CHRISTIAN CONSCIENCE
© Hubert Krause  Additional Editing by Orest Solyma
The Church of God in Williamstown
WEB SITE: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index_.htm

INTRODUCTION
The antinomian-the hater of the Law of God-sees the law as restrictive and confining. However, the Christian comes to realize that within that same law he finds true liberty, a liberty exercised before God in diverse areas of his life as he strives to live both by its letter and spirit. Invariably, each of us interprets the personal applicability of the law to areas of our lives somewhat differently than a fellow brother or sister. Decisions are made on the basis of our consciences. The Scriptures have much to say about conscience. For instance:

So how would God have us correctly follow and respond to our consciences? How can we be sure that our consciences are in harmony with the will of God? And how should we respond to the consciences of our fellow brothers and sisters in the Body of the Church?
Let us consider the nature of the conscience and also its role in our Christian lives.

CORRUPTED HEARTS AND MINDS
We will begin by examining what God tells us in His Word about the mind, the heart and the conscience of man.

Through the Scriptures God declares that He has shown enough of himself in the natural world for man to be unable to plead ignorance of His existence or to have an excuse for his wickedness:

This fact that all who fail to acknowledge God and give Him glory are "without excuse"-whether they are "under the law" or not-is further reinforced: So in God's court every human being-law-keeper or not-is found guilty. Paul elsewhere gives us some of the reasons for this: Knowing God, humankind should therefore have, in their minds (their "thinking") and in their hearts, acknowledged Him and His goodness on the basis of the evidence before them. We are told, for instance, that it is good and proper for mankind to honour God whose bountiful blessings to humanity are a testimony to His existence: Indeed, by-gone history is also our witness that in ages past the beneficence of God was considered and acknowledged by generations of a more noble character, where atheists and agnostics were perhaps far less prevalent!

Yet this evidence-and the testimony of their hearts and minds-mankind rejected! There is no vacuum: if God is not acknowledged and glorified, even for his physical blessings, then the Devil sees to it that the heart and mind become corrupted and even perverted:

A DEAD CONSCIENCE
What then is the result of this corruption of heart and mind?
Ro 1:26-32 goes on to list the price paid for this rejection of God by the Gentiles: a perversion of the conscience. Notice the climax of sin in verse 32: Through rebellion and self-will, the conscience-perhaps a faculty of the spirit in man- given by God to man to discern right and wrong, because of misuse, can be inexcusably stifled. This stifling can occur to such a degree that evil is accepted as if it were good and the sins of others assented to. A corrupt conscience is evident because of discrepancy between confession or admission and any resultant action taken. Your conscience may well confess something to you, but you choose to do nothing about it.

Paul takes this theme a little further in his letter to the Ephesians, in which he continues to describe the moral breakdown of the Gentile world, an example the Church is admonished not to follow:

So sin can produce a dead conscience, one that no longer responds appropriately to sin. God likewise condemned His people Israel and their leaders for such a dead conscience: Could such a dead conscience, where evil is called good, and good evil (Isa 5:20) still be reachable by God, we may ask ourselves? While ultimately God will reveal this to us, the Scriptures, testifying to His great mercy, offer hope. We have considered in the past the possibility that God destroyed the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah in part to forestall an irreversible descent into corruption. Yes, the wickedness of Sodom and Gomorrah was exceedingly great (Ge 13:13; 18:20); not even ten righteous men could be found in the former city (Ge 18:32). Yet let us notice the words of Jesus Christ: Why is the condemnation for cities such as Capernaum greater than that for the dead consciences of the Sodomites? As we will see, a conscience can be "twice dead".

WHAT IS THE CONSCIENCE?
So what exactly is the conscience? Perhaps amazing to us is the fact that in Old Testament Hebrew and Aramaic there is no word for "conscience". However, the Old Testament has much to say about the spirit in man. In the New Testament Greek, the word for "conscience" is "syneidesis", from the root "synoida", "to be aware, to share knowledge". We human beings become aware through the forces that have helped to educate us: home, school, friends, relatives, culture, information given and information gained. This knowledge presents us with responsibilities. Do I believe such and such? Why? Shall I accept this? Why?

