ASPECTS OF GOD'S TIME
© Orest Solyma  
The Church of God in Williamstown
WEB SITE: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index_.htm

The mighty apostle, Paul, who regarded himself as the least of all the apostles (1Cor 15:9), and the least of all the saints (Eph 3:8) tells us in 1Cor 13:2:

None of us would question Paul's love for the people of God, nor would we query his love for the Almighty God, as epistles, like Philippians, reveal. Likewise we wouldn't question the fact that his grasp of the mysteries and knowledge of God was immense. In 2Cor 12:1-7 Paul tells us that the knowledge he was given by divine revelations was of surpassing greatness.

The Spirit of God is the Spirit of Truth (Jn 14:17; 15:26; 16:13). John 1:14 says that Jesus Christ is full of grace and truth; Jn 8:32 informs us: "You shall know the Truth and the Truth shall make you free"; Jn 17:19 says that the saints are sanctified by the Truth! The Word of God is Truth (Jn 17:17). The truth or knowledge of God shows us how to love (Matt 22:36-40; 2Pet 1:2; 3:18; Jn 17:3; Jer 9:24; 1Jn 2:4; 4:6-8; 2Jn 3). 1Jn 4:12 tells us that If we love one another, God [by His Spirit] lives in us, and His love is perfected in us. Likewise we should know that if we have the growing love of God in us (1Jn 4:18), which is the greatest gift that we seek and develop, then of course other gifts of the Holy Spirit must follow and increase also.

With these qualifying remarks - and I don't think I can qualify them sufficiently - may I begin to address aspects of Scripture most of us may not have carefully studied. So it is with some fear and trepidation that I begin to discuss the subject, "Aspects of God's Time," or "Why and when did God establish His calendar?" Time is vital within the Plan of Salvation. Prophecy unfolds in time!

The apostle Paul told Titus that eternal life was promised before time began (Tit 1:2). Furthermore, Scripture says that the purpose of God and the grace of Jesus Christ were given to us before time began (2Tim 1:9); that the wisdom of God was foreordained before the ages [before time began] for our glory (1Cor 2:7); and that the works of God were known from eternity (Acts 15:18; Rom 16:25). God's understanding is infinite [without measure] (Ps 147:5), and God declares the end from the beginning (Is 46:10). These and more verses are consistent with the apostle Peter's inspired words in 1Pet 1:16-25:

Where do we go for guidelines to show us how God deals with the organisation of time, His calendar, and hence a better understanding of the sequence of prophecy? The Sabbaths and Festivals are set in time and predict the unfolding of the foreordained Plan of God, which has awesome prophetic overtones we seek to understand as Peter states: Please note the expression of God's foreknowledge (also Rom 8:29-30) through the mouth of the Son of God: These Scriptures, mentioned so far, show that God is indeed Almighty, that is, omnipotent; God is all-knowing, i.e., omniscient; and God is present everywhere (by His Spirit), i.e., omnipresent, as Ps 139 so awesomely shows (also see Jer 23:24; Job 26:5-14; Matt 10:27-31). Please note that the power of God is also revealed in the creation: The power of God is revealed in the unfolding of the Plan of Salvation and in the unfolding of prophecy. And these are linked to the creation. Jesus Christ, the beginning of the creation of God (Rev 3:14 ; also 1:1,6; 5:9-10; 1Cor 15:24,28; Col 1:16; Jn 20:17; Ps 2:1-12; Prov 30:4; 8:22-36; Is 49:1-9), the foreordained Lamb of God, is the means and the beginning of our redemption from this present evil world (Gal 1:4; Col 1:18-20; Rev 14:4).

So it is most fitting that the first month of the year, in which is the Passover commemoration (2Cor 11:23-26; 1Cor 5:7-8; Jn 13:1ff and v.15), reveals the beginning of the process of salvation through the Lamb of God, by the power of the Holy Spirit, by growing in the grace and knowledge of Jesus Christ, enduring to the end in the knowledge that He will never leave nor forsake all those who are called, chosen, and faithful (Jn 6:35,37-40; Rev 17:14).

THE NEW YEAR ACCORDING TO GOD
Abib (Nisan) is the first month of the year and hence determines the sacred new year. The United Church of God Summary of the Hebrew Calendar - Doctrinal Study Paper (released to its ministry in February, 1997) says: "Certainly all the elements of a calendar can be found in Scripture. We know which month is the first month of the year (Exodus 12:2)" (p. 4). However, this paper in aiming to bring about "a clear consensus for the sake of a unified celebration of God's Holy Days, consistent with the Word of God" (p. 1), goes on to say that "Another difficult area of the calendar revolves around the determination of the first day of Tishri and from there the first day of Abib (the first month of the year)" (p. 21). Then in the concluding paragraph we read: "The rules of postponement are used in the establishment of the first day of Tishri. Once the first day of Tishri is established, then the calendar can be set, and the first day of Abib [177 days before Tishri 1] can be determined. This, in turn, makes it possible to establish the dates for the Holy Days" (p. 22). There is no discussion in the entire Paper, nor in the preceding Doctrinal Statement (released in the latter part of 1996), of the clear biblical injunctions that the first month determines the rest of the year, as against 1st Tishri, according to rabbinical traditions, supposedly determining the rest of the year! This argument inverts the salvation sequence and typology in God's calendar.

