PROMISES TO THE CHURCHES
THE PROMISES OF GOD TO THE OVERCOMER
© Hubert Krause  Sept 17, 2000
The Church of God in Williamstown
WEB SITE: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index.htm

THE STATE OF THE CHURCH
In the second and third chapters of the Book of Revelation we are presented with a very incisive diagnosis of the spiritual condition of seven "churches", all of which represent and typify the one true Church of God—a diagnosis made by the very Son of God Himself. It is a penetrating analysis and summation of some of the spiritual weaknesses that have manifested themselves, and will continue to manifest themselves—even amidst our strengths and the good fruits of the Spirit of God—in the Church of God striving to overcome the world. An analysis of Christ's analysis of the state of His Church can help us to more accurately diagnose our own spiritual condition.

So I would like to consider, and have us all deeply consider, the spiritual weaknesses of the Church of God—of these "churches"—amidst its strengths, as diagnosed by Jesus Christ, reflect on His rebuke and His admonition as they may relate to us today and examine the promises made by Him to the overcomer who does indeed take to heart the diagnosis, the warnings and the encouragement. Christ's promises to those who overcome, wonderful promises which should motivate and inspire us, are rich in symbolism and provide us with a little more insight into the glorious inheritance in store for those who do indeed endure to the end.

What is of course promised to the overcomer in each of the typical Churches is a promise to all who overcome. But let us also analyse the promises made in the context of what is to be overcome.

EPHESUS AND THE TREE OF LIFE
The actual city of Ephesus, at the time of writing, was the greatest commercial city of Asia Minor and capital of the Roman province of Asia. It was a proud, rich, busy port and also a political and religious centre, being home to the cult of the Ephesian Artemis, whose temple there was one of the seven wonders of the world. Yet we are also informed that Ephesus in the first century A.D. was a dying city, given to parasite pursuits, and living on its reputation of old. This flaw has likewise crept into the Church.

The church is commended for its patient endurance, for having worked hard to uphold the Name of Christ, for its readiness to put to the test any who claimed to teach what was of God, and for its unwillingness to tolerate evil, including "the works of the Nicolaitans"—practices and teaching (Rev 2:15) which, when the Greek is transcribed, caused evil to be "victorious over the people of God". Verse 6 presumably only has validity if these practices are extant in the Church, where most, it would seem—but obviously not all—are commended for resisting them.

So we might begin by asking ourselves, What practices and teaching are we tolerating that is causing evil to insinuate itself into the Church and prevail over the saints? How much do we hate evil and evil works and teaching?

Here the Church can indeed demonstrate the works of the faith. Yet, all of its doctrinal purity notwithstanding, it has left its first love (v 4), linked in verse 5 to the "first works" of the Church:

It's almost paradoxical really, isn't it? To be so zealous for the purity of the truth, yet the zeal for the faith and for the works of the faith has waned. Christ has just praised them for 'persevering' and for not growing weary (v 3)! Yet even amidst their zeal and perseverance they had in fact grown weary in this vitally-important area. Co-incidentally, the apostle Paul commended the actual Church in Ephesus for its "love toward all the saints" (Eph 1:15). Do you think that those in the Church here could have or would have diagnosed themselves as having lost their first love? This loss of love is a mark of the end of the age and it is linked, by Christ, to wickedness—which the Church is commended for addressing! When lawlessness increases, good works and the readiness to persist in good works, including the good works of overcoming, decreases. The true love of God, and the deeds of love, Christ said, is with the heart, the soul, and the mind (Mk 12:30) and with the understanding.

