SPIRITUAL HEALING
© Orest Solyma  Oct 23, 1999
The Church of God in Williamstown
WEB SITE: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index.htm

INTRODUCTION
My wife and I had our 27th wedding anniversary last weekend. We went away and stayed in a cottage on the edge of a state forest between Castlemaine and Maldon, in Victoria's goldfields country from 1853 until about 1926. The Ballarat area gold discoveries began in 1851. The weather was wonderful and the area is filled with interest: bush, birds, various native flowers and plants, numerous mullock heaps and mine shafts, derelict gold processing plant, local history, older architecture, antique and book stores, fascinating people. We had time for peace, quiet, meditation, thought, discussion, and enjoyment. We came home greatly refreshed. I had extra and necessary time to re-consider where I'm going and why. What are my hopes and plans? So I want to address fundamental issues—perhaps not in the way expected.

A most awesome gift and blessing of God is healing. Scripture tells us that God heals all our diseases. Let's look at the context of that verse in Psalm 103 by David who died, it seems, in sickness from some kind of problem with poor blood circulation in his old age of seventy years (1Kings 1:1-3; 2:10).

It's an amazing list of doctrinal precepts: honour and gratitude expressed to God. And there's warning not to forget God's blessings: forgiveness, healing, redemption, love and mercy.

We know the NT Gospels have many examples of people being healed of crippling and paralysis, blindness, deafness, leprosy, other diseases, demon possession, and of resurrection from death. How often do we see such healings today? And how often do we see honour and blessing of God, ecstatic remembrance of God's blessings, forgiveness, healing, redemption, powerful love and wonderful mercy? Why is healing stuck in the midst of descriptions of spiritual blessings and practical Christianity (cp. 1Cor 11:28-30)?

In our previous Bible study, entitled The Effects of Healing, based on Luke 5:12-26, one vital aspect I didn't cover was what the apostle Peter said in his first epistle:

i.e., your whole being is continually and amazingly transformed—a transformation that astounds and astonishes you, because you see God's immeasurable grace and priceless truth given to you ever so generously. "Why is God so good to me?" each of us should often ask.

HEALING OF THE BODY OR HEALING OF THE SPIRIT?
Before enlarging on the criteria for spiritual transformation, let's look at how God defines and emphasizes healing through the prophet Isaiah:

The cursing of a nation that symbolizes the problems of the world is spoken of in the context of final healing of those characteristic behaviours that cause error, folly, suffering and destruction. God's anger must end, for if He were to press us harder, our spirits would be crushed. His love and wisdom know the level of pressure we can bear—as 1Cor 10:13 assures us. We notice that the promise made to Egypt is given to Israel. Since the Gospel, the Good News, is for all the world, and God wants as many as possible to be saved, we are assured that this healing is for all who turn to God and to His Son. Jude uses this kind of language (vv 12-13): These are spots in your love feasts …. Raging waves of the sea, foaming up their shame. Again, we see healing spoken of in the context of seeking to live a godly life. But it is strife, war, and evil for the wicked. Once again, the context of healing for Christians is the recognition of sin, overcoming sin, and living the righteousness that God defines. Sin can't be seen for its sinfulness unless the perfect goodness of God is seen for its magnificence and pure excellence. On Wednesday I saw a documentary that spoke of the work of the EU Task Force head-quartered in the capital of Kosovo, Pristina. The chairman has 20 co-ordinators and each has a specialist area to carry out restoration of the devastated country. The devastation is material, structural, cultural, social, psychological, spiritual. One man has responsibility for restoration of roads and bridges, another co-ordinates the rebuilding, re-equipping, re-staffing of schools and universities, another is responsible for restoring hospitals, their medical equipment, their staffing and services, and so on, for the various areas of restoration. These co-ordinators meet regularly to discuss progress, causes of problems and how to overcome them. Pristina has a smaller Serbian population with most people being Albanian and the groups living quite separately and antagonistic towards each other. The main hospital happens to be in the Serb quarter and the doctors and nurses refuse to treat Albanian patients. What can the EU Task Force leader do? At the moment the situation is stalemated. While watching the documentary I was thinking at two other levels: absorbing the documentary, considering present problems elsewhere, and contemplating the necessary skills and characteristics required for this kind of work immediately after Christ's Return. What qualities will the saints who rule with Christ have in the restoration of all things? What kind of opposition would one expect? How would the saints overcome problems such as I've briefly described that exist in Pristina?

