PART FIVE:

1984!!

The quotations that appear at the end of this section are instrumental in the direction of overcoming the liberal/totalitarian cosmopolitan culture-distortion and falsification of history. Over the past two thousand years, there have been many inquisitions practicing intellectual and physical terror – particularly against non-liberal, non-cosmopolitan intellectuals.

These terrorists have re-written every ideology, philosophy or theology for mass consumption in 1984-fashion (except that ‘1984’ began centuries ago). ). They have tried to deceive scholars in all areas into accepting philosophies which are contrary to Historical Fact and Natural Law or Sanskrit Dharma.(For a definition of dharma, refer to Frithjof Schuon, Castes And Races

The cosmopolitan levellers were the outcasts from every race, nation, people and culture within the Levant and later on the European Continent. They are the refuse of the whole human species. They represent the tactical coalescence of this waste into a single power bloc transcending all political/religious/economic doctrine, which today can be defined per Wilmot Robertson's The Dispossessed Majority, as the global 'liberal/minority coalition'. This element constitutes Nietzsche’s "Chandala" or Marx’s "lumpen-proletariat" (except most of them are not proletarian, but just ‘lumpen’; Lumpen is the German word for rags). They exist in every economic stratum of society. They are simultaneously the symptom of decay while also being the agents for further decomposition. This element centuries ago under the leadership of intelligent matoid individuals assumed the control of the covert world of secret societies and through clandestine machinations overturned the Natural Order. Their delusion has continually been the reduction of humanity to mindless conformity (biological, cultural, social etc.). The contemporary cosmopolitan mass society devoid of ethnic or social variation is the outcome of their work.

Even so, their machinations have failed; across the world we are witnessing the re-emergence of social, economic, philosophic ideas which manifest in a host of neo-tribalist ideologies. (Refer to The Social Revolutionary Nature of Australian Nationalism) Certainly ‘Dharma’ may have been frustrated in the past, and still could be, by pollutants, non-degradable chemical weapons or nuclear warfare, but Nature always has a habit of re-asserting itself. In that context, the New Age perspective is of importance.

The cosmopolitan-levellers had/have parasitically attached themselves to every Western (and via the West to the global scene) philosophy etc (as above) to distort it so as to make it all but impossible to detach the original article from the distorted forms.

The Hermetic, Magian, Essene Christianity (i.e. the theosophy of Joshua Ben Pandera or Jesus of Nazareth) is one example; classical liberal democratic republicanism and Marxism are two more. The idea of Republican Democracy (as practiced by its creators in the ancient world of Greece and Rome) saw its finest rendition in Plato’s ideal of THE STATE.

Indeed, EVERY great Caucasian in history has had his ideals recast into liberal-cosmopolitan forms, as mere "pre-history" to the new sick creed. It has been true for all races. Non-existent ("humane") Negroid civilizations have been conjured up (Ethiopians were originally Hamitic-Caucascoids; Zimbabweans were Semitic Caucascoids; Hanibal of Carthage was not black, since his Phoenician Semite features have been preserved in a bust) to show that all races are "the same" with similar ideals. Even in Australia, the discovery of RUINS of Caucasian origin (possibly the lost Lemuria) have been misrepresented to assert that our Aborigines were the bearers of yet another High Culture. We may refer to the research of Rex Gilroy for Australia and Kerry Bolton of P.O. Box 1627 Paraparaumu Beach, New Zealand, for Oceania; we can also note the book, Ancient Celtic New Zealand (De Danann Publishers P.O. Box 300111 Albany, Auckland, New Zealand), and the report in the New Zealand Dominion newspaper, January 11 2000. In fact these things are more proof for a continuous Europid presence and technological achievement in this region.

The principles of ethnocentrism (i.e. the desire to preserve the biological and cultural identity of an ethnic group) and nationalism have been presented as the monopoly of fascism. Ostensibly these ideals lead to concentration camps. In fact, these ideals were held by pre-cosmopolitan socialism, even early Marxism and the philosophers of the Enlightenment. The endless list of Enlightenment liberal or democratic thinkers and their followers in the 19^th Century would include Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Lincoln, Mazzini, Garibaldi, Albert Schweitzer etc. If for example, we were to take a cursory look at The Nationalism Reader, (NJ: Humanities Press, 1995, Prometheus Press, 1999) we would confirm for ourselves the transcendental nature of nationalism and ethnocentrism in all its' variations. Ethnocentrism is no preserve of the Indo-European race either. Japanese, Chinese and Vietnamese thinkers have accepted the realities of the organic unity of race, nation and culture. Today, these races PRACTISE the principle openly. Further, to hold such views need not preclude one from the possession of a humanitarian impulse as the quotations from Lincoln and Schweitzer may illustrate.

Democracy, ancient or modern is similar here. As we know the liberal ideal was "captured" by plutocracy in the 19^th Century and began to inveigh against the authoritarian and ethnocentric views of the early Democrats. Their views varied greatly from those of that father of Democratic ideology – J-J Rousseau (as my quotations show).

Both the French and American Revolutions held to an authoritarian, populist, meritocratic Ideal which was their very definition of Democracy. Both the French and American Presidents had and still have quasi-dictatorial powers. Under the Australian Constitution, the Governor-General has similar powers and is in effect – President under a different label.

The term "Dictator" is Roman in origin. In times of crisis, the Roman Senate would appoint a person to resolve the matter, a man with unlimited power for a set time over certain aspects of policy. The Dictator (he who governs by decree of ‘diktat’ could be a ‘Princep’ (first or principal among peers) and often Pontifex Maximus (a high-priest, yes, but a sort of bridge between man and his gods, the custodian of the spirituality of the traditions of the Roman State). He could be a ‘Hero’ and demi-god himself like Octavian (or Augustus), a divine Caesar. A New Age philosophy would recognize such persons as OVER-MEN; in this case they arose on Democratic soil.

In these capacities, "dictators" would unite the Spiritual (i.e. ideological, philosophic, cultural) and Temporal powers as to create an official State Religion, or in our modern parlance, state ideology. The political/historical function so exercised roughly equates Plato’s goal of a Philosopher-King.

Contrary to popular opinion, neither Julius Caesar nor Augustus were ever "emporers" in the way that Romans despised (i.e. Rex, or king, hereditary leaders), but rather they were "imperators", or victorious generals, strongmen, protectors, similar to the Greek "hegemon". There were many Roman imperators and not all of them were heads of state in the capacities of Dictator or Princep, but rather as acknowledged soldiers of proven success.

Naturally the Roman Senate often conferred the title of Princep or Dictator on a successful military commander who as imperators rose to be heads of state. This position of "Imperium" is not similar to the power enjoyed by our decadent "nobility" – the Saxe-Coburgs, the Hohenzollerns, the Hapsburgs, the Bourbons, Romanovs, or Savoyards. The imperator carries the "odour" of the populist/meritocratic tradition of a man like Bonaparte. As a victorious general and master of statecraft (like Cromwell), he emulated the Roman tradition and rose from Consul to a dictatorship; he practiced his meritocratic populism throughout the time of his power. (Refer to Thomas Carlyle, "The Hero As King" in Heroes And Hero Worship.)

Bonapartism is Oswald Spengler’s Western case of "Caesarism". It is Voltaire’s "hob nail boot" against the effeminate aristocrat’s "silken slipper".

Authoritarianism transcends fascism completely. It is an aspect of Democracy, Socialism, Republicanism, and certainly Communism. In classical Marxism the "tailist" proletariat "need" the greater consciousness of their "vanguard" and the system becomes the DICTATORSHIP of the Proletariat.

Of course the movement for the rebirth of Traditional mores all over this planet (in "revolt against the modern world", to invoke Julius Evola) desires its ethical-socialist state to embody neither the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie nor the dictatorship of the proletariat. It intends to implement the "State of the Whole People". Its governing stratum will be drawn from all social classes and adherents of different philosophies or even religions; but government must be based on MERIT defined as the proven nobility of purpose combined with practical political solutions. In our national case we would demand a TOTAL commitment to the Social Republican state and to the Australian People’s Commonwealth. (Note: the term ‘Commonwealth’ was taken originally from the term used by Cromwell to describe his ‘Protectorate’) Where practical ability is divorced from nobility of mind, insufferable oppression results; and where noble intentions are divorced from practical skills (real-politik) and application (i.e. if pedantism or mania emerge) then such a society so afflicted cannot function and inevitably disintegrates.

The stewardship of holistic purpose would be one characteristic of the ethical-socialist state. Its elite would approximate Nietzsche’s new nobility or Plato’s ‘Guardians' or "Protectors’. It should over time reflect the Natural Aristocracy of a society and necessarily remain open to recruitment by merit. Before the distortion of the term by the Nazis, we could have referred to such a society as "Aryan" in form (arya being the Indo-European word for "noble" Refer to Julius Evola, Revolt Against The Modern World). This is the essence of our mission within the geo-political context of Oceania ( a new Lemuria??). This is the imperative of our Nation’s "OVER-SELF".

"History is only the patter of silken slippers descending the stairs to the thunder of hob-nail boots coming up."

Voltaire.

"Were there a people of gods, their government would be democratic.So perfect a government is not made for man."

Rousseau. (Note: it should be remembered that at one stage in his life Rousseau proposed to write a biography of Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun whom he had met in Switzerland and whom he regarded with classical deference)

"Communism is aristocratic not democratic …. only philosophers and soldiers are capable of it."

Plato.

The following statement is from the American Democrat Senator, Robert Latham Owen (1856 - 1947), whose social and monetary reform goals were partly inspired by his British name-sake, the utopian socialist and factory owner Robert Owen's (1771 - 1858), communitarian experiments in Britain and America - an example of which was the New Harmony Colony on the borders of Illinois and Indiana.

"It was not very long until this information was brought to the Rothschild's Bank, and they saw that here was a nation ready to be exploited; here was a nation that had been setting up an example that they could issue their own money in place of the money coming through the banks. The Rothschild Bank caused a Bill to be introduced into the English Parliament, therefore, which provided that no Colony of England could issue their own money. They had to use English money. Consequently, the Colonies were compelled to disregard their Scrip and mortgage themselves to the Bank of England in order to get money. For the first time in the history of the United States our money began to be based on debt."

The British Robert Owen was one of the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic founders of utopian communitarianism, a project in the tradition of Sir Thomas More's Utopia - itself inspired by Plato's Republic. I note that it was from there that William Lane and other radical nationalist thinkers drew much inspiration. This idea can be summarised today as an expression of national-communitarian ideology of which the Red-Brown / Third Position systems are a harbinger and therefore serve to confirm Owen's prophetic status. It should be remembered that Sir Thomas More was affirmed by the Vatican as a Catholic martyr and therefore his perceptions embrace a trascendental purpose both within traditionalism and secular socialist ideologies. Both the Owen's shared a view regarding the negative significance of the moneypower. This was also a characteristic of early Australian-Socialism as evidenced by a reference to Humphrey McQueen's 1986 appendix to his New Britannia which is now available to all on the Internet - a perspective characteristic of all early Anglo-Saxon-Celtic socialisms.

The British Owen's communitarian experiments also served to influence the organisation of Henry Ford's factories, which included worker-shareholder participation under a patron, a notion which Marx earlier explained as feudal-socialism. This is the Henry Ford who was associated with Charles Lindbergh of the America First Committee and who penned the text available on the Internet The International Jew.. The essence of Ford's work, for which his son profusely apolgised so as to ensure the continued viability of the Ford Motor Company, was that as an organised and politicised collective, Jews represented an unassimilable minority with an extraordinary will to power - who often distorted the direction of whatever host culture they entered into.

(For the benefit of those who imagine this author believes in a monolithic Jewish-Masonic-Vatican-sundry conspiracy: I say that it is as much a product of their imagination as is the whole idea itself.. Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh and the great bulk of the founders of the original Ku Klux Klan were Freemasons - including the polymath Confederate general, Albert Pike, Grand Master of the Scottish Rite. Any question as to that, simply do an Internet search! (See also: John J. Robinson, Born In Blood: The Lost Secrets Of Freemasonry, 1989) The role of the Vatican has alternated between Judaeophilia and pogroms. The relationship between Masonry and Catholicism has alternated between close collaboration and civil war.

The relationship between both these forces and National and International Jewry and their inter-relationships has always been problematic. "There is only the will to power" as expressed through collectivities whether ethnic, religious, ideological, tribal etc. History is not the history of class struggle but rather the alternating alliances amongst power blocs. Yesterday's friend can be tomorrow's enemy and vice versa. There are only really two contending ideas - nationalism or its prototype tribalism - and a monocentric universalism that results in our conemporary fragmented globalised society. The only true twenty-first century synthesis of these two great opposities would be a polycentric universalism which acknowledges a multi-polar world where the real 'diversity' is planetary and not in one's own national backyard! Or, to use a liberal cliche - 'unity in diversity' but within an organic framework and not the contemporary liberal construct. Anthony Sutton has offered considerable detail as to the fluctuating relationships which existed between American and global plutocracies, socialism, Marxist and otherwise, fascism including Nazism and the role of laissez-faire ideology in morals and economics.)

