Nietzsche And Ethical Socialism For The New Millennium Alec Saunders Updated (edited): November 2 2008

Author's Note (December 2002): A pamphlet with a similar title, was published in 1986. The present Internet pamphlet is based upon that earlier document, but with additions and editing. It has been modified also with a view to eliminating a few factual mistakes or over-accentuation of particular details. The reader may note that some minor editing to this pamphlet may occur over time..

"And here I see the mission of the youth that forms the first generation of fighters and dragon slayers; it will bring a more beautiful and blessed humanity and culture, but will have itself no more than a glimpse of the promised land of happiness and wondrous beauty. This youth will suffer both from a malady and its antidotes; and yet it believes in strength and health and boasts a nature closer to the great Nature than its forebears, the cultured men and graybeards of the present."

Nietzsche.

"In me the Christianity of my forebears reaches its logical conclusion. In me the stern intellectual conscience that Christianity fosters and makes paramount turns against Christianity. In me Christianity … devours itself."

Nietzsche.

"The new individualism, for whose service Socialism, whether it wills it or not, is working, will be perfect harmony. It will be what the Greeks sought for, but could not, except in thought, realise completely because they had slaves, and fed them; it will be what the Renaissance sought for, but could not realise completely except in art, because they had slaves, and starved them. It will be complete, and through it each man will attain to his perfection. The new individualism is the new Hellenism"

Oscar Wilde.

"He who desires peace, should prepare for war"

Vegetius.

"God save me from the Marxists."

Karl Marx.

"Speak and live as you would shoot your arrow – STRAIGHT and TRUE."

An old Zorastrian aphorism favoured by Mithraist Roman Legionaires.

Thesis - Antithesis - Synthesis

Hegel

"Ethical-socialism is neither more nor less than the sentiment of action-at-a-distance, the moral pathos of the third dimension; and the root feeling of Care-care for those who are with us, and for those who are to follow."

OSWALD SPENGLER, THE DECLINE OF THE WEST, p.178, of the abridged edition, Helmut Werner, ( translation by C.F. Atkinson and re-prepared by Arthur Helps), The Modern Library, New York.)

"If we allow that Socialism (in the ethical, not the economic, sense) is the world-feeling which seeks to carry out its own views on behalf of all, then we are without exception, willingly or no, wittingly or no, Socialists. Even Nietzsche, that most passionate opponent of the ‘herd morale’, was perfectly incapable of limiting his zeal to himself in the Classical way. He thought only of ‘mankind’, and he attacked everyone who differed from himself. Epicurus, on the contrary, was heartily indifferent to others’ opinions and acts. But Nietzschean Zarathustra – though professedly standing beyond good and evil – breathes from end to end the pain of seeing men to be other than as he would have them be, and the deep and utterly un-Classical desire to devote a life to their reformation – his own sense of the word, naturally, being the only one. It is just this, the general transvaluation, that makes ethical monotheism and – using the word in a novel and deep sense – socialism. All world improvers are Socialists."

(OSWALD SPENGLER, pp. 176-177).

By virtue of Nietzsche’s hostility to mob values (in Nietzsche’s Vedantist terminology i.e. Chandala morality), he has been accused by some Marxoids of being a reactionary,and many degenerate laissez-faire economic-elitists, such as Ayn Rand, have hailed him as one of their own. Both of these views are completely incorrect, as will be demonstrated by reference to Nietzsche’s writings.

"For what drove me to the poorest, O Zarathustra? Was it not disgust with our richest? – disgust with those punished by riches, who glean advantage from all kinds of sweepings, with cold eyes, rank thoughts, disgust with this rabble that stinks to heaven, disgust with this guilded, debased mob whose fathers were pick-pockets or carrion-birds or ragmen with compliant, lustful forgetful wives – for they are all of them not far from whores – mob above and mob below! What are the ‘poor’ and ‘rich’ today! I unlearned this distinction – then I fled away, far away and even farther, until I came to these cows."

(FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE, THUS SPOKE ZARATHUSTRA, Penguin Classics (translation by R.J. Hollingdale), p. 228)

" ‘Good manners?’ replied the other king indignantly and bitterly. ‘What is it we are avoiding then? Is it not good manners? Our good company? – Truly, better to live amongst hermits and goat herds than with our guilded, false, painted rabble – although it calls itself ‘nobility’. But there everything is false and rotten, most of all the blood, thanks to old evil diseases and worse quacks. – I think the finest and dearest man today is a healthy peasant, uncouth, cunning, obstinate, enduring: that is the noblest type today. – The peasant is the finest man today; and the peasantry should be master. But ours is the kingdom of the rabble – I no longer let myself be taken in. Rabble, however means: hotchpotch. – Rabble-hotchpotch: in that everything is mixed up with everything else, saint and scoundrel and gentlemen and Jew, with every beast out of Noah’s Ark. – Good manners! Everything is false and rotten with us. Nobody knows how to be respectful any more: it is from precisely this that we are running away. They are honey-mouthed, importunate dogs, they gild palm-leaves. – It is this disgust that chokes me, that we kings ourselves have become false, arrayed and disguised in the old, yellowed pomp of our grandfathers, showpieces for the stupidest and the craftiest and whoever today traffics with power! – We are not the first of them – yet we have to pretend to be: we have at last become tired and disgusted with this deception. – Now we are avoiding the mob, all these ranters and scribbling-bluebottles, the stench of shopkeepers, the struggles of ambition, the foul breath: faugh, to live among the mob, faugh, to pretend to be the first among the mob! Disgust! Disgust! Disgust! What do we kings matter any more!’"

(F.NIETZSCHE, pp. 258-259).

"But whoever wants to eat with us must also lend a hand, even the kings. For with Zarathustra even a king may be a cook."

(F. NIETZSCHE, p. 295).

"My pity for all that is past is that I see: it has been handed over – handed over to the favour, the spirit, the madness of every generation that comes and transforms everything that has been its own bridge. – A great despot could come, a shrewd devil, who with his favour and disfavour could compel and constrain all that is past, until it became his bridge and prognostic and herald and cock-crow. – This, however, is the other danger and my other pity: he who is of the mob remembers back to his grandfather – with his grandfather, however, time stops. Thus all that is past is handed over: for the mob could one day be master, and all time be drowned in shallow waters. Therefore, O my brothers, is a NEW NOBILITY needed: to oppose all mob-rule and all despotism and to write anew upon new law-tables, the word: ‘Noble’. For many noblemen are needed, and noblemen of many kinds, for nobility to exist! Or, as I once said in a parable: ‘Precisely this is godliness, that there are gods but no God!’"

"O my brothers, I direct and consecrate you to a new nobility: you shall become begetters and cultivators and sowers of the future – truly not a nobility that you could buy like shop-keepers with shop-keepers’ gold: for all that has a price is of little value. Let where you are going, not whereyou come from, henceforth be your honour! Your will and your foot that desires to step out beyond you – let them be your honour!"

"Truly, not that you have served a prince – of what account are princes now – or have become a bulwark to that which stands, that it may stand more firmly! Not that your family have grown courtly at courts and you have learned to stand for long hours in shallow pools, motley-coloured like a flamingo: for being able to stand is a merit with courtiers; and all courtiers believe that part of the bliss after death is – BEING ALLOWED to sit! And not that a ghost, called holy, led your ancestors into promised lands, that I do not praise: for in the land where the worst of all trees, the Cross, grew – there is nothing to praise! – and truly, wherever this ‘Holy Ghost’ led its knights, goats and geese and cross-eyed and wrong-headed fellows always – ran at the head of the procession!"

