WHAT SHOULD MANKIND DO?
ANSWER TO THE PROBLEM OF EVIL
© Orest Solyma Oct 17, 1998
The Church of God in Williamstown
WEB SITE: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index.htm

INTRODUCTION
The clash of civilizations in our world continues in the blindness of not perceiving fundamental issues inherent in religion, philosophy, culture, and psychology. If two fundamentals or first principles were universally understood in the high places of religion, philosophy, culture, psychology, politics, science, technology, industry and economics then the world would become unrecognizably different to what it presently is. All geo-political wranglings, lust-driven global economy ideology, and cultural trends enshrined in the grotesque symbols of Coca-Cola, McDonalds, Hollywood and the like are indicators of universal trends that are inherently anti-Christian-a massive and juggernaut syncretism of many forces that exploit the weaknesses of the weak and reward the powerful who are motivated by the greed is good credo. Because these forces of evil are alienated from the biblical principles of peace, equity, righteousness, and human well-being, they guide the whole earth into inevitable catastrophes: religious, social, cultural, economic, geo-political, environmental. Denial of these trends will not stop them from coming to fruition (Is 28:14-15).

This present evil world does not recognize what is good in the eyes of the Almighty God (Gal 1:4; Rev 18:4). It is blind to the recognition of evil: its origin and its nature. Evil is the antithesis of the good defined by the God of truth revealed in the Scriptures. Recognition of who God is and that He is good, and the antithesis-that which is contrary to God-Satan and evil-are the two fundamentals hidden from the world.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church (Homebush: St Paul's Press, 1994) asks Augustine's question, "Where does evil come from?" (Item 385) and answers with: the evil of sin unmasked in its true identity [is] humanity's rejection of God and opposition to him (Item 386). Subsequent paragraphs deal with the fall of Lucifer (Satan), the fall of Adam and Eve, "original sin," lust and domination ruling over marital relations, and the fall of mankind into "the power of the evil one" (1Jn 5:19; 1Pet 5:8). How well do we recognize that the history and theology of Catholicism are not good advertisements for answers to the problems of what is good and what is evil. Seeking of beatific vision (as does Sufism, Kabbalah, other forms of mysticism in the East and West, and shamanism) and the superstition of the fear of hell are not the substance of godly reality (see Catechism, Items 2548, 1023-24, 1033-37).

The Arabic world, at a confluence of Judaic, Persian, Babylonian, Egyptian, and Indian culture, offers The Koran (Quran). It claims to be, by its commentators, the completion of divine revelation and is the Book of God par excellence. The "portion of the Book" (Sura III.23; IV.44,51), referring to the Law of Moses and the Gospel of Jesus, is viewed as the guide to Unbelievers who uphold Sorcery and Evil (The Holy Quran, Text, Translation and Commentary by A. Yusuf Ali (Sh. Muhammad Ashraf: Lahore, 1938, 1972). Satan is seen as the Power of Evil rather than an entity and the "devils" are "invisible or hidden force" for evil (cp. Sura VI.100, fn. 929 and II.36, fn. 52). The clash of 'doctrine' between Catholicism and Islam has laid the groundwork for historic religious, cultural, and ethnic wars between these two religious systems.

Hinduism attempts to offer an answer to the problem of evil. Wendy O'Flaherty begins her book, The Origins of Evil in Hindu Mythology: "Theodicy, the term used to designate the problem of evil and its attempted resolution, is derived from the Greek theos, god, and dike, justice; … If God is perfectly good, He must want to abolish evil; if He is unlimitedly powerful, He must be able to abolish all evil; but evil exists; therefore either God is not perfectly good or He is not unlimitedly powerful. In a similar definition, C.S. Lewis [that famous Christian author] emphasizes the absence of happiness rather than the presence of evil: "If God were good, He would wish to make His creatures perfectly happy, and if God were almighty He would be able to do what He wished. But the creatures are not happy. Therefore God either lacks goodness, or power, or both" (p 1). Self-deceit and imagination have thus dismissed the true God-"killed him" as Nietzsche said-and have created illusions of a god or gods that fill the realm of modern religious mythologies. However, having perused Lewis' The Four Loves (first published 1960; three years before he died), it is evident he struggled to know God and the love of God