The conscience seems to indicate a process of agreement and disagreement in conflict in the same mind. Good and evil are in juxtaposition. Order and disorder have to be resolved, logic and illogicality must be dealt with. Choices are made. From what has already been shown scripturally, we should be able to see that a pure conscience is one that consistently resolves to reject evil, folly, disorder and illogicality and accepts good, wisdom, divine order and logic.

It is then self-evident that when someone sometimes has a good conscience and at other times a bad conscience, confusion in his speech and his actions becomes evident to someone who is observing him from a godly perspective.

The awareness and sharing of knowledge within the conscience is reflected in what one admits to, in what one says and does on the basis of how the conscience has been used. So how aware are we to the knowledge and grace of Jesus Christ and how do we choose which parts of biblical teaching we shall use?

A good conscience can be an effective judge if there is a corresponding relationship between what it confesses to us about ourselves and the action we subsequently take. Let us consider this a little further.

A RESPONSIVE CONCIENCE
Paul continues his theme that mankind should possess this awareness of the standards of God through the correct use of the conscience:

He then links an awareness of godly standards with the conscience: Now while Paul tells us here that the conscience accuses or excuses, it also warns, advises, corrects, placates, and decides for or against. We can see parallels today: for instance, if unconverted people show respect and honour to parents, they do something that is right and in accordance with the law of God, and good fruits are produced. Deeds done are pronounced good or evil according to this moral consciousness, this activity of the conscience, and witness is borne to an awareness of God's standards, even if imperfectly.

So the conscience should be our judge: it may defend as well as accuse. But the purpose of God is that the conscience, when it accuses, should evoke the correct response. An accusing conscience ignored is an act of weakness. Let us note some examples in unconverted people to make the point.

Did any of these individuals correctly listen to and act according to their consciences? Persecution in "good conscience" before God-but bereft of the Holy Spirit! This, too, is the fruit of a conscience defiled.

Where God is involved in a the life of a human being, the response of the conscience should be one of repentance.

So if we have sown ungodliness, should our consciences not be, at some stage, condemned by the ungodliness that we will eventually reap? Judas may have also wept bitterly but, unlike Peter, did not turn to God in repentance! Why then do some respond correctly to their consciences while others fail to do so? Do we listen to our conscience as we should? Do we recognize and respond to any inner discord, and if so, how? Or do we deny it? Does our conscience accuse us, judge us, and correct us? And even if it does, is this all there is to the story? Are our consciences, even in good faith toward God, infallible?

WEIGHING THE HEART: DAVID AND JOB
We know that the heart of man is desperately wicked, so how can we be sure that our conscience is clean before God before we respond to it and even allow it to act as judge for us?

God weighs, or measures, the heart, the motives, and also tests the heart (Pr 17:3)-and we must ask him to do this for us personally, as David did: So David called upon God to test-or "weigh"-his heart, his conscience, and to instruct and correct him if he fell short; when he did this, he was able to be convicted in his conscience before God when he had gone astray: We may parallel this to David's prayer of repentance in Ps 51, where he called upon God to create in him a "clean heart (v 10)" [Heb: "leb"], a conscience no longer defiled, but cleansed through forgiveness.

However, Job, although he knew better, instead of allowing God to do so, had actually weighed and tested his own heart-looked at his own good works (Job 31: 5,7,9,13,16,17,19-22, etc. Note especially v 33)-and declared himself blameless:

Job referred to his conscience in his case before God-but his conscience was wrong, defiled because of his self-righteousness! It was no longer a reliable guide-but Job thought it was! So even with the indwelling of the Spirit of God, our conscience is not infallible. How then can we be sure that it is indeed a reliable guide to godliness? Could it be similarly defiled and unresponsive to God because we are blinded by our own righteousness or our own misperceptions?