"O my brothers, your nobility shall not gaze backward, but outward! You shall be fugitives from all fatherlands and fore-fatherlands! You shall love your children’s land: let this love be your new nobility – the undiscovered land in the furthest sea! I bid your sails seek it and seek it! – You shall make amends to your children for being the children of your fathers: Thus you shall redeem all that is past! This new law-table do I put over you!"

(F. NIETZSCHE, pp. 220-221).

"Truly, I divine you well, my disciples, you aspire to the bestowing virtue, as I do. What could you have in common with cats and wolves? – You thirst to become sacrifices and gifts yourselves; and that is why you thirst to heap up all riches in your soul. – Your soul aspires insatiably after treasures and jewels, because your virtue is insatiable in wanting to give. You compel all things to come to you and into you, that they may flow back from your fountain as gifts of your love. Truly, such a bestowing love must become a thief of all values; but I call this selfishness healthy and holy. There is another selfishness, an-all-too-poor (my note: i.e. poor in the psychological sense) that always wants to steal, that selfishness of the sick, the sick selfishness."

"Sickness speaks from such craving, and hidden degeneration; the thieving greed of this longing speaks of a sick body. Tell me, my brothers: what do we account bad and the worst of all? Is it not degeneration? And we always suspect degeneration where the bestowing soul is lacking."

"Our way is upward, from the species across to the superspecies. But the degenerate mind which says ‘ALL FOR ME’, is a horror to us."

(F. NIETZSCHE, p. 100)

"And behold, on his way he came unawares to the gate of the great city; here however, a frothing fool with hands outstretched sprang at him and blocked his path. But this was the fool people called ‘Zarathustra’s ape’; for he had learned from him something of the composition and syntax of language and perhaps also liked to borrow from his store of wisdom. The fool, however, spoke thus to Zarathustra: ‘O Zarathustra, here is the great city; here you have nothing to seek and everything to lose. Why do you want to wade through this mud? Take pity on your feet! Rather spit upon the gate and turn back! Here is the Hell for hermits’ thoughts: here great thoughts are boiled alive and cooked small. Here all great emotions decay: here only little, dry emotions may rattle!’"

" ‘Do you not smell already the slaughter-houses and cook-shops of the spirit? Does this city not reek of the fumes of slaughtered spirit? Do you not see the souls hanging like dirty, limp rags? And they also make newspapers from these rags! Have you not herd how the spirit has become a play with words? It vomits out repulsive swill. They pursue one another and do not know where. They inflame one another, and do not know why. They rattle their tins, they jingle their gold.’"

" ‘They are cold and seek warmth in distilled waters; they are inflamed and seek coolness in frozen spirits; they are ill and diseased with public opinion. All lusts and vices are at home here; but there are virtuous people here, too, there are many adroit, useful virtues: many adroit virtues with scribbling fingers and behinds hardened to sitting and waiting, blessed with little chest decorations and padded, rumpless daughters. There is also much piety here and much devout spittle-licking and fawning before the God of Hosts. Down ‘from on high’ drips the star and the gracious spittle; every starless breast longs to go up on ‘high’".

" ‘The moon has its court, and the court has its mooncalves: to all that comes from the court, however, do the paupers and all the adroit pauper-virtues pray. ‘I serve, you serve, we serve’ – thus all adroit virtue pray to the prince: so that the merited star may at last be fastened to the narrow breast. But the moon still revolves around all that is earthly: so the prince too, still revolves around what is most earthly of all: that, however, is the shopkeepers’ gold. The God of Hosts is not the god of the golden ingots; the prince proposes, but the shopkeeper – disposes!’".

" ‘By all that is luminous and strong and good in you, O Zarathustra! Spit upon this city of shopkeepers and turn back! Here all blood flows foul and tepid and frothy through all veins: spit upon the great city that is the great rubbish pile where all the scum froths together! Spit upon the city of flattened souls and narrow breasts, of slant eyes and sticky fingers – upon the city of importunate, the shameless, the ranters in writing and speech, the overheated ambitious: where everything rotten, disreputable, lustful, gloomy, overripe, ulcerous, conspiratorial festers together – spit upon the city and turn back!’"

"But here Zarathustra interrupted the frothing fool and stopped his mouth. ‘Have done!’ (cried Zarathustra). ‘Your speech and your kind have long disgusted me! Why do you live so long in the swamp that you had to become a frog and toad yourself? Does not foul, foaming swamp-blood now flow through your own veins, so that you have learned to quack and rail like this? Why did you not go into the forest? Or plough the earth? Is the sea not full of green islands?’"

" ‘I despise your contempt; and since you warned me, why did you not warn yourself? My contempt and my bird of warning shall ascend from LOVE ALONE; not from the swamp! They call you my ape, you frothing fool: but I call you my grunting pig – by grunting you are undoing even my praise of folly. What, then, was it that started you grunting? That nobody had flattered you enough: therefore you sat beside this filth, so that you might have cause for much grunting – so that you might have cause for much revenge! For all your frothing, you vain fool, is revenge; I have divined you well!’"

" ‘But your foolish teaching is harmful to me, even when you are right! And if Zarathustra’s teaching were a hundred times justified, YOU would still – USE my teaching falsely!’ Thus spoke Zarathustra; and he looked at the great city, sighed and was long silent. At length he spoke thus: ‘This great city, and not only this fool, disgusts me. In both there is nothing to make better, nothing to make worse. Woe to this great city! And I wish I could see already the pillar of fire in which it will be consumed! For such pillars of fire must precede the great noontide. Yet this has its time and its own destiny. But I offer you in farewell this precept, you fool: where one can no longer love, one should – PASS BY.’"

(F. NIETZSCHE, pp. 195-198).

"Watch and listen, you solitaries! From the future come winds with a stealthy flapping of wings; and good tidings go out to delicate ears. You solitaries of today, you have seceded from society, you shall one day be a people: from you, who have chosen out yourselves, shall a chosen people (my note: not to be confused with the "Chosen People", chauvinistic psychology of Talmudic Zionism, as according to Nietzschean philosophy, such a psychology is incompatible with mental hygiene) spring – and from this chosen people, the superman!"

"Truly, the earth shall yet become a house of healing! And already a new odour floats about it, an odour that brings health – and a new hope!"

(F. NIETZSCHE, pp. 102-103).

As a sample of Nietzschean philosophy, the cited extracts are more than decisive in establishing that he certainly was not a reactionary. A reactionary is one who desires to return to some previous Golden Age. Nietzsche who had a natural respect for the past believed that it would serve as a measure by which the future could be anticipated - his Golden Age is the New Dawn which will follow the great noontide of our Western Judaeo–Christian civilization. Neither was Nietzsche a conservative – he believed that all which was withered and devoid of objective organic vitality, should be toppled so as to permit new nascent life to replace it. Thus he was hostile to the peacock aristocracy of old Europe which was a reflection of decadence, of pomp without circumstance. Had he been alive today, he would not have been fond of the institutionalized fossils who sit upon the august ancient seats of William the Conqueror, the Emporer Canute (ruler of parts of Britain and Scandinavia) and Alfred the Great.

When insipid money-hungry/power-hungry troglodytes (no matter how influential) presume that they are somehow Nietzschean supermen, they obviously deceive themselves. Nietzsche’s superman (i.e. ubermensch in German) more accurately translates as Overman. Walter Kaufmann, a leading translator of Nietzsche, always renders it as Overman in all his editions.

The Overman was a concept which Nietzsche became familiar with, through reading the work of the great Anglo-German philologist, Max Mueller who translated the Vedic writings of India. It must be remembered that Sanskrit and its vernacular, the Prakrits, the languages in which Vedantist philosophy was written, are related to the European languages – and collectively they form the Indo-European or Aryan ('Aryan' in the anthropological sense, a term not to be confused with Hitlerite nonsense) family of cultures. Thus the original authors of the Vedas were a Europid people, before through miscegenation, they became absorbed by the indigenous Australid-Negrito tribes who spoke a now vanished (except in certain isolated parts of the Indian subcontinent) tongue, known as the Munda Idioms.