O'Flaherty then proceeds at great length and complexity to explain Hindu mythology. Her conclusion includes: "From [the goddess] Diti [stepmother to Indra, the father of the gods] all the evil demons are born, and from [the goddess] Aditi all the gods; thus the war between the gods and demons, the basis of Hindu mythological theodicy, is a fraternal conflict" (p 349). So one god fathered both good and evil-a notion common to Neo-Platonism, and from which developed the dogma of the trinity. The second last sentence sums up: ""Evil" must be accepted, but "good" must be sought; these views together provide a working solution to the problem of evil, a framework in which mankind as a whole, and each individual, may function in the face of an ultimately insoluble problem" (p 379). It seems that so many come to a similar self-defeating conclusion-answers that are humanly devised-and so typical of most theologians (see Mt 23:1ff.; Jn 8:43-44; 2Tim 3:12-13; 2Pet 2:1-3).

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GOD OF SCRIPTURE
The nature of God is manifest in what is perhaps the profoundest statement in Scripture: 'God is love.' One can also say that Love is of God just as Faith is of God. But to merely say these words is quite inadequate. What do these words mean and how does the Bible define them? 1Jn 4:8 says: 'He who does not love does not know God, for God is love.' The spiritual understanding and godly practice of love (Gk agape) reveals the person who is coming to know the true God. How problematic is the definition of godly love!

There are apparently more than 30,000 Christian groups all claiming to know God and the love of God-in their own way. Are there more than 30,000 definitions of godly love? The Catholic view is expressed as: "The Church is catholic: she proclaims the fullness of the faith. She bears in herself and administers the totality of the means of salvation. She is sent out to all peoples. She speaks to all men. She encompasses all times ... She is indestructible (cf. Mt 16:18). She is upheld infallibly in the truth: Christ governs her through Peter and the other apostles, who are present in their successors, the Pope and the college of bishops" (Catechism, Items 868-869). Who dares to defy her, her love for the gospel and mankind?

Scripture makes it possible to say that since God is love, he who knows God loves God and loves his neighbour (Mt 7:12; 22:34-40; Lev 19:17-18). Rom 13:10 says, Love does no evil (Gk kakos) to a neighbour, therefore love is the fulfilling of the Law. How well the Serbian military have expressed their love-thanks to the immoral support of clergy and polity-in hypocrisy, murder, pillage, devastation, terror. And how courageous is the love of the pseudo-Christian power of a morally defunct alliance of the world's greatest military and economic powerhouse, the USA, with NATO and the UNO, in protecting and sheltering the weak? God is a Shepherd as is the Son of God. Godly leaders are shepherds like David, king of Israel (cp. Jer 23; Ezk 34). The people of God can have no part, no identification with worldly anti-Christian institutionalized dynamics as Rev 18:4 Come out of her My people! and 2Cor 6:17-18 Come out from among them and be separate! say. Characteristic of the people of God is that they, like God, abhor all evils, and love what is good in the eyes of God-as these verses amply show: Amos 5:15; Ps 97:10; Rom 12:9.

May I refer the reader to papers on our web site that add to this topic: The Parenting of God, The Justice of God, In the Name of God, The Immutability of God, Confidence in God, Jesus Christ: The Son of God, God and Evil, "In Wrath Remember Mercy"; and on the problem of evil: Christ, the Avenger of Blood, Mystery Babylon, Atonement and Azazel.