Could this happen to us? We pride ourselves on the fact that all that is aired publicly from the Word of God is subject to scrutiny and, if necessary, to censure—which is as it should be. In the process, however, could we be missing a vital component? What are our motives for our quest to keep the truth of God from being polluted? Are they also pure?
Christ then admonishes His Church:

This is a very serious situation, with the prospect of immediate judgment from Christ if the problem is not addressed. The lampstands symbolise the Church (Rev 1:12,20), which is supposed to be letting its light shine. But it's going to go out, one way or another, if this condition is allowed to persist, and the result will be spiritual darkness for many. The works of love, the works of the faith, need to be resurrected. No amount of works (and in each of Christ's seven messages, as we will see, He addresses "works", good or bad, alive or dead) devoid of true agape love, and no amount of sound doctrine can replace them. We have to walk in (the) truth (2Jn 4; 3Jn 3-4), love in (the) truth (2Jn 1; 3Jn 1)—not uphold the truth as some sort of an slogan, unaccompanied by works of godly love. The apostle Paul tells us (Tit 1:1) that godliness and truth go hand in hand.

Let us then notice the promise made to the Church, "to him who overcomes":

In Pr 11:30, "the fruit of the righteous" saints is described as "a tree of life". Christ is the true Tree of Life, the Way to the tree of life, to immortality, even as He is the true Vine ancient Israel failed to be. Access to the tree of life, through Jesus Christ, forbidden to Adam and Eve (Ge 3:24)—because they rejected it—is given to those who overcome and who keep their first love steadfast to the end. The imagery and symbolism of the Garden of Eden, the figurative antitype, is reintroduced, transplanted, into the vision of the New Jerusalem,where the tree of life its is fed by the river of life—the Water of Life, if you like—which issues from the very throne-room of God, to be established in the heavenly holy city. This fruit, for the saints of God, is abundant, complete, unimpeded, the fullness of the operation of the Spirit of God. The tree of life is indeed linked to the holy city, the New Jerusalem: Those who are privileged to partake of the tree of life in its fullness do indeed become "like God", something which was denied Adam upon his expulsion from the Garden of Eden (Ge 3:22).

If our zeal for the unpolluted Word of God is godly, then our quest to uphold it will accord with the good works of the faith. So what is the status of our first love? Which of our "first works" has diminished because of neglect and is in need of rekindling? Is our vision of access to the tree of life and the New Jerusalem strong enough to motivate us to renew our commitment?

SMYRNA AND THE CROWN OF LIFE
Smyrna was also one of the great cities of the province of Asia, rivalling Ephesus, and was famous for science, medicine and for the majesty of its buildings. The city maintained an ancient alliance with Rome even before Rome became a great power, and actively participated in the Caesar-cult, the Roman system of emperor worship. The faithfulness and loyalty of the Smyrnians became proverbial. We are informed of the city's "crown of porticoes", a circle of beautiful public buildings which ringed the summit of Mount Pagos like a diadem, and which once again provided some of the imagery in Christ's words (Rev 3:10). 'Smyrna', we are informed, is a transliterated Greek word meaning 'myrrh' (the resinous gum used for embalming), alluding to the martyrdom that was impending upon the Church.

The Church is here depicted as poor—in a rich city—but as spiritually-rich (cf. Jas 2:5)—in contrast, as we will see, with Laodicea, physically wealthy but spiritually impoverished—and is undergoing great opposition and persecution which seem to have intensified its poverty. It has been argued that there is no condemnation for the Church of God here, and as also portrayed by Philadelphia. Is this so? True, neither of the two are explicitly urged by Christ to "repent". Yet is there therefore nothing specific that has to be "overcome"? Let us notice:

It is interesting, on an historical level, that there was an actual synagogue in the very temple in Jerusalem in Christ's day. Why is it that a "synagogue of Satan"—an organised assembly, it would seem, claiming to be the true Israel of God—exists in the midst of the Church of God, its adherents asserting that they are right before God, and that those who are in fact true saints are not approved of by God? What level of awareness of the reality of this evil existed in the Church here? Synagogues of Satan devour the servants of God, do they not? They "accuse" the saints, even as the Devil does (Zec 3:1). Jewish sources tell us that a synagogue could be established with as little as ten men. So who and how many would make up such a synagogue, and who would be blamed for its continued presence in the very Church? We'll reconsider these questions shortly.
Could we be tolerating any synagogues of Satan, through whom the Devil still has a foothold in our midst?

Then again follow Christ's promises to those who overcome:

We know the score, at least on paper, don't we? Will we be faithful, even to death, if or when these fires of persecution assail us?

