GOD'S GOVERNMENT
SELF-GOVERNMENT, CHURCH GOVERNMENT, WORLD GOVERNMENT
© Orest Solyma March 13, 1999
The Church of God in Williamstown
WEB SITE: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index.htm

INTRODUCTION
What does each of us think the much-used phrase, the Government of God, means? How would each of us describe the Government of God? What are its main biblical characteristics?

This message will show that what is so often called the Government of God is, by God's standards, the rule of the Gentiles. Furthermore, the personal view each of us has of how we really govern ourselves, behind any facades and masquerades, reflects our view and application of government in our lives, homes, work, etc. The big question remains: What is God's view of government among His people? Out of the abundance of one's heart one governs.

THE BEGINNING
There was a beginning when God created the present universe in preparation for Adam and Eve, for their human progeny, and for God's purpose for all humanity, as the following Scriptures express:

These Scriptures show that by the infinite wisdom and foreknowledge of the Almighty God He planned salvation for man before man existed, i.e., God knew what Lucifer would do and what Adam and Eve would do. Do we accept that God is Almighty (Job 37:23; 2Cor 6;18; Rev 4;8-5:1)? Do we accept that God's wisdom is infinite (Ps 147:5)? Do we accept that God knew the end from the beginning (Is 46:10; Acts 15:18)? Do we accept that God is never less than perfect (Mt 5:48)? Please refer to the paper The Immutability of God for more.

The first work of the Spirit of God was to create light in the darkness, as Genesis 1:3-5 reveals. This is analogous to the experience of conversion and being drawn out from the darkness of spiritual blindness of the present evil world (Gal 1:4):

This statement governs everything-and if not, then it will. Is that our personal experience? Do we in fact experience the Light of Life? Every person claiming to be a Christian must come out of Darkness. The daily, monthly, seasonal changes in light and darkness reveal that change and growth is dependent on light, i.e., spiritual growth is in the Light and Life of Jesus Christ, who is the Sun of Righteousness (Mal 4:2) and the guiding Star out of Jacob (Num 24:17; 2Pet 1:19; Rev 2:28; 22:16; see also Is 59:20; 65:9; Jer 33:25-6).

We should also note that every aspect of the creation when finished by the hand of the Creator was called very good (Gn 1:31). Likewise is the creative work of the Holy Spirit upon the children of God, the promised guiding stars of the universe (Gn 15:5; 22:17-8; Gal 3:8-9,16,18; Ps 147:4-5; Is 14:13; Jer 33:22), which is foreordained into eternity (Eph 1:3-4; Rom 8:29-30).

"AT A BEGINNING"
Genesis 1:1 says: In beginning (what humanity needs to be aware of and respond to) Elohim created the heavens and the earth.

(LXX) Genesis 1:1:
evn avrch/| evpoi,hsen o` qeo.j to.n ouvrano.n kai. th.n gh/n
In [a] beginning created the God the heavens and the earth
taew> ~yIm;V'h tae ~yhil{a/ ar'B' tyviareB.

With much the same thought, John 1:1 says: In beginning (of whatever it was that God created with a specific time scale and purpose in mind, the Father foreknew that His Son would be the means of accomplishment) was the Logos, and the Logos was with the God, and the Logos was a God (i.e., within the Council of God. See the papers The Plan of God and Jesus Christ: the Son of God). Please notice how the NT Greek lays out the text:

There isn't complete agreement about the reasons for altering the word order in the third line. There is no good reason, other than ideological prejudice (viz., trinitarianism), for rearranging the word order:

From a physics viewpoint it can be said that time began when matter came into existence. It might be argued that since matter and energy are interrelated-from the Einstein formula: Energy=Mass by the square of the speed of light (E=mc2), time is in effect when energy is. Our measurement of time is relative to the existence of things (from origins and birth), movement and action (human life, work and aging), growth, entropy, decay (death). But time goes on as we well know. It won't stop when each of us dies. Since matter is the product of the transformation of energy, then the question arises: what is the source of energy in the universe? To say that the universe is created ex nihilo, i.e., out of nothing, is an objective, logical and philosophical absurdity. 'Nothing' means 'not anything'. Logic suggests that just as matter is transformed energy, then energy is not transformed from nothing. Where and from what does energy originate? Is it the result of something transformed by God-His Spirit?
Romans 1:20 suggests that such a conclusion is consistent with current science. Awareness of the creation reveals God to those who want to perceive, as Romans 1:20 shows us: Observing, seeing, perceiving, hearing God's perspectives is profoundly revelatory.