The following Scriptures are descriptive of God's nature:

Here we see, as Heb 2 confirms, that the will of the God and Father of Jesus Christ is carried out in both love of righteousness and abhorrence of evil. God is forever good and righteous. If we should think otherwise then our thinking cannot be right in God's eyes. What a beautiful way of putting this. Mercy, truth, righteous, peace are inseparable. They are like the beloved ones, agapetoi in NT Greek, a word freely and so affectionately used in more than 60 instances (e.g., 2Cor 7:1; Eph 5:1; Phil 4:1; 1Th 2:8; Heb 6:9; 2Pet 3:1; 3Jn 11; Jude 3), and which probably helps explain the naturalness of the holy kiss (Acts 20:37; Rom 16:16; 1Cor 16:20; 2Cor 13:12; 1Th 5:26; 1Pet 5:14). All such qualities are inseparable. No divine quality stands alone. There is, if we carefully consider, philosophic and righteous coherence amongst all characteristics of God. Notions that say the God of the OT is different to the God of the NT are biblically wrong. The God of Abraham and David is the same God as that of Paul, John, and all NT saints. Admittedly, the use of the one English word, God, for the Hebrew El, Eloah, Elohim, and the Aramaic Elah, Elahin, does not help clarify the differences in meaning. There is much debate about this and I hope to contribute, with clarity, with a forthcoming paper on the subject: GOD, God, god: Who Are You? All NT and OT saints surely identify with this for there cannot be different concepts among the resurrected saints (Heb 11) about the Father and the Son of God, their love, mercy, righteousness, truth, justice, etc. And it would seem that all the saints would likewise agree here. Again we must admit that if we should think otherwise then we misunderstand God and His Way. If we should privately believe that God is sometimes partial, capricious, whimsical in His use of mercy then do we know the God of Scripture?

OT ideas are also expressed in the NT:

We should note the very clear expression of free choice in the one who comes to God. Yes, we are entering into the sphere of how the righteousness of God is seen and sought by those who want to belong to God (see 2Tim 2:19; Eph 1:5). If any say they know God and love God but do not keep His Law then they are liars (1Jn 1:6; 2:4; 3:6; 4:7,8,20). SATAN AND EVIL
In contrast to the Almighty God, who is loving, good, perfect in wisdom, merciful, truthful, and completely trustworthy, there is Satan, the arch-enemy of God, of His Christ, and of the saints: He is also called: What the NT says about the Devil is not accepted as reality and Satan is denied as an entity by many theologians (see The Dictionary of Theology, Editors: S.B. Ferguson, D.F. Wright, J.I. Packer, (Leicester: IVP, 1988), p 197). Rudolf Bultmann (1884-1976), 'one of the twentieth century's most influential theologians' brought into theological discussion the term 'demythologizing' which is revealed in his Jesus and the Word (London: Ivor Nicholson & Watson, 1935) which says: "[Jesus'] belief in God as the cause of all that happens did not, in Jesus' undeveloped thought, untrained in logical consistency, exclude the assumption of other active causes of world events; that the strength of Jesus' faith in God is shown precisely in his holding fast, in spite of the belief in Satan, to the thought of God as the final cause of all events" (pp 156-7).

Do we notice what this genius of theology says? Jesus' thoughts are undeveloped. He was untrained in logical consistency. And these undeveloped thoughts of inconsistency led him to believe in Satan. Please note the eminent theologian, Bernard McGinn, Professor of Historical Theology and the History of Christianity at the University of Chicago, and editor of the 80-volume series, Classics of Western Spirituality: "Among the many contributions of apocalyptic eschatology to the religious history of the West, few have been as important as the development and dissemination of the myth of Satan, God's angelic opponent in the struggle between good and evil" (Anti-Christ, p 22).

THE NATURE OF MAN
The nature of man contrasts so radically with the nature of God. We should note the faithfulness, mercy, love of God towards all mankind, and God is not a respecter of persons. These are reflected in gracious summaries of His Will:

The fact that the Gospel demands a call to repentance (Mk 1:14-15; Act 2:35-38), reveals that man must have a change of heart-for the carnal mind, the natural mind of all people, is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the Law of God, which is spiritual (Rom 7:14), nor indeed can be (8:7).

The way of the human being is strange and perverse in the eyes of God; but as for the pure, his work is right (Prov 21:8). What does it take for the human being to recognize and admit that this is true for the Bible is overpowering in its description of the nature of man and his cultures?