The promise is similar, the symbolism different. This imagery of the crown was well-known because of the games at Smyrna and elsewhere in which the prize consisted of a garland. Indeed, there was a Smyrnaean custom of bestowing a crown as a posthumous honour to distinguished citizens. The crown of life is awarded to the saints for their victory in the race. Paul calls it our "crown of righteousness" (2Ti 4:8), Peter the unfading "crown of glory" (1Pe 5:4). It is our glorious reward for righteousness, awarded to us by the Righteous Judge:

Are we faithful athletes, purposeful athletes, who will endure persecution and suffering, even unto death, to win our crown in the arena? Just how do we react—how will we react—when the pressure's on?

PERGAMUM: THE HIDDEN MANNA & THE WHITE STONE
The name 'Pergamum' means 'citadel' (Gk: pergamos), or 'exalted', or 'lofty'; the city was so named from its commanding position on a huge hill overlooking the Caicus valley. It was a great political, cultural and religious centre, hosting many pagan altars, including an altar to Zeus and a temple to the healing god Asklepios, who was worshipped in the form of a serpent—hence the references to the throne of Satan. It was also a centre of emperor-worship. Incidentally, parchment was invented in Pergamum

The Church condition typified by Pergamum is one of faithfulness, of holding fast to the Name of the Son of God, especially during a time of great persecution (Rev 2:13), for which it is commended.

Yet it is censured for its tolerance of people who held to false, idolatrous doctrines of compromise with the world (vv 14-15), such as "the teaching of Balaam", along with the apparently identical teachings of the "Nicolaitans": The imagery is one of idolatry and spiritual adultery. Balaam, who tried to entice the Israelites into idolatry and licentiousness, worked from the outside—hired by the world, by the Devil, if you like—to try to cause Israel to stumble. In what areas are we still accepting of the world and its ideas—idolatrous notions deserving of rebuke, just as Balaam was rebuked—that are turning our hearts away from God?
Notice Christ's injunction: The Word of God is the sword of judgment. "The Words of Him who has the sharp two-edged sword" (Rev 2:12; 1:16) will smite any who fail to heed the admonition to be uncompromising with the doctrines of Babylon.

The promises to the overcomer in this instance are two-fold:

This manna was placed in a gold jar inside the ark of the covenant, hidden from the people but visible to God [Ex. 16:32-34; Heb. 9:4]. It was the "secret" food provided by God to sustain Israel in the wilderness, of which the rest of the world was unaware. So it is with us. The true food that sustains us is "hidden" from the world, but is promised to us now, and forever. "Your word I have hidden in my heart", David declared in Ps 119:11.

The true manna, the bread or food of angels (Ps 78:25), the true bread of God, the ultimate gift of the self-sustaining eternal life which God gives (Jn 5:26) is Christ himself, He whose life on earth was morally excellent, and yet "hidden" from the eyes of men. He is the Bread of God which comes down from heaven:

If we have truly eaten of Christ, the Bread of Life, and continue to do so, we will not die: Our food now should be the Lamb of God, and nothing else! Are we literally feasting on Christ, or still eating the wrong type of food? Sometimes what sustains us, our minds, our thinking, what motivates us, is not the pure food of God, but rather food that has indeed been sacrificed to idols, as here depicted. Such a diet will not bring us eternal life. What are we imbibing that is still of the world?

Jesus Christ is promised—now and forever—to the overcomer. This is the true food provided to us through our special fellowship with the Son of God. Ours for the asking are the unsearchable riches of Christ, "in whom are hidden all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge" (Col 2:3), and through Whom God's secret, hidden wisdom is unveiled, as Paul puts it in 1Co 2:7-9 and Eph 3:8-11. This, the nature and the truths of the Mystery of God, is ours to discover and to uncover, if we are so willing. Are we being nourished on the true spiritual food provided by Jesus Christ?

