THE BLOOD OF CHRIST
© Hubert Krause Additional Editing by Orest Solyma
The Church of God in Williamstown
WEB SITE: http://www.alphalink.com.au/~sanhub/index_.htm

INTRODUCTION
The Day of Atonement is one of the two Holy Days of God during which the blood of Jesus Christ is the subject of special emphasis. I would like to consider this subject in my message today.

BLOOD FOR BLOOD
God the great Life-giver, is also the great Defender of human life, a principle ingrained in His covenant with Noah:

God elaborates on this in the Book of Leviticus, explaining why blood must be shed for the blood of man: Shed blood is sacred; both the innocent blood of a human being made in the image of God, as well as that of any substitutionary animal sacrifice, which epitomized the life of the sacrificial victim.
Human blood that is spilt without cause demands vindication. In ancient Israel, even a domestic animal that had taken a human life was to be stoned to death in the upholding of this principle (Ex 21:28-32)! Shed innocent blood polluted the land and in turn required the shedding of blood as the means of forgiveness-to atone for, to cover, to remove the guilt, in order to avert wrath and death. This is the fullest and truest sense of meaning of the word 'atonement', as we shall see: The guilt of bloodshed has to be immediately addressed. Like the blood of righteous Abel, it cries out to God for vengeance and justice and curses all who are stained by it (Gen 4:10-11). This is why the martyrs of God are justified in demanding vengeance: God, who is perfectly just, who demands that all sin be dealt with and that all evil be accounted for, also demands justice-according to His definition-for all innocent blood shed.

THE GUILT OF INNOCENT BLOOD
Let us now go to the Book of Deuteronomy to see this principle further validated, by means of a parable, in the Law of God.

It is worth noting that the word "expiation" comes from a sixteenth-century word from Latin which gives the sense of removing guilt "through piety". This definition is inadequate, as we shall see, as are the definitions our language has for other words used in translating "atonement". They need therefore to be qualified.

When an innocent victim is found murdered, the community is faced with the possibility of great wrath from God because of the unexpiated blood (v 6-8). The pre-condition is that someone must accept responsibility in order to avert the divine wrath.
The community represents the world. The innocent man is Christ, and we are all guilty of His blood:

Humanity is collectively responsible for the shed blood of Jesus Christ, who has tasted death for us all (Heb 2:9). Like the elders of Israel, like the Church of God, the whole world must announce to God that it does not want to have this innocent blood held against it. But how?

By doing certain things that are themselves parabolic we might indeed see that the wages of sin is death, and that the gift of God is life. But is that gift unconditional? What is required before God forgives?

OUR "PROPITIATION" FROM GOD
Let us notice something of first importance about the blood of Jesus Christ:

The NIV footnote for the words "sacrifice of atonement" reads: "as the One who would turn aside His wrath". Christ is the "means or place of forgiveness", represented by the Mercy Seat, on which and before which the blood was sprinkled; He is the sacrifice that averts the divine wrath of God against sin. Unlike the innocent blood of Abel, which cried out to God for justice and retribution, His innocent blood offers us forgiveness and reconciliation-if we accept it in godly faith: The innocent blood of the Incarnate Son of God, like the innocent blood of the substitutionary animal sacrifices which typified His supreme sacrifice, is God's means of redeeming us from the wages of sin. "The LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." (Isa 53:6).

PURIFICATION BY BLOOD
The writer of the Book of Hebrews, alluding to the blood of Christ, tells us:

There is no forgiveness-universally-unless blood is shed. Someone has to pay!
Now let us notice verse 23: This purification is all-pervasive: the spiritual altar in the heavens, which is not pure, we are told by Job (Job 15:15), must also be cleansed.. Therefore, by accepting the blood of Christ: We need to rethink how the shed blood of the innocent Son of God cleanses our consciences. Do we know what it means to eat and drink of the Life of the Son of God? REJECTING THE ATONEMENT: JUDAS AND THE PHARISEES
As we have noted, the shed blood of His elect Son is precious to God (1 Pet 1:19). If it is rejected, God is insulted, and the curse of innocent blood shed but not expiated unleashes His wrath and vengeance: Judas Iscariot probably understood the Old Testament symbolism of innocent blood shed requiring vindication by blood, but He rejected the life being offered by the Son of God: The thirty pieces of silver which Judas was willing to accept as his price for betraying his Master was apparently, referring back to Ex 21:23, the standard price for a slave. Jesus Christ, the precious Lamb of God, the "Slave" or "Servant" of His Father (Isa 52:13), was treated like a human slave-yet His blood is precious and without price!
The commentaries seem to agree, from the Greek word translated "temple" above, that Judas, in his desperation, appeared to have hurled the coins into the sacred court of the priests; some of the money could have even reached the temple porch. The perverse religious protocol of the priests, more in accord with Talmudic traditions, forced them to regard the coins as 'holy' because they had landed in the sacred area, but they could not be put into one of the regular accounts. The innocent blood of the Son of God counted for nothing to them, but His ransom price was suddenly 'holy'! The reality, however, is that His ransom is holy. The irony is that the Jewish priests had no comprehension of that

Just as innocent blood shed cursed the land until the blood of the guilty was shed (Nu 35:33), so the rejection of the blood of the Son of God brings curses upon the generations of humankind until there is either an acceptance, through repentance and faith, of the only sacrifice that removes guilt, or the wrath of God to its full measure-and its result, the final death:

Luke amplifies this: This prophecy of Christ will continue to be fulfilled! Unless the Son of God is accepted as Redeemer (Jesus), and as Messiah (Christ), there can be no forgiveness or salvation.

THE VENGEANCE OF GOD
To curse God by willfully rejecting the shed blood of His Son leaves the wrath of God as the only alternative-the exacting of the penalty of death for guilt in the murder of the innocent Son of God!

The guilt of bloodshed was not accepted by the generation of Christ's day. The accountability for unrequited innocent blood was therefore imputed to, borne by, and passed onto subsequent generations until there is a righteous acceptance of guilt: This is the nature of the wrath of God to come. His vengeance upon the godless age that rejects Him and the blood sacrifice of His Son is depicted also as a symbol of blood: And God will repay blood with blood: So the type of prayer uttered by Nehemiah and Jeremiah has its place: CONCLUSION
The precious blood of the Son of God has not been shed in vain. Its acceptance means reconciliation to God and deliverance from His wrath, its rejection brings curses and the vengeance of God.

Go back to our Home Page