THE OLD AND NEW COVENANTS
©  Paul Brydson  Oct 1997
The Church of God in Williamstown
WEB SITE: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index.htm

What are the old and new covenants?
Does God call us into a different type of relationship to that to which He called ancient Israel?
Did God offer ancient Israel a covenant that was second-best?
Why is the new covenant better than the old covenant?

"MY COVENANT"
To start with, I want to briefly revise some points I made in a sermonette on the Covenants about a year ago.  The Bible consistently refers to these covenants as "My covenant".

Psalm 78:10 calls it the covenant of God. Luke 1:72 calls it His (that is God's) holy covenant, and Romans 11:27 calls it "My" covenant.
(See also Gen 6:18; 9:9; 17:2; Ex 6:4; 19:5; Lev 26:9; 1Kg 11:11; Ps 50:16; 89:28,34; 132:12; Isa 56:4,6; 59:21; Jer 11:10; 33:20-25; Ezk 16:60-62; Hos 8:1; Heb 8:9).

The next point is to recognise that the purpose of these covenants was consistent. It was "to be God to you and your descendants after you" (Gen 17:7).
The covenant with Israel had the same purpose (Lev 26:12; Zec 8:8).
This is also God's desire for the church:

So here our calling is described in the same terms. And when the New Jerusalem comes God will make all things new (Rev 1:5): WHO IS UNDER THE OLD COVENANT?
The old covenant applies to most of mankind.  Christ's death redeems all those who are called (no matter what nation they are from) from transgressions under the first covenant. The whole earth is under a curse because mankind has transgressed the everlasting covenant. Rousas Rushdoony, in his book "The Institutes of Biblical Law", says: This is the old covenant - the everlasting covenant that man has broken.

ADAM AND ISRAEL
God created man to live with Him within the context of a relationship defined by His covenant.
Consider Adam. God made known the relationship he wanted with Adam. Under what covenant was Adam? He was offered the tree of life, which we know is symbolic of eternal life. He was given the choice of life or death, to be fruitful and multiply, to take of the Holy Spirit (Gen 2). However, he was deceived and led astray by Satan and his own lusts.

Consider Israel. God made known his covenant to Israel and the people were given the choice of life or death (Deut 30:15-20), and to be fruitful and multiply (Lev 26:9), just as Abraham was (Gen 22:15-17), and also David (Jer 33:20-22). However, the majority were deceived and also led astray.

GALATIANS 4: THE COVENANTS REVEALED IN AN ALLEGORY
Gal 4:22-31 For it is written that Abraham had two sons: the one by a bondwoman, the other by a freewoman. 23 But he who was of the bondwoman was born according to the flesh, and he of the freewoman through promise, 24 which things are symbolic. For these are the two covenants: the one from Mount Sinai which gives birth to bondage, which is Hagar; 25 for this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia, and corresponds to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children; 26 but the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother of us all. 27 For it is written: "Rejoice, O barren, You who do not bear! Break forth and shout, You who are not in labor! For the desolate has many more children Than she who has a husband." 28 Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are children of promise. 29 But, as he who was born according to the flesh then persecuted him who was born according to the Spirit, even so it is now. 30 Nevertheless what does the Scripture say? "Cast out the bondwoman and her son, for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman." 31 So then, brethren, we are not children of the bondwoman but of the free.

ABRAHAM, A TYPE OF GOD THE FATHER

So Abraham's household is a parable of the covenants.

HAGAR: THE OLD COVENANT

Hagar represents the old covenant.  Remember, Hagar lived 400 years before God made his covenant with Israel, so the old covenant is greater in its scope than ancient Israel.  She was Egyptian (Gen 16:1-3), and thus represents the world. She corresponds to current Jerusalem, which is also to be called Egypt (Rev 11:8). The covenant was made known at Mt Sinai, where the law was written on tablets of stone. It revealed the condemnation that they (and all men) were under (2Cor 3:7,14).

So who are Hagar's children, born into slavery? They are children born according to the flesh:

All of mankind has a heart of stone, that rejects the word of God.  All men need a new heart (Ezk 36:26). The mind of man is blinded to the old covenant (2Cor 3:14). All mankind is the offspring of Adam, who was the son of God (Luke 3:38). Thus, Hagar and Ishmael represent offspring of God from the world. Such children are strangers and foreigners (Eph 2:19), not belonging to the household of God.

SARAH: THE NEW COVENANT
God says He calls his sons out of Egypt, out of the world (Matt 2:15):

Sarah represents Mt Zion (Heb 12:22-23), the heavenly Jerusalem, which comes after Christ's return (Rev 21). She represents the church. Just as the law came out of Mt Sinai written on tablets of stone, so too the law comes out of Zion (Mic 4:2), to be written on tablets of hearts of flesh (Jer 31:33; 2Cor 3:2).

The sons of the free woman are the sons of promise, just as Isaac was:

All who have been redeemed from slavery and now belong to Christ are the children of the promise (Jn 8:36; Gal 3:29).
So: Just as ancient Israel was tested to see if the people would be faithful to the covenant, before they were given the promises (which they failed to receive because of unbelief [Heb 3:12-4:11]), so too those being offered the covenant (2Cor 3:6) are being tested to see if they will be faithful to the covenant before they receive the promises and enter the rest of God (Heb 4:9).

