SPIRITUAL RESPONSIVENESS
HOW DO WE HEAR GOD?
© Hubert Krause Jan 16, 1999
The Church of God in Williamstown
WEB SITE: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index.htm

RESPONDING TO AND RESISTING THE GOSPEL
About three months ago I gave a message entitled, "Spiritual Blindness and the Hardening of the Heart" in which scriptures were cited showing that Christ expected at least some understanding when He proclaimed the Gospel, as evidenced in verses such as:

I would like to revisit this theme today by considering the antithesis of having a hardened heart and suffering from spiritual blindness: hearing God and being responsive to Him.

When we review Christ's earthly ministry we might again ask ourselves the question: Did full enlightenment always result from Christ's preaching? The obvious answer is no. Sometimes understanding was lacking even among His own disciples whom He taught personally:

This was one of the things they had heard but were not yet to fully understand, as though it were "hidden" from them: So, as was shown in this previous message, Christ tailored His teachings according to His perception of the ability of His audience to hear with understanding: This was the case even with His disciples who would not be able to handle the fullness of the truth until the advent of the Holy Spirit: However, that people were expected to firstly receive a truly-commissioned messenger of the Gospel, and then be prepared to listen to and finally respond appropriately to the message of the Gospel proclaimed to them is evident from the teaching of Christ and the apostles. Accountability for the witness of the Gospel is not necessarily even solely a case of how one responds to the preaching of the Word of God. The Gospel is attested to in many ways. The culpability of the cities of Capernaum, Chorazin and Bethsaida to whom Christ witnessed was in that they had seen mighty miracles and works but had failed to respond appropriately with repentance (Mt 11:20-24). It was similar to Christ's words to the unbelieving Jews: even if you don't believe what I say, believe the works (Jn 10:38).
Intransigence and resistance to the Gospel when the mind should be receptive is a serious matter. This was the condemnation of ancient Israel and of the Jews: as a whole, they had heard the words of God and seen His works-and rejected them. Let us briefly consider their record of unresponsiveness.

THE RECORD OF ISRAEL AND THE JEWS
Ancient Israel, and the Jews of Christ's day, had a long legacy of opposition to the Word and to the correction of God. This was the testimony of Stephen before the Sanhedrin which cost him his life:

The apostle Paul also attested to this: This verse was quoted by Paul from the prophet Isaiah. When God's servant brought the word of God, instead of receiving a godly response, he found himself mocked by the prophets and the people of the nation; "Do you really think you can teach us? You're babbling like a fool, and treating us like children, as if we didn't even know our ABC": Isaiah retorted that if they would not listen to basic instruction from God, then they would have to be taught the lesson of godly response the hard way: through the rod of the Assyrians: They had chosen to remain deaf to the message of hope, comfort and consolation offered them: And even the harshness of captivity made little difference. Their resistant hearts continued to look upon the Word of God as nonsense, so nonsense it would remain to them: They felt that they could not be taught and so failed to respond to what they heard. Could we ever become like this: unresponsive to God even through the rod of His correction?

Jeremiah also had much to say about the unwillingness of the Jews to listen to, accept and respond to the Word of God:

This is how God viewed it. From God's perspective, Israel and Judah were totally unresponsive.

The situation had not changed at the time of the apostle Paul's ministry:

They fulfilled this prophecy from Isaiah by choosing not to respond with obedience to what they had heard. They did not want to understand!
Notice Paul's final remark in this context when his efforts to reach out to his fellow Israelites had again been rebuffed; the words are a statement of the prophesised responsiveness of the Gentiles: The unresponsiveness of the Jews, the people of the covenant, resulted in the Kingdom of God being taken away from them: So those worthy of the Kingdom of God are the ones who bear the fruits of the Kingdom of God. As we will see, these fruits are the indicator of our responsiveness to God.

RECEPTIVENESS OF THE GENTILES
This is not to say that many Jews did not respond and were added to the Church. Yet as a people, as a nation which had received the oracles of God, to whom, as the apostle Paul put it, pertained "the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the service of God, and the promises (Ro 9:4), the Jews were unresponsive and rejected the truths presented to them. The responsiveness of the Gentiles to the preaching of the Gospel and the honour accorded to it by them contrasted sharply to the hard-heartedness of the Jews:

Their hearts responded nobly to the Word of God. Indeed, Paul often commended the Gentile converts for their responsiveness to God's Word: They had not only heard, but responded, and allowed the Word of God to work in them.