Also promised is a 'white stone':

White is the biblical colour of victory and joy. The overcomer, the conqueror, is honored with the gift of a white stone inscribed with a new name—in all likelihood the name of the victor, a name that speaks of accomplishment!
There is a possible combination of imagery at work here, including a reference to the precious stones in the breastplate of the high priest which represented the twelve tribes of (Ex 28:15-21; 35:27). In the athletic games, the Greeks gave a white stone to the victor in a contest, and the Romans to gladiators at the games who had won the admiration of the public and had been allowed to retire from further combat. There is also the allusion to the Roman system of judgment. This Greek word for stone is also used in Ac 26:10, where Paul speaks of "depositing his pebble", or casting his vote against the saints. The white stone cast into an urn was used by jurors to signify acquittal, whereas a black meant condemnation. In Rev 20:4, in line with this symbolism, those who endure and do not accept the mark of the beast reign with Christ for a thousand years and are given authority to judge.

The white stone was regarded also as a mark of well-being and happiness. In a certain royal assembly possession of a stone entitled one to free entertainment. We are further informed that festal days were noted by a white "stone", days of calamity by a black. A host's appreciation of a special guest was indicated by a white stone with the name or a message written on it. For us, this stone is our victory stone, our ticket of admission to the Messianic Banquet, our new name, indicating our new status, giving us the right and authority to be in attendance at the Wedding Supper of the Lamb!
Zion's new name is bestowed by Christ Himself:

How much do we desire this new name? We will consider the new name of the overcomer a little more shortly.

THYATIRA: AUTHORITY OVER THE NATIONS; THE MORNING STAR
Thyatira, the home of Lydia (Acts 16:14), was founded by Seleucus 1 about 300 B.C. as a garrison city. It was a centre of manufacturing and trade, especially in the royal purple fabric. The temptation to idolatry there is no doubt connected with the strength of the pagan trade-guilds in that city. Each guild had its own guardian god, and the Christian who did live there and who valued his livelihood was under pressure to participate in the idolatrous feasts of his guild. Again, this imagery is carried over into the Church.

Christ's introductory commendation of His Church as typified by Thyatira is even more lavish than that of Ephesus!

It is characterised by works of love, faith, service and patient endurance (v 19)—works which, in contrast to Ephesus, are greater now than they were at the beginning! How do we understand this in the context of the Christian's "first love", supposedly a spiritual frame of reference?

Then follows Christ's rebuke:

In this case, not only does the problem of false teaching exist in the Church, but its proponents are also present, and, even worse, are being accorded status. This "Jezebel" and her teachings are tolerated, and in verse 23, she is depicted as having "children". Again, what is the degree of awareness, of recognition, of this false teaching in the Church? Unlike Balaam, this "Jezebel" works from the inside to cause the saints to stumble. There is no testing of what is taught, as is the case in Ephesus.
Once again, a paradox: how is it that such great works co-exist amidst the presence of such great error? There is a finality of resolve here (cf. Christ's words in regard to Jerusalem in Mt 23:37). There is now no alternative than judgment from God. How many warnings from God do we allow to go by unheeded, until He is left with no other option than to send down His direct judgment? Once again, what are we tolerating that is contrary to sound doctrine?
Yet to those—"the rest" in Tyatira: were they a minority or a majority, we may wonder? —whose record is clean: Notice once again the two-fold promise for overcoming: What does it mean to us to be given authority to rule "with a rod of iron"? The reference to the iron rod, which was apparently the shepherd's oak club, the end of which was capped with iron, and the shattered clay vessels, links back to Psalm 2: The shepherd's staff is a protection for the sheep but a weapon of offence against their enemies. The rod, the sceptre is of iron: the rule is strong. To us is promised a share in the dominion and power of the Son of God. But Christ also rules with a "sword": Yet it is also the sceptre of righteousness: The two symbols of authority, the sword and the rod, will be combined in the rulership of Christ and the saints over the nations.

The saints will have this authority bestowed upon them just Christ was granted such authority by His Father.

We are to share in His rulership over the earth, as we share in His victory over His enemies. Does this challenge and responsibility motivate and inspire us?