In setting the guidelines for answers to the calendar problems, readers are informed :

These questions shall be answered. However, the Study Paper and Doctrinal Statement contain the premise that the oracles [Greek: logia, i.e., teachings; Rom 3:1-2], the Word of God and the oral, 'biblically based', traditions were maintained after the destruction of the Temple (70 A.D.) and were the God-given responsibility of the Jews. The argument (assumed from Rom 3:1-2) ignores the anti-NT Jewish perspective on circumcision (See also Acts 15:5, 24; Gal 5:15; 6:15; Rom 5:25-29). Furthermore, it is quite evident that the Church (the Temple of God; Eph 2:19-22; 1Cor 3:16-17; 2Cor 6:16) has the responsibility of preserving and teaching the oracles, i.e., the true teachings of God (Acts 7:38; Heb 5:12; 1Pet 4:11), which are the only other verses using logia in the NT). The rabbinical rules, not biblical oracles, governing ritualised Sabbath observance, circumcision, washings, foods (e.g., milk and meat regulations) [and calendar (amongst numerous other regulations)] are scorned by Jesus Christ (Matt 15:1-9, 12-13 [see NIV footnote to v.2]; Mk 7:1-9,13 [see NIV footnote to v.13]; Lk 11:45-53; Matt 23:1-7).

NIV Study Bible footnotes on Matt 15:2 comment on the tradition of the elders:

"After the Babylonian captivity, the Jewish rabbis began to make meticulous rules and regulations governing the daily life of the people. These were interpretations and applications of the law of Moses, handed down from generation to generation. In Jesus' day this "tradition of the elders" was in oral form. It was not until c. A.D. 200 that it was put into writing in the Mishnah."
And on Mk 7:13:
Thus you nullify the word of God by your tradition.
"The teachers of the law appealed to Nu 30:1-2 in support of the Corban vow, but Jesus categorically rejects the practice of using one Biblical teaching to nullify another. The scribal interpretation of Nu 30:1-2 satisfied the letter of the passage but missed the meaning of the law as a whole. God never intended obedience to one command to nullify another." [Matt 23:14,27-28]
THE BIBLICAL CALENDAR
Genesis 1:14 tells us that the sun and moon [hence a solar-lunar calendar] are for "signs and for seasons (mo'ed = time(s); season(s); festival(s); assembly), and for days and years." The LXX confirms this translation. Targum Neofiti [See the note following this paragraph] has (Gen 1:14): And the Lord ['according to the decree of his Memra' [i.e., YHWH]] said: "Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to separate the daytime from the night, and let them act as signs and (sacred) seasons [times] and so that the intercalation of moons (and) months may be consecrated by them." (The Aramaic Bible, (translated by Martin McNamara M.S.C.); T and T Clark, Edinburgh, 1992). Another Aramaic Targum, Pseudo-Jonathan, says: God said, "Let there be lights in the firmament of the heavens to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs and as festival times, and for counting the reckoning of days, and for sanctifying the beginnings of months and the beginnings of years, the intercalations of months and the intercalations of years, the solstices, the new moon, and the cycles (of the sun)." (The Aramaic Bible, (translated by Michael Maher M.S.C.); The Liturgical Press, Collegeville, MN, 1992).

It is accepted that these Aramaic Targums pre-date the apostolic times and so are quite valuable in revealing the earlier Jewish understanding of Genesis 1:14. The NEB has "as signs both for festivals and for seasons and years." The NJB has "let them indicate festivals, days and years."

Ps 104:19 supports Gen 1:14 with the remarkable statement that God appointed the moon for seasons [festivals], which are agriculturally-based and typify the harvests of God's saints (1Cor 15:20,23,24). The NEB and the NJB translate 'festivals' for 'seasons' in Gen 1:14.

The month with the Passover, Abib, is specifically commanded by the Lord as being the beginning of the year (Ex 12:2; and also see Ex 13:4; 23:15; 34:18; 40:2,17; Lev 23:4-6; Num 9:1-3; 20:1; 28:16; 33:3; Dt 16:1-3; Josh 4:19; 5:10; 1Chr 12:15; 27:2-3; 2Chr 29:3,17; 30:15; 35:1; Ezr 7:9 [see NIV footnote]; 10:17; Neh 2:1 [see NIV footnote]; Est 3:7 [see NIV footnote]; Ezk 29:17; 45:18,21 [Ezk 45 has a millennial setting!]). This beginning symbolises the redemption of the Israel of God from the world's system (Gal 1:4; Rev 14:4), and the typology of the Passover lamb foreshadows the Lamb of God (Jn 1:29; Rev 5:6-6:1; 14:1-4). Clearly, the first month of the year symbolises what is first in the sequence of salvation, and determines all that follows. The religious leaders of Judaism, as described in the Gospels, rejected the Son of God (Jn 8:19; 16:3), and not surprisingly their spiritual ancestors determine the calculations for the calendar from 1 Tishri (the day commemorating the return of Jesus the Messiah (1Cor 15:51-53; 1Th 4:14-16; Rev 20:6; Lev 23:23-25), who is still not recognised.

"The observation of the autumnal equinox, i.e., 'the going out of the year' (Ex. 23:16), and of the spring or vernal equinox, called 'the return of the year' (1 Ki. 20:26; 2 Ch. 36:10 KJV), was important for controlling the calendar and consequently the festivals. Thus the year began with the new moon nearest the vernal equinox when the sun was in Aries (Josephus, Ant. 3.201 [better to see Ant. III.x.5]), and the Passover on the fourteenth day of Nisan coincided with the first full moon (Ex 12:2-6)." (The Illustrated Bible Dictionary, J. D. Douglas and N. Hillyer, editors, IVP, 1980; Article Calendar, Vol 2, p. 223).
F. F. Bruce, the writer of this article, goes on to say (p. 225):
"In general, the Jewish calendar in NT times (at least before C.E. 70) followed the Sadducean reckoning, since it was by that reckoning that the Temple services were regulated. Thus the day of Pentecost was reckoned as the fiftieth day after the presentation of the first harvested sheaf of barley, i.e., the fiftieth day (inclusive) from the first Sunday after Passover (cf. Lev. 23:15f.); hence it always fell on a Sunday, as it does in the Christian calendar.

