It seems that this series of messages -- THE LIFE
AND TEACHINGS OF JESUS CHRIST -- will prove to be elemental,
fundamental, vital, and the most demanding, the most challenging
of messages I've ever considered.
Why have I chosen Luke's Gospel narrative as the basic framework
for these studies? The answers are many, are strong, and will
unfold as we go along. But I am daunted by the awesomeness of
the task: Who dares to expound and explain the Life and Teachings
of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, sent into the world, rejected
by the world, misunderstood and misrepresented by the world, but
loved by over 22,000 variations of the Messenger
of God? Matt 24:4,5,24; Mk 13:22; 2Tim 3:13; 2Pet 2:1-3; Gal 1:6-9
and many other OT and NT Scriptures speak of the prevalence of
deceptions, false christs, and distortions of the true Gospel
(Rev 12:9). Who am I that I should attempt to explain the Gospel
Jesus Christ brought to all mankind? Yet I am compelled to attempt
to answer: Who is the real Jesus Christ? Who is the Son of Man?
Who is the Messiah? What did He and what does He really teach?
Idolatry (i.e., worship of a false god or gods) always
has been and continues to be the prevailing problem. It began
with Adam and Eve who listened to the god of this world, who himself
turned away from the Will of the true God as Isa 14:12,13 shows.
Gen 6:11,12 tells us that the whole civilization of the earth
had corrupted God's Way. Bible history is relentless in revealing
that idolatry is the problem throughout: this includes rebellion
against the Will of God (1Sam 15:23) and the whole concept of
covetousness, which is idolatry (Col 3:5; Eph 5:5; and see Job
31:24-28; 42:5-6 for further consideration of this problem of
evil). The last sin that is condemned in the Scriptures is that
of adding to and diminishing the Word of God, which results in
misrepresenting God and His Will, therefore a false god and false
gospel are offered (Rev 22:18,19). And my experience has also
includes that the last sin any church might consider is that their
god might be a false god. All of us must be ever alert to not
being idolaters (1Jn 5:21).
CHARACTERISTICS OF LUKE'S GOSPEL
Though Luke's name does not appear anywhere in the text of this
Gospel nor in Acts he is regarded by inferences from Col 4:14:
"Luke the beloved physician and Demas greet you", and
Philemon 24: "Mark, Aristarchus, Demas, Luke, my [i.e., Paul's]
fellow labourers", that he is very familiar with the earliest
teachers of the Gospel of Christ. There is uniform ancient testimony
that Luke was the author of this work. Two of the earliest attestations
of authorship are in The Muratorian Canon (probably a fragment
written not long after 155AD; see ANF, Vol. V; T&T Clark,
& Eerdmans; pp 603-4) which says Luke is the author and the
work is upheld by the Catholic Church. Irenaeus also (ca.
180AD) also affirms his authorship (see ANF, Vol 1; p 439; Irenaeus
Against Heresies, Bk III. XV. I).
Though the NIV gives three sets of dates of writing, viz., 59-63,
in the 70s, or in the 80s, (admittedly the NIV prefers the earlier
dating), it is my present conviction that both Luke and Acts were
written at about the same time (probably 61-63). The last two
verses of Acts: (28:30-1: Then Paul dwelt two whole years in his
own rented house [but still as a prisoner of Rome] and received
all who came to him, preaching the Kingdom of God
and teaching the things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ with
all confidence, no one forbidding him.) seem like an editorial
addition after the bulk of the work was completed. Luke was evidently
written first (See the Bible Study, Acts 28, especially
the latter part, Paul's Last Years, for further
details).
"Luke was probably a Gentile by birth, well educated in
Greek culture, a physician by profession, a companion of Paul
at various times from his second missionary journey to his first
imprisonment in Rome, and a loyal friend who remained with the
apostle after others had deserted (2Ti 4:11)." The enduring
loyalty of Luke to the apostle was surely encouraging: "for
Demas has forsaken me, having loved this present world
Only Luke is with me" (2Tim 4:10-11). Earlier in Paul's last
letter we hear of a massive desertion into heresy: "This
you know, that all those in Asia have turned away from me"
(2Tim 1:15). Luke seems to be one of those who loved Paul through
thick and thin.