Vedanta, being a theosophy reflecting a cosmology and sociology essentially Europid in character, therefore, found great appeal in the West, by many extraordinary thinkers. For example, and as I shall further explain, all the early prominent British Fabian-socialists such as H.G. Wells, H.M Hyndman, Annie Besant, George Bernard Shaw, etc., were all familiar with both Nietzschean philosophy and Vedantist theosophy, as was the world acclaimed novelist and journalist Jack London. All shared the highest esteem for Nietzsche and Vedanta. Other Vendantists and pantheists of prominence were W.B. Yeats, Thoreau, Emerson, Oscar Wilde etc. According to the eminent Australian historian David Walker, in his work Dream And Disillusion: A Search for Australian Cultural Identity, Australian National University Press, 1976, Nietzsche was widely read and respected by the majority of early Australian-Socialists and radical-nationalists, many of whom were also familiar with Vedantist theosophy. Lane’s writings are a testimony to his Vedantism, whilst the nationalistic (a progressive but not a radical) Prime Minister Alfred Deakin, had been a member of the Theosophical Society (see: J.A. La Nauze, Alfred Deakin: A Biography. Sydney: Angas And Robertson Publishers, 1979.)

Nietzsche’s anti-Christianity has been much made of, and more than often, misconstrued. It will suffice to say that any reference to either Beyond Good And Evil or Will To Power, will readily demonstrate that he was not opposed to Jesus the Nazarean, but rather to the misapplication of a highly personal semi-Buddhist ethic, in a political context. As for Nietzsche’s supposed anti-semitism, this too is a fabrication. Walter Kaufmann and Oscar Levy, two of Nietzsche's translators, were of Jewish descent, as is the contemporary author of Dark Riddle: Hegel, Nietzsche And The Jews (1998), Yirmiyahu Yovel. Nietzsche’s largest following within any ethnic group, would probably be amongst a host of professional and intellectual persons, who have emancipated themselves from the shallow belligerent dogmas of Talmudic Judaism. Therefore Nietzsche’s hostility to the value-system inherent in aspects of exoteric Judaeo-Christian civilization, cannot be construed as hostility to people or peoples, but rather as opposition to ideas and philosophies and, naturally too, as hostility to the individual protagonists of such value-systems. It must be also remembered, that Karl Marx who had Rabbinical antecedents, wrote a treatise entitled A World Without Jews (proper title: On The Jewish Question), in which he demanded that Western Jewry should emancipate itself from the belligerent and counter-productive religion, and value-system of Judaism, that they should completely assimilate into the national-cultures of their host countries - or alternatively they were to leave the West. Only an imbecile would describe Marx’s position as ethnic anti-Judaism when he himself was ethnically Jewish; certainly too, as we have seen, Nietzsche is exempt from such an inference. Some Nietzscheans of Jewish descent, who decided to take Marx's advice and leave the West, were some of the founders of the current State of Israel as evidenced by Jacob Golomb, Nietzsche And Zion, Cornell University Press, 2004.

The following two extracts by Nietzsche will act as the conclusion to this segment. It should prove interesting food for thought, if nothing else. A more comprehensive essay enititled "The Philosophy of F. Nietzsche" is promised and this will deal in depth with Nietzsche’s attitudes to Judaeo-Christian civilization, his relationship to Richard Wagner, his view of Buddhism and Islam etc., his position towards Bismarck as well as his attitude to socialism and communism generally. It is sufficient to say that Nietzsche was not opposed to an organic tribal-communitarian society, (as evidenced by the semi-Platonic political formula for social organization offered by Nietzsche in his work, Will To Power) but rather to the liberal-egalitarian dogmas of the deluded souls who believe that every individual is identical in capacity, intellect, creativity etc. with every other individual. This position is patently absurd and thus a socialist or communist ideology, which does not take into consideration socio-biological and cosmo-biological realities (Refer to Hans Eysenck, Cosmo-Biology and L.N. Gumilev, The Biological-Geographical Conception Of Ethnic History and Robert Ardrey, The Territorial Imperative) is either childish nonsense, or demagogic lunacy. The fact that many non-liberal British (Fabians), American, Australian and continental-European socialists, accepted Nietzschean philosophy as ethical-socialism, is demonstrative that it is one of the more realistic schools of socialist thinking.

"One must stop permitting oneself to be eaten when one tastes best: this is understood by those who want to be loved long. – To be sure, there are sour apples whose fate is to wait until the last day of autumn: and they become at the same time ripe, yellow, and shriveled. – In some the heart ages first and in others the spirit. And some are old in their youth: but those who are young late stay young long."

"For many a man, life is a failure: a poison-worm eats at his heart. So let him see to it that his death is all the more a success. Many a man never becomes sweet, he rots even in summer. It is cowardice that keeps him fastened to his branch. Many too many live and they hang on their branches much too long. I wish a storm would come and shake all this rottenness and worm-eatenness from the tree!"

"I wish preachers of a speedy death would come! They would be fitting storm and shakers of the tree of life! But I hear preached only slow death and patience with earthly things! Ah, do you preach patience with earthly things? It is these earthly things that have too much patience with you, you blasphemers!"

"Truly, too early died that Hebrew whom the preachers of slow death honour: and that he died too early has since been a fatality for many. As yet he knew only tears and the melancholy of the Hebrews, together with the hatred of the good and just – the Hebrew Jesus: then he was seized by the longing for death.

F. NIETZSCHE, pp. 98 -99

Behold this moment’, I went on: ‘from this gateway Moment a long, eternal lane runs BACK: an eternity lies behind us. Must not all things that CAN happen HAVE already happened, been done, run past?’"

" ‘And if all things have been here before: what do you think of this moment, dwarf? Must not this gateway, too, have been here – before? And are not all things bound fast together in such a way that this moment draws after it all future things? THEREFORE – draws itself too? For all things that can run must also run once again forward along this long lane. And this slow spider that creeps along in the moonlight, and this moonlight itself, and I and you at this gateway whispering together, whispering of eternal things – must we not all have been here before? – and must we not return and run down that other lane out before us, down that long, terrible lane – must we not return eternally?’"

(F.NIETZSCHE, pp. 178-179).

Preface: Ethical Socialism For A New Age

"Mightier than the tread of marching armies is the power of an idea whose time has come". Victor Hugo.

The ethical-socialist world-view for the new millennium is the Platonic golden mean between Classical liberal- democracy (in the original sense of the French and American revolutions), Marxism (as its founder postulated and not as dished up by contemporary liberal-cosmopolitans in the West) and European Fascism (in its many variations), which, as a community of anti-communist, anti-liberal, ultra-nationalist ideologies with totalitarian aspirations ("nothing outside of the state" to paraphrase Mussolini), appeared after the First World War and effectively disappeared in 1945. The subsequent plethora of miniscule neo-fascist groups (including neo-nazis) were/are politically ineffectual. Unlike certain Marxists and liberals, this author shall not associate military dictatorships with fascism. So as to avoid rendering the term fascism and neo-fascism historically meaningless, this author will constrain himself to defining neo-fascism as an ideology which draws upon one or more of the historical fascisms as its ideological antecedents - the bulk of which were either actively or passively aligned with the Axis powers.

Despite what cosmopolitan propagandists whether through ignorance or deception maintain is the irreconcilability of these ideologies, the FACTS of the matter are very different. It can be said that the disaster which befell the European world, indeed the whole world, in the Second World War, had some of its roots in the contention amongst these reductionist ideologies for global hegemony. There was no effort at a revolutionary syncretism.