Then the promise is made of "the morning star", of Christ Himself, to the overcomer:

In his epistle, the apostle Peter uses a different Greek word for the term "morning star": The term "morning star" was used in classical Greek of the planet Venus as the morning star, with the connotation not only of beauty, but of daybreak, and so of sovereignty and victory, of the type to be given the overcoming saints. Christ, who gives us the light of spiritual perception, is the Morning Star, the "Dayspring" (Lk 1:78-79)—the dawn, the rising sun—who announces and ushers in the Day of God and who symbolises the victory and the rulership to be accorded to the saints. He is the Light-giver of the New Jerusalem (Rev 21:23) who is "given" to the saints—we share in His reign, His rule (His "throne"), for we have overcome as He overcame (Rev 3:21). We will be with Him, and we will also be like Him in royal splendour: —quoting: The imagery is truly awesome!

SARDIS: WHITE GARMENTS
Sardis was the capital of the ancient kingdom of Lydia, overthrown by Cyrus in 546 B.C. The last Lydian king, Croesus, was legendary for his wealth as well as for his pride and presumptuous arrogance. Situated upon a virtually inaccessible hill with only one point of access that could easily be fortified, the citizens of this proud city were arrogant and over-confident in their conviction that their capital was impregnable. One unobserved, unguarded weak point was all it took to bring the city down on two occasions. Although still wealthy, by Roman times it had lost its former greatness, and it never recovered from a great earthquake which devastated it in A.D. 17. It was in decay, and was slowly dying. The principal trade of Sardis was the manufacture and dyeing of woollen garments—hence the references to "white robes".

The Church—as a whole here, with only a few exceptions (Rev 3:4)—partakes of the character of the city, a city, as one scholar (W. M. Ramsay) has put it "whose name was almost synonymous with pretensions unjustified, promise unfulfilled, appearance without reality, confidence which heralded ruin." During a time of freedom from persecution there is spiritual decay amidst peace—the peace of the cemetery, as it has been described—and a misplaced pride in things past, false feelings of self-sufficiency, and arrogance. The Church as a whole is like a living corpse.

Similarly, are we Christians—spiritually-overconfident Christians—in name only, "having a form of godliness but denying its power" (Jas 2:17), a lot of style, but little substance? Is there still power behind our conviction, or are we resting on some supposed spiritual laurels? Is our opinion of our spiritual status matched by the reality? Could it be that we have more 'dead works'—works that lead to death (Heb 9:14)—than the 'good works' (Eph 2:10) which mark a living faith? Is the Spirit of God within us being quenched through our negligence (ITh 5:19)? If so, do we know when was it that we ceased to persevere in overcoming? Would we recognise the symptoms of spiritual stupor in ourselves, and in our midst? We all need to take Christ's admonition and warning to heart: Or, as the apostle Paul put it to the Corinthians—and to us: And to the Ephesians: Where are we spiritually vulnerable? If we do not come to recognise it, it will be our undoing one day, in the most unexpected manner.

White robes, or garments, are promised to him who overcomes:

This is of course linked to Christ's promise to acknowledge or "confess" all those who, by their lives of faithful overcoming, acknowledged Him: These white robes are defined for us. They are the robes of glory, of salvation, the attire of the Bride of Christ: For some—the spiritually asleep—the acquisition of these robes will be more painful than for others: These then are the garments of the redeemed. These are the robes that have been washed in the blood of the Lamb, even as are those who have to be purified through tribulation, who have "washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb." (Rev 7:14).

This language in Revelation is linked back to the "bright" of Christ as the Morning Star (Rev 22:16), and the same word is used to describe Christ's dazzling raiment in the vision of His transfiguration (Lk 9:27-32). It is this glory that we, too, will put on. To quote again from the prophet Daniel:

Will we be found with the appropriate garments for the wedding banquet, or will our garments still be "defiled by the flesh" (Jude 23) because of spiritual neglect and a failure to persevere in overcoming—so that we are left 'speechless' in the presence of Christ, as in the parable (Mt 22:11-12)?