Scholars are consistent in telling us that Luke had an outstanding
command of Greek. He expresses sensitivity about geography and
culture which is revealed in use of vocabulary to reflect location
and customs of the day. His writing has literary excellence and
historical detail. He uses Latin, Hellenic, and Aramaic idiom
as he sees appropriate. Luke was practising in his literary skills
a key approach of Paul's: "I have become all things to all
men" (1Cor 9:22).
Characteristic themes include: recognition of Gentiles as well
as Jews in God's Plan; emphasis on prayer; joy at the announcement
of the Gospel; special concern for women, children, and family;
and special interest in the poor.
FROM THE NRSV (the HarperCollins Study Bible; annotated
edition by the Society of Biblical Literature; 1993)
SATAN'S RULE IN THE WORLD
We'll continue with the characteristics of the Gospel of Luke
as in the NRSV Study Bible:
JERUSALEM'S ROLE
We'll briefly look at some of these Scriptures since Jerusalem,
prophesied as being a stumbling block to the nations, as will
also be the people of God (Zech 12:2-3; Isa 8:14; Dan 11:32,33).
A Gospel is a theological narrative about Jesus Christ.
It teaches us the truth about the Son of God and gives us His
teachings, which He was given by His Father (Please see
John 5:19,20; 6:29,33,44,45,57; 8:28; 14:24, et al).
From Darrell L. Bock (LUKE: A
Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament; 1994; VOLUME
I [LUKE 1:1-9:50]; VOLUME II [LUKE 9:51-24:53]). This is a
huge work (over 2000 pages) which is the result of 13 years of
effort by a scholar who regards the Gospel of Luke as his favourite.
He says that Luke is the longest book in the NT and tells us
what first-century customs and thinking were like. He not only
introduces Jesus and his ministry, but also shows how that ministry
relates to the early church era. He also lays the foundation for
many of the issues whose answers come in Acts. Our studies
will verify this very strongly. And I'll probably refer more to
this two-volume work. I'll use his scholarship to point out various
major errors scholars make, and that he does also. In the process
we should learn even more how to heed with far more exactitude
and care, and how to verifiably interpret the Scriptures.
MATTHEW, MARK, LUKE, JOHN -- How are they different?
Matthew 1:1-2 The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ
(What kind of genealogy is Matthew really interested in? Only
the physically accurate?), the Son of God (which is not in
the original Greek), the son of David (who was alive
about 1000 years before Jesus; Joseph was His father by human
records), the son of Abraham (Abraham died over 800 years
before David. So the genealogical interest from the first verse
is in the prophetic promises given to the one who is the Father
of many nations, the Father of the Faithful, and in the significance
of the promises about the Throne of David, which is not a wooden
chair in a pagan cathedral, nor a stone invented by Irish legend.
All the promises are brought together by Jesus Christ the Son
of God [Rev 3:14 in NKJ, NASB, RSV; Prov 30:4; Heb 1:8,9; Jn 1:14,18
{monogenes Theos [God], not monogenes hios [son]}).
2 Abraham begot Isaac, Isaac begot Jacob, and Jacob begot Judah
and his brothers (The Bible frequently speaks of the God of Abraham,
Isaac, and Jacob, and of the promises given them - who are all
our spiritual fathers (Rom 4:16; Isa 51:2; 1Thess 2:11; 1Cor 4:15-17;
Heb 11;40). They are our spiritual fathers if we worship the same
GOD they worshipped and the same Christ they all came to know
(Gen 22; 32; Gal 3:8; Heb 11:10,39,40).
Mark 1:1 The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, the
Son of God.