SPIRITUAL HEALING
Let's note the background the apostle Peter used in his epistle. I'll read the NIV translation of Isaiah 53:1-6, then consider it further:

Let's consider Isaiah 53 more carefully. A few days before the 30 A.D. Passover, John made these interpretative remarks about what Isaiah said: In Romans 10, Paul applies this Scripture in Isaiah to disbelief in the Gospel and a refusal to hear.

Who fully identifies with what Isaiah 53 says? Those who really want to know the Son of God always seek to know and do the Will of His Father. Those who seek the Will of God recognize that their Christianity demands growth in the grace and knowledge of Jesus Christ—for we are to become perfect: that is the demand of Scripture (Mt 5:48). We all know this, but why do we not consistently and wholeheartedly apply this? Why the reluctance to overcome and why the resistance to correction?

With so many different Christian groups, who really knows which will is the Will of God? And are differences among Christians and groups defined by personal preference and opinion or irrefutably defined by Scripture which is revealed by the Spirit of God? Isn't godly understanding and action always coherent, always ready to answer, always full of grace and truth? How does the Bible define the differences between the righteous before the true God and the righteous before their own versions of God? If I may speak in a parable: the Serbs and Albanians in Kosovo have their justifications for their separation, they have their just causes disputed by the other, they have their justifications for their unwillingness to open up discussions.

Let's continue with Christ's words in John 12:

But is it not we who blind ourselves?

It should be seen that the difference between righteous decision and self-centred, misperceived opinion is the same as the difference between Cain and Abel, Judas and Job, Ishmael and Isaac, Esau and Jacob. One is not prepared to fully confess his sins, is not receptive to being questioned in the Light of Scripture, is subsequently—sometimes years later—proven to be self-willed and proud. The other readily admits to his sins, is prepared to answer all questions, and is not self-willed. His humility leads him to be healed of any spiritual sickness and therefore he walks, talks, sees, hears, thinks, does what is different to what he was earlier, for he is receptive to truth even if that truth hurts his carnal sensitivities. Even if a child should correct me on a point of Christian behaviour, I am obliged to heed, admit error to the child if I am wrong, repent, and do good. Receptivity to correction is a distinguishing feature of Christian behaviour. If rebuke, expression of disagreement, or criticism is in error then sound proof of invalidity of the correction offered should be willingly forthcoming. If not, then one has to ask, 'Why is there a willingness to prolong a bad situation? Why is there an unwillingness to resolve problems?' Sometimes we have to just let go because the other is not ready for more godliness. In marriage, when couples are unwilling to resolve their problems, they guarantee more pain, more disappointments.

Let's continue with Isaiah 53:

Examples of godly righteousness have similar little effect. Christ's life illustrates that. Human righteousness, however, has more appeal to the naïve mind. Fear is the reason for the weaker choice of human trust rather than the courage to seek the confronting truth. Fear responds with inaction and denial of some truth. Godly courage seeks righteousness, abhors all evils, fulfills truth. And expressing hatred of evil without righteous actions is hypocrisy. Though many see that Jesus Christ died for the sins of the world, many do not see the Jesus, the perfect example of godliness, nor do they see their own sins as God does. When we suffer as Christ did we then see who heals and how we are healed. We seek healing because we readily admit to spiritual sickness. Questioning does not offend nor alienate us! A sick person surely doesn't mind the diagnostic questions of a doctor—unless he believes the doctor doesn't know his job. Then why waste time with him? If we disregard someone's correction is it because of disrespect for the person rather than respect for resolution and righteousness? These principles separate good and evil so that good and evil are not on the same tree.