The Pharisaic reckoning, which became standard after CE 70, interpreted 'sabbath' in Lv. 23:15 as the festival day of Unleavened Bread and not the weekly sabbath; in that case Pentecost always fell on the same day of the month [Sivan 6]."

The rabbinical authorities since the destruction of the Temple, and like the Pharisees of Christ's time, use tradition to apply Scriptures in determining Shavuot (Pentecost). If the Church accepts that the Jews have the oracles of God, then their reckoning (Sivan 6) should be accepted for the Feast of Firstfruits, Purim and Hanukkah should also be observed, as the Jews do (Est 9:26-31; Jn 10:22).

The UCG Study Paper refers to Mr Herbert W. Armstrong's February, 1940, letter about determining Passover and the Festivals. His letter says: "The present "Jewish Calendar" has come down intact without change since 100 A.D. - that much is proved by history."
History in fact proves contrawise. The letter goes on to 'prove' that the Samaritans have kept and still keep the Passover, as the Jews do, "with all its Penteuchal ceremony." The letter tells us that the Samaritans kill the lamb "on the eve, or night part, of the 14th, not on the 15th." If Jews were to kill a lamb for their Passover these days, they would do it in the afternoon of the 14th and eat it on the 15th. So the argument is self-evidently contradictory. Furthermore, at the end of the letter, Mr Armstrong states twice that Pentecost for 1940 would be on Tuesday, 18th June. This decision would have to be based on counting from the Sunday after the days of Unleavened Bread (i.e., with the assumed 7th day being Sunday, 29th April). I mention this because there appears to be an apparent over-reliance on the name of Mr Armstrong rather than on Biblical accuracy and historical fact.

It is evident that if 1st Abib is incorrectly calculated then the Passover season is wrongly determined, and if 1st Tishri [the determinative day for Jewish calculation] is incorrectly decided, then all the Festivals fall improperly. Would Isaiah 1:13-14 and Hosea 2:11 apply?

MORE ON THE JUDAIC CALENDAR
The present Jewish calendar, often termed the Hillel calendar, is of more recent derivation than generally known. There is no doubt that the postponement system, according to the Encyclopaedia Judaica, was not fully in place until the eleventh century and is not really the product of Rabbi Hillel II from 358 C.E., even though it is commonly attributed to him. We should recognise that we are confronted with either the observance of God's Festivals or the observances of a calendar with postponement rules based on rabbinical traditions. The intent of the Catholic calendar is to avoid agreement with the original Jewish calendar and the current Jewish calendar avoids agreement with the almost universal Christian calendar (the Eastern Orthodox churches excepted). For example, the Catholic observance of Easter Sunday was 30th March, 1997, whereas the Orthodox Easter Sunday was 27th April, 1997. The Jewish Passover was on the night of 21st April. The Roman observance is based on the early (Nicean) arguments which related to the avoidance of the original Jewish observance:

"The Easter controversy raged in the early Church and still exists between the Western and Eastern churches. The final conditions arrived at in the West are that Easter must be kept on the Sunday after the paschal moon (the calendar moon whose fourteenth day falls on or after the vernal equinox), reckoned from the day of the new moon inclusive" (The Encyclopedia of Religion, (MACMILLAN, 1987, ed. Mircea Eliade), Vol 10, p. 86). The 1997 spring new moon (Jerusalem time) was on the night of 8th-9th March.

"Since the majority of early Christians were Jewish converts, it is understandable that from the outset the Christian calendar was governed by the fact that the death and Resurrection of Christ had taken place at the time of the Jewish feast, the Pasch, or Passover, celebrated on the 14th day of the month of Nisan, i.e., at the full moon following the spring equinox" (New Catholic Encyclopedia, (McGRAW HILL, N.Y., 1967),  Vol 2, p. 1062). Please note that the larger groups observing the Passover season follow the rabbinical traditions. Scriptures and historical support for non-rabbinical practice are denied.

Comments from Anatolius, Bishop of Laodicea, [c.230-c.280] are confirmatory of what has already become very evident:
"Nor is this an opinion confined to ourselves alone. For it was also known to the Jews of old and before Christ, and it was most carefully observed by them. And this may be learned  from what Philo, and Josephus, and Musaeus have written; and not only from these, but indeed from others still more ancient, namely, the two Agathobuli, who were surnamed the Masters, and the eminent Aristobulus, who was one of the Seventy who translated the sacred and holy Scriptures [i.e., the Septuagint] of the Hebrews for Ptolemy Philadelphus [285-246 B.C.] and his father, and dedicated his exegetical works on the law of Moses to the same kings. These writers, in solving some questions which are raised with respect to the Exodus, say that all alike ought to sacrifice the Passover after the vernal equinox in the middle of the first month" (Ante-Nicene Fathers, (Eerdmans, 1986), Vol 6, The Paschal Canon of Anatolius of Alexandria, III, p. 147).
The Encyclopaedia Judaica (Jerusalem, 1972) says that:
"the present [calendar] system was expected to be replaced again by a system based on true values more akin to the earlier Jewish calendar in which New Moon (days of the phasis) and intercalations were proclaimed on the basis of both observation and calculation"(p. 47). Then on p. 50 we find this stunning comment: "There is ... unimpeachable evidence from the works of writers with expert knowledge of the calendar that the present ordo intercalationis [sequence of intercalations]  and epochal molad [1st Tishri] were not intrinsic parts of the calendar of Hillel II, these being seen still side by side with other styles of the ordo intercalationis and the molad as late as the 11th century [i.e., about 1038 A.D.]. Also the four dehiyyot [postponement rules] developed gradually. ... By the tenth century the Jewish calendar was exactly the same as today."
Those who claim that the present Jewish calendar, with its rabbinical postponement rules, is valid for Christians have made insupportable assumptions. This calendar does not truly represent the calendar operative in the days of Jesus Christ when the Sadducees made the calendar determinations.