Luke is different again. His scientific caution, his methodical
calm is clear:
John's account is the last, probably written some 15 years after
the destruction of Jerusalem. He had very likely read all the
previous accounts. His account challenges the core of heresy that
is rampant and flourishing: Who really is Jesus Christ? What is
the relationship of the Father and the Son of God?
Scholars will admit that this translation and word order does
not misrepresent the NT Greek of Jn 1:1-2. But there are endless
and lengthy arguments as to why this cannot be. The primary motivation
is that this contradicts the dogma of the trinity.
Let's again notice the differences as revealed by the opening
statements in the four Gospels.
Mark gives no introduction but directly tells us that he
is concentrating on the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and strengthens
this impact in verses 14-15: Now after John was put in prison,
Jesus came to Galilee, preaching the gospel, 15 and saying, "The
time is fulfilled, and the Kingdom of God is at hand. Repent,
and believe the Gospel."
Luke is very clear that he is about to give a very careful
and thoroughly accurate, chronological account of the life and
teachings of Jesus Christ.
John is markedly different. He starts with the heavenly
history of Christ's origins, and that approach is maintained throughout.
I again ask readers to carefully consider Jn 20:17; Rev 1:6; 3:12,21;
5:9,10.
It seems that each builds on the previous work or works. Since
there is no biblical statement that these gospels are sequential
and in the order as listed in the NT canon, we have to turn in
part to early historical evidence. All early references that are
currently available list the books in the current order given.
Irenaeus makes an interesting comment (Irenaeus Against Heresies,
Bk III, XI,8) and says that the order of the Gospels is comparable
to the order of the Cherubim: the Lion, Matthew
(see Rev 5:5; Hos 11:10; Gen 49:8-10); the Ox, Mark
(see Rev 4:6; Dt 33:17; Num 29:13ff; Ps 22:12; Jer 52:20); the
Man, Luke (see Gen 3:24; Heb 9:5; 1Ki 7:27-9,35-6; Ezk
1:4-28); the Eagle, John (Ex 19:4; Rev 12:14; Rev
4:7; Ezk 1:10; 10:14).
Additional Anticipations in Luke
Gentiles are included in the Plan of God as God's people. The
apostle Paul develops this much further, and it should be recalled
that Luke was a working companion with the apostle. So it is apparent
that Luke will help us develop a healthy world view of the life
and teachings of Jesus, the Son of God.
The Jewish nation, which received the Gospel first, responded
negatively in the main. And it is quite disturbing to find that
the primary persecutors of Christians in NT times, as Acts makes
abundantly clear, were religious Jews. The lesson for us is: the
coming persecutions will be primarily from those who know us and
say they love us (Matt 10:34-9; Mic 7:5-7; Dan 11:30b,32). The
Church did not separate itself from Israel, but the Jews forced
Christians away. The story of Hagar and Sarah which parallels
Sinai and Mt Zion is instructive on this (Gal 4:22-31).
Luke deals with the resurrected Christ in lots of detail and this
is further developed in Acts. How can a Church preach the Gospel
in the absence of the Leader? Faith and the Power of God are wonderful
features (See Lk 1:15,17,35,41,46-7,67-8,80; 2:25-7,32,40,52;
3:16,22; 4:1,14,18-9).
Luke explains what it means to live in a community and be a disciple
in the face of hatred and open hostility. Yet the Christian continually
grows in the grace and knowledge of Jesus Christ. The Way of Life
revealed was promised in the OT, and its external impacts were
reflected in the lives and events of the patriarchs, prophets,
and other mighty saints of the OT. The kind of hostility that
murdered the Righteous One, the Anointed Son of God, His brothers
and sisters can continue to expect like resistance if their lives
are as His (Matt 5:48; 1Jn 2:6).
FROM THE NIV
The editors and contributors to the NIV Study Bible have presented
a large amount of material in addition to the translation/interpretation
of the biblical text. Luke and Acts were regarded by some very
early commentators as a single work in two volumes (cp. Lk 1:1-4;
Acts 1:1-2).
God's will and reign are at work in human history, in contention
with the collusion of human and demonic powers against God's "holy
servant Jesus".