The American Founding Father, Benjamin Franklin, warned the American people as to the inherent dangers of laissez-faire ideology, in that it can lead to plutocracy, the dictatorship of finance capital:

"There are two passions which have a powerful influence on human affairs: love of power and love of money ... When they are united ... they produce the most frightful outcomes."

Lincoln's view of the plutocracy - he was in part their captive and sought to find a means of salvation for himself and his people - can be summarised by the following:

"The money power preys on the nation in times of peace, and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. It denounces, as public enemies, all who question its' methods or who throw light upon its' crimes."

Lincoln also said: "Money is the creature of law, and the creation of the original issue of money should be maintained as the exclusive monopoly of the national government. The monetary needs of inceasing numbers of people advancing towards higher standards of living can and should be met by the Government. Government, possessing power to create and issue currency and credit as money, and enjoying the right to withdraw both currency and credit from circulation by taxation and otherwise, need not and should not, borrow capital at interest as the means of financing Government work and public enterprise. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the perogative of Government but it is the Government's greatest creative opportunity. Thus money will cease to be master, and become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the Money Power."

"I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country; corporations have been enthroned, an era of corruption in High Places will follow, and the Money power of the Country will endeavour to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the People until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the Republic is destroyed. I feel that this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war".

Thomas Jefferson's view of plutocracy was not dissimilar to that of Lincoln, as evidenced when he said in 1802: "I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up and around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

The reader should now appreciate one part of the pattern of liberal cosmopolitan intellectual 'activity'. Another area of their historic distortion has been to equate people with a sense of ethnocentrism to be, by their very nature, anti-human. It is an objective fact, as borne out by the science of socio-biology that there are inherent differences between gene pools and as a consequence - cultures.

(Author's November 2005 Note: The hysterical reaction to Australian Associate Professor Andrew Fraser of Macquarie University in Sydney was anticipated in the 1970's by the responses to American emeritus Professors Hans J. Eysenck and Arthur R. Jensen. It should be remembered that Professor Eysenck left Nazi Germany because he was an opponent of its totalitarian form of political correctness. Little did he realise that the multiculti liberal also had his totalitarian genocidal agenda - the elimination of all human diversity in the proverbial melting pot of an amorphous humanity. Jensen is part Jewish. Eysenck's step-father was Jewish and his grandmother died in a concentration camp as part of the Nazi euthenasia program.

For a comprehensive appreciation of the relationship between community ethics and its demographic constituencies, refer to the works of expatriate Australian lecturer, Dr. Frank K. Salter of the Max Planck Institute in Germany. See also for a competent exposition of sociobiology: Glayde Whitney, "Raymond B. Cattell And The Fourth Inquisition", Mankind Quarterly, Vol. 38, Parts 1 and 2, Fall/Winter 1997, pp. 99 - 104 )

"Basing their ideas on the concept of the brotherhood of man, certain writers, who are mostly social anthropologists, consider it immoral to study race and produce book after book exposing it as a myth. Their prudery about race is equal to the horror of the Victorian prudery about sex. These writers are not physical anthropologists, but the public does not understand the difference."

Carleton Coon

"A race or tribe is a corporate body which nature has entrusted with an assortment of human seed or genes, the assortment differing in some degree from that entrusted to every group. If the genes are to work out their evolutionary effect, then it is necessary that the tribe or corporation should maintain its integrity through an affinity of generations. If a tribe loses its integrity by free interbreeding, that tribe has to come to an end."

Sir Arthur Keith, eminent geneticist.

"A social pyramid which is to endure must be made up of individual human units, preferably of a common racial origin, who, from bottom to top of the pyramid, are conscious of a common evolutionary destiny, and work together to attain it.

Sir Arthur Keith.

" There is something that all white men must learn and know as I have: that these individuals are of a lesser-race. They have neither the intellectual, moral or emotional abilities to equate or share equally with White men in any of the functions of our civilization. I have given them my life to try and bring them the advantages which our civilization must offer, but I have become well aware that we must retain the status of White the Superior and they the inferior."

Albert Schweitzer, referring to African adaption to European civilization.

"If I was Black, I would be for the Blacks; being White, I am for the Whites."

Napoleon Bonaparte, referring to the so-called 'French revolutions' in San Domingo and Haiti

Thomas Jefferson, as below, quoted from his Works: Volume One, p. 48. Jefferson was referring to slavery; he was himself, a slave owner:

"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free; nor is it less certain than the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them. It is still in our power to direct the process of emancipation and deportation peaceably and in such slow degree that the evil will wear off insensibly, and their place be .... pari passu filled up by free White labourers. If on the contrary left to force itself on human nature much shudder at the prospect held up."

Abraham Lincoln, also interpreted the revolutionary premise of the American Constitution. This was an extrapolation of the Rousseauesque postulate pertaining to governments and governors being the instruments of the general will of the masses. When governments no longer represent this will they are in breach of the social contract and every person of character and honour has a moral obligation to terminate the charade. Today, every Western nation which has been influenced by classic liberal-democratic thought will have to address this dialectical crisis - the solutions to this dilemma can easily be developed from Abraham Lincoln. The position expressed by Lincoln below also is a re-presentation of a premise present in the original Magna Carta imposed by English nobles upon Prince John. It is in fact the founding premise of all Anglo-Saxon-Celtic institutions and not strangely finds echoes throughout the Indo-European world.

"The country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it."

"Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God."

Thomas Jefferson.

Neither the above references to Albert Schweitzer's or to Abraham Lincoln's thoughts below are intended to affirm or negate the esoteric supposition of white racial superiority. But Lincoln's true thoughts or feelings have been misrepresented or suppressed by liberals. The raison d'etre for Lincoln's emancipation of the Negro slaves was in keeping with the spirit of Jefferson and the other Founding Fathers. Lincoln's intent was to resettle them within their own country be it in Africa (ie. Liberia) or somewhere in the Americas, but outside of the United States. He was an advocate of complete separate development.

After the Civil War the mass movement of Southern Negroes to the North supplied a cheap labour pool. The Negro had exchanged the feudal form of servitude, which offered degrees of welfare and protection to the black man (who was technically the plantationist's chattel), found himself in a condition of wage slavery, without these advantages, at the hands of the Northern liberal capitalist industrialists. In the process, they retarded the aspirations of the white working people to a living wage by serving as a surplus un-unionised labour force. These problems Lincoln anticipated and sought to address.

Today, the same forces demand the complete eradication of borders and the free-flow of labour and capital. The movement of the intellectual and professional classes from the Third World to the West, not only undermines the Western professional classes, but deprives the Third World of its natural leadership. These people who abandon their patrimony are free from any altruism and should be viewed with the contempt they deserve, not simply as contenders with our own elites, but as traitors to their people. If the ordinary working masses of the Third World do not have leadership, then who is responsible? The liberal multiracialist is in fact undermining the world he purports will be created - by eroding what future the Third World has which must come from its Natural elite. The bulk of asylum seekers pay their way to people smugglers. The ordinary person in the Third World does not posess those means. Therefore a pan-nationalist perspective is the only mechanism by which there can be a universal elevation of the conditions of life. Pan-nationalism in the new millennium is only viable form of internationalism, because it is founded on the principle of mutual social obligations. Such a world view does not countenance desertion.

I mostly rely on Roy P. Basler (ed.), The Collected Works Of Abraham Lincoln: Rutgers University Press, 1953, published in eight volumes, for the following quotations.

"I can not make it better known that I strongly favour the return of Negroes to Africa. With this return, even to a limited extent - enhanced wages to white labour is mathematically certain. Reduce the supply of labour by repatriating the blacks and by precisely so much, you increase demand for, and wages of, white labour."

"See our present condition - the country engaged in war! - our white men cutting one another's throats …..and then consider what we know to be the truth.

But for your race among us there could not be war, although many men engaged on either side do not care for you one way or the other … It is better for us both, therefore to be separated.

You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but that the physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly, many of them by living among us, while ours suffer from your presence. In a word, we suffer on each side. If this is admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated."

Address On Colonization To A Deputation Of Negroes In Washington D.C., August 14 1862 (Vol. V, p.371)

"There is a natural disgust in the minds of all white people to the idea of indiscriminate amalgamation of white and black races." (Springfield,Illinois 1857).

"Negro equality! Fudge!! How long in the government of a God great enough to make and maintain this Universe, shall there continue knaves to vend, and fools to gulp, so low a piece of demagogism as this?"

Fragments. Notes For Speeches, September 1859. (Vol. III, p. 399)

"I will say then that I am not, nor have ever been in favour of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races (applause) … that I am not, nor have ever been in favour of, making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favour of the superior position assigned to the white race …"

Fourth Debate With Stephen A. Douglas At Charlestown, Illinois, September 18 1858. (Vol. III, pp. 145, 161)

The following poem by Rudyard Kipling essentially reaffirms the eternal necessity for separate development. The presense of Muslim aliens whose God has repossessed their souls, has led to the tragedies of Bali, London, Madrid and countless expressions of unnecessary civil strife.The obvious evidence of Australia's Cronulla 'riots' (sic), the French riots (2005), the recent 2007 Russian riots and the constant race conflicts which have eventuated from the entry of aliens into the Western Civilization, is in front of us.. There is a clash of civilizations, but not that promulgated by the Anglo-American-Zionist bloc which is the principle advocate of the multicultural society. The term multiculturalism appeared first in the anglophone world in the 1950's and 1960's and gained hegemony from this bloc and spread to non English speaking nations. The only conflict of civilizations is inherently domestic (since different ones have coexisted for millennia on the basis of separate development - eg. the Chinese and Japanese civilizations existed with minimum interaction between themselves and the rest of the world until the 'barbarians' broke down their doors for economic reasons under the pretense of the 'white man's burden'). All ancient civilizations advised against the presense of unassimilable aliens. Even India, which has been often toted as the epitome of multi religious, multi ethnic nirvana, has always been a hot-bed of communal violence throughout its history. With these thoughts in mind, the 'Stranger Within My Gate' is all the more important to us, as it encapsulates these notions and it comes from a man born in the days of Britain's Indian Raj, a country which the East India Company used as a production base for the opium which lay at the base of the Chinese Opium War. Yesterday's white man's burden, the building of empires, has seen the chickens coming home to roost. This is what every sage of every civilization has warned his people against - it is still not too late to save our civilization!

PART SIX

"Ariel Sharon has Yassir Arafat under house arrest in Ramallah and George Bush under house arrest in the Oval Office."

Leibowitz is right, we are Judaeo-Nazis, and why not? .... Now don't be shocked, if (Israel's founders) had killed six million Arabs here or even one million, what would have happened? Sure, two or three nasty pages would have been written in the history books, we would have been called all sorts of names, but we could be here today as a people of twenty five million ....

"Even today I am willing to volunteer to the dirty work for Israel, to kill as many Arabs as necessary, to deport them, to expell and burn them, to have everyone hate us, to pull the rug from underneath the feet of the diaspora Jews, so that they will be forced to run to us crying, even if it means blowing up one or two synagogues here and there, I don't care. And I don't mind after the job is done you put me in front of a Nuremberg Trial and jail me for life, hang me if you want as a war criminal. Then you can spruce up your Jewish conscience and enter the respectable club of civilised nations, nations that are large and wealthy. What you don't understand is that the dirty work of Zionism is not finished yet, far from it."

"Every time we do something you tell me America will do this and will do that .... I want to tell you something very clear: don't worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America and the Americans know it." (Ariel Sharon, October 3 2001, quoted from Uncensored, Issue 15, March - June 2009 - www.uncensored.co.nz)

The Role Of The Jews In European History.

We could begin by referring to Paul Rassinier, Drama Of The European Jews (1964), now republished by Historical Review Press, P.O. Box 612 Silver Springs, Maryland 20901, U.S.A. Rassinier was an anarcho-communist and founding member of the French Resistance. He was a prisoner of the Nazis in Buchenwald and Dachau concentration camps until release in 1945. In 1946, he was elected for a brief term to the French Chamber of Deputies.

Arthur Butz’s Hoax Of The Twentieth Century published also by Historical Review Press is a development of Rassinier’s work on the Nazi policies towards Europe’s Jews.

Another useful work in this area is The Jewish Mask from the Omni Christian Book Club of America.

Much has been written on the Jews in European history. The above cited book for example is correct in its sections dealing with Jewish antiquity and produces much material similar to the work of scholars with a Jewish background, such as Allegro, Koestler and Lillienthal. But it errs badly when discussing the ‘Jewish character’ and social ideas of the socialist and communist movements (both Marxist and non-Marxist). The flaw in analysis lies in making assessments based upon misunderstandings of various historical complexities which have not been relevant since the 1930’s (if certain opinions were ever really correct). Let alone relevant to those nations which were officially Marxist in Europe. (Refer to my ‘Social Revolutionary Nature’)

There is much anti-semitic propaganda dished up by the old-right, both in its traditional conservative and nazi/fascist forms. We have to confront it.

The writings of the controversial British historian, David Irving, are useful to answering the propaganda of anti-semitism. To the chagrin of anti-semites (and Zionists Jewish or gentile), David Irving's mother was a non-practising Jew and by rabbinical law, he qualifies under the Israeli 'Law Of Return' to become a settler/citizen - as does Aleksandr Rutskoy. The American editor and patron of Common Sense, Benjamin Freedman, was a former Jew who converted to Catholicism. Vladimir Zhirinovsky's biological father was a non-practising Jew. These four examples are of self-evident assimilation with all four being patriots to their own lands. All four are defenders of facts, or to paraphrase Freedman: "facts are facts".