THE SPIRIT, THE WORD AND FAITH
It was a consistent claim of the apostle Paul that he had always striven to serve God with a good conscience:

This same godly conscience was extended to his fellow man: So we can deduce from this that if there is a discrepancy between the fruits produced by the response of our conscience in terms of our actions towards God and towards one another-if there is offense or injury-then our consciences may well be found wanting before God!

In his letter to the Church in Rome, Paul attests to the sincerity of his sorrow for his fellow-Jews by taking an oath before Christ and appealing to his conscience-a conscience impacted by the Holy Spirit-as a co-witness to his vow:

A conscience fully led by the Holy Spirit of God is a reliable conscience! It is a testimony to others. It is ever guided by the love and mercy of God. Let us also notice the connection between faith and this good conscience, this conscience approved by God: A good conscience is linked to a sincere faith. Our consciences must always be subject and responsive to the living Word of God which has the power to judge the heart, the mind and the conscience: So it is the Holy Spirit of God, the entire Word of God, and the purity of the faith produced by these that will help to build a conscience fully approved by God.

ASSURED BEFORE GOD
Our conscience should convict-reprove or correct-us if we are guilty, or otherwise acquit us. This was the case for the apostle Paul. Notice how his conscience, first judged by him according to God's standards, left him free of guilt before God:

The apostle John spoke of this same confidence engendered by a conscience judged and assured before God: It is then that we know that we do indeed have this good, this pure conscience before God, which is a testimony to others: Such confident commendation-on the basis of a pure conscience before God-results from the teaching and application of the undistorted Word of God!

Paul and the writer of the Book of Hebrews could therefore claim this "pure", this "good" conscience before God:

A conscience so self-judged is then confident of being judged and assessed correctly by others-opinions and accusations notwithstanding: A "SEARED" CONSCIENCE
We spoke earlier of a "dead" conscience, evident in Paul's description of the immoral excesses of the Gentiles. The Bible speaks also of a "seared" conscience: The conscience has become insensitive and unresponsive to sin because of persistent and undiluted evil and the absence of repentance. Indeed, Paul may even mean here that such a conscience bears the brand-mark of the Devil: the individual is already owned by him!
This bespeaks of a total defilement of mind and conscience: A human conscience-converted or unconverted-can be "seared" if it declares itself unresponsive to and unreachable by the Spirit of God through wickedness, rebellion and self-will. This was Christ's warning to the Jewish leaders who denied Him (Mt 12:31; Mk 3:28; Lk 12:10), to the cities who rejected the Gospel He brought from His Father (Mt 11:23-24), and it is His warning to Christians today who would neglect the spiritual enlightenment given to them: In Hebrews 10:32, the same description of enlightenment, or illumination, is given and, in the light of this, the same warning against apostasy which can destroy the Christian conscience: Jude provides us with a description of the spiritually-dead conscience: The unconverted mind is described as being "dead in trespasses and sins" (Eph 2:1,5; Col 2:13), so the spiritually dead are depicted as "twice dead".

Let us now bring this topic of Christian conscience into the realm of the Church community.

RESPECTING AND OFFENDING THE CONSCIENCE
How does God expect us to deal with matters of conscience between each another?
In Romans 14, the apostle Paul addresses the issue of the eating of meat purchased in the marketplace that may have been consecrated to pagan gods. Some Christians, for conscience' sake, elected not to eat meat for this reason; others had obviously reasoned the matter out and concluded that there was nothing wrong in eating this meat. Let us notice carefully what Paul is actually saying as he admonishes the Church:

Paul here condemns the ungodly, judgmental attitudes of some and their attempts to compel others in the Church to conform to their practice, to enforce uniformity of opinion. Each Christian is personally responsible to His Lord and Master and is to be accepted by others just as the Lord has accepted him. Therefore, he enjoins upon them all their responsibility not to impede another Christian's spiritual progress: Yet what was the apostle's personal conviction in regard to the issue of meat offered to idols? He then continues, seemingly addressing those "strong" in the faith with whose position over this issue he is obviously in agreement: Consider the consequences of your enlightened behaviour and, in love, do not fly in the face of the sensitivities of the "weak" and compel them to act against their consciences, Paul is telling them. Christian liberty must be willing to subject itself to the law of love, and to be merciful and longsuffering. To seek to impose upon others what you perceive as being "lawful" is to act contrary to this law and to deny mercy, longsuffering and brotherly kindness.