Let's look at some evidence of this because Luke is acutely aware
of the power of the rule of Satan in civilization. Luke does help
us in having a larger world view with God's perspective.
Lk 22:1-6 Now the Feast of Unleavened Bread drew near,
which is called Passover (Here is an example of the kind of care
Luke wants us to note. Jewish custom and tradition called the
entire period "Passover" [cp. Mk 14:1; Matt 26:1 which
reveal further ambiguity about Jewish tradition]). 2 The chief
priests and the scribes sought how they might kill Him, for they
feared the people (How inexplicably extraordinary that men who
spend their lives studying, living, teaching what appears to be
the Word of God should plot to murder the Son of God. The perverse
logic of this shows that this attitude then hates and conspires
against all who follow the true Son of God). 3 Then Satan
(other references to Satan in Luke are: 4:1-13; 10:18;
11:18; 13:16) entered Judas, surnamed Iscariot,
(This is the only place in the Gospels that says this. We should
note that there was no recognition among the eleven apostles that
Satan had possessed Judas [Ps 35:4-8; 41:9; 69:22-28; 109:14-20])
who was numbered among the Twelve (He was called to
be one of the 12 - this son of perdition! [Jn 17:12; 6:70; 2Thess
2:3; Rev 13:11]).
There is more in Luke's writing that exposes the power of evil.
Immediately following the mighty events of Pentecost (probably
Sunday, 26th May, 30AD; F.F. Bruce in his New Testament
History [Doubleday; 1980; p 188] says: The last feast which
brought Jesus to Jerusalem was the Passover of early April in
A.D. 30. The U.S. Naval Observatory has tables available on
Internet [http://riemann.usno.navy.mil/AA/data/docs/SpringPhenom.html]
which confirm these conclusions: Tuesday night 4th April was Abib
14th in 30AD) this follows:
4 So he went his way and conferred with the chief priests and
captains, how he might betray Him to them. (How would Judas betray
Him? Betrayal suggests that the enemy does not recognize who they
seek. Christ was well-known and surely was readily recognizable
to those who sought to kill Him). 5 And they were glad, and agreed
to give him money. 6 So he promised and sought opportunity
to betray Him to them in the absence of the multitude.
(Cowardice, deception, treachery, false accusations are prime
characteristics of the ways of Satan [Rev 12:9]. But let's notice
that the conspirators were conscious of support for Jesus Christ.
Their approach and propaganda intents required that Jesus be arrested
when minimal support was around, and that there be demonical opportunity
to manipulate opinion against the Son of God).Acts 3:1-9 Now Peter and John went up together to the temple
at the hour of prayer, the ninth hour (3p.m.). 2
And a certain man lame from his mother's womb was carried, whom
they laid daily at the gate of the temple which is called Beautiful
(the gate entrance into the Court of Women directly in front of
the exterior altar), to ask alms from those who entered the temple
(Presumably a good location as people are in a supposedly good
frame of mind to help the needy - a vital aspect of true religion);
3 who, seeing Peter and John about to go into the temple, asked
for alms. 4 And (Peter) fixing his eyes on him, with John, Peter
said, "Look at us." (One might suppose that here was
the 40-year old cripple, tired at the latter part of the day,
holding out his container for gifts of money, and too weary to
look up at passers-by. Peter asked him to look up). 5 So he gave
them his attention, expecting to receive something from them.
6 Then Peter said, "I do not have any silver or gold (money),
but what I do have I give you: In the Name of Jesus Christ the
Nazarene, rise up and walk." (What inspired Peter to respond
like this?) 7 And Peter took him by the right hand and lifted
him up (Would a man who has been unable to stand for so long know
how to stand, comprehend that he has the strength to stand up,
have the faith to accept Peter's words?) and immediately his feet
and ankle bones received strength. 8 So he, leaping up (in enraptured
joy and disbelief swept away), stood (savouring the joy of noting
"I'm actually standing!") and walked (and he savoured
that totally new experience) and entered the temple with them
-- walking, leaping, and praising God (in exultation, over-flowing
exuberance, and gratitude). 9 And all the people saw him walking
and praising God.