JUDAISM'S NEW YEAR
Note here the comments of the Judaica concerning the accuracy or otherwise of the postponements:

"Fixing Rosh HaShanah (New Year's Day). The year begins on Tishri 1, which is rarely the day of the molad [the 'black' moon; conjunction], as there are four obstacles or considerations, called dehiyyah, in fixing the first day of the month (rosh hodesh). Each dehiyyot may cause a postponement of two days: (1) mainly in order to prevent the Day of Atonement (Tishri 10) from falling on Friday or Sunday, and Hoshana Rabba (the seventh day of Sukkot; Tishri 21) from falling on Saturday, but in part also serving an astronomical purpose... (2) entirely for an astronomical reason, if the molad is at noon or later Rosh HaShanah is delayed by one day" (ibid., p. 44).

"If Rosh Hashanah fell on a Sunday, Hoshanah Rabbah would fall on the Sabbath and would call for the elimination of certain rituals which the pharisaic rabbis did not want to forgo" (Jewish Quarterly Review, Vol 25, No 1, 1997; Article by Rabbi Saul Leeman, "Why is Pesach So Late This Year?").

The 3rd and 4th dehiyyah are more complex rules involving specific times of the molad and the consequent postponement of 1st Tishri. These moladot are tabulated with specific rules outlined in the Judaica article. See the Appendices for some clarification.
"... the present system was expected to be replaced again by a system based on true values [as opposed to mean values] more akin to the earlier Jewish calendar in which New Moons (days of the phasis [i.e., the length of the interval from the true conjunction to the first sighting of the new crescent]) and intercalations were proclaimed on the basis of both observation and calculation" (p. 47).
Please notice there is the suggestion that the present Jewish calendar is not correct and needs revision. Furthermore, we are informed that the Day of Trumpets is rarely on the day of the molad [the conjunction] which means the 'holy' day is often not observed on the correct day [i.e., the new moon] as are the subsequent festival days. Please recall the earlier reference to Gen 1:14. "According to a tradition quoted in the name of Hai Gaon (d. 1038), the present Jewish calendar was introduced by the patriarch Hillel ll ... in 358/59 C.E. ... While it is not unreasonable to attribute to Hillel ll the fixing of the regular order of intercalations, his full share in the present fixed calendar is doubtful" (ibid., p. 48).

The correct new moons are vital in determining the months. The New Moon of Abib determines the year, not 1st Tishri. Please refer to the list of Scriptures in the last paragraph of page 4.

Philo of Alexandria [20 B.C.-50 A.D.] tells us, [translated by F. H. Colson (Harvard University Press, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, MA, 1937); The Special Laws, II, Xl,41]:

"The third [feast; ('the first is each day, and the second is the sabbath')] is the new moon which follows the conjunction of the moon with the sun." And in II, XXVl,140: "This is the New Moon, or beginning of the lunar month, namely the period between one conjunction and the next, the length of which has been accurately calculated in the astronomical schools."
It should be noted that the popular Hendrickson Publishers edition (1993) of C. D. Jonge's 1854 translation does not have the same information that the Colson translation gives. Indications are that the conjunctions [the molads] were determinative in deciding the first of the month. It should be noted that there were astronomical calculations used before the time of Christ.

MORE ON ABIB AND TISHRI
"Nisan: Related to the Babylonian first month Nisannu, "to start," or perhaps to Hebrew nitzan, "blossoms." Its pentateuchal name is Aviv, [or Abib], "spring." ... The first never falls on Monday, Wednesday, or Friday. In the twentieth century its earliest beginning is March 13th and its latest beginning is April 11th" (The Jewish Almanac, (Bantam,1980), p. 245).

The whole Passover season also symbolises the preparation of the firstfruits of God for the Firstfruits harvest, Pentecost. The above postponement rule avoids the Jewish observance of their Passover co-incident with a Tuesday night occurring on the 14th Abib. The rules for Abib do allow for a Sabbath to fall on the 14th [where the 1st Abib is a Sunday], which is a preparation day for the 15th, the first holy day of the seven days of unleavened bread. However, in Tishri, a Sabbath is not permitted just before or after the 1st [Feast of Trumpets] or the 10th of the month [Day of Atonement].

"Tishre: From Aramaic shera or sherei, "to begin." ... Seventh month in the religious or festival cycle; first in chronological or civil cycle... The 1st never falls on Sunday, Wednesday, or Friday. In the twentieth century, its earliest beginning is September 6th and its latest beginning is Oct 5th" (p. 241).
THE NEW MOON AND THE MOLAD
We should note that the conjunction, or molad, is the astronomical cross-over point from one month to the next and that the calendrical New Moon (determined by traditions) and the molad seldom coincide.
An example of the 3rd dehiyyah (postponement rule) is: If the molad of Tishri occurs at 12 noon on Saturday [Under ideal conditions the very first sliver of the crescent would be visible after the ensuing sunset, i.e., about 6 to 8 hours after the molad.], Rosh HaShanah would be deferred to Sunday, "which again is not permitted, so that the festival will be moved one further day, to Monday" (Encyclopedia Judaica, Vol V, p. 44).