But notice what Isaiah goes on to say:

Isn't it strongly evident that the healing Isaiah speaks of is of the spirit in man? Man's sickness may include some or many of these kinds of sins: arrogance, ignorance, pride, self-deceit, self-will, folly, capriciousness, greed, lust for status and prestige and many other sins. Constantly, I have given more credit than warranted. Constantly, I have given more benefit of the doubt than was probably deserved. Constantly, however, I am mindful that I must always forgive, always seek peace, always be gracious, and I must never defile any of the Word of God. This is a vital part of the Christian's very difficult struggle. Getting the godly balance is difficult. And each of us must plead for that kind of help from God. That truth-directed willingness is a measure of the kind of character we are developing (see Rom 7:16-22). In fact, the more righteousness we seek the more difficult it is, as Romans 7 illustrates. So why make life more difficult by complicating it with more and more godliness?

The crippled person knows he is crippled and doesn't want to be. But how often is the spiritual cripple prepared to admit to sickness? The person who is blind knows, just as all observers know, that he is blind. But the spiritually blind—who is able to see? What kind of Christian will admit to being spiritually blind? Job did! Jacob eventually did! Job's spiritual blindness was recognized by only one person, Elihu, until Job came to see his blindness. Job was then healed! Let's look more at the human walls of resistance to correction.

WALLS OF RESISTANCE TO CORRECTION
The Holy Spirit leads one to overcome evil with good. Reluctance to address, neglect of, or blindness to any evil surely indicates blind resistance to the revelation of the Spirit of Truth—a quenching and grieving of the Spirit. The fruits of the Holy Spirit always conform with righteousness and are visible and always good to those can see. Why then do so many, when rebuked for doing wrong, refuse to heed and to overcome evil with good (Rom 12:21)? Why should a person neglect or refuse to think about that?

If I don't give to others the kind of treatment I receive from God and His Son then I am cursed. The love of God gives correction to the children He loves.

Do we notice? Resistance to correction and rebuke is a form of hatred.

If I, with all my might, my mind, my heart and the grace of God, strive to treat others as God treats me, then I am blessed. "How well do I know this?" I ask myself. I am, nevertheless, unconvinced that we all know this well! Why am I unconvinced? Because the spirit that drives this world is the same spirit that uses the same tactics to misinform, disinform and misdirect the people of God. Why do people respond to situations emotionally rather than with godly discernment and wisdom? I too often see and hear of people who prefer personal impressions and naïve opinions rather than the difficulties of long-suffering and righteous discernment of realities—realities as defined by God, and not those naïve, wrong and impatient impressions which then give rise to false conclusions and then the misuse of those false impressions. If and when I am guilty of that someone should have the courage to tell me right away.

It is an invisible spiritual darkness that distorts the differences between good and evil, between right and wrong, between recognition of the tree of life, in which there is no darkness at all, and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. The tree of the knowledge of good and evil always masquerades as good, as innocent, well-intentioned, correctly-informed, justified. However, this is all a front for questionable intentions, falsehood, misrepresentation and hidden deceits. Its intent is to get what is evil in the eyes of God as acceptable in the eyes of men. Worldwide advertising and the political and cultural propaganda industries thrive on this seductive ideology. We know this but fail to recognize it when it is close at hand. Why?

The frightening assumption in what I'm saying is that it is godly discernment, godly recognition, godly wisdom, godly intentions that govern the perceptions conceived and conveyed to others. But each person is right in his own eyes, just as Job and Judas were. Their ends, however, were markedly different. Why? Cain and Abel both worshipped, supposedly, the same God. Ishmael and Isaac worshipped the same God. Esau and Jacob worshipped the same God. Lucifer got his following from among those who were all worshippers of the Almighty God. What caused angels to follow Lucifer rather than the One who is the promised Firstborn of all creation (see Col 1:15; Rom 8:29; Ps 89:27; 45:7)? What is the essential difference between these sets of characters? Do we think we know, or do we know? And is that understanding based upon clear, logical, irrefutable use of Scripture? And do my questions irritate? Why?

What are the crucial factors that tell those who seek the Will of God who is righteous before God and who is wrong and in sin before God, but who may still appear to be righteous before some? We know, don't we, that folly and perversity are inherent in civilization? So what is it that separates those who, as true Christians, want to live by every word of God from those who want to live by their emotionally-driven perceptions of the Word of God? We know that wisdom begins with the reverential fear of God. The more an individual fears God in reverence of His Word and Will, the more clear thinking he becomes. The proof of this we shall look at more fully.