THE SONS OF THE SLAVE PERSECUTE THE SONS OF THE FREE
Gal 4:29 "But, as he who was born according to the flesh then persecuted him who was born according to the Spirit, even so it is now."

The children born of the world are by nature wrathful (Eph 2:3). As such, the falsely-religious are jealous of the sons who are free, and, inspired by Satan, seek to destroy them (Matt 23:34-36; 24:9-12,24; 25:1-3; Jn 8:37-47).
If the sons of the slave (who don't know they are actually slaves [Jn 8:33]), see the promises of God to His sons, they will think they belong to them (Jn 8:41). How will they interpret the promises? They will interpret them according to their own natures - carnally and physically. When the sons of the free woman see the same promises of God they will interpret them according to the Spirit that God has given them (1Cor 2:11). Who will therefore interpret the promises correctly?

SONS OF THE SLAVE ARE CAST OUT (Gal 4:30)
When it comes time for the sons of promise to inherit, the sons of the slave are cast out:

This begins at Christ's return (Ps 105:43-45; Jer 16:15-16; 30:3):

And is finalised when all evil-doers are destroyed in the lake of fire:

Therefore the old covenant vanishes when there are no more human beings born of the flesh (Heb 8:13), when the new heavens and new earth are created (Rev 21:1-4,7), and so the new covenant is consummated in God's new creation, with sons and daughters who will not sin.

MOSES AND THE RENEWAL OF THE COVENANT
At Mt Sinai the Lord entered into his covenant with Israel (Ex 20-24). Its law was written on tablets of stone, which were the work of God (Ex 24:12; 32:15-16).  Because of Moses' delay in coming down from the mountain, the people were led astray into making gods for themselves to worship (Ex 32:1-6).
Moses interceded with God not to destroy them (Ex 32:7-14). Moses broke the tablets of the covenant (Ex 32:19) and destroyed the idol (Ex 32:21-24). There was a separation of the people, and the idolaters were slain (Ex 32:25-29).
Moses again went up to the Lord to ask forgiveness for their sins. The Lord declared that those who had sinned against him would be blotted out from the book of life (Ex 32:33). Notice this: people in ancient Israel could be blotted out of the book of life. There is one everlasting covenant. There wasn't a physical covenant with ancient Israel and a spiritual covenant with the church. God didn't offer them an inferior covenant. Good news came to them just as it did to us (Heb 4:2). Many are called, few are chosen. There was a remnant then and there is a remnant now.
All who sought the Lord had to go to the tent of meeting outside the camp (Ex 33:7, cf Heb 13:13). Moses pleaded for God to show him his ways so that he could know him and find favour (Ex 33:13). Moses was told to cut two tablets of stone (symbolic of the circumcision of our hearts?) as at first, and the Lord would write the same words on them - i.e., the renewed covenant was the same as the first (Ex 34:1)

And so we read in Deut 5:2-3 of the renewed covenant that the Lord made with those who survived.  (Is this why the giving of the commandments is given twice - once after the exodus, and then again in the "new law"?).

NEW COVENANT BASED ON BETTER PROMISES?
If the covenant itself is unchangeable (Heb 6:17-18) and everlasting, how can it be said in Heb 8:6:

What are these better promises?

Heb 7:11 and 7:18-19 contrast one priesthood that was weak, and through which perfection could not be attained, with another priesthood which had a better hope (of being made perfect), and which provided access to God.
Heb 9:9 and 10:1 and 4 confirm that through the old law those who drew near could never be made perfect.
Contrast this with the priesthood of Jesus Christ (Heb 10:14) under which those who draw near are perfected. This is also the point that Heb 8:8-12 makes.

In the new covenant the people would be perfect in their obedience because the law would be internalised (Heb 9:14). The something "better" that God has foreseen for us and the faithful of old is therefore the "being made perfect" (Heb 11:39-40). Therefore, the better promises of the new covenant are that the people are perfected in it, and have access to God the Father through Jesus Christ (Heb 6:18-20; Heb 10:19-22). That's why it is a better covenant - not because the covenant has changed, but because the people have.

SUMMARY
The two covenants are but different aspects of the one everlasting covenant.
The old covenant, as revealed in ancient Israel, was the broken covenant and so brought condemnation, being cut off from God and bondage to sin. The ritual laws revealed that sinfulness, uncleanness and separation from God. The old covenant revealed man's separation from and antagonism against God (2Cor 3). Adam (and mankind) was barred from the tree of life (Gen 3:24). The old covenant was faulted, not because the covenant itself was imperfect, but because the people were imperfect and unfaithful (Heb 8:7-9).

The new covenant is being offered to those called now and will be made with sons born of God's will and with His nature, at the resurrection to eternal life.

God did not deny ancient Israel His Holy Spirit - they resisted it (Act 7:51). In Elijah's time there were 7000 who had not bowed their knee to Baal (1Kg 19:18). There has always only been a remnant that has responded to the calling of God (Rom 9:27). This remnant was called, but most were deceived and led astray. Is it any different today (Matt 22:14)? The covenant itself is perfect, was instigated by God and is unchangeable (Heb 6:17-18).

There is nothing new under the sun (Ecc 1:9). The new covenant is to restore things to the way they always should have been:

Go back to our Home Page