The present Jewish calendar is lunisolar, the months being reckoned according to the moon and the years according to the sun. A month is the period of time between one conjunction of the moon with the sun and the next. The conjunction of the moon with the sun is the point in time at which the moon is directly between the earth and the sun (but not in the same plane) and it is thus invisible. This is known as the molad ("birth")" (ibid., p. 43).

Since the molad is indeed the conjunction - and all appear to agree on that - then time before the molad is the end of the previous month, and time after the molad is attributable to the new month. And since the biblical day is evening to evening, it would seem that, where the conjunction is half-way or more into the day (i.e., at about 6 a.m. onwards), agreement needs to be reached about a rule which does not contravene biblical rule(s), and which is in line with astronomical calculation.

THE CALENDAR OF CHRISTIANITY
It should be noted that there is a lack of postponement rules indicated in the early Church (admittedly Catholic, but nevertheless pertinent to our decision-making on these matters of determining what calendar Christians ought to observe). The key postponement rule used by the Catholic Church is that Easter Sunday is the first Sunday after the Paschal (full) Moon.

Hippolytus [170 - 236 A.D.], The Refutation of All Heresies, VIII.xi (ANF, Vol V, p. 123):

Easter should be kept on the fourteenth day of the first month, according to the commandment of the law, on whatever day (of the month) it should occur.
Anatolius in his The Paschal Canon, (ANF, Vol VI, pp. 146-7), says:
"(I) just as they [Isodore, Jerome, Clement] differ also in language, have, nevertheless, come harmoniously to one and the same most exact reckoning of Easter, day and month and season meeting in accord with the highest honour for the Lord's resurrection. But Origen also, the most erudite of all, and the acutest in making calculations, .... has published in a very elegant manner a little book on Easter. And in this book, while declaring, with respect to the day of Easter, that attention must be given not only to the course of the moon and the transit of the equinox, but also the passage of the sun, (II) There is, then, in the first year, the new moon of the first month, which is the beginning of every cycle of nineteen years, on the six and twentieth day of the month called by the Egyptians Phamenoth. But, according to the months of the Macedonians, it is on the two-and-twentieth day of Dystrus. And, as the Romans would say, it is the eleventh day [i.e., 20th March, and at the time of the vernal equinox] before the Kalends [first] of April."
A post-Nicaean letter from the emperor, Constantine I (306-337C.E.), further illustrates the kind of calendrical problem we are confronted with.
"Constantine, august, to the churches. ...

When the question arose concerning the most holy day of Easter, it was decreed by common consent to be expedient, that this festival should be celebrated on the same day by all, in every place. ... it seemed to every one a most unworthy thing that we should follow the custom of the Jews in the celebration of this most holy solemnity, who, polluted wretches! having stained their hands with a nefarious crime, are justly blinded in their minds. It is fit, therefore, that, rejecting the practice of this people, we should perpetuate to all future ages the celebration of this rite, in a more legitimate order, which we have kept from the first day of our Lord's passion even to the present times. Let us then have nothing in common with the most hostile rabble of the Jews. We have received another method from the Saviour. A more lawful and proper course is open to our most holy religion. In pursuing this course with a unanimous consent, let us withdraw ourselves, my much honored brethren, from that most odious fellowship. ... As it is necessary that this fault should be so amended that we may have nothing in common with the usage of these parricides and murderers of our Lord; and so that order is most convenient which is observed by all the churches of the West, as well as those of the southern and northern parts of the world, and also by some in the East, it is judged therefore to be most equitable and proper, and I pledged myself that this arrangement should meet your approbation, namely that the custom which prevails with one consent in the city of Rome, and throughout all Italy, Africa and Egypt, in Spain, Gaul, Britain, Lybia, the whole of Greece, the diocese of Asia, Pontus and Cilicia, would be gladly embraced by your prudence, ... and to have no fellowship with the perjury of the Jews. And, to sum up the whole in a few words, it is agreeable to the common judgment of all, that the most holy feast of Easter should be celebrated on one and the same day." (A Historical View of The Council of Nice; with a Translation of Documents by Rev. Isaac Boyle, D.D.; (T. Mason and G. Lane, New York, 1839), pp. 51-4).