Permit a broad statement: although many of the leaders of the Marxist Bolshevik movement were Jews, the Marxist cause was NOT an attempt of the Zionists to achieve any political world domination. Rather it was a product of very specific 19^th century Western issues; in as far as the Jews were concerned, it was product of a SPLIT (to use Winston Churchill’s phrase) in the Jewish community.

The bulk of the pre-Bolshevik Marxists of the European Social Democratic Movement, (and here I will refer specifically to those of them who were Jews) were ANTI-ZIONIST, and often European ethnocentrists. Marx himself was a pan-German imperialist and chauvinist and accused of it by the anti-German French socialists of the period. Marx’s German imperialist ideas were rabid enough to cause Nesta Webster, writer of "conspiracy" history to condemn Marxism as a German/Jewish plot!!! We can read N.Weyl’s Karl Marx: Racist for more here. The FACT seems that most of the Jewish Marxists (though not all) were emancipated Jews, secular and assimilated. Certainly they DID project many of their root-ideas; but the fact as cited stands.

I would say that if Marx were alive today Zionists psychotics would denounce him for anti-semitism and NAZISM (despite his Jewish ancestry) as they have done to many other anti-Zionist Jews including the former liberal Chancellor of Austria, Bruno Kreisky. I am sure the Simon Wiesenthals would be most active!!

Russian Bolshevism was not a single monolithic movement but rather an amalgam of movements and tendencies synthesized and dominated by the personality of another Marxist Vladimir Illich Ullyanov (Lenin). Lenin’s ethnic background was partly Swedish, part Finnic (Chuvash or pre-Slavic ‘aboriginal’ type which inhabited Russia, related to the Samoyeds of Siberia from whence Lenin derived his Mongoloid features), part German, part German-Jewish. Amongst the many factions within Bolshevism were Pan-Slav ethnocentrists and peasant socialists, who were more philosophically akin to Dostoyevsky than Marx. They had their origins in groups like ‘Narodnaya Volya’ (the Russian word Narod signifies both Nation and People similar to the German word Volk or the English word Folk; a related idea is the English word 'nation' derived of the Latin root word for 'nascent' or birth; nativity et al, thus one is born into the nation) or the National-Peoples Will (ie. the will of a specific people).

(Note: April 2008. Narodnaya Volya was reconstituted in December 2001 and led by veteran Russian radical nationalist, Sergey Baburin. On March 26 2007, Narodnaya Volya fused with much of the broad Rodina bloc to create a new party - Narodny Soyuz (National-People's Union/Alliance). Amongst its more prominent members is the former Vice President of Russia, Aleksandr Rutskoy. Baburin has held the post of Speaker of the Duma and his party has also hosted a delegation from the government of Hugo Chavez. This alliance will become very significant to Russia's national renewal and possibly that of the imminent Eurasian imperium.)

There were other Marxists of the Marx-Engels school of thinking who were desirous of creating a European Federation based on the solidarity of the respective working classes, a transnational union of ‘white’ proletariat. Plekhanov, an ethnic Russian, represented that trend of thought. Plekhanov had been Lenin’s mentor until the famous Bolshevik/Menshevik split, and his thinking had wide support, both Jewish and Gentile.

However, Lenin’s thinking became the dominant trend. Lenin’s goal was a totalitarian-Marxist-cosmopolitan one in that he aimed at a UNIVERSAL TRANSCENDENTAL STATE, a union of republics, an eventual ONE-WORLD REPUBLIC with a single cultural-political form. It was to implement a universal racial/cultural homogeneity, in a proletarian guise. The New Testament notion of 'there is neither Greek nor Jew' was interpreted as neither white nor black nor brown nor yellow, simply proletarians. It was such that the universalist homogenising imperative implicit in Christianity whereby there would be a global community of the faithful, became the community of the Marxist faithful.

Marx in the preamble to the Communist Manifesto (particularly in the preface to the Polish edition) acknowledged the principle of nationality. He desired a Federation of European communist nations under the hegemony of Germany. In this sense alone was he an internationalist. He did not promise the abolition of ethnic and national particularisms. Lenin only acknowledged this type of federation as a stepping stone to the "amalgamation" of all nations, races and peoples into the World Republic. Lenin’s dream was more akin to cosmopolitan Christianity (i.e. the universal Christian or Catholic Church embodying all of mankind) but interpreted in the light of dialectical materialism. Lenin’s dream, like that of the extreme world-homogenizing Christian fraction, is hostile to LIFE which demands the heterogeneity of races, peoples, nations and cultures.

Let us discuss this liberal cosmopolitanism in more detail. It seems important to our discussion of the Jews, of liberal values, of Marxism.

During the French Revolution a similar totalitarian cosmopolitan , but economically liberal and capitalist interpretation of classical liberal-democracy arose. But it was beaten down by those who saw the "fatherland is in danger" (le patrie en danger) and Democracy was harnessed to French ethnocentric nationalist ideals. During the American Civil War, the liberal-cosmopolitan leveler group appeared again under the leadership of the radical Republican Party. They used Abraham Lincoln’s assassination (Lincoln was a racial-nationalist) as a pretext to pursue a policy of the destruction of the old Confederacy during the dark period of "Reconstruction". They were defeated both in the South and North by American nationalist secret societies/militias. D.W. Griffith’s 1915 silent movie classic Birth Of A Nation tells us much here. The original book text of Margaret Mitchell's Gone With The Wind is faithful to the truth also. The relatively recent, Gods And Generals, starring Robert Duvall is also a useful film in so far as it demonstrates that the Confederacy was often both humane to their Negro slaves as well as being enemies of the New York plutocracy which controlled the Northern government.

The liberal cosmopolitan trend however never seems to rest in any time or any place. But he had to exercise great care in the West until 1945, the time of Fascism’s military defeat. As a consequence of Fascism’s ethnocentric-nationalist character, the distorter was able to brand all nationalism as "fascism" and therefore pursue a totalitarian programme to destroy all manifestations of European racial-nationalism. Of course, it could be pointed out that Hitler, Mussolini and the rest had as much opposition from non-nazi, non-fascist authoritarian-nationalists as from certain cosmopolitan forces (see my Social Revolutionary Nature as well as Douglas Reed, Prisoner Of Ottawa and Nemesis); it is a fact that the fascist movement was never synonymous with ethnocentrism or nationalism as such. It represented merely a specific community of ideologies related to the first fascism – that of Mussolini. Hitler saw Mussolini as his mentor saying: "it is uncertain that if there had never been Fascism, whether there would have been National Socialism". Indeed, Nazi ideology was never totally in synchronization with German Nationalist ideology; rather it was a fascism in the German context. In short, it was Hitlerism, just as Bolshevism was never Marxism as such, but Leninism.

In truth, the liberal-totalitarian attempt to equate Europid nationalisms with fascism and concentration camps – is finished! The silence into which this nationalism was compelled – is over! Truth is prevailing and "we" are returning in strength. Particularly, we have made gigantic gains in the former Socialist Bloc of countries (see Alexander Yanov, Russia’s New Right , Right-wing Ideologies In The Contemporary U.S.S.R., University of California, a study of various Russian nationalist ideologies). While the title is a misnomer (nationalism can be as much ‘left’ as ‘right’), the work is very useful. David Shipler, Russia: Broken Idols, Solemn Dreams, Mc Donald Futura Australia, develops Yanov’s information. (Kevin Coogan, Dreamer Of The Day: Francis Parker Yockey And The Post-War Fascist International, New York, 2000; in my Social Revolutionary Nature, I refer to other works regarding the transformations in post-1990 Russia).

In reality, there have been more concentration camps and mass murders perpetrated by totalitarian cosmopolitans (whether Christian liberal or "marxist") in the name of the one world ideal, than those "crimes" which can be laid at the door of nationalism, fascism included.

There could be "one-world", a multi-polar world which is OUR one-world, and not that of the totalitarian world homogenisers – be they Marxist, theist, atheist, liberal or fascist. Indeed, there have even been fascist one-worlders, particularly those of the "clerical-fascist" mould and "world Aryanisers" who want to destroy groups for "aesthetic" reasons. Whether it be the amorphous brown man dreamed up by liberal world-homogenizers as the future humanity, or the blond-haired/blue-eyed Aryan ideal of Hitlerism supplanting and exterminating all inferior races, or a world where everyone is genuflecting and handling rosary beads and ignoring and supplanting all other thought-processes through an Inquisition, they all arrive at the abolition of the natural cultural and biological diversity of humanity. This world-homogenizing tendency is therefore not exclusively an appendage to liberalism, Christianity or Marxism, but rather is an expression of every ideology that aims at overruling the natural diversity, that expression of the only true manifest divinity we can arrive at through empirical observation - and intuition. This little gem of information may shock them, but it nonetheless remains a fact!

The fact is that the One World of the cosmopolitans is a product purely of the intellect devoid of instinct. The alternative arises from the ‘powers’ latent in any creed of blood and soil as more recently developed by Professor Lev Gumilev in the U.S.S.R.. His The Biological and Geographical Conception of Ethnic History and Ethno-genesis And The Biosphere enjoyed wide circulation, particularly now after the collapse of the old regime. His conception remains one based on Natural Law. Gumilev's works are the principle inspiration for Gennady Zyuganov's Communist Party Of The Russian Federation, as well as that of several other nationalist groups in Russia. (Refer to Gennady Zyuganov's postulates on "the third road" in his political manifesto, My Russia. Armonk (New York): M.E. Sharpe, 1997.)

Global co-operation between all peoples, races, nations and cultures as DISTINCT ENTITIES is at the core of the New Age world-view implicit in the principle of Unity in Diversity (E PLURIBUS UNUM – UNUS UNORUM EST -- "one in the many and all in the one"). We are speaking of a system transcendent of economic or social systems, i.e. a REAL DÉTENTE based on the acceptance of the uniqueness of each component. A global solidarity could help avert nuclear war, pollution, soil erosion social/cultural decomposition of certain peoples etc. A global solution to these problems through national means! This ideology is implicit in the New Age orientated national-revolutionary groups in Western Europe and the Americas. They promulgate a THIRD POSITION in politics, neither Left nor Right, neither Marxist nor capitalist (see my ‘Social Revolutionary Nature’ and the forthcoming essay ‘What is Australian-Socialism?’).

The above world-view was anticipated by the seventeenth century Scottish parliamentarian, Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, but at that time, the world was not mature enough to implement it. It is now the twenty-first century. An interesting interpretation of this progressive co-nationalist perspective can be found in Graham Williamson and T.P. Bragg, A Declaration And Philosophy Of Progressive Nationalism (2005). (Obtainable 'Livable Nation', C/- P.O. Box 4127, Hornchurch, Essex, RM12 4PJ, United Kingdom) As its authors themselves acknowledge, this is a pioneering work and an interpretation and not the final form - since there will be always many forms and interpretations of progressive nationalism.

"Show me a true patriot, and I will show you a lover not merely of his own country, but of all mankind. Show me a spurious patriot, a bombastic fire-eater, and I will show you a rascal. Show me a man who loves other countries equally with his own and I will show you a man entirely deficient in a sense of proportion. But show me a man who respects the rights of all nations, while ready to defend the rights of his own against them all and I will show you a man who is both a naionalist and an internationalist." Andrew Fletcher, 1653 -1716. The relevance of Fletcher's world-view to the contemporary New Age movement is self-evident by simply referring to A.R. Orage's New Age Magazine, 11 August 1910, Vo. 7, No. 15

The One World of the cosmopolitan is evolutionary-negative in that it represents an impossible desire to return to the "primordial chaos" (or undifferentiated mass that resonates with the protozoic soup) , whilst our concept is the Positive Constructive of the Imperative of Evolution. Our concept is therefore NATURAL.

Let us now return back to the matter of the Jews.

Naturally, many of the cosmopolitan Bolsheviks may have been secret Zionist cultural-political -imperialists (of the type the Apostle Paul liked to call the Judaisers of Christianity: so this lot sought to remodel Bolshevism) who saw in Bolshevism an attempt to proclaim the Ural Mountains the new Mount Zion on earth. They distorted the Bolshevik movement from its Russian roots to give it other messianic directions. From certain Pan-Slav underlying bases it did, for a long period, reflect the distorters values (see the works of John Jewell: for his then-current list of Soviet anti-Zionist publications). This tendency of the Russian Jews was long recognized in the Bolshevik movement. Lenin purged the Zionist "Bund" from the party as well as entering into conflict with the Zionists (so did Stalin). What Lenin began for totalitarian-Marxist-cosmopolitan reasons, Stalin finished for ethnocentric-nationalist reasons (but within the constraints of Marxist categories and dialectical materialism). Stalin’s "anti-cosmopolitan campaign" drove most rootless aliens out of the Communist movement (be they Jewish or Gentile) in the late 1940’s, leaving the state firmly under the hegemony of ethnocentric nationalist Gentiles.