FORGIVENESS AND CORRECTION
We have no doubts that sins are forgiven by God and by the Son of God! Thousands of Christian churches understand that. We are taught to pray, Forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors (Mt 6:12). And Scripture teaches, If you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you. But if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses (Mt 6:14-15). And if our sins are not forgiven, i.e., they are not repented of, then can we forget that the wages of sin is death (Rom 6:23)? Do we, however, have power to forgive sins? We've heard that if we don't forgive others, we are not forgiven. When I've corrected or disagreed with anyone, I cannot assume it is understood or accepted. I hope for the best, wait for the best, and strive for the best of all. I offer forgiveness and hope it is accepted. Just as Christ said, Father, forgive them for they don't know what they're doing (Lk 23:34), and just as Stephen, while being stoned to death, cried out, Lord, do not charge them with this sin (Acts 7:60), so I offer and request forgiveness. However, it is God who ultimately forgives, and that is upon recognition of sin, repentance of sin, real desire to flee from evil. Please read 1Cor 8:9-13; 9:19-23; Gal 6:1-4; Rom 15:1-6 for Paul's supreme efforts not to offend anyone weak in the Faith. Sometimes I've made the mistake of assuming someone is strong in the Faith but have been proven to be wrong. I suffer for it and I'm sorry that you do.

Everyone is welcome to come here. Anyone who goes to a synagogue can come here. Anyone who regularly or sometimes attends another church is welcome to come here. That does not mean I approve or agree with all their behaviour. Christ's example is that anyone could come to Him and He taught them all, He fed them, and healed those who had faith. If someone comes here always, sometimes, or rarely and if that person does wrong in our presence, we, as Christ instructs, must deal with that problem. Godly correction and exhortation must be carried out. If I don't follow Christ's example then someone should have the courage to tell me. We should know, however, that in too many cases the NT evidence and current history suggest that people, when it really counts, do not commit their lives to living by every word of God. I hope and desire that as many as possible will commit themselves to His Will in sincerity and truth. If possible and acceptable, I'll help in that with all the power given me by the God who is immeasurably gracious to me and to others who know we all need His grace.

Most of you understand that I also believe the prophecies of Jeremiah, Isaiah, Zechariah and Malachi that speak of the scattering of the sheep, that the shepherds and those pretending to be shepherds are the primary destroyers of the sheep. I want no part with such shepherds. I see the spirit of this world working ever more strongly to divide, confuse and conquer. And just as the world does not recognize the work of Satan, so likewise too many Christians don't recognize the Devil's work among the saints. And similarly, far too many do not recognize where and how the Spirit of God, the Spirit of Love and Truth, is working among those called, chosen, and faithful (Rev 17:14).

We should also know that what we wish on others will fall upon us:

We could say: Just as you wish to be treated with generous sensitivity to your preferences, so treat others with respect to their sensitivities, their well-being, their preparedness. Do not impose your own will nor your own misperceptions, but respond in the way Jesus Christ or the apostle Paul did and would in the particular situations you come across that require discernment, discretion, patient kindness, long-suffering. Whatever evil we wish on others will be brought upon us. If anyone should try to nail someone, quite inevitably, he will be nailed. If you want to live by the sword of retribution, you shall die by the sword, as Christ said to Peter in Gethsemane (Mt 26:52). If you believe false opinions, they will devour you. If you support and disseminate secret sin, you will be exposed in public. If you honestly profess Jesus Christ's teachings and live them, you will be publicly rewarded with the grace of God, the righteousness of God, the life of God, and spiritual riches beyond our present capacities to understand.

A principle of God's Will, expressed in various ways, such as in Luke 6:31, is included in the promise to Abraham and his spiritual descendants: I will bless those who bless you, and I will curse those who curse you (cited in Gen 12:3; also Num 24:9). Examples are:

When Isaiah was sent to preach, this is what he was told to say: We are washed, made whole, cleaned, healed by God by His love, mercy, forgiveness, through the shed blood of His Son, through repentance and faith, through being godly doers and not merely hearers, through accepting correction. So why refuse correction?