HEARING GOD
The Jewish leaders heard and listened to Christ, but failed to respond to Him. They had hearts which were willfully unreceptive:

Those who are God's do not just hear, but also respond to what they have heard: The true sheep of God listen only to Him, and also respond to Him. They follow-they heed- the godly instruction they hear: In contrast, the world hears and responds to the spirit of error: RESPONSE TO THE GOSPEL
Christ's parable of the sower and the seed is an illustration of different degrees of responsiveness amongst those who are witnesses to the preaching of the Gospel. Let us examine this in a little detail.
The words of the Kingdom are sown in the field, representing the human heart, and thus are expected to produce results. God says that He never disseminates His Word in vain. The words of life are intended to produce results: Bible commentaries tell us that it was the practice in the Middle East at this time to sow the seed first and then plough the field afterwards. In addition, roads and pathways ("waysides") often passed through these fields, making the surface very hard for any seeds to take root and germinate. Furthermore, the seed was sown by hand, so not unexpectedly some of it fell where-at least from a human perspective-it may not have been intended to fall. God sows, but He does not sow wastefully or in unsuitable places; it is up to us to plow any hard, fallow ground that could resist the progress of the Word and the Spirit of God: However, notice that Christ tells us that even in the first category, where the seed fell not on the field, but along this pathway, or wayside adjacent to it (Mt 13:3), where the ground was unproductive, the words of the Kingdom were still sown in the individual's heart: The problem was that no plowing took place to make the hard ground of the wayside receptive to the teaching of God. We read that there was no understanding. The question we need to ask is why would Satan want to take away something that is not understood anyway. Why is it that there was no understanding?
The seeds of the words of life were not even received on the soil of the farmer's field-in the heart of the individual-to be able to take root. There was no response.

However others hear and do respond:

The word was received with joy, just as it was by the three thousand on the Day of Pentecost: The truth of God can be embraced with great joy and enthusiasm, even for a long, long time, but trials and hardships for the sake of the Gospel can, if not handled correctly, stifle growth and on-going responsiveness to such a degree that the believer's faith is aborted-sometimes almost overnight ("immediately"), as Matthew adds in his Gospel. The foundation has not been properly laid. There is no track record of productive fruit. The "stony places"-the heart that is not totally submissive and responsive to God-have never really been broken up.

Others respond to God and do establish a good foundation, do bear fruit and continue to be fruitful, but then become spiritually unproductive, perhaps over a long time, when they allow this world to gradually quench the Spirit of God:

Luke's account of this parable comments that in this case the fruit was not brought "to maturity" (Lk 8:14).
Therefore, the production of godly fruit must be on-going and must come to complete maturity: The other Gospel accounts of the parable of the sower and the seed add a little more detail in their description of the believer who is able to continue to respond and to bear fruit to the end: We need to ensure that we are of those who do continue to respond with good fruit.
The apostle Paul spoke of the nature of the godliness of the last days, where men would love pleasure more than God (2Ti 3:4) and would have a form of godliness, but deny the power of true godliness (v 5). Similarly, our faith can have only an outward form, without power, if we allow our responsiveness to God to be stifled by the riches of Babylon, by the cares and concerns of this world, or by the deceitfulness of sin that hardens the heart and renders it unreceptive to what is heard (Heb 3:12-15).

HOW DO WE HEAR?
Christ many times throughout His ministry enjoined upon those to whom He witnessed the need to listen and respond if they indeed had "ears to hear":

So it is not just a matter of hearing, but of having the spiritual, circumcised ears that enable us to truly hear. Israel of old also heard the Gospel but was rejected. They heard but failed to keep the Word of God which was heard: Even our desire to obtain the Kingdom of God is not necessarily a guarantee that we will respond to God as He would have us. Again, Paul tells us that Israel always aspired to the promises of God, sought the promises of God zealously (Ro 10:2) but these were taken away from them nonetheless: They were "blinded" because they refused to hear, refused to respond.

To hear and to "keep"-that is, to be responsive to-the words of God is the mark of a true disciple of Jesus Christ:

Those who do this are indeed brethren of Jesus Christ, who has always done the same: So what is paramount is how we hear and how we then respond to God. For it is how we hear that will determine how we respond to the truth we hear. If we respond appropriately, in godliness, we will receive even more: The Bereans did this. They listened with thoughtfulness, with soberness, with readiness to take on board what they had heard if it withstood the scrutiny of the Word of God: It is only be hearing correctly-and then responding appropriately-that more will be given to enable us to continue to learn and to grow. To hear in a godly manner is to be truly taught by the truth heard: The hearing is only part of the process. Are we taught by what we hear?

Christ admonishes those of His Church to hearken back to times when they had both heard well, received and responded to His Words:

This admonition still applies to us today, for we too can so easily drift away through the cares of this world or the deceitfulness of riches: This was also Paul's admonition to Timothy: STANDING FIRM
Instead of drifting through unresponsiveness, do we, responsively, stand in what we have heard and believed? They had heard, received, and now stood in the truth of the Gospel.

And do we then abound in that in which we stand?

It is this fruitfulness which is the measure of our responsiveness to God: So let us ensure that the precious promises of life and immortality made available through Jesus Christ (2Ti 1:10) are not lost to us because of our failure to hear and to respond to God as we should.

Go back to our Home Page