The Talmud-inspired Zionist imperialists are distinct from certain Jewish cultural nationalists, although the latter have been often manipulated by the former who dream of the messianic possibility of a World Empire dominated by God’s Chosen People through proxy nations such as the United States. Two classic Soviet booklets dealt with this subject in precisely these terms (see: Ivanov's Caution Zionism! and Trofim Kychko'sJudaism Without Embellishment, as published by the prestigious Ukrainian Academy of Sciences). In recent times, notable persons such as Dr. Mahatir Mohammed of Malaysia and Professor Gennady Zyuganov of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (and former presidential candidate) - have reiterated this perspective. The Jewish nationalist desired the right to separate from the gentile world without animosity or chauvinistic intention. This legitimate right to self-determination was achieved in the creation of the state of Israel, but it was equally achieved through the formation of the Autonomous Region of Birobidzhan in the Soviet Union, or could have been realised by the proposal for a Jewish State in Madagascar. It must be remembered that long before Hitler advanced a Madagascan solution to the German-Jewish question, that solution was proposed by Jewish nationalists in the late nineteenth century.

However, the Talmud-inspired Zionist can feel only contempt for humanity, indeed a vicious hatred worse than the supposed excesses of Hitlerism. In his gospel, the Talmud, he postulates nothing but hatred for the goyim (the unclean Gentile cattle, the Zionist precursor of the Nazi untermenschen or sub-human ideology) who exist for no other reason than to be milked by chosen hands. As he ‘milks’, the Chosen awaits his messiah to manifest, after which he shall have numerous goy slaves and the wealth of the world will be delivered unto him. This Talmudism, combined with his desire to revenge himself upon the goyim for real and imagined wrongs, makes the Zionist an eternally unassimilable distorter. This fact is known to all: to gentiles , cosmopolitan and nationalist, to Jews, cosmopolitan and assimilated. It should be remembered that Ben Gurion, the first Prime Minister of Israel, defined Zionism "as the ceaseless struggle of a divinely chosen people against a campaign to dilute or exterminate them." It should be noted that Israel Abrahams, Chief Rabbi of South Africa, as quoted in the South African Jewish Times (September 1964) stated: "The call of assimilation, in all its multifacted aspects, is the soul destroying tragedy that quenches the altar fires of our faith and idealism, leaving only the cold ashes of a forgotten glory, of a rejected mission, of a trust betrayed." It is interesting that Ben Gurion and his Zionist fellows, both Jewish and Gentile, equate dilution/assimilation with extermination, therefore making the Zionist, of his own choice, unassimilable.

I refer the reader to Wilmott Robertson’s The Dispossessed Majority Cape Canaveral, Florida) as well as Francis Parker Yockey, The Enemy of Europe , Parts One and Two, (Liberty Bell Press, West Virginia) Though both authors belong to the American political Right (Robertson is a traditional conservative, Yockey an unorthodox neo-fascist intellectual), their work deserves to be considered even if not fully endorsed by New Age revolutionary intellectuals. The New Age ethical-socialist idea is neither Left nor Right in the traditional sense but transcends it, drawing on all political and philosophical traditions in keeping with historical facts. The same can even be said of being "eclectic" towards Nietzsche and Spengler.

Theodore Herzl said: "Every nation in whose midst Jews live is either covertly or overtly anti-semitic… Anti-Semitism increases day by day and hour by hour among nations (Author's Note: But, why?). Indeed it is bound to increase, because the causes of its growth continue to exist and cannot be removed (Author's Note: Why can't it be removed?)…"

In grasping this subject, we can turn to Leo Cooper, In The Shadow Of The Polish Eagle: The Poles, The Holocaust And Beyond, Basingstoke (Palgrave) 2000. This Jewish author alleges that General Anders and his fellows in the anti-Nazi Polish Home Army were opposed to the return of Jewish emigrants because of a belief that prior to 1939 they exerted a disproportionate influence in Polish economic, cultural and political life. The Home Army were also accused of liquidating left-wing partisans whose leadership was often made up of pro-Soviet proletarian Jews and by such actions hoped to avert the Sovietisation of Poland after the war. Yet, the Home Army was the recognised military arm of the Polish government in exile in London, subject to general Allied direction, particularly that of Churchill. Churchill understood the struggle that was occurring in the 'Jewish soul', dividing it between Zionism and internationalist socialism of all shades.

Herzl continued, addressing the World Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland, in 1897:

: "…Thus united we suddenly discover our strength …when we sink we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party, when we rise, there also rises the terrible power of the purse!!"

Maybe, that is why there is anti-semitism?!

For references to matters raised in this Part:

I conclude here with some endearing gems from the Talmud, the Zionist Mein Kampf, because Zionism/Talmudism is the politicisation, and therefore perversion of the Jewish bible (the Torah etc). The Talmud is made up of sixty three books and is often printed in about eighteen large volumes. Much of the Talmud was written by rabbinical sages between the years 200 A.D. and 500 A.D. and is not necessary to Judaism (which is older than the Talmud), and which therefore - can be dispensed with. Eight Catholic popes condemned the Talmud. Martin Luther, founder of the Protestant church, ordered it burnt, whilst Pope Clement VIII ordered it eternally proscribed. Neither Luther's nor Clement VIII's solutions to the Talmud were later shown to be compatible with the spirit of the Enlightenment. That which exists in the darkness must be exposed, and so the great French Caesar, Napoleon Bonaparte, summoned the Great Sanhedrin and asked them quite simply: 'please explain' the purpose of these statements. Being compelled to answer is to ensure that light prevails over darkness. As long as persons of Jewish confession constrain their belief-system and value-system to the pentateuch and the remainder of the Old Testament which they share in common with Christians, they are in one sense simply a sect within a broad 'Judaeo-Christianity', and not a 'problem'. They should be allowed to practise this confession in the same way as Western Civilization tolerates many other confessions compatible with its value-system. But the Talmudically inspired, be they of theistic or atheistic perspective, are incompatible with any host culture in direct consequence of the value system they espouse, as evidenced by the following. Again, we ask: 'please explain' in the event we fail to understand the purport of these Talmudic texts.

"Murdering goyim is like killing a wild animal".

Sanhedrin 59a

"Even the best of the gentiles should be killed."

Abordah Zara

"A goy who pries into The Law is guilty of death."

Sanhedrin 59a

"Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."

Yebhamoth 11b

"Jesus fornicated with his jackass"

Sanhedrin 105ab

"Jesus is in hell and is being punished by being boiled in hot semen. Christians are boiled in dung."

Gittin 57a

"It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator anywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."

Choszen Hamiszpat 388

"Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."

Schabouth Hag 6d

"Jews must always try to deceive Christians."

Zohar 1160a

"Do not save goyim in danger of death."

Hilkkoth Akum 11

"A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Aqum (gentile/idolator). For he who returns lost property (to gentiles) sins against The Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of The Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honour the name of God, namely, if by so doing Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honourable people."

Choshen Ham 266 1

"The Jew is allowed to go to the Aqum lead him on, do business with him, to deceive him and take his money. For the wealth of the Aqum is to be regarded as common property and belongs to the first who can get it."

Choshem Ham 156, 5 Hagah.

"The money of the truly righteous Jew is more precious to them than their own bodies."

Sotah 12a

"You are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts." Baba Mecia, 114, b

"On the house of the goy, one looks as on the field of cattle."

Tosefta, Erubia, viii.

"We beg thee, O Lord, indict thy wrath on the Nations not believing in Thee and not calling on Thy name. Let down thy wrath on them and inflict them with Thy wrath. Drive them away in Thy wrath and crush them into pieces. Take away, O Lord, all bone from them. In a moment, indict all disbelievers. Destroy in a moment all foes of Thy nation. Draw out with root, disperse and ruin unworthy nations. Destroy them! Destroy them immediately, in this very moment.

(Pranaitas: Christianus in Talmudus Judeorum; quotations from Synagogue Judaica, p. 213. Minhagin, p.23; Croch Chaim, 480, Hagah) This above is the prayer said on the eve of the Passover.

"The estates of the Goys are like wilderness; who first settles in them has a right to them." Baba Batra, 54,b.

"If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wiping him off the face of the earth."

Choschen Hamm 388,15.

"The property of the Goys is like a thing without a master"

Schulchan Aruch: Chozen Hamiszpat, 156, 5.

The Jew has struck his spade in the ground of the Goy; he has become master of the whole." Baba Batra, 55a.

" A Jew may rob a Goy; he may cheat him over a bill which should not be perceived by him otherwise the name of God would become dishonoured."

Schulchan Aruch Chozen Hamizpat, 348.

"The Son of Noah, who would steal a farthing ought to be put to death; but an Israelite is allowed to do injury to a Goy; where it is written, Thou shalt not do an injury to thy neighbour is not said, thou shalt not injure a Goy." Missa Sanhedrin, 57.

"Who took an oath in the presence of the Goys, the robbers, and the customs house officer, is not responsible." Tosefta Szebnot, 11.

"In order to annul marriages, oaths and promises, A Jew must go to the rabbi, and if he is absent, he must call three other Jews, and say to them that he is sorry to have done it, and they say: ‘Thou art allowed to’." (Schulchan Aruch, 2, 1.247.)

The Kol Nidre prayer of the Day of Judgment, that acquits beforehand Jews from the failure to fulfill all oaths, vows and promises:

"All vows, oaths, promises engagements and swearing which beginning this very day of reconciliation, we intend to vow, promise, swear and bind ourselves to fulfill, we are sorry for already, and they shall be annulled, acquited, annihilated, abolished, valueless, unimportant; our vow shall be no vows, and our oaths, no oaths at all."

Schulchan Aruch, edit 1, 136.

"If a Goy killed a Goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew killed a Goy he is not responsible."

ibid., viii, 5.

"If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he only ought to give a false explanation, that he might not, by behaving differently, become an accomplice in betraying this information. Who shall violate this order shall be put to death."

"Every Goy who studies the Talmud, and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die."

Sanhedrin 59a Aboda Zora 8-6 Szagiga 13.

These quotations from The Talmud may explain why there has been throughout history constant condemnation of Talmudic Judaism. Amongst many great Western thinkers there has been a critical examination of Judaic texts. I include, as follows, three observations from famous products/precipitators of Enlightenment thought. Again, I reiterate, Judaism need not and should not be Talmudic, since it is the latter which is offensive and not necesarily the remainder of the theology:

"The Jews are nothing but an ignorant and barbaric people, which have for a long time combined the most loathsome avarice with the most abominable superstition and inexhaustable hatred of all peoples by whom they are tolerated, and through whom they are enriched." Francois-Marie Arouet (Voltaire).

"I decided to improve the Jews: but I do not want any more in my realm: indeed, I have done all to prove my scorn of the vilest nation in the world." Napoleon Bonaparte.

"There is a great danger for the United States of America, this great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen, in every land in which the Jews have settled, they have depressed the normal level and lowered the degree of commerial honesty. They have remained apart and unassimilated - they have created a state within a state, and when they are opposed they attempt to strangle the nation financially as in the case of Portugal and Spain. For more than 1700 years, they have lamented their sorrowful fate - namely, that they were driven out of their motherland, but gentlemen, if the civilized world should give them back Palestine and their property, they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires - they cannot live among themselves; they must live among Christians and others who do not belong to their race.

If they are not excluded from the United States by the Constitution, within less than a hundred years they will stream into this country in such numbers they will rule and destroy us and change our form of Government for which we Americans shed our blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the Jews are not excluded, within two hundred years our children will be working in the fields to feed the Jews while they remain in the Counting House gleefully rubbing their hands.

I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews forever, your children's children will curse you in your graves. Their ideas are not those of Americans even when they have lived among us for ten generations. The leopard cannot change its spots. The Jews are a danger to this land and if they are allowed to enter they will imperil your institutions - they should be excluded by the Constitution."

Benjamin Franklin, 1789, addressing the question of Jewish immigration during the debates of the American Constitutional Convention.

The quotation from Benjamin Franklin is particularly relevant today in terms of world politics since it is referred to by Osama bin Laden (see: bin Laden's declaration on this site). He uses it to show the reasons why the world may yet see a global conflageration betwen Islam and so-called Christendom. He says this would be a consequence of the Zionist domination of the United States of America. Since American political leverage operates over the remainder of the white world, and particularly within the Anglophone bloc, they can induce this 'clash of civilizations' that might otherwise, not occur.

PART SEVEN:

"I Haven't Come To Praise Caesar But To Bury Him".

"The evil that men do liveth after them; the good is often interred with their bones." (Shakespeare, ‘Julius Caesar’)

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its' natural manure." (Thomas Jefferson)

"History records that the Money Changers have used every form of abuse, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling the money and its issuance." (James Madison, President of the United States of America).

National Socialism, as Nazism or Neo-Nazism should not be necessarily equated with the idea of ‘nationally-specific socialism’ ie. a socialism within a nationalist (or tribalist or ethnic) context. The idea that has become popularly known as 'National Socialism' is specifically Hitlerism or Neo-Hitlerism (sic). Thus it was a doctrine limited by TIME and SPACE. It had its own unique historical, geo-political and bio-cultural origins and characteristics. Concentration camps, countless corpses and other 'crimes against humanity' may have been a few of its features but so were other specifics not so atrocious and even benevolent. But it was never a universal white man's creed as postulated by contemporary neo-nazis, and it was certainly never meant for Australia or New Zealand whose fate Hitler intended was no different from the multiracialist liberals who advocate an Asian destiny. In fact, Hitler said:

"The descendants of the convicts in Australia should inspire in us nothing but a feeling of supreme indifference. If their vitality is not strong enough to enable them to increase at a rate proportionate to the size of the territories they occupy, that is their own look-out, and it is no use their appealing to us for help. For my own part, I have no objection at all to seeing the surplus populations of prolific Asia being drawn, as to a magnet, to their empty spaces. Let them all work out their own salvation! And let me repeat – it is nothing to do with us.