PHILADELPHIA: A PILLAR IN THE TEMPLE & A TRIPLE NAME
Philadelphia, a city of some commercial importance located on the main route between the east and the west, was also a city of earthquakes. It was very heavily influenced by Greek culture, and was at one stage known as "little Athens". Out of gratitude to the Emperor Tiberius for relief given after the great earthquake of A.D. 17, the city renamed itself Neocaesaria, the "new city of Caesar"; later it changed its name to Philadelphia Flavia to honour the emperor Flavius Vespasian. In the third century A.D., the name was again altered to Philadelphia Neokoros, to indicate that Philadelphia was the "keeper of the temples" which honored the Roman emperors. This provides the setting for Christ's reference to the "new name" in Rev 3:12.

The claim is consistently made that in this instance the Church is only commended by Christ—and it is indeed praised for holding true to Christ's Name and His Word (v 8), and for its patient endurance.

Yet the synagogue of Satan—those who claim to be the true Israel of God, but who are in fact fulfilling the will of the Devil—is to be found, once again, amidst them, as they are in the midst of the Church where its spiritual condition is typified by Smyrna. It will take the intervention of Jesus Christ to expose these false elements of the congregation for all in the Church to see them for what they are. But is this not the responsibility of the Church here and now, as it exposes and purges out evil? So Philadelphia likewise is not without blame, is it? When is the only time that Christ will declare His Church blameless?
Can we also infer that just as the historical city of Philadelphia sought, through this constant readiness to change its name, to find favour in the eyes of outsiders, that such an attitude—an attitude of accommodation—here exists in the Church, even though unstated, an attitude which helps explain the continued presence of evil-doers masquerading as the saints of God? They are accommodated when they should have been exposed.

Note the first promise to the overcomer:

This metaphor probably refers to the two pillars which adorned the porch of Solomon's temple. Like the pillar that is forever fixed, so is the overcomer, in character and in status. He will remain forever in place as a mainstay in the Temple of God in the New Jerusalem. We are God's temple (1Co 3:16; 2Co 6:16; Eph 2:21), whose foundation consists of the prophets and apostles, and Christ, the Foundation, as its "Cornerstone" (Eph 2:20). He is the living Stone (1Pe 2:4), even as we are living stones (1Pe 2:5). This temple will forever be "the pillar and foundation (or "bulwark") of the truth" (1Ti 3:15): The new Jerusalem, with us as mainstays, is this temple: Then, alluding to the city's penchant for often changing its name, a triple name is promised to the overcomer: God names things for what they are. The new names will denote our new existence, our reward for overcoming! Just as the gates of the city have the names of the twelve tribes as an inscription (Rev 21:12), so on the pillars of the temple—upon the firstfruits saints of God—is written the name of God, of the Son of Man, and of the holy city. A new name in the New Jerusalem (Rev 21:2), in the new heaven and new earth (2Pe 3:13; Rev 21:1)! The overcomer receives this triple name (of God, of the city of God, of Christ) on his forehead (as a seal of ownership: cf. 14:1; 7:3; 22:4) denoting his citizenship of the New Jerusalem, the City of God. We are God's, and Christ's—and citizens of the New Jerusalem! We human beings do have this constant need to identify with something, to be recognised, yet so often we seek this recognition in a world that is passing away. Can we identify with the heavenly city which is eternal, in which we are promised an enduring name?

LAODICEA: SITTING ON CHRIST'S THRONE
Laodicea was a wealthy commercial and financial city originally founded by the Seleucid king Antiochus 11 (261-246 B.C.), and named after his wife Laodice. It was situated on the great trade-route from Ephesus to the east and was the seat of banking and large manufacturing operations, especially of woollen carpets and clothing. The city had "need of nothing" (Rev 3:17), not even the earthquake relief funds offered by the Roman Senate after Laodicea was destroyed by an earthquake in A.D. 60. It was also the home of a medical school, and the manufacture of collyrium, a famous eye-salve (Rev 3:18). Lacking a natural water supply, the city relied on an artificial pipeline bringing water drawn from the hot springs at Denizli to the south, water which was still tepid after flowing for five miles in stone pipes and which was so impure as to have an emetic effect, inducing nausea and vomiting, hence Christ's comments in 3:16.