Contemporary cosmopolitan plutocratic liberal-democracy has little relationship to the ideologies of the American and French revolutions. In fact these philosophies bore points in common with pre-Leninist Marxist Social Democracy (at the turn of the twentieth century) and historical fascism. Jacobinism, Fascism and Bolshevism all share the combat model of the command structured action party. Even their ideas of workers participation in industry through trade guilds, soviets or corporations are similar. It should be remembered that the 'Star Spangled Banner' which graces the American Congress is flanked by two fasces, the symbol of fascism, and that there is a large statue of Thomas Jefferson leaning on a fasces. Thus, the spiritual common origins of classical liberal-democracy and fascism are self-evident. I make this comparison by referring to the well known work of the American fascist poet, Ezra Pound - Jefferson And/Or Mussolini, New York, 1955. For the relationship between Fascism and Marxism-Leninism, see A. James Gregor, The Two Faces Of Janus, Yale University Press, 2000.

(Ezra Pound was one of the many ideologically diverse contributors to A. R. Orage's New Age magazine , . Ernest Hemmingway, who was also a contributor to Orage's New Age, pleaded for Pound's release from political imprisonment on treason charges in St. Elizabeth's Hospital, in Washington, a lunatic asylum and achieved that end to the advantage of Anglophone culture; earlier he had pleaded for Pound's life, obviously equally successfully. Pound's would-be executioners were aware that the alienation of Hemingway in the event of Pound's death would embarrass them tremendously.)

Apart from the thought-forms behind these ideologies, a Pan-European ethical-socialist ideal can call upon the collected wisdom of "all ages". One can apply an eclectic and syncretic approach in these matters. Platonic or Neo-Platonic thought (a derivative of which is certain Christian thought), pre-Platonic Hellenic or Roman thought, Gothic Christian (commencing with the Arius Heresy and culminating in the Catholic Cathedrals of the Middle Ages with their Freemasonic / Templar mythic overtones) or Renaissance thought and other Indo-European thought, can and already does, serve as a spiritual-political base for 'New Age' thought.

I refer to many exceptional thinkers in this pamphlet, including those whose world-view may bear a resemblance or relationship to liberal-democracy, Marxism and fascism; however, the perspective for the new millenium must remain anti-liberal, anti-marxist and anti-fascist, since these ideologies are reductionist and not holistic in their approaches. From the outset in 19th century Australia (and New Zealand), this millenarian perspective was anticipated as 'socialism without doctrines'.

"The (Hegelian) State of the Whole People" is the objective of the new political ideal. It is the herald of the rebirth of the philosophy of the Overman. The new faith affirms the right of every race and nation to pursue its own path to its own "OVER-SELF" and respects the principle of ‘unity in diversity’, not exclusively in the form of the multiracial/multicultural society, but also in the respect amongst the plurality of the many imminent unique sovereign predominantly homogenous ethical-socialist nation states. The right of national self-determination, in theory acknowledged by the United Nations, must also unequivocally include the right of a country to determine its ethnic composition. The totalitarian cosmopolitans induced their cosmopolis predominantly through stealth and without consultation, and finally with the terror associated with 'political-correctness'.

This perspective is articulated in my The Social Revolutionary Nature of Australian Nationalism, and may be qualified in a future Internet essay, What Is Australian-Socialism?: The Impact Of The Knights Of Labour On Australia's Nationalist tradition..

PART ONE:

Karl Marx : Racist

The following comments can be verified by an examination of Nathan Weyl’s Karl Marx: Racist, Arlington House, N.Y., 1980.

The historical Karl Marx shares little in common with the mythical creature invented by the liberal/totalitarian cosmopolitan Marxoid priesthood. He was never the propagandist for "World Revolution" outside of the parameters of the European world. He regarded coloured peoples as outside of his historical dialectic. He was not in favour of the emancipation of the coloured peoples from the yoke of Western Imperialism.

The growth of the national liberation movements influenced by Western nineteenth century rationalist economic determinist thinking was the inevitable historical marriage of the genuine nationalist aspirations of Third World peoples with what they perceived was the dominant contending ideology in the West sympatheic to their emancipation; this 'sympathy' was a product of Western liberalism not a derivative of the ideology of Karl Marx. The liberation of the Third World from the yoke of Western imperialism was rather an inevitable historical trend since even a cursory historical view of former empires demonstrates they fragment along national/tribal/ethnocentric lines once the centrifugal hegemonic power has no longer the means nor willingness to assert its dominance. The most recent example was the USSR which was in many ways geographically a continuation of the former Tsarist empire, and it in itself represented a marriage of anti-Western Russian nationalist aspirations with what was then the 'trendy' ideology of the day - Marxism.

The only similarity between Marx’s conception of history and that of the liberal/totalitarian cosmopolitan "marxists" is the theory of the class struggle and Economic Determinism. He and Engels defined this theory as Dialectical Materialism.

As ethical-socialists subscribe to a holistic philosophy which in an eclectic fashion favours Hegel’s dialectic of history (Hegel understood that economics is only part of the locomotive of history and not its predominant determinant), they could not subscribe to Marxism even as its founder intended it. This is not to suggest that Marx did not, in a genius-like fashion, understand certain historical processes, but rather his views were myopic and therefore over-rated.

Marx was a "Left-Hegelian" who distorted his mentor’s philosophy.

PART TWO:

Heresy

Exoteric Judaeo-Christianity has little relationship to historical fact. It has little in common with its alleged "founders" - Moses, Jesus etc. It is simply the de-naturalised distorted representation of a series of archetypal myths (in the Jungian sense) common to various Hamito-Semitic and Indo-European cultures. The works of John M. Allegro, The Controversy Of Zion by Douglas Reed, The White Goddess by Robert Graves and The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler illustrate this. Allegro, and Koestler both had a Jewish background. Zionist fanatics and rabid Christian fundamentalists have threatened them with murder and violence for their intellectual "threat" to Judaeo-Christian civilization. R.S. Campbell, Race And Religion (Omni Christian Book Club of America), discusses this subject, as does the following: H. Spencer Lewis in his The Mystical Life Of Jesus. Lewis was the late inspiration of A.M.O.R.C., the principal American Rosicrucian fraternity and his book is available through most New Age bookshops.

This is not to suggest that there may not be "valuable" ethics and ideas in both Judaism and Christianity such as belief in family, justice etc., but these things are not a monopoly of Judaeo-Christian thought in any case. In that sense, we recognise the Ten Commandments and other implied strictures in this system as also empirically and universally necessary to the survival of a society and present and prescribed by the Hammurabi Law Code, the Laws of Manu and so forth; expressed otherwise they appear as the eternal struggle between cosmos and chaos contained in Greek philosophy. Further, quite reasonably, what has been claimed as a Judaeo-Christian monopoly has often been a distortion of other systems and not of much value if not applied in the macrocosm. For Nietzsche's view of the Laws of Manu, we can do an Internet search, but then that would turn up thousands of references!.

For the relevance of the Laws Of Manu to Western Civilization, I quote from an introduction to this work adopted by Professor M. Devanayagam and Professor D. Devakala in their writings. Some of their work is freely available on: www.geocities.com/Athens/Ithaca/1412/brahmins.html and www.geocities.com/Athens/Ithaca/1412/racism.html

"In the tradition of Western scholarship, 'there is no work that has had such great fame and has for centuries been considered to be so authoritative as the Manavadharmasastra. Manu was among the first Sanskrit works to be translated into any European language. The earliest translation of the text, published in Calcutta in 1794, was that of Sir William Jones, one of the founding fathers of modern Indology; the statue of Jones in St.. Paul's Cathedral in London holds a volume of Manu in its hand. Jones's English translation was then translated into German and published by J. Chr. Huttner in Weimar in 1797. The rapid appearance of subsequent translations in French, German, Portuguese and Russian and the inclusion of the text in the monumental Sacred Books of The East series edited by F. Max Muller, are testimonials to the historical and religious importance that European Orientalists conferred on the work."