Adolf Hitler, Feb. 7^th 1945.

The idea of a ‘national-socialism’ is however, transcendant of TIME and SPACE. It has existed universally from its most primitive form (i.e. primitive communism at the primary stage) even amongst Australian Aborigines, Melanesians, Polynesians, Negroes etc., through to a higher cultural form amongst various Europid and Mongoloid peoples (Celts, Teutons, Slavs, Berbers, pre-12^th Century Japanese, early Chinese, Amerindians) in the secondary pre-feudal stage of development. From the early pre-feudal forms, tribal-communism or tribal-socialism evolves into the national-socialism of the feudal form – the organic-national-body corporate or "bee-hive society". According to Herbert Spencer, a 19^th Century English sociologist, (he was torn between his desires for an ethical-socialist society and the inorganic bourgeois social-darwinist commercial society), Feudalism was the continuation of the tribal-socialist society which had undergone further cultural-political development and social articulation in the form of the growth of the authoritarian-aristocratic-state. He even claimed that the then-contemporary socialist and communist ideologies we aiming at the reforming of a feudal society. He argued that the modern states were overlays over feudal society where the predominantly agrarian feudal culture was revolutionized by industrialization giving the state a more "democratic" (i.e. meritocratic") basis for its leadership. A greater social-mobility and equality of opportunity had emerged to replace the ossifying effects of rigid class organization. (For a comprehensive appreciation of the schism in Herbert Spencer's analysis of history and his personal world-view, I recommend a search citing his name in relation to 'communitarian social-darwinism')

Between the feudal and industrial forms of State Socialism there is the period of social re-organisation (which may take decades or even centuries) during which society is more fluid and liberal as a prerequisite for permitting new dynamics (like technology) to reshape it. This anarchic period in which everything is challenged and nothing held to be absolutely valid is usually brief (historically speaking) since the perpetuation of this condition threatens the society’s very existence.

From anarchic liberalism and democracy evolves authoritarian liberal democracy (the Cromwellian Protectorate, the American and French revolutionary governments) or even socialist democracy.

This liberal phase of history belongs with the Indo-European speaking section of the Caucasoid group; this group seems to retain a penchant for cyclical periods where social and individual ‘rights’ are defined and re-defined. Rousseau’s ‘Social Contract’ and the American Constitution and Bill of Rights are simply recent recapitulations of patterns of behaviour present in the classical cultures of Greece and Rome echoing Indo-European antiquity. The battle of Runnymede and the consequent Magna Carta is another Anglophone cultural example of how Indo-Europeans through insurrection bring about cultural/social revolution in which the rights and obligations of subjects and citizens are clearly defined. Hamito-Semitic, Finno-Ugrian and High Mongoloid cultures seem to have moved from their feudal stages to advanced civilizations without an indigenous liberalistic period inspired from native-facts (Japan after the Meji Restoration, China, Korea, Aztecs, Incas etc. were all transmuted under the direct impact of Western imperialism). This fact has shaped much world history and is likely to influence things even more. The reality is that democracy (as westerners define it) has become a feature of state forms amongst non-Indo-European peoples only because of the great influence and power of this civilization.

As stated previously : "Democracy is the philosophy of Nature’s Nobles". It is a grand IDEAL which Indo-Europeans should maintain; but it should not have become an ideology for export. Cosmopolitans have pushed it onto others minus its essential authoritarian aspect and its racial base. Libertarian-levellers are still pirating this concept.

As Rousseau suggests, the type of Absolute Freedom which is posited as the final goal of liberal-democracy, belongs only to the psycho-biological type which is imbued with an inherent desire not to abuse it – by a sense of responsibility for the welfare of the Nation as a whole. Such persons are the exception and not the norm. They exist in every race, people and nation, and form its natural aristocracy. This aristocracy represents Vilfredo Pareto's 'contending elite'. They can bear the goals set by the NEW AGE IDEAL.

A nationally-specific socialism as an ethical socialism, was a feature of classical American and French democracy, and before that the Cromwellian state. Its first post-feudal form under Cromwell yielded to the economics-centred world view of the bourgeoisie. With its social-darwinist ethics, it waged the bourgeois class war. It ended as plutocracy: the dictatorship of finance capital. In response to the class war from above, the Marxist school of socialism responded with class war from below, its own version of social-darwinism. It sought the dictatorship of the proletariat over the bourgeoisie. Ethical-socialism can be defined as the essentially communitarian ethics ie. individual interests being subordinated to the interests of the community be it religious, regional, tribal, racial or national - in short, a civic religion. A comprehensive definition of ethical socialism by a person hostile to all forms of socialism can be found in Chapter 27 of Socialism: An Economic And Sociological Analysis by Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973), which is available on the Internet. For a complementary history of ethical socialism, refer to N. Dennis and A.H. Halsey, English Ethical Socialism: From Thomas More To R.H. Tawney, Oxford, 1988. Professor Halsey was Emeritus Professor at Nuffield College. The realtionship of Friedrich Nietzsche to the communitarian ethic is easily accessible by a simple internet search entitled 'communitarian ethic, Nietzsche'.

The hegemony of the English doctrine of "liberalism", the paid for creed of the plutocracy infected and distorted American and French democracy away from its ethical-socialist basis overwhelming it with the "shop-keeper’s" ideology (Napoleon’s phrase). Work should not simply be a means to accrue capital, but be rather, a life function and a pleasure. The bourgeois ideal is a twisted ‘will to power’ incompatible with the life-centred ‘will to form’ spoken of by Nietzsche as the mark of his ‘over-man’,

Prussia meanwhile was developing (through a process which restricted the "liberalizing" of the feudal structures) a modern industrial society based upon authoritarian structures and advanced social legislation. The Bismarck period consumated this process. Prussia evolved an ethical-socialist society. Whilst English children were dying of lung diseases brought on by chimney sweeping, or sweating in work houses for subsistence, Prussia had compulsory education, health insurance, pensions, and legalized unions. Social Democrats were able to achieve parliamentary representation to win social reforms. This progressive situation was both conservative and radical. It sought to conserve the best in the Prussian-German tradition whilst facilitating non-violent change through gradualness. That the programme worked can be shown by the fact that after twenty years of Bismarckian rule, Germany was able to challenge the hegemony of England and her plutocratic allies.

This "progressive-conservative" approach to State-Socialism had its British counterparts (the non-Marxist Fabians who were all ethno-centric, and patriotic within a culturally specific context, as well in favour of a Pan-European federation) and found echoes right throughout the white world. Despite what modern Fabian cosmopolitans may say (and right-wing fools), the founders of Fabianism (George Bernard Shaw, Sidney and Beattrice Webb, H.G. Wells etc) were all non-Marxist, ethnocentric-realists and in favour of authoritarian measures in the state; their philosophic roots lay in Nietzsche NOT dialectical materialism. Today’s Fabians are frauds and liars with no right to claim any part of the Fabian tradition. Indeed, today's Fabian Society has completely repudiated all formal adherence to an economic socialist objective in favour of laissez-faire economics and therefore in no way are they related to the original movement. They are nihilists, distorters.

Fortunately for the twenty-first century the Internet exists; it is full of wonders and blunders. Nonetheless, without it a lot of history would have been flushed down the proverbial 1984 memory s......t shute. Any querant who has doubts as to the non globalist New World Order world-homogenizing and levelling nature of both the British Fabian socialist movement and some of its' satellites such as the suffragette movement, the birth-control movement etc. should perform for themselves a simple 'search' detailing H.G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, racism, Eugenics, Birth-Control, Margaret Sanger. They will be surprised. As Jean-Jacques Rousseau implied history has been horrendously falsified!

The English capitalist idea NECESSARILY came into conflict with the Prussian socialist idea. There was the possibility that the former European aristocracies, the new proletarians and the pressed petty bourgeois (who were going under to monopoly capital) might ally together to create a new progressive order. Germany was the PIVOT of this new conception. It was the ETERNAL IDEA given form. We now understand the Great War in this new light.

The modern world grew out of that war. Exploitation of the environment, periodic economic crashes on a global scale, disintegration of family structures, Bolshevism, Fascism, Nazism, U.S. Coca-Cola Imperialism, cultural perversion, all this, grew from the attempt to frustrate the development of the Prussian ethical socialist ideal. This ideal stood for the model of a new order in the Europid world, a New Age.

An early indication of this struggle was evident in the British radical journal, The New Age, circa 1907; as in its first volume the masthead was subtitled 'The Socialist Alternative'. This magazine, which was edited and published by Alfred Richard Orage and Holbrook Jackson, drew contributors from the best of the British literati, Hillaire Belloc, G.K. Chesterton, H.G. Wells, George Bernard Shaw, Sidney Webb, Christabel Pankhurst, Arnold Bennett, Hamilton Fyfe, Percy Alden MP, Storm Jameson, Edwin Muir, P.L. Travers, A.J. Penty and Granville Barker as well as Charles Ferguson (1863-1944) later of the Alberta Social Credit Party.

This array of thinkers demonstrates that many of the policies that were being implemented in Prussia had mass appeal throughout the whole European world (see: Gary Taylor,Orage And The New Age, 2004 ; also, Stuart Christie's analysis in 'The Modernist Journals Project', The New Age, Volume 29, May 5 - October 26 1929.) An interesting article on Major Clifford H. Douglas (1879 - 1952), who was later the founder of the Social Credit movement, can be found in Brian Burkitt and Frances Hutchinson, "Major Douglas Proposals For A National Dividend: A Logical Successor To The Wage", International Journal Of Social Economics, No.1 1994 at www.mcb.co.uk Major Douglas collaborated in Orage's New Age magazine, as did George Orwell, the author of 1984 and other works.

In recent times, similar power blocs with related ideological underpinnings, the groups which declared war on the ethical socialist Prussian idea (long before 1914), had declared (cold) war on Soviet Russia as a prelude to a possible Third World War, and continues to declare war on every movement postulating the need for a national renaissance. If these plutocrats succeed in global homogenization it may be the end of the white race and all ethnically specific nations. This global tragedy cum farce (to use Marx's phrase) may retard many civilizations for centuries. Many cultures’ respective mythologies have spoken of "Armageddon"; it need not come as an explosion, but through the gradual erosion of all the values and forms that have given peoples meaning to their existence and made their life worthwhile. The world-consuming necropolis of cosmopolitan capitalism has its parallels in ancient Babylon, Rome etc. It is not the pinnacle of a civilisation, but its graveyard. (Refer to the history of culture in Oswald Spengler's The Decline Of The West).

The Soviet Union (as evidenced in Part Six and in my Social Revolutionary Nature) had not only abandoned the cosmopolitan brand of Marxist thinking (totalitarian ethical-liberal cosmopolitan marxist ideology is now a specifically Western disease and it entered into alliance with other Western liberal ideologies such as Christianity and corporate capitalism against the U.S.S.R.) but it was also abandoning its bureaucratic Marxist economic model in favour of a more holistic approach which permitted some private enterprise and rewarded personal initiative (ie. what perestroika or reconstruction began as).. In fact, this new economic model was first initiated by Lenin as the "New Economic Policy", but it was abandoned after his death in favour of the centralized totalitarian economy suited to rapid industrialization.

If Lenin had not been a cosmopolitan, the evolving New Age national revolutionary U.S.S.R. could easily have affirmed him as a Great Russian "saint" (this tendency was already manifest in Soviet Nationalist mythology).

Whatever right-wing enemies of the Soviet Union may have said (be they traditional conservatives, fascists or liberal plutocrats styled as conservatives like Thatcher and Reagan) the former U.S.S.R. because of the ideological influence over Mikhail Gorbachev by the progressive-conservative Soyuz faction in the Soviet parliament, was becoming a co-nationalist commonwealth of culturally autonomous State-Socialist republics. This was forming under the hegemony of the strongest group, the Great Russians and possibly the other Slavs. In this sense, the Soviet Union was a potential friend of the whole white race. The tradition of the great Dostoyevsky stayed alive in Russia!! Pan Slavism remained a step to a wider perspective.

The Soyuz faction maintained ideological links with the 'Conservative Revolutionary' European New Right (ie. GRECE, Thule etc) and sought the U.S.S.R.'s ideological transformation from Marxism-Leninism to a pan-European ethical-socialism. (Refer to The Dreamer Of The Day)

In the last days of the U.S.S.R. the aim was to transform the cyrillic acronym to render it as the Union Of Sovereign Syndicalist (Soviet) Republics, abolishing even the term 'Socialist' within this description, because of the popular association of 'socialism' with Marxism. The Stalinist reactionaries of the military coup of 1991 (who sought the impossible goal of re-instating 1950's political forms, including a return to totalitarian excesses) overturned the naturally destined direction of Russia. They played into the hands of the culturally-distorting compradors like Boris Yeltsin and his accomplices in the Russian mafia and the whole underworld seething with alienated discontent and egocentric malice, in the best mould of Dostoyevky's "The Possessed". In short, the Soviet system restrained these subterranean elements, but its' collapse opened up new possibilities, both for the underworld liberal/criminal elements as well as those committed to a new Russian renaissance. The covert world also included patriotic forces committed to a national renewal who operated within the Soviet system but now, with its collapse, and the explicit chaos, could shed the forms of Marxism-Leninism, a goal that they were incrementally working towards already. This was the beginning of the red-white-solution (harmonisation of tensions between Russia's communist and Tsarist heritages) essentially realised within the Red-Brown Coalition.