May I again examine, in part, Matthew 18:15-20, which deals with a sinning brother. It has been taught and believed that the first approach is by an offended brother going to the brother or sister in Christ who has sinned against him. That is not necessarily the case, as the NT Greek original raises a question. There is the possibility that a Christian has seen another Christian sin. It may not necessarily be against him personally. The NJB, NASB, TEV and comments by Bruce Metzger (in Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament) suggest that the phrase "against you" is not part of the original text. The Alfred Marshall interlinear has (Mt 18:15): Now if your brother sins go and reprove him … The word translated as reprove is elenzon, from elencho. The some word is used in

What happens if these rebukes are rejected? The OT basis for these instructions by Paul is in Negative reaction to rebuke and correction takes these kinds of courses: Let's note some Scriptures on this: What amazing attitude to acceptance of correction. Do we see why? Do we notice the implications? Whoever takes correction heeds the rebuke, sees, hears, comes to greater righteousness and does not deride the one who corrects. Many Proverbs speak of this. Some examples are: THE RELATIONSHIP OF CALLING AND REPENTANCE
The relationship of the Father's calling and drawing the person to Himself is tied to repentance. Repentance occurs when recognition of personal sin takes place. The complication is that the carnal mind is in denial about its own sinfulness. Repentance occurs when humility is present. Humility, like that of Job, after quite a spiritual battering, brings a person to an awareness of his sinfulness. The humble person is willing to listen to someone who disagrees with him and is willing to discuss. We'll look at Luke 5:27-32, which illustrates this. If we are drawn to God then we willingly do His Will. If we love God we accept His rebukes irrespective of where they come from, for we are not respecters of persons nor filled with self-importance. Josiah rejected the rebuke of Pharaoh Necho and died in consequence (2Chr 35:20-24). If we love God's Way we do not neglect any of God's Word and accept correction, or at least begin to consider it—for we just might be blind to something. This is very like our personal call from the Father. Christ tells us in John 6: The calling by the Father is miraculous, is experienced very powerfully, is productive in godly fruits. The result of the calling is that one turns wholeheartedly to God, is led by Jesus Christ, the Shepherd and Overseer of our lives, and by the Holy Spirit to a life that lives by the Bread of Life, the Fountain of Life into a life that is continually transformed, willingly, humbly, into the fellowship of the saints who live by the same process: the calling of God, the recognition of sin, repentance, the experiences of forgiveness, the complete willingness to have others share in the same, and the willingness to share the promised immeasurable blessings. Let me ask: Is a refusal to fellowship a silent statement against love for the brethren? Who is willing to answer that question? Please note how this incident is also a parable. These religious people were righteous and had their followers. They, after all, knew the Scriptures. They were regarded as religious leaders, trend-setters in God's Word, exemplars of living by the Word of God. They understood their truth! They knew they were saved and blessed. Others were required to recognize and follow their perceptions and precepts. Their ideas were founded in their truth. So why was Jesus Christ inconsistent with their teachings? Surely this Man who called Matthew to be a disciple and apostle was mistaken? That's why they would not answer His questions. CONCLUSION
So Christ was interested in and devoted to those who are spiritually sick and who admit to their sickness. Their healer is Jesus Christ. This is how Matthew must have regarded himself. The scribes, the theological writers of the day, and the Pharisees, the theological teachers of the day, were not "sick." They didn't need the healing that God, through His Son, was offering. The righteous did not need to be called, did not need to repent, did not need to experience forgiveness, did not need the blessings of the God and Father of Jesus Christ. They had it all worked out for themselves. They didn't need God's correction, for they were not His children. They knew what God wanted. They knew what the vision of the Kingdom of God was. They were preaching the visions of their god. They knew they were right and righteous. They did not need to answer the questions of those they regarded as spiritually ignorant.

Those who doctor doctrine don't need God's medicine, whether He offers it directly or through any servant of His.

And God, as we should well know, does not call the righteous, those who have their own visions of God and His Kingdom. God calls sinners to repentance, grants the forgiveness they humbly and hungrily seek, gives the promised blessings of love for God and fellow man, the blessings of enduring hope and faith, of loving your neighbour as yourself, of treating others the way each of us—who seek the righteousness of God—experience being treated by God—and strive with all their might toward the Kingdom of God.

May the grace and peace of God be with all those who agree and who will fully agree with the Almighty God and His Son, Jesus Christ.

Go back to our Home Page