All codes of law appearing in higher civilizations in the past have been summed up by Dorian Scott Cole in his Claims And Expectations: Ontology Of God religion series in the 'Spirit Of The Law' as to the goals of the law being as follows:

#Harmony, justice, restoring balance in society
#The integrity of the family
#Well-being of the needy in society
#Fairness in trade and economics
#Misuse of position, power, and wealth - oppression and tyranny
#Individual and community moral (law) and responsibility.
(www.visualwriter.com/HumanCond/OntologyOfGod5TheLaw.htm)

PART THREE:

Jung And Mythical Indo-European Archetypes

For a novel insight into the origins of Jungian mythical archetypes and customs , refer to: Julius Evola, The Hermetic Tradition Rochester: Inner Traditions ; Franz Bardon, Initiation Into Hermetics, Dieter Ruggberg, 1962; Frithjof Schuon, Castes And Races, Bedford, Perennial Books; Caitlin Matthews, Sophia: Goddess Of Wisdom, London, Harper Collins, 1992; Paul Huson, The Devil’s Picture Book, Sphere Books, Abacus, London; as well as the great classic by Sir James Frazer - The Golden Bough.

(Frazer, along with Nietzsche and Ibsen were the favourite authors of the famous Australian poet, patriot and prophet, Bernard O’Dowd).

The following works trace the psychological, mythical and biological evolution of European culture and civilization:

Julius Evola, Revolt Against The Modern World, Rochester: Inner Traditions; Joshua Buckley, Collin Cleary and Michael Moynihan, Tyr: Myth Culture Tradition, Atlanta: Ultra, 2002; Pagan, Celtic Britain (Sphere, Cardinal edition, 1974), Robert Graves (ed.), The New Larouse Encyclopedia Of Mythology, (Paul Hamelyn), H.R. Ellis Davidson, Scandinavian Mythology, (Paul Hamelyn), John Gray, Near Eastern Mythology, (Paul Hamelyn), Pierre Honore, In Quest of the White God, (Futura Publications) and all of Carlton Coon's classic works including Living Races Of Man (1965) The Origins Of The Races (1962), The Story Of Man (1962) and The Seven Caves (1957); refer to any work by Marija Gimbutas on the Indo-Europeans.

On race history: Vere Gordon Childe (1892 - 1957): Origins Of European Civilization and The Aryans: Childe was an eminent Australian anthropologist whose principal concern with the economic factor in pre-historic European development was the result of his belonging to the European ethnocentric Marxist school – which he freely acknowledged. Childe’s concern with economics was not doctrinaire Marxism; he was a brilliant intellectual who would not confine his analysis to the restrictive confines of any dogmatic school of thought.

PART FOUR:

Herrenvolk?

Nietzsche has introduced into contemporary Western philosophy the term ‘Herrenvolk’ or Master People. This should not be confused with the Herrenvolk ideology of Hitler’s fascism. The Nietzsche scholar, Walter Kaufmann, has demonstrated the distortions involved in the Nazi misrepresentation of the original concept. A 2002 academic analysis by Jacob Golomb and Robert S. Wistrich (Jacob Golomb and Robert S. Wistrich (eds.) Nietzsche: Godfather Of Fascism?, Princeton, 2002), offers an interesting criticism of Kaufmann's view of Nietzsche.

Nietzsche, like the Nazarene of whom he was ambivalently critical, has inspired countless inividuals with heterodoxical interpretations (or to satirically re-present a New Testament idea: whenever two or three of you are gathered in my name, there is the basis of a new sect). Ideologically opposed persons could all style themselves as Nietzscheans. We see therefore two gentlemen of the Left, Jean-Paul Sartre and the neo-marxist of Jewish descent, Erich Fromm (see his Psychoanalysis And Religion) using Nietzschean prisms to articlutate their world-views and their right-wing antagonists, Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini doing likewise. It should also be remembered that Jesus said "in my father's house there are many mansions" (ie. there are many paths to the truth). Nietzsche recommended that everyone find's his own truth - and thus every interpretation must be personalised - as is the one of this author. (More on the ideological heterogeneity of Nietzsche, refer to: Steven E. Ascheim, "Nietzschean Socialism - Left And Right 1890-1933", Journal Of History, 1988, pp. 147 - 165. Available also on Internet.)

Nietzsche in the Vedantist tradition subscribed to the concept of Self-Overcoming or Self-Mastery. A national community of Self-Mastered individuals led by the most capable in body and soul (Evola's anarch, a Being which no longer is subject necessarily to the mores of society, but rather draws upon the value of his Higher Self or what ethical socialists like Dugin, Bessant etc define in Vedic terms as the Atman) constitutes a Master People or Herrenvolk. Its contending leading group, presently organized as a sub-culture, having overcome its own internal chaos, would (as the governing stratum of a nation) institute order within the whole national body-politic by acknowledging the value of every component and formulating an ideology/methodology aiming at national salvation through national reconciliation, national reconstruction, national re-birth. Self-overcoming is the raison d’etre of every High Religion.

Such a group (organized in every nation of the European Civilization) in the Nietzschean terminology is "the Party of Life" and its world-historical mission is to vanquish our current bourgeois Western civilization in a "twilight of the idols", during the "Great Noon Tide".

An interesting insight into Nietzschean thinking is found in a number of Colin Wilson’s works, in particular, "The Outsider". The writings of P. D. Ouspensky and G. I. Gurdjieff, two early 20^th Century Russian psycho-technologists, was a development of Nietzschean thinking. (For the relationship of Ouspensky and Gurdjieff to New Age metaphysical/metapolitical ethical socialist thought, simply do an Internet search using their names in tandem with A.R. Orage.)

All "good Europeans" need arise from their lethargy. Nietzsche was the first prophet of the coming age of the "good European".

PART FIVE:

1984!!

The quotations that appear at the end of this section are instrumental in the direction of overcoming the liberal/totalitarian cosmopolitan culture-distortion and falsification of history. Over the past two thousand years, there have been many inquisitions practicing intellectual and physical terror – particularly against non-liberal, non-cosmopolitan intellectuals.

These terrorists have re-written every ideology, philosophy or theology for mass consumption in 1984-fashion (except that ‘1984’ began centuries ago). ). They have tried to deceive scholars in all areas into accepting philosophies which are contrary to Historical Fact and Natural Law or Sanskrit Dharma.(For a definition of dharma, refer to Frithjof Schuon, Castes And Races

The cosmopolitan levellers were the outcasts from every race, nation, people and culture within the Levant and later on the European Continent. They are the refuse of the whole human species. They represent the tactical coalescence of this waste into a single power bloc transcending all political/religious/economic doctrine, which today can be defined per Wilmot Robertson's The Dispossessed Majority, as the global 'liberal/minority coalition'. This element constitutes Nietzsche’s "Chandala" or Marx’s "lumpen-proletariat" (except most of them are not proletarian, but just ‘lumpen’; Lumpen is the German word for rags). They exist in every economic stratum of society. They are simultaneously the symptom of decay while also being the agents for further decomposition. This element centuries ago under the leadership of intelligent matoid individuals assumed the control of the covert world of secret societies and through clandestine machinations overturned the Natural Order. Their delusion has continually been the reduction of humanity to mindless conformity (biological, cultural, social etc.). The contemporary cosmopolitan mass society devoid of ethnic or social variation is the outcome of their work.