This letter of Constantine reveals a high level of manipulation of political power, propaganda, and religious coercion. Furthermore, roots of anti-Semitism in Western culture are seen in the world government of the day.
"It will suffice here to say that a decision seems to have been arrived at in the Council of Nicaea, which, though it is strangely absent from the canons of the council as now preserved to us (Turner, Monumenta Nicaena, 152), is believed to have been determined that Easter was to be celebrated on the first Sunday after the first full moon which follows the spring equinox" (Catholic Encyclopaedia, 1913; obtained from Internet: 'New Advent' Catholic Supersite (http://www.knight.org/advent/cathen/03158a.htm#easter).
It is worthwhile and a little entertaining to see how the last larger bastion of resistance, Britain, fell to the onslaught of calendrical and further religious distortion. The British historian and bishop, Bede [c.672-735 A.D.], in his The Ecclesiastical History of the English People, especially in chapters 25-26 of Book III, has much to say about the synod and the discussions presided by King Oswy [612-670], particularly between Bishop Colman and the Rome enthusiast, the Abbot of Ripon, Wilfred, in the monastery of Streanaeshalch [i.e., the historic Synod of Whitby of 664 A.D.].
"Bede makes it very clear that the calculation of the date of Easter was not a merely technical or isolated issue. The movement of Easter was one of the many things which argument in terms of symbols (as we would say, but symbol is for us a limiting word, mysteries they would say) showed to be loaded with significance. Easter had to be just at the equinox, for the lengthening days represented Christ's triumph over the powers of darkness. It had to be in the first month of the lunar year, for this was the month in which the world had been created and in which it ought to be newly created. It had to be as the moon was about to wane, for the moon turns from earth to heavenly things [See Rev. 12:1; Mal. 4:2; Lk. 2:32; Isa. 60:1-3]. It was appropriate that Easter should always fall within a space of seven days, for seven was a number of divine significance. Considered from another point of view, Easter was to be calculated in such a way as to fulfil both of the Old Law of the Jews and the New Law of Christ. If it was celebrated at the right time, then all was in harmony." (Introduction, p. xviii, by James Campbell, who translated Bede's EH  for The Great Histories Series by Washington Square Press,  N.Y., 1968).
Before quoting directly from Bede let us look at a footnote (no. 44, pp. 400-1):
"Both the Celts and their opponents agreed that Easter was to be calculated by reference to the full moon which came on or first after the spring equinox. But the Celts held Easter Sunday to be that which came in between the fourteenth day of the moon (i.e., the day of the full moon) and the twentieth, both included. That is to say, that if the full moon came on a Sunday, they made this Easter Sunday. The other churches refused to make the day of the full moon Easter Sunday. Thus the system which Bede used, and which became universal in the west, reckoned Easter Sunday as that which fell between the fifteenth and the twenty-first days of the moon. If the full moon on or next after the equinox came on a Sunday, then the next Sunday was Easter Sunday."
After Bishop Colman had indicated that his observance of Easter was received from his elders and was "the same which the blessed Evangelist John, the disciple especially dear to the Lord, celebrated, "the founder of the Benedictine Order in Britain, Wilfred, responded:
"The Easter which we observe we saw celebrated by all at Rome, where the blessed Apostles Peter and Paul lived, taught, suffered, and were buried. This is what we saw observed by all in Gaul and in Italy when we travelled through them to study and to pray. This we have learned to be practiced in Africa, Asia, Egypt, and Greece, and by the whole world wherever the faith of Christ has been spread through various races and tongues; all make use of the one single way of determining the date of Easter. The only exceptions are these people and their accomplices in obstinacy, I mean the Picts and the Britons, with whom (the inhabitants of the two last islands of the ocean, and only on part of those) they stand against the whole of the world, struggling foolishly" (ibid., pp. 160-1).
Wilfred's next comment is fascinating, especially when we note that both were wrong, but Wilfred was obviously the more cunning and informed:
"Far be it from us to charge John with foolishness, for he observed the precepts of the Law of Moses literally, at a time when the church still followed the Jews in many things; and the Apostles were not able suddenly to set aside the entire observance of the Law laid down by God ... So, John, according to the custom of the Law, began the celebration of the feast of Easter on the evening of the fourteenth day of the first month, paying no attention to whether it fell on the Sabbath or on some other day" (pp. 161-2). (There are no postponements here).
Wilfred then proceeds to contradict what he said and espouses the catholic convention.

This pattern of universal imposition of the dating and mode of observance in the Passover/Easter controversy has persisted through the centuries. The New Catholic Encyclopedia comments:

"Since the majority of the early Christians were Jewish converts, it is understandable that from the outset the Christian calendar was governed by the fact that the death and Resurrection of Christ had  taken place at the time of the chief Jewish feast, the Pasch, or Passover, celebrated on the 14th day of the month of Nisan, i.e., at the full moon following the Spring equinox. However, rather than literally follow the Jewish Passover, since this would necessitate the commemoration of the Resurrection on a different day of the week each year, Christian custom (sanctioned by the Council of Nicaea I in 325; ConOecDecr 2-3, n.6) fixed the anniversary of Christ's Resurrection on the actual day of the week (the first day) on which the Resurrection had taken place. As a result, Easter falls on the first day of the week (Sunday) after the first full moon following the spring equinox, and thus can be as early as March 22 and as late as April 25" [which would make it the second full moon after the equinox]  (ibid., McGraw Hill, N.Y., 1967; pp. 1062-3).
What is most important with the quotes here is that we see that the influence of both Rome and Judaism has obscured the true Passover. The Orthodox schisms have made the problem even more complicated in that they adopted the Jewish postponements and then kept their Easter a week after the Jewish Passover.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church (St Pauls, Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 1994, Item 1170) says:

"At the Council of Nicaea, in 325, all the Churches agreed that Easter, the Christian Passover, should be celebrated on the Sunday following the first full moon (Nisan 14) after the vernal equinox. The reform of the Western calendar, called "Gregorian" after Pope Gregory XIII (1582), caused a discrepancy of several days with the Eastern calendar. Today, the Western and Eastern Churches are seeking agreement in order once again to celebrate the day of the Lord's Resurrection on a common date."
In 1997 the Western churches celebrated Easter (30th March) one week after the Sunday, which fell on the 15th Abib (March 23rd). The Orthodox churches held their Easter on Sunday, a week later than the Jewish postponements, on April 27th. There is an additional consequence in that Pentecost and the end of the sacred year's festivals (Feast of Trumpets, Day of Atonement, Feast of Tabernacles) are a month later in 1997. Yet in 1998 the Jewish calendar, by coincidence, lines up with the calendar based on a true new moon on 1st Abib.