Scripture reveals that creation is not ex nihilo (out of nothing; [Ps 33:6 created by the breath of His mouth; Heb 11:3 the visible created from the invisible-which is not nothing]). God sends out His Spirit and things are created. This is consistent with the first and second Laws of Thermodynamics (heat, work, mass, energy are interchangeable; entropy [death] is the end result). If it weren't for the fact that the God of Scripture gives of His sustaining power and love, then the death of everything and a meaningless universe would be certain:

Similarly, the power of God, the Spirit of God, works on the human spirit creating godliness in the willing spirit (1Cor 2:10-16; Gal 5:22-23; Rom 8:14-17; Eph 2:19-22).

DEFINING GOVERNMENT AT THE BEGINNING [of human history]
God gave mankind the authority to effect godly rulership, the exercise of righteous will, the executive right to divinely-inspired use and administration of the creation. This is expressed in Genesis 1:26-29:

Mankind is given responsibility for wise dominion over all life on earth. This implies a huge and ongoing study of the pure and natural sciences (See 1Ki 4:33; Ps 8:6-8; 19:1-6; Job 38:16,19). And since not all plants are fit for human food (some are deadly; others poisonous and indigestible), we might infer that plants are for scientific study so that other uses can be found: e.g., medicinal; chemical properties for many uses: dyes, paints; and other likewise thoroughly- researched industrial, technological, chemical applications causing no harm.

It is evident that man is failing hopelessly in godly use of all that the environment offers. If man cannot rule successfully in little things, how can man hope to rule over that which is to be eternal? Does man have blessing from God to exercise ungodly rulership? God gives man the freedom to choose-even wrongly-but man does not have blessing in choosing wrongly. Does man have moral approval from God to exercise unrighteous will? Does man have divine right to mismanage and misuse the creation? How does God expect man to rule over his environment? (See the three-part series on Earth and Environment). Let's consider these questions in more perspective. In so doing I'd like to review what we might call the government of Satan.

SATAN'S GOVERNMENT
An influential exponent of satanic ideology was Friedrich Nietzsche, who in his Beyond Good and Evil, says, "Life itself is will to power" (13). This is amply expressed in the symbolic anti-types in Isaiah 14:12-13 (Babylon-the politico-military-religious system) and Ezekiel 28:14-16 (Tyre-the financial-commercial-industrial system):

Ps 48:2 says that Mt Zion is in the extremes of Zaphon, which is anciently identified as the place where the assembly of the Elohim is. See NRSV and NIV translations for these verses.

Lucifer persists in lust for the throne given to the Son of God and for the position the children of God, Christ's disciples and brethren, are offered (Rev 1:6; 2:26; 5:10; 21:7). As with the nations of the world, so Satan lays the churches of God low (Mal 2:1-9; Dan 12:7; 2Thess 2:3).

Who might that guardian cherub be? Is there analogy with Cain's attempt to have what was given to Abel because he was righteous? Is there analogy with Ishmael who desired what was given to Isaac in his faithfulness? And is there a comparison with Esau's attempts to take what was given to Jacob, the spiritual rather than physical firstborn?

Jesus Christ in the wilderness during His 40-day fast experienced the direct approach of Satan:

Other Scriptures that speak of Satan's control over the earth are: Air, fire, water, earth are regarded as the four elements in the realm of the occult with air symbolic of life and thought. The apostle Paul was well aware of the witchcraft, gnostic and mystical ideas of his age-little different to today's systems of kabbalah, mysticism and mediumship. The "prince of the power of the air" is the Devil, whose all-pervasive influences govern the life, culture and ideologies of the world. Mysticism seeks to provide the means-in this present life-to visit Mt Zion, the New Jerusalem, to have communion with the Godhead, the ecstasy of union with God (e.g., LaCugna, God for Us, pp 350-353; Henri Corbin, Mundus Imaginalis [trans. Leonard Fox]; Modern Religious Thought, ed. Jaroslav Pelikan; pp 475-546). Mystical seeking of a divine ecstasy precludes the Will of the God of Scripture and is Satan's deceptive way of creating esoteric religious schools within Buddhism, Hinduism, Islam, Judaism, Catholicism and Christianity, and other schools such as founded by Swedenborg, Blavatsky, Rosicrucianism, O.T.O., Timothy Leary, & c. They are varied and endless-as one would expect of Babylon, the mother of harlot gods-the demons. To the very end Satan refuses to desist from his hate-filled rampaging, as Rev 9:11 shows: Satan will, even beyond the Millennium, completely unrepentant, defiant of God and all of God's purposes, lead rebellion against the saints (Rev 20:7-10). His reprobate intransigence is seen in: There may be a growing belief that Satan will be redeemed and that only the concept of evil will be cast into the Lake of Fire. This is a disguised form of an ancient doctrine, the sanctification of transgression, which seeks to justify eternal existence to the unrepentant on the basis of an imagined god's unconditional forgiveness, undiscerning mercy and blind love.