Even so, their machinations have failed; across the world we are witnessing the re-emergence of social, economic, philosophic ideas which manifest in a host of neo-tribalist ideologies. (Refer to The Social Revolutionary Nature of Australian Nationalism) Certainly ‘Dharma’ may have been frustrated in the past, and still could be, by pollutants, non-degradable chemical weapons or nuclear warfare, but Nature always has a habit of re-asserting itself. In that context, the New Age perspective is of importance.

The cosmopolitan-levellers had/have parasitically attached themselves to every Western (and via the West to the global scene) philosophy etc (as above) to distort it so as to make it all but impossible to detach the original article from the distorted forms.

The Hermetic, Magian, Essene Christianity (i.e. the theosophy of Joshua Ben Pandera or Jesus of Nazareth) is one example; classical liberal democratic republicanism and Marxism are two more. The idea of Republican Democracy (as practiced by its creators in the ancient world of Greece and Rome) saw its finest rendition in Plato’s ideal of THE STATE.

Indeed, EVERY great Caucasian in history has had his ideals recast into liberal-cosmopolitan forms, as mere "pre-history" to the new sick creed. It has been true for all races. Non-existent ("humane") Negroid civilizations have been conjured up (Ethiopians were originally Hamitic-Caucascoids; Zimbabweans were Semitic Caucascoids; Hanibal of Carthage was not black, since his Phoenician Semite features have been preserved in a bust) to show that all races are "the same" with similar ideals. Even in Australia, the discovery of RUINS of Caucasian origin (possibly the lost Lemuria) have been misrepresented to assert that our Aborigines were the bearers of yet another High Culture. We may refer to the research of Rex Gilroy for Australia and Kerry Bolton of P.O. Box 1627 Paraparaumu Beach, New Zealand, for Oceania; we can also note the book, Ancient Celtic New Zealand (De Danann Publishers P.O. Box 300111 Albany, Auckland, New Zealand), and the report in the New Zealand Dominion newspaper, January 11 2000. In fact these things are more proof for a continuous Europid presence and technological achievement in this region.

The principles of ethnocentrism (i.e. the desire to preserve the biological and cultural identity of an ethnic group) and nationalism have been presented as the monopoly of fascism. Ostensibly these ideals lead to concentration camps. In fact, these ideals were held by pre-cosmopolitan socialism, even early Marxism and the philosophers of the Enlightenment. The endless list of Enlightenment liberal or democratic thinkers and their followers in the 19^th Century would include Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, Lincoln, Mazzini, Garibaldi, Albert Schweitzer etc. If for example, we were to take a cursory look at The Nationalism Reader, (NJ: Humanities Press, 1995, Prometheus Press, 1999) we would confirm for ourselves the transcendental nature of nationalism and ethnocentrism in all its' variations. Ethnocentrism is no preserve of the Indo-European race either. Japanese, Chinese and Vietnamese thinkers have accepted the realities of the organic unity of race, nation and culture. Today, these races PRACTISE the principle openly. Further, to hold such views need not preclude one from the possession of a humanitarian impulse as the quotations from Lincoln and Schweitzer may illustrate.

Democracy, ancient or modern is similar here. As we know the liberal ideal was "captured" by plutocracy in the 19^th Century and began to inveigh against the authoritarian and ethnocentric views of the early Democrats. Their views varied greatly from those of that father of Democratic ideology – J-J Rousseau (as my quotations show).

Both the French and American Revolutions held to an authoritarian, populist, meritocratic Ideal which was their very definition of Democracy. Both the French and American Presidents had and still have quasi-dictatorial powers. Under the Australian Constitution, the Governor-General has similar powers and is in effect – President under a different label.

The term "Dictator" is Roman in origin. In times of crisis, the Roman Senate would appoint a person to resolve the matter, a man with unlimited power for a set time over certain aspects of policy. The Dictator (he who governs by decree of ‘diktat’ could be a ‘Princep’ (first or principal among peers) and often Pontifex Maximus (a high-priest, yes, but a sort of bridge between man and his gods, the custodian of the spirituality of the traditions of the Roman State). He could be a ‘Hero’ and demi-god himself like Octavian (or Augustus), a divine Caesar. A New Age philosophy would recognize such persons as OVER-MEN; in this case they arose on Democratic soil.

In these capacities, "dictators" would unite the Spiritual (i.e. ideological, philosophic, cultural) and Temporal powers as to create an official State Religion, or in our modern parlance, state ideology. The political/historical function so exercised roughly equates Plato’s goal of a Philosopher-King.

Contrary to popular opinion, neither Julius Caesar nor Augustus were ever "emporers" in the way that Romans despised (i.e. Rex, or king, hereditary leaders), but rather they were "imperators", or victorious generals, strongmen, protectors, similar to the Greek "hegemon". There were many Roman imperators and not all of them were heads of state in the capacities of Dictator or Princep, but rather as acknowledged soldiers of proven success.

Naturally the Roman Senate often conferred the title of Princep or Dictator on a successful military commander who as imperators rose to be heads of state. This position of "Imperium" is not similar to the power enjoyed by our decadent "nobility" – the Saxe-Coburgs, the Hohenzollerns, the Hapsburgs, the Bourbons, Romanovs, or Savoyards. The imperator carries the "odour" of the populist/meritocratic tradition of a man like Bonaparte. As a victorious general and master of statecraft (like Cromwell), he emulated the Roman tradition and rose from Consul to a dictatorship; he practiced his meritocratic populism throughout the time of his power. (Refer to Thomas Carlyle, "The Hero As King" in Heroes And Hero Worship.)

Bonapartism is Oswald Spengler’s Western case of "Caesarism". It is Voltaire’s "hob nail boot" against the effeminate aristocrat’s "silken slipper".

Authoritarianism transcends fascism completely. It is an aspect of Democracy, Socialism, Republicanism, and certainly Communism. In classical Marxism the "tailist" proletariat "need" the greater consciousness of their "vanguard" and the system becomes the DICTATORSHIP of the Proletariat.

Of course the movement for the rebirth of Traditional mores all over this planet (in "revolt against the modern world", to invoke Julius Evola) desires its ethical-socialist state to embody neither the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie nor the dictatorship of the proletariat. It intends to implement the "State of the Whole People". Its governing stratum will be drawn from all social classes and adherents of different philosophies or even religions; but government must be based on MERIT defined as the proven nobility of purpose combined with practical political solutions. In our national case we would demand a TOTAL commitment to the Social Republican state and to the Australian People’s Commonwealth. (Note: the term ‘Commonwealth’ was taken originally from the term used by Cromwell to describe his ‘Protectorate’) Where practical ability is divorced from nobility of mind, insufferable oppression results; and where noble intentions are divorced from practical skills (real-politik) and application (i.e. if pedantism or mania emerge) then such a society so afflicted cannot function and inevitably disintegrates.

The stewardship of holistic purpose would be one characteristic of the ethical-socialist state. Its elite would approximate Nietzsche’s new nobility or Plato’s ‘Guardians' or "Protectors’. It should over time reflect the Natural Aristocracy of a society and necessarily remain open to recruitment by merit. Before the distortion of the term by the Nazis, we could have referred to such a society as "Aryan" in form (arya being the Indo-European word for "noble" Refer to Julius Evola, Revolt Against The Modern World). This is the essence of our mission within the geo-political context of Oceania ( a new Lemuria??). This is the imperative of our Nation’s "OVER-SELF".

"History is only the patter of silken slippers descending the stairs to the thunder of hob-nail boots coming up."

Voltaire.

"Were there a people of gods, their government would be democratic.So perfect a government is not made for man."