Notice how things develop as a result of the godly expressions
of Truth and evidence of the works of God through the Holy Spirit,
the power of God (Lk 1:35; 2Cor 13:4):
Acts 4:1 Now as they (Peter and John in that late afternoon)
spoke to the people, the priests, the captain of the temple, and
the Sadducees came upon them, 2 being greatly disturbed that they
taught the people and preached (that) in (the Name of) Jesus the
resurrection from the dead (is God's promise). 3 And they laid
hands on them (How incongruous that two men should be arrested
for doing the work of God!), and put them in custody until the
next day, for it was already evening (about 6pm or a little later).
4 However, many of those who heard the Word believed; and the
number of the men came to be about five thousand. 5 And it came
to pass, on the next day, that their rulers, elders, and scribes,
6 as well as Annas the high priest, Caiaphas, John, and Alexander,
and as many as were of the family of the high priest, were gathered
together at Jerusalem (All these were held in high esteem by the
religious public and all are conspirators against the Son of
God! Do we comprehend the enormity of evil in that religious leaders,
avowedly honouring God, but with hidden hypocrisy, lead in the
plot to murder The Son of God [Ps 2:2-6; 35:4-8,26]? These men
with their fine outward appearances continue with their perversity):
7 And when they had set them in the midst, they asked, "By
what Power or by what Name have you done this?" 8 Then Peter,
filled with the Holy Spirit, said to them, "Rulers of the
people and elders of Israel: 9 If we this day are judged for a
good deed done to a helpless man, by what means he has
been made well, 10 let it be known to you all, and to all the
people of Israel, that by the Name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth
(the Greek has, the Nazarene), whom you crucified,
whom God raised from the dead, by Him this man stands here before
you whole. 11 (Peter does not let up, but continues to dominate
with the power of God): This is 'the Stone which was rejected
by you builders, which has become the Chief Cornerstone.'
(We should note that Peter says, citing Ps 118:22 that they are
the builders! What a powerful condemnation!) 12 Nor is
there salvation in any other, for there is no other Name
under heaven given among men by which we must be saved" (But
there are more than 22,000 variations of that Name). 13 Now when
they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they
were uneducated and untrained men, they marveled.
Peter and John did not graduate from the schools they went to.
Similarly, the saints who are of God, are to confound the mighty
(1Cor 1:27-8; Dan 11:32-3). This is an integral part of my motive
in working for those who want to turn to the true God and emulate
the Son of God.
13b And they realized that they had been with Jesus.
These religious knew they couldn't afford to teach people to become
great. They didn't want people who paid their wages to grow too
strong in Spirit and in Truth! This is a too prevalent a characteristic
of the ministries of various churches. It would seem one has to
conclude that it is better to serve the man and be subservient
to the man than to serve God and do the Will of the Almighty God!
14 And seeing the man who had been healed standing with them,
they could say nothing against it.
Yes, one can still deny the Power of God, as they did. One can
have a godly religion, but deny the Power of God (2Tim
3:5).
15 But when they had commanded them to go aside out of the (Sanhedrin)
council, they conferred among themselves, 16 saying, "What
shall we do to these men? For, indeed, that a notable miracle
has been done through them is evident to all who dwell in Jerusalem,
and we cannot deny it (But in public the facts were denied. Hypocrisy
thrives in the dark!) 17 But so that it spreads no further
among the people, let us severely threaten them, that from now
on they speak to no man in this Name."
How I identify with this! The reason I was fired by the Worldwide
Church of God and the United Church of God is because I preach
the Son of God as described in the Scriptures and not a christ
who is in the imaginations of men. The binitarianism that too
many uphold, i.e., God the Father and the Son of God are co-equal
and co-eternal, is unscriptural, illogical, and philosophically
absurd. These people, who do not think about the meaning of what
they believe, are blinded to the fact that they worship two gods.