The 1991 attempted coup was without the consultation of the Soyuz faction (see The Dreamer Of The Day) and its principal leaders were arrested by Rutskoi who freed Gorbachev (something that he later regretted). In 1993, the parliamentary forces led by Vice-President Alexander Rutskoi, directed the so-called 'Red-Brown coalition' of the National Salvation Front to reclaim Russia from criminals and compradors but were crushed by the tanks of the Ministry of the Interior, acting on Yeltsin's orders. Young officers of the Ministry recommended to Rutskoi that he surrender before they were compelled to execute Yeltsin's orders to level the parliament building. President Bill Clinton didn't hesitate to laugh on television when advised by reporters that tanks had fired on the Russian parliament. Clinton, and his successor, George Bush, are the patrons of world dime-ocracy. They are the beacons who give us confidence in western capitalist institutions! We'll not hesitate to die for them in Iraq and elsewhere! Clinton will be remembered by history simply as "that groper between two bushes", whilst the two Bushes, history will asign, more sinister motivations.

(October 2006 Note: Despite the cant for which the Anglo-American-Zionist bloc have developed a reputation, the Busheviks today are compelled to publicly acknowledge that they are the architects of a new Vietnam in Iraq. These mass murderers, who during their war of attrition over ten years after the first Gulf War (in which thousands of Iraqi children died from a lack of medical resources in a country which prior to the war was becoming a First World State generating the largest number of qualified doctors trained in the West), compelled the country into the quagmire. The Iraqi nation has not forgotten or forgiven these creatures. The imperialists are now forced to admit that without the intervention of Syria and Iran, confederates of the Ba'athist and Shiite forces, there can not be a practical reconstitution of Iraq. Now the Anglo-American-Zionists acquiesce to the fact that the future of Iraq lies in an authoritarian state under the leadership of a strong man whom they prefer would be a secularist. So why did these imperialists depose Saddam in the first place - since its Ba'athist history was secular nationalist?

The collapse of the Soviet Union and many other communist states, was celebrated by the global plutocrats as the end of history. They construed that cosmopolitan liberal democratic capitalism had finally triumphed not only over fascism in 1945, but also over communism. To the extent that the plutocracies refuse to address the genuine socio-biological-geopolitical imperatives of this planet, they are yet to confront a series of continuous upheavals which will compel their system to accomodate change or alternatively perish. The more intelligent and ideologically evolved fascists and communists, in terms of their dialectical practicalities, have outgrown their irreconcilability, and have metamorphised into new ideological syntheses. The Red Brown Coalition is a living example of this new, and radical anti-capitalist, anti-globalist, pan-nationalist ideology. Inter-Nationalism in the form of the polycentric pan-nationalism/co-nationalism will be the new form to replace the monocentric cosmpolitan-internationalism of the previous age. Such a 'global' system would be based upon an acknowledgement of the right of self-determination of all peoples which includes the right to determine their own economic and political systems. Co-operation as sovereign peoples and not American facsimilies-cum-McDonalds-clones-clowns. The Hegelian dialectical process of thesis-antithesis-synthesis is a constant as Life is enternally in flux, Being and Becoming Itself.

The defeat of Rutskoi's parliamentary forces was atoned for by Vladimir Zhirinovsky's (the liberal media's 'Vlad The Bad') successes in the subsequent elections and the unequivocal pardon issued to the revolutionaries of 1991 and 1993 by a massive parliamentary vote passing over Yeltsin's veto. Classical liberal-democratic thought as postulated by the American and French revolutionaries will dialectically complement the new revolutionary ethical-socialist philosophy that is imminent, but it must emancipate itself from the cosmopolitan-plutocratic baggage which it acquired, just as the historically more progressive fascists and communists had to emancipate themselves from the reductionist, materialist, social-Darwinistic thinking of the nineteenth century.

The classical liberal-democratic idea of the Sovereign Individual, when organically understood as applying to an integral member of a Sovereign National Community, co-operatively functioning within the community of nations, will guarantee the New Age revolutionary ethical-socialist idea will not recapitulate the totalitarian excesses of fascism and communism. Thus, only when liberal-democracy is truly representative of the Rousseau-esque 'general will of the masses' in tandem with contemporary socio-biological/cosmobiological thinking and not simply an instrument of cosmopolitan plutocratic elites (who have neither colour nor country, to paraphrase William Lane) can it serve as the third political ingredient of the New Age revolutionary philosophic synthesis. This perspective, founded upon historically observable Eternal Verities, is inherently authoritarian, meritocratic, populist and 'liberal' (in a classical sense of a broadly generous all-encompassing world-view which in other times was classed as a liberal or catholic perspective) and intrinsically opposed to all monocentric-reductionist, totalitarian thinking. Indeed, if it had been arrived at syncretically before 1939, it may have made the Second World War with all its attendant costs - during and after - unnecessary. We were never the last of yesteryear, but always the first of tomorrow! (Author's October 2006 Note. For a comprehensive analysis of the relationships between Cosmo-Biology and Socio-Biology and Ethical Socialist thinking, see: David P. Barash, Ideas Of Human Nature: From The Bhagavad Gita To Socio-Biology. Prentice Hall, 1998; Michael G. Gazzaniga, The Ethical Brain and Edward Osborne Wilson,Socio-Biology: The New Synthesis, 1975. The latter was and continues to be the source of much intellectual debate as any Internetsearch would show.

Most Russians today understand that the stand of Russia's patriotic parliamentary forces was the true general will of the Russian masses, because it sought to preserve the best aspects of the former Soviet system but move forward into a new progressive future. That stand was not simply Russia's Alamo / Eureka Stockade. It was generally acknowledged by many Western Third Position national revolutionaries as a flashpoint between the Spenglerian forces animated by holistic political-thinking and the need for an ethical-socialist state in contrast with the purely economic thinking of the liberal plutocracy and its world-city or Babylon The Great order. For this reason a number of Western Third Position activists were present and some died with their Russian comrades.

Subsequently, David Duke of the Euro-American Unity And Rights Organization (EURO), spent some time in Russia at the invitation of pan-European Russian nationalist Alexander Prokhanov, editor in chief of Zavtra (Tomorrow). He has also conferred with former communist lawmaker and ultra-nationalist, General Albert Makashov, as well as many other radical nationalist figures of considerable political import. Duke has concluded that Russia "is the key to white survival" and he predicts that "racially-aware" parties could achieve political influence there. He believes that Russia's "sense of racial understanding" will unleash a trend internationally. Duke's autobiographical political manifesto My Awakening, has been published in the Russian language and enjoys wide circulation there. David Duke achieved sixty per cent of the white vote in Lousiana's election-for-governor in 1997 and is a well-respected figure in American patriotic circles just as he is hated and loathed by cosmopolitan liberals and Zionists. He has been formally denounced by George W. Bush.

(Note: August 2007. On July 20 - 21 2007, in recapitulation of a similar Forum held in 2006, pan European ethical socialists from all Europe and the Americas gathered for a meeting in Moscow 'The White World's Future: Europe And Russia A New Perspective'. David Duke was one of the participants.)

On December 7 2003, Vladimir Putin's more conservative-patriotic Russian Unity party (now the United Russia party) was returned to government in coalition with more radical nationalist parties - that of the now infamous and racially unambivalent Vladimir Zhirinovsky (the Russian Liberal-Democratic Party) and Rodina (Motherland).

The criminal Yegor Gaidar, whose cosmopolitan ideological allies such as George Soros and the enigmatic liberal Anatoly Chubais whose 'economic shock therapy' contributed to the erosion of both the USSR's natural destiny and distorted the subsequent Russian Federation compliments of Yeltsin, has denounced Putin for a captive of Russian "national socialists". Putin who in collaboration with the St. Petersburg 'silovniki' (or strongmen), former KGB officers who did not betray their motherland for 'thirty pieces of silver', by becoming kleptocrats like the Mafia backed Berezovsky, Khodarovsy and Abramovich types, or serving them,are determined to fulfill the promise made to the Russian and European Third Position patriots who were martyred in 1993 in the service of a new Russian/European revival. (September 2008 Note: The plutocratic criminals Soros and Berezovsky have continued to play a role in attempting to neutralise Russia's national rebirth in the Balkans, the Baltic and the Black Sea and were significant in the Orange Revolution in the Ukraine.)

If Gennady Zyuganov's Communist Party of the Russian Federation (a national communitarian party and not a Marxist-Leninist one as evidenced by Zyuganov's manifeto My Russia), leaves the opposition and is welcomed into Putin's patriotic populist coalition of all anti-cosmopolitan, anti-plutocratic forces - then in Spirit although the original players may not be present, the Red-Brown Coalition of the National Salvation Front will have been resurrected - and with that will come the resurrection of Russia and Europe. (See: David Reminck, Resurrection: The Struggle For A New Russia. New York: Vintage Books, 1998 - an interesting if not a jaundiced view by someone hostile to the forces of national resurgence)

Western European Third Position nationalists are welcoming this development as evidenced by a conference in France on January 17 - 18 2004, held under the auspices of some of the former associates of Jean Thiriart's European Liberation Front. They anticipate the establishment of a Paris/Berlin/Moscow axis to combat the forces of global homogenisation at the hands of cosmopolitan plutocrats, who dominate the white Anglophone world from their financial-spiritual centres in the stock-exchanges and propaganda agencies of New York, London and Hollywood.

Europe is awakening. Not the Europe of Brussells, which was and still is the instrument of those who have consigned the white race to oblivion, by unlimited miscegenation with Third World immigrants in the service of the global market economy. It will be the Europe of a 100 Flags, one in the Spirit of the militant nationalists of the 1960's who fought for Nation-Europa and in the Spirit, if not necessarily in the forms, of the Imperium prophesised by Francis Parker Yockey and Jean Thiriart.

This Europa Magna will have a geopolitical base from the Bering Strait "to the rocky promotories of Galway", and to paraphrase from the epilogue from D.W. Griffith's classic film 'Birth Of A Nation' - "will reclaim our Aryan birthright."

All 'good Europeans' (to invoke Nietzsche) should remember that it was from the Eurasian "forests and steppes" in many migrations over millennia "our forefathers burst ... a fierce avalanche of daring men and lusty women" (to paraphrase William Lane) who brought into Being countless civilizations founded upon Aryan principles and even to this day, most Europeans speak a tongue descended from the sacred mother tongue of our Indo-European parent group. The modern European gene pool is an amalgam of proto-Indo-European speakers (the presumed language of the Paleo-Atlantid or Cro-Magnon type), Hamito-Semitic (Basques, Etruscans, Minoans, Picts or Prytani, Moors, Hebrews etc), Finno-Ugrian and Indo-European speakers (it is purported the ancestral Indo-European language evolved on the Eurasian steppe from the Cro-Magnon language) with the latter being the most culturally predominant. So therefore, we can speak of European Civilization as being Indo-European or Aryan in character and form, though not exclusively in content (see: Julius Evola, Gordon Childe, Carleton Coon, Marija Gimbutas).

(Author's Note: The reader should consult the Irish Book Of Conquests which confirms the Scythian/Russian origins of the anthropomorphic demi-gods of Irish mythology, the Tuatha-de-Danann as well as refer to the Rite of Coronation of the early Gaelic-speaking elected kings of Scotland, in which they recited their genealogy culminating in the references to the heroic lords of Asia, the Scuthi or Scythians. This rite took place upon the sacred 'Stone of Destiny' transported to Scone from Eire by Kenneth MacAlpin of the House of Dal Riada. To this day. archaelogists and anthropologists continue to recover mummies dressed in tartans related to their Celtic cousins as far east as the Tak-li-Makan / Taklamakan Desert in China and amongst the Kurgans found in the permafrosts of Siberia. These mummies are unquestionably Caucasian. For a general perspective of 'The Scythians', refer to the work of that title by Tamara Talbot- Rice as well as any Internet reference to the Scythian origins of the Scots and Irish.

Also, the works of the Icelandic historian-poet, Snorri Sturlson (1179-1241), should be considered. He recites how Odin/Woden/Wotan led the ancestors of the Tuetons, the mythical Aesir, from their home Asaland/Asaheim/Asgard/Asgartha/Agarttha/Agarthi in what was known in Old Norse as Greater Sweden and in fact was Russia - a land named after the Varangian Rus who themselves came from Sweden. Sturlson implies that Rurik the Rus and his brothers were simply returning to the land of their ancestors.