Rousseau. (Note: it should be remembered that at one stage in his life Rousseau proposed to write a biography of Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun whom he had met in Switzerland and whom he regarded with classical deference)

"Communism is aristocratic not democratic …. only philosophers and soldiers are capable of it."

Plato.

The following statement is from the American Democrat Senator, Robert Latham Owen (1856 - 1947), whose social and monetary reform goals were partly inspired by his British name-sake, the utopian socialist and factory owner Robert Owen's (1771 - 1858), communitarian experiments in Britain and America - an example of which was the New Harmony Colony on the borders of Illinois and Indiana.

"It was not very long until this information was brought to the Rothschild's Bank, and they saw that here was a nation ready to be exploited; here was a nation that had been setting up an example that they could issue their own money in place of the money coming through the banks. The Rothschild Bank caused a Bill to be introduced into the English Parliament, therefore, which provided that no Colony of England could issue their own money. They had to use English money. Consequently, the Colonies were compelled to disregard their Scrip and mortgage themselves to the Bank of England in order to get money. For the first time in the history of the United States our money began to be based on debt."

The British Robert Owen was one of the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic founders of utopian communitarianism, a project in the tradition of Sir Thomas More's Utopia - itself inspired by Plato's Republic. I note that it was from there that William Lane and other radical nationalist thinkers drew much inspiration. This idea can be summarised today as an expression of national-communitarian ideology of which the Red-Brown / Third Position systems are a harbinger and therefore serve to confirm Owen's prophetic status. It should be remembered that Sir Thomas More was affirmed by the Vatican as a Catholic martyr and therefore his perceptions embrace a trascendental purpose both within traditionalism and secular socialist ideologies. Both the Owen's shared a view regarding the negative significance of the moneypower. This was also a characteristic of early Australian-Socialism as evidenced by a reference to Humphrey McQueen's 1986 appendix to his New Britannia which is now available to all on the Internet - a perspective characteristic of all early Anglo-Saxon-Celtic socialisms.

The British Owen's communitarian experiments also served to influence the organisation of Henry Ford's factories, which included worker-shareholder participation under a patron, a notion which Marx earlier explained as feudal-socialism. This is the Henry Ford who was associated with Charles Lindbergh of the America First Committee and who penned the text available on the Internet The International Jew.. The essence of Ford's work, for which his son profusely apolgised so as to ensure the continued viability of the Ford Motor Company, was that as an organised and politicised collective, Jews represented an unassimilable minority with an extraordinary will to power - who often distorted the direction of whatever host culture they entered into.

(For the benefit of those who imagine this author believes in a monolithic Jewish-Masonic-Vatican-sundry conspiracy: I say that it is as much a product of their imagination as is the whole idea itself.. Henry Ford, Charles Lindbergh and the great bulk of the founders of the original Ku Klux Klan were Freemasons - including the polymath Confederate general, Albert Pike, Grand Master of the Scottish Rite. Any question as to that, simply do an Internet search! (See also: John J. Robinson, Born In Blood: The Lost Secrets Of Freemasonry, 1989) The role of the Vatican has alternated between Judaeophilia and pogroms. The relationship between Masonry and Catholicism has alternated between close collaboration and civil war.

The relationship between both these forces and National and International Jewry and their inter-relationships has always been problematic. "There is only the will to power" as expressed through collectivities whether ethnic, religious, ideological, tribal etc. History is not the history of class struggle but rather the alternating alliances amongst power blocs. Yesterday's friend can be tomorrow's enemy and vice versa. There are only really two contending ideas - nationalism or its prototype tribalism - and a monocentric universalism that results in our conemporary fragmented globalised society. The only true twenty-first century synthesis of these two great opposities would be a polycentric universalism which acknowledges a multi-polar world where the real 'diversity' is planetary and not in one's own national backyard! Or, to use a liberal cliche - 'unity in diversity' but within an organic framework and not the contemporary liberal construct. Anthony Sutton has offered considerable detail as to the fluctuating relationships which existed between American and global plutocracies, socialism, Marxist and otherwise, fascism including Nazism and the role of laissez-faire ideology in morals and economics.)

The American Founding Father, Benjamin Franklin, warned the American people as to the inherent dangers of laissez-faire ideology, in that it can lead to plutocracy, the dictatorship of finance capital:

"There are two passions which have a powerful influence on human affairs: love of power and love of money ... When they are united ... they produce the most frightful outcomes."

Lincoln's view of the plutocracy - he was in part their captive and sought to find a means of salvation for himself and his people - can be summarised by the following:

"The money power preys on the nation in times of peace, and conspires against it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. It denounces, as public enemies, all who question its' methods or who throw light upon its' crimes."

Lincoln also said: "Money is the creature of law, and the creation of the original issue of money should be maintained as the exclusive monopoly of the national government. The monetary needs of inceasing numbers of people advancing towards higher standards of living can and should be met by the Government. Government, possessing power to create and issue currency and credit as money, and enjoying the right to withdraw both currency and credit from circulation by taxation and otherwise, need not and should not, borrow capital at interest as the means of financing Government work and public enterprise. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the perogative of Government but it is the Government's greatest creative opportunity. Thus money will cease to be master, and become the servant of humanity. Democracy will rise superior to the Money Power."

The reader should now appreciate one part of the pattern of liberal cosmopolitan intellectual 'activity'. Another area of their historic distortion has been to equate people with a sense of ethnocentrism to be, by their very nature, anti-human. It is an objective fact, as borne out by the science of socio-biology that there are inherent differences between gene pools and as a consequence - cultures.

(Author's November 2005 Note: The hysterical reaction to Australian Associate Professor Andrew Fraser of Macquarie University in Sydney was anticipated in the 1970's by the responses to American emeritus Professors Hans J. Eysenck and Arthur R. Jensen. It should be remembered that Professor Eysenck left Nazi Germany because he was an opponent of its totalitarian form of political correctness. Little did he realise that the multiculti liberal also had his totalitarian genocidal agenda - the elimination of all human diversity in the proverbial melting pot of an amorphous humanity. Jensen is part Jewish. Eysenck's step-father was Jewish and his grandmother died in a concentration camp as part of the Nazi euthenasia program.

For a comprehensive appreciation of the relationship between community ethics and its demographic constituencies, refer to the works of expatriate Australian lecturer, Dr. Frank K. Salter of the Max Planck Institute in Germany. See also for a competent exposition of sociobiology: Glayde Whitney, "Raymond B. Cattell And The Fourth Inquisition", Mankind Quarterly, Vol. 38, Parts 1 and 2, Fall/Winter 1997, pp. 99 - 104 )

"Basing their ideas on the concept of the brotherhood of man, certain writers, who are mostly social anthropologists, consider it immoral to study race and produce book after book exposing it as a myth. Their prudery about race is equal to the horror of the Victorian prudery about sex. These writers are not physical anthropologists, but the public does not understand the difference."

Carleton Coon

"A race or tribe is a corporate body which nature has entrusted with an assortment of human seed or genes, the assortment differing in some degree from that entrusted to every group. If the genes are to work out their evolutionary effect, then it is necessary that the tribe or corporation should maintain its integrity through an affinity of generations. If a tribe loses its integrity by free interbreeding, that tribe has to come to an end."

Sir Arthur Keith, eminent geneticist.

"A social pyramid which is to endure must be made up of individual human units, preferably of a common racial origin, who, from bottom to top of the pyramid, are conscious of a common evolutionary destiny, and work together to attain it.

Sir Arthur Keith.

" There is something that all white men must learn and know as I have: that these individuals are of a lesser-race. They have neither the intellectual, moral or emotional abilities to equate or share equally with White men in any of the functions of our civilization. I have given them my life to try and bring them the advantages which our civilization must offer, but I have become well aware that we must retain the status of White the Superior and they the inferior."