Moses' perspective was the same. The theme persists in the Scriptures: Again we see that this is said from God's perspective, which we should always seek. And what do we reject that is godly? What do we refuse to listen to that is of God? The wisdom and discernment necessary for godly life are based on reverence for God (Job 28:28; Prov 1:7; 9:10; 15:33). If one checks or recalls the vain imaginations of people such as Plato, Philo, Plotinus, Proclus (Rom 1:18-22; 1Cor 1:20-21), one realizes that their god, One, Intellect, Soul, is a trinity of absurd abstractions. When sins separate leaders from God then the nations career toward disasters.

In the NT the theme continues.

Mk 7:21-3 outlines what people are unwilling to give up. However, it should be remembered Jesus is also speaking about the spirit of the Law as in Matt 5:21-30: In Jn 12:37-43 we read: The editorial comment by John shows that people prefer to live their religion within a larger organizational structure that they were "born into" or "called into" rather than have the courage to follow the Lamb wherever He leads as Rev 14:4, and Jn 10:4,5,27 reveal. The culture of this world is the manure that promotes the growth and spread of such sins.

THE MYSTERY OF GODLINESS AND GOD'S RELIGION (1Tim 3:16)

The Christianity of God always challenges the mind, emotions, and real motivations. Will the Evil One ever seek and ask for repentance? Those who speak of Satan's redemption on the basis of God's unconditional mercy are, one might assume, blind to their own hidden and unrepentant sins. More and more demands are placed on those who are God's. Here is one of the most difficult of consistent things a Christian must do: And if we really are getting ready for what God has in mind (Eph 6:12-15; Josh 1:6-9; Dan 11:32-3): The mighty apostle, Paul, defines the kind of love God demands of us: Many Scriptures describe and list the highest levels of spiritual life. This following list we probably known by heart: In Proverbs, there are like demands made on the Christian mind and behaviour: How does one do this and please God? To whom? Who serves God and gives you the increase God approves of? Readers might like to see our paper, History of Tithing from the Bible.

THE EXPERIENCE OF GOD-GIVEN REPENTANCE
When the apostle Paul first came to Athens he saw that the city was full of idolatry, but there was evidence that despite ignorance and blindness, there was a public admission to not having the answers in a monument dedicated to THE UNKNOWN GOD.

Too few heed such words. We surely must. Idolatry is of the mind and imagination as Ezk 14:1-7 and 1Jn 5:21 indicate.

When the resurrected Jesus Christ spoke to the apostles for the last time before His ascension:

Repentance cannot be preached to all the world, so integral to the Gospel, unless those who preach are well educated in the Teaching of Jesus Christ, are repentant, are able to explain what they know, are striving mightily to live by every word of God, and have God's support-evident to all when God chooses to make it visible. Even now we see preachers speaking in the Name of God attempting to spread the Gospel to some of the world but by their own power: money, buying TV time, buying advertising space, and not personally evangelizing as the prophets and apostles have done. The Gospel will be preached when those appointed by God are thrust forward by the power of God. I wish I could see evidence of that now. Let's recall the amazing example that exploded before the eyes of thousands on the day of Pentecost in 30 AD. The English word repentance (Gk metanoia; change of mind, view, opinion, approach) is meant to convey the OT and NT description of completely turning away from all sin in abhorrence and rejection of evil and then turning to God and the goodness of God in wholehearted love and complete commitment to His Way and Law, which is holy, righteous, and spiritual (Rom 7:12,14).
Let's look at an example of an entire congregation repenting: Prov 20:27 tells us that the spirit of a man is the lamp of the LORD, searching all the inner depths of his heart by the Spirit of God acting upon the spirit in man (1Cor 2:10,11,13). However, Paul was raised as a Pharisee and was well versed in the OT. He knew before his conversion that the Law forbids covetousness. But the Law is spiritual. Those who are not Spirit-led are blind, just as Paul admits he was. The deeper the spiritual conversion the greater the perception of one's sinfulness. Before conversion one feels fairly comfortable with one's own humanity. When the perception of the truth of the Commandments came to me I recognized sin and I was killed by it. When the recognition of sin came to me I saw the extent of my self-deception and that killed me. For the persistence of carnality is so strong that I am overwhelmed and am left perplexed by its hold on me. Because I strive for perfection in every matter, because I judge myself and fail, I am forced to cry out to God for His power, His forgiveness, His mercy. David's experience is the same: Unless the Church, which is of like-minded people, has this kind of repentance experience, it cannot preach the Gospel in the Name of God. How could it preach and teach repentance toward God if it does not experience God-given repentance (2Tim 2:25-26)? Having repented according to the will of God, David asks prophetically that the Church should be led by God to like repentance, and then it can open the gates in the walls of salvation and show people the Way into the Holy City (Heb 12:22-23; Is 1:27; 40:9; Rev 21:12-14). Ps 73 gives further perspective on this subject of what God wants for all mankind. Hatred and the spirit of murder are concealed. Each true Christian has the deeply moral obligation of enduring and creating a continuity for the Gospel-seeing that the next generation receives the Truth. Similar thoughts are expressed by Ezekiel. The wages of sin is death. We reap what we sow. We are rewarded according to our works. No-one can escape the judgment of God: Characteristic of the self-satisfaction of today is what God says to the church in Laodicea: Physical blindness is recognizable both to victim and viewer. Many of us might readily see blindness in other religions and other religious groups. If one is right, why does the other party believe it sees? Indeed, the other party may believe you are deceived and blind. How can one really know if one sees as the prophets, apostles, and Jesus Christ? My persistent reply is: Unless one has a most gratifying identification with all of the word of God, all of the saints of Scripture; unless one can walk in the shoes of Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Sarah, Rachel, Esther, Mordecai, Isaiah, Ezekiel, Malachi, Peter, Mary, Timothy, Lydia, and the like-one is blind. One also seeks to commune with in fellowship and express love to as many as possible of those who see. How and when do we recognize the chastening of the LORD? Is God's chastening producing good? Is it possible that if we are not overcoming that we might be poor, blind, and naked? 1Jn 5:5 links overcoming and believing in Jesus Christ. If one fully identifies with Jesus Christ it is because one is overcoming and is walking as He walked (1Jn 2:6). Communication of Spirit to spirit, as in 1Cor 2:10-15, in turning to God is powerfully expressed in: CONCLUSION
Yes, the topic is vast, and profound, and difficult, and painful. But it is truly rewarding. It is full of hope and promise from God. Let's look at two more Scriptures and read them with care, respect, and thought. The love the apostle Paul shows for God, the Gospel, the saints is probably beyond words of description. His epistles are full of this overflowing love (e.g., Rom 16, Phil 1). Paul's last epistle reveals the confidence of victory in God, no doubt because of his love: I have fought a good fight, I have finished the race, I have kept the Faith. Finally, there is laid up for me the crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous Judge, will give me on that Day, and not me only but also all who love His appearing (2Tim 4:7-8). Paul had no fear of how he would be judged. It is so very evident that those who belong to God and are shepherded by His Son are those who fellowship in love and affection for one another as the Scriptures describe. Unless we conform to the biblical manner of spiritual sacrifice then we are like Cain and he did not seek repentance though he seemingly believed that he believed God. And this is what the Almighty God, who is perfect, faithful, merciful and gracious, and judges righteously-says to all peoples and nations: For the world is ruled by lust, greed, selfishness. The Love of God gives goodness, righteousness, peace, References and a partial bibliography
The following are a sampling of works that describe aspects of the problem of evil. Many authors seek to address the problem: none have the complete answer. Many offer possibilities for hope with suggested change on a universal scale. All religions attempt to address the problems of good and evil. In the listing below the works that advocate evil are indicated with an *. Without the knowledge of the Bible and the revelation of the true God all works are inadequate and some are perversely misleading. Of course, there are many more books and essays on the problems of defining good and evil. Works marked with # are remarkable for their extra-biblical value.