They do not know the meaning of "There is one GOD" [Eph
4:6; 1Tim 2:5]. The very few who cite Scriptures they do not understand
and supposedly contradicting what I believe refuse to explain
the key and simple Scriptures which contradict their biblically
misinformed minds (e.g., Jn 20:17; Eph 1:3; Rev 1:6; Prov 30:4).
Can you coherently explain these few Scriptures just given?
18 And they called them and commanded them not to speak at all
nor teach in the Name of Jesus. 19 But Peter and John answered
and said to them, "Whether it is right in the sight of God
to listen to you more than to God, you judge (Of course they outwardly
say they obey God rather than men, but the reality is otherwise).
20 For we (the servants of God) cannot but speak the things which
we have seen and heard." 21 So when they had further threatened
them, they let them go, finding no way of punishing them, because
of the people, since they all glorified God for what had been
done. 22 For the man was over forty years old on whom this miracle
of healing had been performed. 23 And being let go, they went
to their own companions and reported all that the chief
priests and elders had said to them.
The gathered disciples give praise and glory and honour to God:
24 So when they heard that, they raised their voice to God with
one accord and said: "Lord, You are God, who made
heaven and earth and the sea, and all that is in them, 25 who
by the mouth of Your servant David have said (in Ps 2): 'Why did
the nations rage, and the people plot vain things? 26 The
kings of the earth took their stand, and the rulers
were gathered together against the LORD and against His
Christ' (the Anointed - the One anointed by His Father to do what
the Son did and is doing). 27 For truly against Your holy Servant
Jesus, whom You anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, with
the Gentiles and the people of Israel, were gathered together."
Anti-Semitic feelings and hatreds, because Jews are regarded as
"God-killers" are totally unfounded and anti-biblical.
All of us, of whatever race, are guilty of sin, and hence responsible
for the death of Jesus Christ, our Redeemer. It is Satan who deceives
the nations, bringing them into ruin (Isa 14:12), and it is the
Devil who leads the efforts to destroy Truth and those who uphold
the Truth (1Jn 5:19; Rev 12:9; 6:9,10; 13:15; 17:6).
Jesus' contemporaries are also depicted as not understanding
the character of the conflict (see Eph 6:12; Rev 12:9 -- the
conflicts are Satan inspired). ... The story is a fascinating
and dire depiction of how conquered people are divided or even
pitted against each other. ... Since Luke's story of Jesus emphasizes
the fulfillment of the Scriptures, it is not surprising to find
the narrative full of scriptural allusions. However, Matthew
has the largest number of OT quotations of all the NT writings.
It is Matthew's Gospel, as the first of the NT works, which of
necessity reveals the comprehensive interconnections of NT and
the OT.
FROM THE NJB (Standard Edition, 1985; a Catholic
translation with extensive annotations).
The third Gospel's distinguishing quality results from the
attractive personality of its author which shines through all
his work. Luke is at once a most gifted writer and a man of marked
sensibility. ... Luke is able to bring out one of his chief theological
notions: namely that the Holy City is the predestined stage
for the drama of salvation (See 9:30-1; 13:33-5; 18:31-3;
21:20-1; 24:44-53; Zech 12:2; Dan 11:45; Rev 11:7-8; 21:1-2).
How interesting that a vision should reveal to us that Moses and
Elijah knew that the Messiah would die in Jerusalem. Moses had
never been there.
Luke 9:30-1 And behold, two men talked with Him, who were Moses
and Elijah, 31 who appeared in glory and spoke of His decease
which He was about to accomplish at Jerusalem.
Luke 13:33-5 "Nevertheless I must journey today, tomorrow,
and the day following; for it cannot be that a prophet should
perish outside of Jerusalem (Jesus and the apostles had to
keep very busy, moving frequently, to avoid being arrested before
the time, as foreknown by God and revealed to His Son [Acts 2:23;
Lk 9:51]). 34 O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the one who
kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her!