When Jesus Christ met with the apostles for what Paul calls the "Lord's Supper" (1 Cor 11:20; see also Jn 13:2,4; 21:20), that night was the night before the Jewish Passover, which was the Passover that Israel observed in Egypt (Ex 12:11-14), and which Jews still observe. So the event that Christians should observe is on the evening of the 14 Abib, whereas Jews observe the evening of 15 Abib. The killing of the Passover lambs in the afternoon immediately preceding that night (Ex 12:1-31) results in the celebration of Israel's freedom as described in Ex 12:40-42. The Lord's Supper for 1997 fell on the evening of Friday, 21 March (14 Abib), since the vernal new moon is March 9 and the vernal equinox was just before midnight of March 20.

Calendrical history-makers seem to be intent in creating sufficient confusion to suppress the truth so that the Passover season, determined from the true New Moon of spring, can be readily known. The times of the biblical feasts are determined from Abib (Ex 12:2; 23:14-16 [v.16 says that the Feast of Tabernacles is at the end of the year; see also Ex 23:16; 34:18-22; Lev 23:24; Num 29:1,7; Ezk 45:25]; Lev 23:4; Num 9:1-2; 28:16; Dt 16:1; Josh 4:19; Ezk 45:18-21). Postponements are in effect a denial that the calendar is determined from the first day of the first month! The flow of festivals is from the first month and not the seventh.

The 24 page doctrinal paper, ratified by the Doctrinal Committee and the Council of Elders of UCG-AIA, does not discuss the matter of Abib being the first month and cites only Ex 12:2 in this regard. Nevertheless, though correct days might be observed by some, Christians must abide by every word of God in sincerity and truth (Is 66:23; Hos 3:5; Nah 1:15; Col 2:16).

If we are not biblically right in understanding the purpose and plan of God, and in application of the calendar, then do these Scriptures apply (Is 1:13-14; Hos 2:11-12; Amos 5:21; 8:10)? Quite self-evidently, therefore, we have an awesome responsibility to faithfully, willingly and with knowledge, cheerfully observe the correct sacred days. We need to more clearly grasp the God-given sequence of typology and symbolism in the unfolding of the Plan of Salvation. We need to help restore them so that others may keep them in rewarding obedience to the Word of the Almighty and Gracious God.

The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you all. Amen. (Rev 22:21)

*************************************************************************************
Festivals for 1997:
Feast of Unleavened Bread (15-21 Abib): Sun 23rd - Sat 29th March
Pentecost (Feast of Firstfruits): Sunday, 11th May
Feast of Trumpets: Tuesday, 2nd September
Day of Atonement: Thursday, 11th September
Feast of Tabernacles: Tuesday, 16th - Monday, 22nd September
Last Great Day: Tuesday,  23rd September 

Festivals for 1998 
Feast of Unleavened Bread: Sabbath, 11th - Fri., 17th April
Pentecost: Sunday, 31st May
Feast of Trumpets: Monday, 21 September
Day of Atonement: Wednesday, 30th September
Feast of Tabernacles: Monday, 5th - Sunday, 11th October
Last Great Day: Monday, 12th October
In 1998 the Festivals  coincide with the regular Jewish calendar, because postponement rules are not applicable.
*************************************************************************************
APPENDIX  A 
THE RULES OF POSTPONEMENT 
The Comprehensive Hebrew Calendar (Albert Spier, 3rd rev. ed., Feldheim, N.Y., 1986), Encyclopaedia Judaica (Vol V), The Jewish Almanac, and various other sources are used here to simplify the four postponement rules. 

As the Judaica says:

"The year begins on Tishri 1, which is rarely the day of the molad, as there are four obstacles or considerations, called dehiyyot, in fixing the first day of the month (rosh hosdesh). Each dehiyyah defers Rosh Ha-Shanah by a day, and combined dehiyyot may cause a postponement of two days" (p 44).
As a result the festivals before and after 1st Tishri are affected by such postponements. If the 1st Abib is calculated, keeping in mind that the Abib full moon must fall on or after the spring equinox, then all the festivals are relative to the Passover season, the beginning of the year. This is logically, astronomically, and biblically supportable, and no rabbinical traditions need to be considered.

THE POSTPONEMENT RULES: 
· 1.  When the molad of Tishri occurs on a Sunday, Wednesday, or Friday, Rosh HaShanah is postponed to the following day. The Day of Trumpets can never fall on a Sunday, Wednesday, or Friday.
· 2.  When the molad of Tishri occurs at noon or later, Rosh Ha-Shanah is postponed to the next day - or, if this condition occurs on a Sunday, Wednesday, or Friday - postponement is to the Monday, Thursday, or Sabbath (because of rule 1).
· 3.  When the molad of Tishri of an "ordinary" year (i.e., not a leap year, where a 13th lunar month is added) falls on Tuesday at 9hrs and 204 halakim (parts; 1080 halakim to the hour), i.e., at 3:11 and 20 seconds a.m., the Day of Trumpets is deferred to Thursday!
· 4.  When, in a common year succeeding a leap year, the molad of Tishri occurs on Monday morning at 15hrs 32mins 43 and one third seconds (i.e., 15hrs 589 halakim; or 9:32 and 43.3secs a.m. (approx)), Rosh Ha-Shanah is postponed to Tuesday.

Is it apparent that these, especially rules 3 and 4, were verified by visual sighting? These minutae in the calendar are typical of rabbinical traditions seen in other aspects of Judaism.