Paul's second epistle to Corinth tells us:

Paul understood the symbolic implications in the creation. These thoughts from Paul show the Christian struggle of seeking self-control, godly discipline over mind and flesh, crucifying of the flesh, self-government by the Word of God.

SELF-GOVERNMENT
is evident in the ever-present concept of overcoming-the process of transformation in heart and mind (Rom 12:2). The apostle Paul describes it as a constant struggle (Rom 7:14-24), because the Spirit is willing and the flesh is weak, the flesh lusting against the Spirit and the Spirit against the flesh (Mt 26:41; Gal 5:17). God's concept of choice maximizes personal responsibility in choosing the finest godly principles, the exercise of discernment, perception, wisdom, endurance, patience, faithfulness. Righteous exercise of will is demanded by God. Many seem to easily diminish godly principle in favor of man's replacement of God's Word with his own dictates and systems. God tests us so that each of us finds out whether we love the Word of God above the pseudo-righteousness of men and their organizations set up in the Name of God (Please see the paper In the Name of God).

Other biblical statements to this effect are:

Luke rephrases this profound principle: These and all other principles of God must be adhered to in godly love and truth if we are to govern righteously. They measure our faith (Mt 4:4; Ezk 43:10-12; Rev 11:1-2; Mt 7:21).

"OLD TESTAMENT" GOVERNMENT
is a huge subject. The elderly Moses (Dt 1:3; 31:1-2) was given the following by the pre-incarnate Son of God (see 1Cor 10:2-4; Act 7:30-39):

I see no significant change today from what we've read just above. At the beginning of this last work, written by Moses in the last month of his life, we note: Paul's description of how most of us are is so similar: not many wise, not many mighty, not many noble, the foolish, weak, the base and despised, those who are as nothing-who by the power of God are to bring to shame and confusion those who are mighty in this world of the Devil (1Cor 1:26-31). Let us continue in Deuteronomy, which gives us some first principles as we strive towards entry into the Kingdom of God which shall govern all the earth. Moses prophesies that Israel, on entering Canaan, will want government like that of the Canaanites: As prophesied, Gentile government reared its beastly head in Samuel's last days (ca. 1050 BC). The account develops further: The people's choice was supported by God, but God disapproved, and told them they would come to disaster. The occasional success, as with David, does not abrogate God's will. Notice Christ's response to the apostles about superiority: "NEW TESTAMENT" CHURCH GOVERNMENT
Let's ask ourselves where and when we have seen this done: Why are people afraid to even take this first step? Because of expected negative reactions? Because it takes too much effort to exercise the principles of godly wisdom and conflict resolution? Because those involved might learn how to govern themselves according to the Word of God? Is it better to set up a system where independent judges can be used to preserve the system? People prefer humanly-devised systems to God's principles which require courage. Some take this to mean that the church is the ministry. Does it not mean that the entire congregation is addressed, as exemplified in several examples where individuals and their sins were exposed to the whole church (1Cor 5:1 to 6:2; Gal 2:14; 3Jn 9-12)? Where and when have we seen the principles shown here applied in the Church? The fruits of these principles, not followed by organized churches today that I'm aware of, brought God-given growth.

Paul's first letter to the church of God in Corinth lists some categories of gifts that God gives. However, experience generally reveals that people are told by singular individuals who can do what. Churches like to copy the ways of the world (Rev 18:4) rather than see where and in whom are particular fruits of the Spirit.

Do we have a problem in recognizing who can do miracles by the power of God? Would we have difficulty in recognizing those who have the gift of tongues? How strange that we've had difficulty in recognizing false prophets and false apostles. And we've had difficulty in recognizing who teaches the Truth. The epistle to Ephesus tells us the basis of true teaching. God's Spirit, the Spirit of truth, of love, of power and sound mindedness is what must be seen as inspiring the governing of the Church. Notice how effusively Paul expresses this: Again, the various categories of gifts, not hierarchy, are given. For in all of this everyone defers to another's gift of the Spirit (cf. Eph 5:21 'serve one another'). It should be very apparent that where people do not live by every word of God, will not be corrected by the word of God, refuse to re-consider the word of God, and instead rule by additions and deletions from the Scriptures and administer by human ideology and traditions, how is it possible for these benefactors (Lk 22:25) to claim they rule according to the government of God?

The English word government occurs a few times in the NT. The word comes from the Greek noun kubernetes and is translated as master (Acts 27:11), shipmaster (Rev 18:17); it can mean helmsman, statesman (figuratively), or leader. Linguistically, k and g are transposable, as are b and v. For example, William comes from the Dutch Willem (pronounced Villem) but easily becomes Bill. Kubernet(es) becomes govern[ed].