(How strange that the City of Peace, the city symbolic of the
best that God offers, the city representative of godly government,
the city to which all the world will turn, is also representative
of the worst: "spiritually called Sodom and Egypt" [Rev
11:8]). How often I wanted to gather your children together, as
a hen gathers her brood under her wings, but you
were not willing! 35 See! Your house (The brand new and fabulous
Temple - as described in Matt 24:1; Mk 13:1; Lk 21:5) is left
to you desolate (But it was busy; there was financial support;
people flocked there on the Holy Days; the religious leadership
structure was extensive; but Christ's perception was that
it was spiritually desolated!) and assuredly, I say to you, you
shall not see Me until the time comes when you say, "Blessed
is He who comes in the Name of the LORD!" (i.e., The Son
of God returns in the Name of His God and Father [Jn 20:17; Rev
1:6; 3:12,21; 5:9,10; 20:6]).
Luke 18:31-3 Then He took the twelve aside and said to them, "Behold,
we are going up to Jerusalem, and all things that are written
by the prophets concerning the Son of Man will be accomplished.
32 For He will be delivered to the Gentiles and
will be mocked and insulted and spit upon. 33 They will scourge
and kill Him. And the third day He will rise again."
(Both Jews and Gentiles are guilty of the death of the Son of
God. The wages of sin is death, and all have sinned. Christ has
purchased us all by His own blood).
Just prior to the 70AD destruction vast numbers flooded into the
city to help in the siege. Furthermore, the additional factors
mentioned by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and Daniel show that there is
to be an end time capture of the city from the Jewish people.
Lk 21:24 tells us that "Jerusalem will be trampled by Gentiles
until the times of the Gentiles are fulfilled," i.e., the
city is captured because the whole world, under Gentile control,
turns against the last geo-political resistance of prophetic significance
(Zech 14:2; Rev 11:2,8-10; Dan 8:13). Either before or shortly
after the Passover season I'll give a fairly comprehensive coverage
of prophecy using Luke 21 as the basis for the sequence of prophetic
events.Luke 21:20-1 But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies (That
occurred in 66, 68, and 70AD; and it will occur in the future),
then know that its desolation is near. 21 Then let those who are
in Judea flee to the mountains, let those who are in the midst
of her depart, and let not those who are in the country enter
her.
We are told here that there is a tripartite division to the OT:
Genesis to Deuteronomy, the prophetic books, and what is otherwise
known as the Hagiographa, or the Writings, i.e., the poetic works
with Chronicles being last in the OT canon.
Luke 24:44-53 Then the resurrected Jesus Christ said to them at
His last miraculous appearance, "These are the words
which I spoke to you while I was still with you, that all things
must be fulfilled which were written in the Law of Moses and the
Prophets and the Psalms concerning Me."
45 And He opened their understanding, that they might comprehend
the Scriptures (probably hours of teaching and reviewing Scriptures
from Genesis, including the Psalms, Isaiah, Zechariah, and many
other OT works). 46 Then He said to them, "This is how it
was written, and so it was necessary for the Christ to suffer
and to rise from the dead the third day (No OT Scripture directly
prophesied this other than parabolically interpreting Jonah [Matt
12:39,40; Lk 11:29]), 47 and that repentance and remission of
sins should be preached in His Name to all nations (down through
history), beginning at Jerusalem. 48 You are witnesses of these
things. 49 Behold, I'm sending the Promise of My Father upon you;
but stay in the city of Jerusalem until you are endued with Power
from on High." 50 And He led them out as far as Bethany (on
the N.E. side of the Mount of Olives on the road to Jericho),
and He lifted up His hands and blessed them (Examples of blessing
are: Gen 48 and 49; Ps 134; Prov 31:28; Rev 1:3). 51 Now it came
to pass, while He blessed them, that He was parted from them and
carried up into heaven. 52 And they worshipped Him, and returned
to Jerusalem with great joy, 53 and were continually in the temple
praising and blessing the God (Gk ton Theon, which
only refers to the Father; the normal use of Theos, Theo, Theou
has no definite article, whereas Theon does have the
definite article, the).