With this in mind, the lands that were once the Scythian/Tsarist Russian empires, are not only the motherland of the Russian nation, but also the ancestral mother of all white, Aryan speaking peoples, as well as the Finno-Ugrian speaking peoples both white as in Finns, Estonians, Hungarians etc., and non-white as in Kalmuyks, Samoyeds etc. These two groups co-existed for so long whereby obvious biological assimilation did occur, leaving only the non-Aryan language as a legacy of these otherwise unambiguously Caucasian groups, stamped with their unmistakably Indo-European cultural form.)

Therefore all Western, pan-Caucasian, ethical-socialists (not simply those living in Europe) should welcome this imminent Paris/Berlin/Moscow axis in the same vein as David Duke has anticipated its emergence. (Author's July 2005 note: Jean-Marie Le Pen of the French Front National recently addressed a conference of Rodina, an integral part of the patriotic coalition under Putin. Le Pen understands the historical necessity for a new Paris/Berlin/Moscow entente cordiale).

It is not the Eurasian Imperium that will be our enemy, but rather the Powers Of Darkness (the forces of delusion, disintegration, decomposition, deception and ultimately - death, or in Sanskrit, Tamas guna. Refer to the Bhagavad-Gita as translated by Annie Besant of Fabian/suffragette fame). They already declared during the senseless Balkan civil wars, which they encouraged by promoting secession but then denying the participants the right to ethnic self-determination, that the former socialist states of the old Yugoslavia had to unconditionally accept the market economy. In fact they have declared (through the direct statement of General Wesley Clark) that they will not tolerate ethnically specific nations in the Twenty-First Century anywhere in the world, and for that reason they created a caricature on what was once a viable state (Yugoslavia) in the centre of that former state. There were always only two real options, either a commonwealth of southern Slav nations as part of a European union (ie. the political entity 'Yugoslavia', the state of the southern Slavs) or Serbia, Croatia, Slovenia, Montenegro, Macedonia, Herzegovina etc as ethnically-specific sovereign nations operating within a greater European commonwealth. The creature they created fits neither option. The senseless bloodbath these forces fostered, produced a travesty of ethno-nationalist and ethno-pluralist principle and a bloody heroic farce.(Author's August 2008 note: The Anglophone cosmopolitans have now compelled Japan to acquiesce to its balkanisation by the year 2040 by which time it will unconditionally accept people from all over the world to constitute a ten per cent minority)

The agents of these powers know who they are (as Professor Alexander Dugin of the Eurasianist Movement, puts it) and we also know who they are. If the white Anglophone world should fragment through civil wars as a consequence of the intolerable conditions imposed by the multiracialist/multiculturalist forces, then "so mote it be". We in whose blood is inscribed the Vedic/Homeric/Eddic etc tradition/s, do not betray our Aryan patrimony (dharma) or Destiny (karma), to invoke one of our Spiritual Masters, Baron Julius Evola.

(Note:for the benefit of the liberal media's mental midgets who with their jaundiced beady little eyes have spied the term 'Aryan' and decide 'we are dealing with neo-nazism here', they should know that the term was in popular philological and anthropological use for over a century well before the Nazi misuse of the appellation. Also, these cretins should be made aware that a SS inquiry (a would-be council of 'grand inquisitors' to draw on Dostoyevsky's analogy) at the beginning of the war conducted into the philosophy and ideology of Evola, defined his "radical traditionalism" as "neither Fascist nor National Socialist", for a number of reasons including his anti-totalitarian perspective. This inquiry recommended that no Axis government should lend Evola's projects any support. His goals had included the recreation of a new Holy Roman Empire based upon Romano-Germanic principles and traditions. This Empire was the occidentalist version of the Third Rome ideology of the Slavophiles. Both the occidentalists and the Slavophile positions are subsumed, indeed synthesised, in the Eurasianist perspectives advanced by Yockey and Thiriart, theories which relied upon the geopolitics of Mackinder and Haushofer.

What support Evola obtained towards the end of the war came at the behest of the Abwehr (ie. military intelligence) in defiance of the official policy of the Third Reich and contrary to all of the Axis orthodoxies. The Abwehr, like the faction of the KGB which supported the Soyuz group, were devoid of doctrinaire madness. They remained patriots and socialists who believed in the principle of family, folk and fatherland (this is a conservative-revolutionary principle) within the context of a greater European union - or 'soyuz.' They therefore never needed the baggage that either Hitler, Mussolini or Stalin wanted to impose upon them. It is simply a fact that intelligent people can never be constrained by the limitations of ideological shibboleths - and throughout history it is these superior people whether they were in an established church, state or whatever, as princes or principal players with less than august lineages, who have found themselves often burnt at the stake for heresy by the dogmatists who failed to outgrow these limitations.For such heroic people it has always been 'better to light one candle than to curse the darkness' - even if that candle ignites one's own funeral pyre. So we invite these spillers of ink-swill - I use Nietzsche's words - to lie as they will. To use the vernacular, short and sweet, they can 'go and fuck themselves! After all, it is becoming universally accepted that the tongue and pen of these media prostitutes is profoundly linked to the 'arses' of the mogul-paymasters whom they lick with a relish proportionate to their own pay-package.

It should not be forgotten that John Swinton, the former Chief of Staff of the New York Times, when he was called upon to give a toast at the New York Press Club in 1953, replied thus: "There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history, in America, as an independent press. You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dares to write your honest opinions and, if you did you know before hand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinions out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the streets looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my paper, before twenty-four hours, my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalists to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it - and what folly is it to talk of an independent press. We are the tools and vassals for rich men behind the scenes. We are their jumping jacks; they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes.?)

We who are bound by ancestral bonds, announce to the rootless cosmopolitan / the atomised ant (the 'Last Men' of Nietzsche's 'Great Noontide'), that they who presumed to proclaim the end of history and the triumph of their god, 'the golden ingot', are in store for serious shock therapy.

The Heroic Spirit of countless patriotic-socialist fighters (regardless of the flag under which they fought), who shed their blood senselessly in fratricidal forays - is reincarnating into a new spiritual-political organism, and will brook no further opposition from the cosmopolitan moguls and the maggots who thrive in their putrid system.

Long before the Treaty of Versailles, the spiritual precursors of our current crop of matoids and their retinue had planned in their lodges, boardrooms cum bordellos of Washington and New York, the draft for this current imposture/caricature of 'God's Kingdom On Earth', popularised by George Bush Snr. as the New World Order.

Our current 'Skull and Bones' groomed emporer is now obviously naked and we Heretics from political correctness possess the courage of children to openly laugh in his face. Whilst presuming to send Americans of all races to plunder Iraqi oil fields in combination with the so-called 'Coalition Of The Willing' (but not particularly able) - George W. Bush's heroic career in the Texas Air National Guard (from which he was mostly absent although not technically 'awol' ( refer Time magazine February 16 2004) is proving to be as large a farce as the weapons of mass distraction.

His conspicuous absence was at a time when three hundred Americans a week were coming home in body bags - and this serves as a suitable recommendation for this office of Commander In Chief of a country/ideology which, since the American Civil War, has been the paramount agent of global corruption undermining Traditional cultures, including their own, during the former Confederacy's period of Reconstruction and subsequently.

Patriots and socialists of all races and ideological hues in tandem with all forces committed to the anti-globalist struggle must 'never again' fight their dirty wars. They must not accept their filthy lucre for the privilege of donning the uniforms of those who are held in universal contempt.

The Time is imminent when the old political coalitions of racial-separatists which appeared in the 1930's/1940's, 1960's and more recently in the 1980's, are to be recapitaluated. Louis Farrakan's Nation Of Islam was able to mobilise close to a million men in one of their demonstrations of Afro-American consciousness, pride and power. The great Muhammad Ali (Cassius Clay) once stated the following: "Bluebirds like to be together, eagles hang out with eagles, sparrows stick with sparrows, buzzards go with buzzards. They're all birds, but they go with their own kind." "It is against God's law to integrate. It's only nature, not hatred, to keep people among their own kind. A man has to be a fool to live among any other culture but his own". Ali also said: "No intelligent black man or black woman in his or her right black mind wants white boys and white girls coming to their homes to marry their black sons and daughters." (A more comprehensive account can be found in Marcus Garvey and Robert A. Hill (ed.), The Marcus Garvey And Universal Negro Improvement Association Papers, now published on the Internet.)

Indeed, it was David Duke, a long-time pro-white activist, who demonstrated the universal popularity of this perspective during the Louisiana elections for governor. This man has had no difficiulty in collaborating with like-minded people of different races - and has been welcomed all over the world by peoples of different racial and ethnic backgrounds.

Between all persons with 'race and tradition' (to invoke Spengler), regardless of their race or tradition, there is a natural empathy and solidarity, which is not felt for or by the rootless denizens of the world cities - be they white septic tanks (Yanks!), spics, wogs, slopes, niggers or any other politically incorrect nomenclature for the deracinated and deculturated rabble, the fellaheen who are slaves of the Babylonian system. "Babylon The Great is falling; come out of her, my people, lest ye share in her iniquities". (The Book Of Revelations, Chapter 18)

Some three thousand years ago, another racially conscious people, the ancient Hebrews, led by two ethnarchs/hierophants (ie. Sanskrit Manu as per the Laws Of Manu., edited by Max Mueller), the brothers Moses and Aaron, who approached the then-master of their known world, the Pharoah and demanded: "let my people go."

Today, all persons who can still hear the admonishments of their ancestors, demand unequivocally for themselves the same right to self-determination that Moses and Aaron demanded for their people. If our imperatives are not respected, then we invoke our revolutionary rights as defined by Abraham Lincoln and the rest of the Founding Fathers of 'these United States', whose perogatives have been usurped by a cosmopolitan/plutocratic/liberal/minority coalition (Nietzsche's Chandala and Marx's Lumpen, the contemporary expression being the Bushevik / Obamaniac consortium) and behind whose glorious emblems and sacred symbols, this human waste now masquerades.

If Babylon The Great denies her subjects the right to self-determination, which may include the right to complete secession from the Union, then North American civil wars are again inevitable, and the likelihood is that in these 'convulsions', Babylon The Great will meet her apocalypse.

"The spirit of the times may alter, will alter. Our rulers will become corrupt, our people careless .... From the conclusion of (this revolutionary) war we shall be going downhill. It will not be necessary to resort every moment to the people for support.

They will be forgotten, therefore and their rights disregarded. They will forget themselves in the sole faculty of making money, and will never think of uniting to effect a due respect for their rights. The shackles, therefore, which shall not be knocked off at the conclusion of this war, will be heavier and heavier until our rights shall revive or expire in a convulsion." (Thomas Jefferson, anticipating the corruption of the American revolutionary principles, courtesy of plutocracy and the decadent forces that serve it and which it serves - yet, he also anticipated the possibility of an American renaissance through further convulsions or revolutions)

All New Age national revolutionaries (regardless of their ideological or philosophical or theological beginnings) must stand ready to seize the historical opportunity to make REVOLUTION should ‘Destiny’ so provide. The compulsion to an ethical-socialist state is too strong to be forever held at bay by the distorting politics of liberal cosmopolitanism and the global plutocracy.

PART EIGHT:

The Hero As King

(Refer To Thomas Carlyle, "The Hero As King", in Heroes And Hero Worship.)

"Find Me The Best Man And Make Him King". Thomas Carlyle.

"Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's." Jesus, Platonic Logos, Gnostic Christos?

"Once on a time - 'twas A.D. One, I think -
Thus spoke the Sybil , drunken without drink:
"How bad things go!
Decay! Decay!
Ne're sank so low!
Rome is now a harlot and brothel too,
Rome's Caesar a beast and God himself - a Jew!"
Nietzsche, Thus Spake Zarathustra

It is the heretical personality in history (we could include Jesus who was a heretic in the terms of Orthodox Judaism, one who had no hesitation in expelling with a whip the money-changers from the Temple, those whose god was that of the golden ingot - another example was the catalyst for the Protestant Reformation, Martin Luther, who would not indulge the purveyors of papal indulgences) who creates revolutions, who brings about revolutions in politics, economics, theology and culture. History will demand for the contemporary Western New Age movement a Martin Luther who will purge it from the pedlars of pretentious potions and presumptuous portents - before it can be truly instrumental to what Rene Guenon defined as Integral Traditionalism and from which Julius Evola extrapolated the notion of radical traditionalism - and which may be interpreted as a variation on Aldous Huxley's idea of the "perennial philosophy".

Let us refer to a Nietzschean from history, General ("imperator") Oliver Cromwell, Lord Protector of the first white English-speaking Commonwealth and Republic. He was certainly one of Nietzsche’s "overmen". Indeed, Nietzsche referred to him as "that northern barbarian of the spirit". We Australians know him as an inspiration to the early Australian national revolutionary movement, the cause of the Social Republic. His spirit should be as relevant to us as it was to Henry Lawson and William Lane. In 1895, S.A. Rosa, an anarchist of the time who was highly critical of the Cromwellian orientation of Lane’s "Boomerang" wrote a novel entitled, "Oliver Spence, the Australian Caesar". It postulates the historical inevitability of an Australian dictatorship based on meritocratic ideas, populism and thorough nationalism. This ideal was indeed at the very roots of the early Australian nationalist and socialist movement.

Henry Lawson wrote:

"For Australia":

Now when the wars of the word begun,

they’ll listen to you and me,

Now while the frightened nations run to the arms of democracy,

Now when the blathering fools are scared,

and the years have proven us right –

All unprepared and unprovided the

outpost of the white.