Additional factors: 
·1st Nisan (Abib) never falls on Monday, Wednesday, Friday. Aries is the astrological sign, and the month is assigned to the tribe of Benjamin. "In leaving Egypt the Jewish people were born, Passover is, thus, a festival both of redemption and creation" (The Jewish Almanac, p 246).
·1st Iyyar never falls on Sunday, Wednesday, or Friday. Taurus is the astrological sign, and Reuben is connected with the second month.
·1st Sivan (3rd month) does not fall on Monday, Thursday, or Shabbat. Gemini and Simeon.
·1st Tammuz never falls on Monday, Wednesday, or Shabbat. Cancer and Levi.
·1st Av (5th month) does not occur on Sunday, Tuesday, or Thursday. Leo and Judah.
·1st Elul never falls on Tuesday, Thursday, or Shabbat. Virgo and Zebulon.
·1st Tishri (7th month) never falls on Sunday, Wednesday, or Friday. Libra and Issachar. The day marks the "birthday of the world" as counted from the creation, and is also the beginning of the ten days of repentance leading up to Yom Kippur (the Day of Atonement). The 21st has an air of solemnity owing to its being considered to be the day when the seal is placed on the verdict passed on Yom Kippur and also when the final judgment is passed concerning the amount of rainfall for the coming year. Hoshana Rabbah (the 21st; [See Haggai 2:1-3]) is celebrated with special rituals, including a procession of seven circuits around the synagogue reciting supplications and petitionary prayers and beating of willow branches.
·1st Heshvan never occurs on Sunday, Tuesday, or Friday. Scorpio and Dan.
·Kislev (the ninth month; [See Haggai 2:10,18,20]) never begins with Shabbat. Sagittarius and Gad.
·
1st Tevet never falls on Thursday or Shabbat. Capricorn and Asher.
·1st Shevat does not occur on a Sunday or Friday. Aquarius and Naphtali.
·1st Adar I (the 12th lunar month), or Adar II in leap years, does not fall on Sunday, Tuesday, or Thursday. Pisces and Joseph.

APPENDIX  B 
DETERMINING PASSOVER: A SIMPLIFICATION 
Compiled by Norm Womersley and edited by Orest Solyma (May, 1997)

(1) Abib (to sprout, to bud, to be tender; green ears; barley [Lev 2:14; Ex 9:31]) is the first month of the Lunar-Solar Year and the month in which Passover is observed (Ex 12:2; 13:4).

(2) The 1st day of the lunar month is a new moon, therefore the full moon occurs on the 14th-15th of the month.  A lunar month is 29 days 12 hours 44 + minutes long. 

The first month, Abib (in the northern hemisphere; Jerusalem as the focus [Ps 122; 135:19-21; Zech 14:1-4; Rev 21:2-3]), is the beginning of the sacred year when the days start to get longer. Some barley is ready for harvesting (Lev 23:10; Ruth 1:22; 2:23; 2Sam 21:9), but reaping may continue as late as August in higher altitudes. Wheat and rye are still immature in spring  (Ex 9:31,32). 
This season must coincide with the Vernal Equinox, which causes seasonal change and crop development not vice versa. The 20th-21st March is the turn from winter to summer of a solar year (Gen 1:14). Biblically, it is the start of the summer season (Gen 8:22; Ps 74:17).

(3) Passover is viewed as a season, a feast, including Unleavened Bread, a day, or a meal (Matt 26:17; Ezk 45:21; Num 9:6; Lk 22:15). Included is the Lord's Supper on the 14th Abib, the Night to be Much Observed on the 15th Abib, (i.e., 14th-15th at the time of a full moon), followed by the Wave-Sheaf Offering (God's acceptance of the resurrected Christ), both set during the Days of Unleavened Bread, and with the seventh day of Unleavened Bread being 21st Abib.
The full moon of Passover must be the first full moon and after the new moon nearest to the Vernal Equinox, i.e., nearest to March 20th-21st.
The nearest New Moon could be up to 14 days before or after the Equinox, and may depend on the need for a thirteenth month, Adar II, to bring the lunar and solar year calculations into synchronisation. Adar II is required seven times out of a nineteen-year cycle and is the month just before the start of the sacred new year. In 1997 (the 19th year of a cycle) Adar II was inserted so that the Jewish Passover, to satisfy traditions, fell on the second full moon after the vernal equinox, thus making a late spring.

Note that errors of up to 2 hours are probable for 30 A.D. reckonings, and therefore important implications are consequent as seen in the table below which uses U.S. Naval Observatory astronomical calculations obtained from the Internet.

(http://riemann.usno.navy.mil./AA/data/docs/SpringPhenom.html).

Solar Year and Equinox New Moon
1 Abib
*The Lord's Supper
14 Abib
1st Day UB
15 Abib
Wave Sheaf
Sunday
7th Day UB
21 Abib
30 A.D
22 Mar 10 a.m. (1-2 hr. variation)
Wed 22 Mar
Wed 22 Mar 1800 hrs GMT Thur 23 Mar Tues 4 Apr Crucifixion(?)
Wed 5 Apr
Wed eve 5 Apr
Annual Sabbath
Thur 6 Apr
Acceptance of resurrected Christ
Sun 9 Apr
Mon 11 Apr
Tues 12 Apr
1997
20 Mar
Sun 9 Mar Sat 22 Mar Sun 23 Mar Sun 23 Mar Sat 29 Mar
1998
20 Mar
Sat 28 Mar Fri 10 Apr Sat 11 Apr Sun 12 Apr Fri 17 Apr
1999
21 Mar
Thur 18 Mar Wed 31 Mar Thur 1 Apr Sun 4 Apr Wed 7 Apr

*Observance of the Lord's Supper is the previous evening. Holy Days begin the previous evening.
*Copies of this chart before Feb 12, 1999, were in error in the bottom line of the table.
* Additional material from the Jewish scholar Maimonides and explanatory comments about the year 2000 are forthcoming and will be included in an update of this paper.

Go back to our Home Page