Continuing again with other references to the characteristics
of Luke's Gospel:
An Introduction to the New Testament (Raymond E
Brown; Doubleday; 1996) is by a renowned Catholic scholar and
his comments include:
This is the longest of the four Gospels ... for it was originally
joined to Acts as part of a two-volume work that in length constitutes
over one quarter of the NT--a magnificent narrative that blends
together the story of Jesus and that of the early church. ...
perhaps more than any other Gospel the story is intrinsic to the
theology (p 225).
Why do we have four Gospels? Would not one accurate one be enough?
What are their essential differences? There are many scholarly
arguments about supposed inconsistencies and differences that
expose errors amongst the Gospels. Admittedly there are differences.
These, as I'll show, are of emphasis and purpose. This can be
illustrated by looking at the first verses of each which reveal
profoundly different approaches.
The Greek word for beginning is arche and is without
an article (a, or the). In fact this introductory remark
has no verb. It is not so much a sentence as a headline - a headline
loudly proclaiming Mark's intentions in the record he gives us.
The headline would probably be better put: Beginning the
Gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. Mark then, in
verses 14,15 of chapter one enthusiastically and boldly says:
14 Now after John the Baptist was put in prison, Jesus came to
Galilee, preaching the Gospel of the Kingdom of God, 15 and saying,
"The time is fulfilled, and the Kingdom of God is at hand.
Repent, and believe in the Gospel!"
Mark's narrative emphasizes more of what Christ did rather than
what He said. He also leaves the impression that godliness brings
persecution and suffering.
Luke 1:1-2 Inasmuch as many have taken in hand to set out
in order a narrative of those things which are most surely believed
among us (So in Luke's day there were many accounts of the life
and teachings of Jesus Christ. We can see how much has survived
by the Will of God), 2 just as those who from the beginning were
eyewitnesses and ministers of the word delivered them to us (Luke
admits he was not an eyewitness but he spoke to eyewitnesses,
and key ministers of the Gospel and of course he knew Paul very
well. That is the nature of his record of the Gospel).
John 1:1-2 (I shall render the first two verses in the
Greek word order that scholars still argue about how to interpret.
The bias of the trinity dogma forces the interpretative word order
the vast majority of Bibles now have): In the beginning
(Gk en arche; i.e., in a beginning) In a
beginning was the Word, and the Word was with (the) God (ton
Theon), and God (Theos; no article,
hence a God is a possible translation) was the Word.
2 This One was in a beginning with the God (ton
Theon).
Matthew is concerned that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.
Jesus is of the Royal House of David. So can there be another
inheritor to the Throne? No! Jesus is the son of Abraham,
who is the father of the faithful, and we must note that the Scriptures
frequently speak of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Hence
the promises of the OT fill Matthew's work. Matthew has more OT
references than any other NT work. Matthew also has 30 references
to the Son of Man (Luke has 25; Mark has 13; John has 11).
Luke-Acts highlights God's Plan (Acts 2:38-9: Repentance, baptism,
forgiveness of sins, receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit, and
the promise includes children and those scattered all over the
earth who are called; and Acts 3:19-21: Repentance, forgiveness,
the times of refreshing promised by the Coming of Jesus Christ,
and the Restoration foretold by all the prophets but who understands?).
These promises are given to the whole world even though the Jerusalem-Judaea
focus is grounded in the promises given to Israel. Too often it
is forgotten that the seemingly physical promises
do not fully stack up with Scripture when these are carefully
examined. Exodus 19:4-6 is a paramount example. Here is
the promise of creating a Royal Priesthood (and restated in the
NT: Rev 5:10; 3:21; 2:26; 1Pet 2:5,9), only possible through Jesus
Christ, and made according to the Old Covenant (Ex 24:6-8). What
do those who say that the Old Covenant is totally abolished say
about this? They do not bring this into their spurious theological
assumptions.