Paul takes the whole argument over meats a step further:

He concludes this section of his letter commending the firm convictions of the consciences of the spiritually-strong: Notice the NEB translation of verse 23: EDUCATING THE CONSCIENCE
Let us, however, pose the question: how and by whom is such an individual condemned? Is he condemned by God according to His law? What would have been the nature of the condemnation whose end result could have seen a brother abandon the faith? To be sure, these "weak" Christians had a strong conviction of what was right and what God's will for them was, and acted according to their conscience, for whose sake they were unable, of themselves, to make any concessions. However, they had not yet grasped the fullness of the will of God and of His Word in this matter, had they? So Paul, in verse 14, gives them teaching of which he was persuaded "in the Lord Jesus" as part of the on-going process of helping them to develop consciences fully in accord with the Word of God.

Paul attests to this lack of complete enlightenment in the knowledge of God in his letter to the Corinthians, where the subject is similarly addressed:

So such a person would therefore be condemned by his own conscience. From distress and initial shock at another's ostentatious "enlightened" actions, they then violate their consciences and a situation for a potential spiritual disaster is set up: So their consciences were still being developed, enlightened, as to the complete will of God. Patience, mercy, understanding, edification were called for (these were brethren according to the will of God, not self-willed heretics!)-not judgement, criticism or pressure to conform. Therefore, as is so often the case, the logical step of ordering conformity was one that Paul avoided in Romans 14, no doubt realizing that any quick, forceful attempt to educate their consciences could well be disastrous. And sometimes it may even prove futile: Christ Himself took no further action after the rich young ruler was condemned by his conscience as covetous and an idolator (Mt 19:22; Mk 10:22; Lk 18:23).

So what is the lesson for us here? Simply that, in the interests of building each other up in our common faith, let us be considerate of the "weaker" consciences of our brothers and sisters and let us not, lest our actions result in offence, seek to impose upon them, by words or actions, directly or obliquely, the fullness of our understanding-our consciences-in particular matters that do not involve any violation of the Law of God. And if this is the teaching of the Scriptures even if our consciences are fully approved by God through His Word, how much more so should this be the case in matters where opinions and ideas are falsely or tenuously proffered as doctrine or expressions of a more enlightened "godliness"?
Paul reaffirms this in chapter 10 of this epistle, still dealing with meat offered to idols:

Let our example of love and deference, following a conscience approved by God, rather than any attempts to impose ourselves and our standards, ideas and opinions upon others, be what helps propel the consciences of our "weaker"-whether perceived or real-brothers and sisters towards full enlightenment as to the complete will of God in all aspects of their lives.

CONCLUSION
The conscience of each human being is God's testimony to Himself as Creator. He has endowed humanity with this capacity to discern between right and wrong and, through His Spirit and His Word, He affords each son and daughter of His the opportunity to develop the conscience further to the full measure of the knowledge of His will. Let us ensure that our consciences are good, pure, approved by God and not neglected or dead like the world's, or spiritually-seared, overridden and aborted. And in the community of the Church let us be mindful of the consciences of one another and conduct ourselves in deference to one another in pursuit of the good of each individual.

The testimony of the Spirit of God is also the testimony of our conscience.

If we are convicted by the conscience as were the multitudes on that Day of Pentecost, then there is only one action possible: Belief in the whole Gospel and repentance are the final, true, godly responses of a good conscience-a conscience convicted by the Faith of God.

Go back to our Home Page