devil, he will flee from you (Jas 5:7; Eph 4:27).

CONCLUDING THE LEV 16 RITUAL

The man, probably selected from among the priests, has been contaminated (Hag 2:10-14), and must be washed (by the water of the Word).

Go back to our Home Page