From "Australia’s Peril":

Listen through the House and Senate,

listen from east to west

For the voice of one Australian

who will stand above the rest,

Who will lead his country’s dawning, who will lead

in his manhood’s noon –

The man may come with the hour –

but the hour may come too soon.

From "Cromwell":

… in my country’s hour of need,

For it shall surely come,

While run by fools who’ll never heed,

The beating of the drum,

While baffled by the fool at home

And threatened from the sea –

Lord, send me a man like Oliver –

And let me live to see.

From "The King of Our Republic":

If you find him stern, unyielding,

when his living task is set,

I have told you that a Tyrant shall

uplift the Nation yet.

The real Oliver Cromwell was scarcely the religious dogmatist as portrayed by those whose ideology was/is the "god of the golden ingot". Their motivation in defaming him lay in the fact that he abolished the powers of a corrupt parliament. This element had fought the ethical-socialist regime of Charles the First and disintegrated that state making necessary the rebirth of ethical socialism in the form of the Protectorate and Commonwealth.

This gang later devised the idea of laissez-faire and brought William and Mary to the British throne, to set up a constitutional monarchy as a façade for the money masters. From this time, British history was that of the plutocrats. The Shylocks of all religious and non-religious persuasions were destined to seek and at times obtain, their pound of flesh, but mostly through the blood sweat and tears af those whom, they exploited. The age of class war and national/social disintegration of the previous organic community had begun. We are living with its contemporary consequences through the rebirth of laissez-faire liberalism in the days of Thatcher-Reagan and their successors - particularly the neo-cons. This element within society somehow says it believes in the supposed primacy of the atomised human being, one that somehow exits outside any cultural, ethnic, historical context. Yes, but in which universe? certainly not this one! (Refer to the works of the English-born old-Labour MP, Australian nationalist Frank Anstey 1865 -1940, particularly to his once-suppressed The Kingdom of Shylock, 1917)

The distorters of British history chose to justify the "Glorious Revolution" of William and Mary by blackening the name of Cromwell. They posited that his regime was based on vile anti-Catholic ideology, even more extreme than the general English attitude. This was false. In reality Cromwell made pacts with Catholic states which helped facilitate England’s rise to empire. Cromwell’s attitude to matters of faith was peculiarly liberal. He came close to granting Catholics an Act of Toleration. It was usually the gentile-zionists who favoured the persecution of other Englishmen on religious grounds.

(Author's 2005 Note: A contemporary example of gentile-zionism is the Moral Majority in the United States. They unequivocaly define themselves as Christian Zionists. This milieu originated with the likes of the Reverend Jerry Falwell and gained pre-eminence during the regime of Ronnie Ray-Gun (the cowboy of Star Wars fame); they continued in influence during the era of Bush 1 and today are completely enmeshed with the American neo-conservatives of Bush 2. Interestingly, the latter are almost completely of Jewish origin and some began in Trotskyist politics. So obviously, the evolution from Bolsheviks to Busheviks can be understood in the context of what Theordore Herzl had expressed in 1897. Yesterday's subordinate officers of the revolutionary proletarian party are today exercising the terrible power of their purse! Their metamorphosis away from favouring a command economy may be a response to what these Trotskyites called Stalinist nationalism. Although now unequivocal advocates of private/corporate enterprise and the global market, they have not abandoned their world-homogenizing goals.Yesterday's rootless deracinated and deculturated proletariat is today's world-American - the new Babylonian of the 21st century.. It is a pity for them that some peoples aren't interested in becoming Americans - an example of which is the Iraqi nation For acomprehensive academic view of the relationship between Trotskyism and neo-conservatism, see: Kevin MacDonald, "Neo-Conservatism As A Jewish Movement", Occidental Quarterly at http://theoccidentalquarterly.com/vol4no2/km-understandIII.html and Nikolai Bezroukov, "Neo Trotskyism aka Neoconservatism: Neo-cons And Straussian Philosophy")

The distorters further charged Cromwell with the establishment of personal dictatorship. In fact, he was raised to the position of Protector by the New Model Army, the revolutionary national army. The Protectorate was forced on Cromwell by the chaos into which England had sunk. But he refused to take a crown.

And again it was supposed that Cromwell was out to turn English society into a social lunatic asylum. They point to the activities of Levellers and Diggers who actually dubbed Cromwell "anti-Christ" and the "Great Dragon". These messianists were not to Cromwell’s taste. The mailed fist and the hob-nailed boot of the Ironsides suppressed this lunacy. These gentile-zionists entered into opposition.

Cromwell’s aim was to serve his State and People. He did not follow dogmatic formulae in anything. In his theology he was an "Independent" who believed everyone could find god in his own fashion. In his statecraft, he chose sure policies. His aim was the reconciliation of all in the State.

Lastly, and curiously, Cromwell has been decried by those who should be his supporters because of his use of Old Testament symbolism. Contemporary Protestant Christianity may have a Zionist bent and a love of all things Hebraic, but this charge cannot truly be laid on Cromwell. (A future essay, ‘Babylon: Archetypal Cosmopolis’ will examine gentile-zionsim)

We must seek always the SPIRIT BEHIND FORMS. Cromwell expressed his ideology in then contemporary language. His hostility to Rome was essentially nationalistic and in the spirit of Nietzsche's definition of how a "northern barbarian" expresses his Christianity through the Stoic prism, and NOT exclusively in the stated Protestant peccadillos. The evidence for this is found in Leon Poliakov's The Aryan Myth, which discusses other undercurrents outside of Judaeo-Christianity found present in the Cromwellian revolution, and which I re-present in Part One of the Social Revolutionary Nature Of Australian Nationalism. Historical necessities always compel symbolism. Cromwell was no messianic Anglo-Zionist cum Grand Inquisitor or Pharisee ready to crucify a potential Christ for heresy on behalf of some tenuous orthodoxy… by blood and spirit, he was related to Hengist and Horsa not Moses and Aaron.

The following quotations from Maurice Ashley’s The Greatness Of Oliver Cromwell, establish certain root ideals and principles from which a modern New Age oriented national revolutionary movement can extrapolate. These Aryan conservative-revolutionary ideals and principles are advanced in the cultural and spiritual Evolian/GRECE/Thule sense of the term Aryan; this is something not to be confused with the Hitlerian-Rosenbergian interpretation of the term, which as the ideological basis of Nazism, became the root cause of the loss of the Second World War by the Axis. Alfred Rosenberg proscribed the writings of Julius Evola early in the war so as to not contaminate the Waffen (combat) SS with perennial philosophic ideas that were incompatible with Nazism in particular and fascism generally. Sections of the pan European Waffen SS at the end of the war, they who were ready to arrest Hitler and the other Axis leaders, were evolving in their own directiion, as distinct from Nazism - and fascism generally. These individuals with fellows outside of the Axis like the great French national resistance fighter, General Charles de Gaulle were imbued spiritually with the Imperitive to establish a united Europe from the Urals to the Atlantic and were consciously or unconsciously instruments of the philosophia perennis. Much of those who were inspired by the radical traditionalism of Evola, those who saw themselves as Knights of Labour and patriots to their peoples within a new European Imperium, have aspects of their perceptions compatible with the history of Australian Socialism. This can be summarised as founding a state where there is liberty without license and order without oppression. "Whatever will benefit Australia, that we are for; whatever will harm Australia, that we are against". (William Lane)

Finally the Jews were allowed to resettle in England. This was owing, very largely, to the persistent support of Cromwell.

(Author's Note 2008: The Jews were expelled in 1290 by the Edict of Expulsion issued by Edward the First ('Longshanks' of 'Brave Heart' fame). The first edition of the Magna Carta in 1215 said of Jewish money-lenders: " If one who has borrowed from the Jews any sum, great or small, die before that loan can be repaid, the debt shall not bear interest while the heir is under age, of whomsoever he may hold; and if the debt fall into our hands, we will not take anything except the principal sum contained in the bond."; "And if any one die indebted to the Jews, his wife shall have her dower and pay nothing of that debt; and if any children of the deceased are left underage, necessaries shall be provided for them in keeping with the holding of the deceased; and out of the residue the debt shall be paid, reserving, however,service due to feudal lords; in like manner let it be done touching debts due to others than Jews."

Defining the very reason for the proclamation of the Magna Carta, the theologian William of Montibus, referred to Jews as "the spongers of kings". He further added: "they are blood suckers of Christian purses by whose robbery kings despoil and deprive poor men of their goods". Montibus meant by that the special relationship they enjoyed under Prince John and the Crown protection they enjoyed since the Norman Conquest. The Jews served Prince John as the principal tax collectors, receiving a commssion on the totals they would bring to John. Naturally, the great disatisfaction with Prince John by nobles and commoners alike, as evidenced by the myths of Robin Hood and Ivanhoe, found expression in pogroms against John's instruments and collaborators. Similar pogroms, originating from similar disatisfactions, have plagued this persevering people throughout the ages. A more comprehensive understanding of these issues, can be gained from: Professor Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight Of Three Thousand Years - esp. Chapter 4, available on the Internet)

It seems that the matter was first raised when John Thurloe went with a mission to Holland in 1651, and there met the famous rabbi Menesseh ben Israel. The question was discussed in the Assembly of Saints, but no decision was reached. Cromwell later suggested to a crypto-Jewish merchant who had settled in London if Menessah were to come over to London to treat it might be helpful. He duly came, and on November 12 1655, Cromwell brought his petition before the Council of State. The Council recommended that outside opinion should be consulted, and on December 4 Cromwell presided over a conference of lawyers, theologians and others. The lawyers said there was no bar to the readmission of the Jews, but the theologians objected as did the merchants of the City of London. Cromwell, realising that no help was to be obtained from the conference, referred the matter back to his Council of State. In March 1656, during the opening stages of the Spanish war (when Jewish intelligence proved valuable), he again pressed for the reconsideration of the question and eventually, on June 25, permission was granted by the Council for the Jews to hold private services (as the Anglicans and Roman Catholics) and to purchase a cemetery outside the city. In December, a house was rented as a synagogue and a cemetery opened at Mile End. Thus for four times Cromwell tried to persuade his councillors to agree to the admission of the Jews before they reluctantly consented. The episode exemplified his liberal attitude of mind on matters of religion and also the limitations of his own influence as Protector.

It was at that point, where liberty of conscience becomes an excuse for the abuse of public order, that Cromwell was confronted at frequent intervals throughout his life with the conflict between the protection of liberty of thought and the maintenance of peaceful government. He never asked for or expected, or permitted when he became ruler so much freedom for religious practises that they disrupted the peace of the community. He had been ready, when the Presbyterians were supreme, to acquiesce in their control of a state church provided that they were willing to tolerant other Christian opinions outside it. He never (he explained) sought for "licentious liberty under the pretence of obtaining ease for tender consciences." He asked in 1647 only that "every man that walks peaceably in a blameless conversation and is beneficial to the Commonwealth may have liberty and encouragement." In 1648 he made no attempt to force his own religion on the Scots and when later as Lord Protector he tried hard to resolve the differences between the Scottish Remonstrance and Resolutioners, wherever his personal sympathies lay, he believed that Scots were entitled to work out their own salvation.

The following quotations are from some of the Ethical Socialist thinkers mentioned in this pamphlet, thinkers influenced by Nietzschean philosophy and/or its antecedents. The following references are meant to suggest that cosmopolitan Marxism always had a real alternative, not simply the sham alternative of liberal cosmopolitan capitalism. This true option is that of organic, ethnocentric and nationalist ethical-socialism. One of the variants of this universal concept is Australian-Socialism. Today, it is commonly accepted that Marxism, cosmopolitan or otherwise, is passe. We will see how long its capitalist cousin survives into the twenty first century - particularly after Freddie Mac and Fanny May.

"Pacifism will remain an IDEAL, war a FACT. If the white race chooses to wage it no longer, the coloureds will, and they will inherit the earth."

OSWALD SPENGLER, author of The Decline Of The West.

"I am a socialist, an up-on-hind-legs fighting Socialist Labor Party man – but above all else I am a WHITE MAN".

JACK LONDON, American author, journalist and American Socialist.

"… the natural thought forms, and dispositions, and instinctive reactions of Northern Europeans and Jews, Negroes and Whites, Indians and Chinese, vary subtly and profoundly; you can no more ignore differences of race than differences of sex. They are things greatly intensified by differences of tradition, training and conditions, but when all such modifications are eliminated, essential differences remain".

H.G. WELLS, renowned author, one of the spiritual founders of (pre-liberal-cosmopolitan) British Fabian Socialism. Quote is taken from Is Race Conflict Unavoidable? (1924). Wells is one of the eminent progenitors of the current New Age movement.

"We must remain white first, or nothing else can matter… The Australian labour movement’s struggle is more than a national or social movement; it is a true racial struggle."

WILLIAM LANE, Australian Socialist, trade union leader, a founder of the Australian Labor Party, whose thinking serves modern Australian Nationalism, founder of the failed Colonia Cosme New Australia colony in Paraguay. The lifestyle practises encouraged by Lane at Colonia Cosme anticipated whole aspects of the New Age movement and the counter-culture communities.