In Paul's epistle to the church of God in Corinth is the only other NT use of this word. The NRSV has (italicized here):

The LXX (Septuagint) uses this word in fascinating ways, e.g.: In the OT we recall that famous use of government in Isaiah 9. The LXX uses arche: The question each of us must ask: Does God, through His Son, King of kings and LORD of lords, rule over us by His Word? Are we being prepared by the power of God for life in the Kingdom which will reign over the earth?

JESUS CHRIST: SERVANT OF GOD
The prophets and apostles of God were sent as His servants-and consistently suffered at the hands of the Establishment (see Mt 21:33-45; Mk 12:1-12; Lk 20:9-19; this parable, given three times, is based on the biblical concept of servanthood exemplified in Is 5:1-7, Jer 7:21-29, and in many other verses in the OT and NT. The record is such that if any of us had opportunity to ask OT or NT establishments: "If God were to send the Messiah or a prophet, would you persecute and kill him?" We know the reply would be a strong denial. Would not all Christian churches today, over 30,000 varieties of them, likewise give a strong and righteous denial. Who would be telling the truth?

Isaiah, a great servant of God (Is 27:3), has much to say that I find priceless.

The Hebrew word, 'ebed, equivalent to the NT Greek, doulos, servant, slave, is used in the following verses.

God is speaking to the Israel of God, the chosen, friends of God (Gal 3:6-9; 6:16; Rev 14:1-4). Now the prophet gives us the pre-incarnate Jesus' stunning words about Himself: How extraordinary that Jesus Christ, the Son and Servant of His God and Father (see Jn 16:28; 17:11; 20:17; Rom 8:29; 15:6; 1Cor 1:3,9; 3:23; 11:3; 15:24,28; 2Cor 1:3; 11:31; Eph 1:3,17; Col 1:3; Heb 1:8-13; 1Pet 1:3; Rev 1:1,6; 3:2,12,14,21) should also be called the servant of rulers-the One who is LORD of lords and King of kings. The consistency of the relationship between the son and the Father is further expressed in: Like the Son of God, the children of God are given the names of the Father (Ex 23:21; Rev 3:12; 14:1). And again, can we fail to note the amazing consistency of biblical doctrine that goes on to add to His story and describes some of the Son's pre-crucifixion tortures? The description continues: How can people come to serve the immortal God through the mediation of His Son if they do not know the true relationship that governs the activities the Son does for the Father (Prov 30:4; Ps 1:10-12; Heb 2:5-18)? Unless one understands the Divine relationships, agrees with the Will of the Father, hears the Voice of His Son (Jn 10:3,16,27; Ex 23:21-25), one can hardly expect to share in the promises of God that are described ahead.

WORLD GOVERNMENT
is introduced to Israel at Mt Sinai.

But is that their perception of how they were brought to Sinai? Far from it! But they never were-all of them-a priestly kingdom. They were lying! The NT priestly kingdom cannot do likewise.

The Israel of God has Jesus Christ as its King. It must rule itself by the Word of God, which means hungering and always thirsting after the righteousness which is of God. If the saints cannot govern themselves, how can they possibly govern a future world according to every Word of God?

The last book of the Bible has much to say about government, the world and the saints. Jesus Christ has shown us that He was and is governed by the Will of His God and Father. And finally, in the context of the New Jerusalem, and universal government, we read: CONCLUSION
When we look at Abel, Enoch, Noah, we see no structured form or human system of government (Heb 11:7). These people were faithful and walked with God. In considering Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, what kind of government did they use (Heb 11:8-16)? Did they live by every word of God? It's obvious that these patriarchs, fathers to the faithful, did, if we take to heart what Gal 3:6-9 and Heb 11:17-20 say. And what was the government Moses advocated? What was the government Israel was under in the time of the judges? Was the kingship period of Israel illustrative of how God rules? And how did the prophets and apostles rule? Government, outside of those who lived by the Faith, is an unrelenting, unlearned lesson of history in which the OT, NT, and the history of mankind expose the principles of worldly government: lust, misuse of power, alienation from God and His truth.

If we have experienced the government of God, then it has been with the rule of God in our hearts, minds, words and deeds. God's principles always determine how we live-if not, then participation in the Kingdom of God will prove a present illusion and a terrible future threat of exclusion (Mt 7:21-23).

Our personal view of government must be in full agreement with how God rules. And how we rule ourselves and others is too often attributed to the way our personal God rules. God cannot make anyone a member of the Kingdom of Priests of the Order of Melchizedek unless the heart, mind, words and deeds are in full agreement with all that Jesus Christ reveals.

Far more can be said. Enough has been shown to reveal that the organizational and corporate structures with which we are familiar are unable to govern by the truth of the Word of God because they institutionalize idolatry (1Sam 15:22-23; Mic 6:6-8).

May the grace of God be with all the saints who love the Almighty God with all their heart, all their mind, all their being.

Go back to our Home Page