The Smyrnian condition of the Church although—or perhaps because—it is persecuted for the sake of the faith, is truly rich, as we noted (Rev 2:9). On the other hand, the Church here—Laodicea—is poor, yet it is deluded, thinking itself to be spiritually rich. It is called on to become rich by turning to God.
Again, Christ knows their works—their empty, dead works!—and He can commend them for nothing. There is evident neither a steadfast loyalty nor an active disloyalty, only a comfortable self-satisfaction, which is also the Sardis condition, and which is blinding the Church to the spiritual poverty that is indeed the reality. So this is Christ's rebuke:

The irony here is that the Church thinks it possesses what it in fact does not have, hence its delusion as to its true spiritual condition. It is rich only in pride and conceit, not "rich toward God" (Lk 12:21). Lukewarmness is usually unpalatable, nauseating even, isn't it?; and so is it in the nostrils of Christ, but the entire Church is blind to it. What a state!

What about us? Could Christ ever be really disgusted with us—personally and collectively—because we have become so prosperous—real or imagined—that it distorts our perception of our true standing before God? Is our spiritual vision of ourselves accurate? Are we truly poor in spirit, acknowledging our inadequacy and dependence upon God, or do we continue to rely upon our own resources to attempt to compensate? Do we consider ourselves spiritually self-sufficient?
And His admonition—and it's now a matter of life and death!:

Could we ever be so spiritually deluded, thinking we have perfect vision yet blinded to our spiritual lethargy, listlessness, lack of zeal? We are admonished by the apostle Paul to be "never lacking in zeal" and always "fervent in spirit" (Ro 12:1)? Does the fire truly burn, as we think it does, or are there areas in our spiritual lives where we are indeed lukewarm, complacent, apathetic, or careless—again, "a form of godliness" exists, but there is a denial of its power (2Ti 3:5)? You know, listlessness, if not addressed, can quickly result in lifelessness, the state of Sardis.

And then Christ's promise to the overcomer of authority over the nations, paralleling that to the Church typified by Thyatira (Rev 2:26):

Sitting on His Father's throne is synonymous with sitting at the Father's right hand (Mk 14:62; Ro 8:34)—in other words, sharing in His rulership, in much the same way as the twelve thrones promised to the apostles are but extensions of—a sharing in—Christ's sovereignty: In the first instance, this is a promise of rulership over the earth, which we have previously considered. The saints, the apostle Paul reminded the Church in Corinth (1Co 6:2), are to judge the world.
Yet Christ, the apostle Peter tells us, "has gone into heaven and is at God's right hand—with angels, authorities and powers in submission to him" (1Pe 3:22). He is "seated .. far above all principality and power and might and dominion, and every name that is named, not only in this age but also in that which is to come" (Eph 1:20-21). Recall that Christ said that "all things" (Mt 11:27), and "all authority in heaven and earth" (Mt 28:18) had been granted Him by His Father. And in this, too, the saints are to share: It's as good as done! Can we begin to grasp the awesome glory of the inheritance which is promised to us?

CONCLUSION
Yet before we can begin to inherit these wonderful promises, we need to spiritually examine ourselves—constantly—individually, and as the collective body of Christ. The diagnosis by Jesus Christ of His Church which we have briefly considered, affords us an excellent starting-point. Christ knows all our works, our strengths and our shortcomings, and He knows the motivation we need to press on and continue to overcome.

In what areas would Christ commend us? With what can He charge us? What does He have "against" us? What would be His prognosis of our current spiritual condition, personally and as a Body? Can we, with His help, identify our spiritual lapses in this analysis by Jesus Christ of His Church? And if we can, if we do, will we also be sobered by His rebuke, motivated by His correction, if it is indeed applicable to us, and inspired by the vision of the wonderful promises to us if we overcome?

Christ is the heir of all things (Heb 1:2; cf. Eph 1:22) and we are "heirs of God" and "joint-heirs with Christ" (Ro 8:17). What does this mean to us? What should it mean to us? Let's have one final glimpse at our glorious inheritance, the birthright of the 'overcomer':

May this vision be one day realised for each and every one of us who have indeed overcome!

Go back to our Home Page