Attali, Jacques, Millennium, Winners and Losers in the coming World Order, (New York: Times Books, 1991)
Augustine, City of God; especially Books X11, XIII
Bloom, Allan, The Closing of the American Mind, (New York: Touchstone, 1988)
Bronowski, Jacob, Science and Human Values, (New York: Harper Colophon Books, 1975)
Carrel, Alexis, Man, the Unknown, (London: Hamish Hamilton, 1946)
* Carus, Paul, The History of the Devil and the Idea of Evil, (La Salle: Open Court Publishing Company, 1990)
Cleary, Thomas (Translator), The Book of Leadership and Strategy, Lessons of the Chinese Masters, (Boston: Shambhala Publications Inc., 1990)
# Dostoevsky, Fydor, The Brothers Karamazov, [Book 5, The Grand Inquisitor]
Ellul, Jacques, # Propaganda, The Formation of Men's Attitudes, (New York: Vintage Books, 1973); The Meaning of the City, (Paternoster Press, 1997); The Subversion of Christianity, (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988)
Eliade, Mircea, Cosmos and History, (New York: Harper Torchbooks, 1959)
Frazer, Sir James George, The Golden Bough
Fromm, Erich, Escape from Freedom, (New York: Avon Books, 1965)
Galbraith, John Kenneth, The Anatomy of Power, (Corgi, 1985)
Goldberg, Carl, Speaking with the Devil, (Viking, Penguin, 1996)
Heidel, Alexander, The Babylonian Genesis, (University of Chicago Press, 1963)
Huxley, Francis, The Dragon, (New York: Macmillan, 1979)
# Huntington, Samuel P., The Clash of Civilizations, (New York: Touchstone, 1997)
John Paul II, Veritatis Splendor [Encyclical letter, 1993]
Johnson, Paul, A History of the Modern World, (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1984)
Keegan, John, A History of Warfare, (London: Hutchinson, 1993)
* Machiavelli, Niccolo, The Prince
McGinn, Bernard, Anti-christ, Two Thousand years of the Human Fascination with Evil, (HarperSanFrancisco, 1994)
Martin, Malachi, Hostage to the Devil, (HarperSanFrancisco, 1992)
Masters, Brian, The Evil that Men Do, (London: Black Swan, 1997)
Milton, John, Paradise Lost [first published ca. 1667]
Morrow, G.R., Dillon, J.M., translators, Proclus' Commentary on Plato's Parmenides, (Princeton Uni. Press, 1987);
# Nugent, Christopher, Masks of Satan, (Westminster, Maryland: Christian Classics, 1989)
* Nietzsche, Friedrich, Thus Spoke Zarathrustra and Beyond Good and Evil
O'Flaherty, Wendy, The Origins of Evil in Hindu Mythology (New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1988)
Packard, Vance, The Hidden Persuaders, (Penguin, 1981)
Pagels, Elaine, Adam, Eve, and the Serpent, (Vintage Books, 1989)
Peck, M. Scott, The Road Less Travelled, (London: Rider, 1989); People of the Lie, (New York: Touchstone, 1985)
Phillips, Robert A.J., When Rabbit Howls-the Troops for Truddi Chase, (London: Pan, 1988)
* Plato, The Republic
Pratkanis and Aronson, Age of Propaganda, (New York: W.H. Freeman & Company, 1992)
Sargant, William, Battle for the Mind, (London: Pan Books, 1961)
Smith, T.V. (Editor), From Thales to Plato, (University of Chicago, 1956)
Szasz, Thomas S., The Manufacture of Madness, (Paladin, 1973)
Thomson, Oliver, A History of Sin, (Edinburgh: Canongate Press, 1993)
Toffler, Alvin, Powershift, (Bantam Books, 1991); A & H Toffler, War and Anti-War, (London: Little, Brown, 1993)
Tuchman, Barbara W., The March of Folly, (London: Abacus, 1985)
Wiesel, Elie, Night, (Penguin, 1981)

Go back to our Home Page