Albert Schweitzer, referring to African adaption to European civilization.

"If I was Black, I would be for the Blacks; being White, I am for the Whites."

Napoleon Bonaparte, referring to the so-called 'French revolutions' in San Domingo and Haiti

Thomas Jefferson, as below, quoted from his Works: Volume One, p. 48. Jefferson was referring to slavery; he was himself, a slave owner:

"Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free; nor is it less certain than the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them. It is still in our power to direct the process of emancipation and deportation peaceably and in such slow degree that the evil will wear off insensibly, and their place be .... pari passu filled up by free White labourers. If on the contrary left to force itself on human nature much shudder at the prospect held up."

Abraham Lincoln, also interpreted the revolutionary premise of the American Constitution. This was an extrapolation of the Rousseauesque postulate pertaining to governments and governors being the instruments of the general will of the masses. When governments no longer represent this will they are in breach of the social contract and every person of character and honour has a moral obligation to terminate the charade. Today, every Western nation which has been influenced by classic liberal-democratic thought will have to address this dialectical crisis - the solutions to this dilemma can easily be developed from Abraham Lincoln. The position expressed by Lincoln below also is a re-presentation of a premise present in the original Magna Carta imposed by English nobles upon Prince John. It is in fact the founding premise of all Anglo-Saxon-Celtic institutions and not strangely finds echoes throughout the Indo-European world.

"The country, with its institutions, belongs to the people who inhabit it. Whenever they shall grow weary of the existing government, they can exercise their constitutional right of amending it, or exercise their revolutionary right to overthrow it."

"Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God."

Thomas Jefferson.

Neither the above references to Albert Schweitzer's or to Abraham Lincoln's thoughts below are intended to affirm or negate the esoteric supposition of white racial superiority. But Lincoln's true thoughts or feelings have been misrepresented or suppressed by liberals. The raison d'etre for Lincoln's emancipation of the Negro slaves was in keeping with the spirit of Jefferson and the other Founding Fathers. Lincoln's intent was to resettle them within their own country be it in Africa (ie. Liberia) or somewhere in the Americas, but outside of the United States. He was an advocate of complete separate development.

After the Civil War the mass movement of Southern Negroes to the North supplied a cheap labour pool. The Negro had exchanged the feudal form of servitude, which offered degrees of welfare and protection to the black man (who was technically the plantationist's chattel), found himself in a condition of wage slavery, without these advantages, at the hands of the Northern liberal capitalist industrialists. In the process, they retarded the aspirations of the white working people to a living wage by serving as a surplus un-unionised labour force. These problems Lincoln anticipated and sought to address.

Today, the same forces demand the complete eradication of borders and the free-flow of labour and capital. The movement of the intellectual and professional classes from the Third World to the West, not only undermines the Western professional classes, but deprives the Third World of its natural leadership. These people who abandon their patrimony are free from any altruism and should be viewed with the contempt they deserve, not simply as contenders with our own elites, but as traitors to their people. If the ordinary working masses of the Third World do not have leadership, then who is responsible? The liberal multiracialist is in fact undermining the world he purports will be created - by eroding what future the Third World has which must come from its Natural elite. The bulk of asylum seekers pay their way to people smugglers. The ordinary person in the Third World does not posess those means. Therefore a pan-nationalist perspective is the only mechanism by which there can be a universal elevation of the conditions of life. Pan-nationalism in the new millennium is only viable form of internationalism, because it is founded on the principle of mutual social obligations. Such a world view does not countenance desertion.

I mostly rely on Roy P. Basler (ed.), The Collected Works Of Abraham Lincoln: Rutgers University Press, 1953, published in eight volumes, for the following quotations.

"I can not make it better known that I strongly favour the return of Negroes to Africa. With this return, even to a limited extent - enhanced wages to white labour is mathematically certain. Reduce the supply of labour by repatriating the blacks and by precisely so much, you increase demand for, and wages of, white labour."

"See our present condition - the country engaged in war! - our white men cutting one another's throats …..and then consider what we know to be the truth.

But for your race among us there could not be war, although many men engaged on either side do not care for you one way or the other … It is better for us both, therefore to be separated.

You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but that the physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffer very greatly, many of them by living among us, while ours suffer from your presence. In a word, we suffer on each side. If this is admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated."

Address On Colonization To A Deputation Of Negroes In Washington D.C., August 14 1862 (Vol. V, p.371)

"There is a natural disgust in the minds of all white people to the idea of indiscriminate amalgamation of white and black races." (Springfield,Illinois 1857).

"Negro equality! Fudge!! How long in the government of a God great enough to make and maintain this Universe, shall there continue knaves to vend, and fools to gulp, so low a piece of demagogism as this?"

Fragments. Notes For Speeches, September 1859. (Vol. III, p. 399)

"I will say then that I am not, nor have ever been in favour of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races (applause) … that I am not, nor have ever been in favour of, making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favour of the superior position assigned to the white race …"

Fourth Debate With Stephen A. Douglas At Charlestown, Illinois, September 18 1858. (Vol. III, pp. 145, 161)

The following poem by Rudyard Kipling essentially reaffirms the eternal necessity for separate development. The presense of Muslim aliens whose God has repossessed their souls, has led to the tragedies of Bali, London, Madrid and countless expressions of unnecessary civil strife.The obvious evidence of Australia's Cronulla 'riots' (sic), the French riots (2005), the recent 2007 Russian riots and the constant race conflicts which have eventuated from the entry of aliens into the Western Civilization, is in front of us.. There is a clash of civilizations, but not that promulgated by the Anglo-American-Zionist bloc which is the principle advocate of the multicultural society. The term multiculturalism appeared first in the anglophone world in the 1950's and 1960's and gained hegemony from this bloc and spread to non English speaking nations. The only conflict of civilizations is inherently domestic (since different ones have coexisted for millennia on the basis of separate development - eg. the Chinese and Japanese civilizations existed with minimum interaction between themselves and the rest of the world until the 'barbarians' broke down their doors for economic reasons under the pretense of the 'white man's burden'). All ancient civilizations advised against the presense of unassimilable aliens. Even India, which has been often toted as the epitome of multi religious, multi ethnic nirvana, has always been a hot-bed of communal violence throughout its history. With these thoughts in mind, the 'Stranger Within My Gate' is all the more important to us, as it encapsulates these notions and it comes from a man born in the days of Britain's Indian Raj, a country which the East India Company used as a production base for the opium which lay at the base of the Chinese Opium War. Yesterday's white man's burden, the building of empires, has seen the chickens coming home to roost. This is what every sage of every civilization has warned his people against - it is still not too late to save our civilization!

PART SIX

"Ariel Sharon has Yassir Arafat under house arrest in Ramallah and George Bush under house arrest in the Oval Office."

Leibowitz is right, we are Judaeo-Nazis, and why not? .... Now don't be shocked, if (Israel's founders) had killed six million Arabs here or even one million, what would have happened? Sure, two or three nasty pages would have been written in the history books, we would have been called all sorts of names, but we could be here today as a people of twenty five million ....

Even today I am willing to volunteer to the dirty work for Israel, to kill as many Arabs as necessary, to deport them, to expell and burn them, to have everyone hate us, to pull the rug from underneath the feet of the diaspora Jews, so that they will be forced to run to us crying, even if it means blowing up one or two synagogues here and there, I don't care. And I don't mind after the job is done you put me in front of a Nuremberg Trial and jail me for life, hang me if you want as a war criminal. Then you can spruce up your Jewish conscience and enter the respectable club of civilised nations, nations that are large and wealthy. What you don't understand is that the dirty work of Zionism is not finished yet, far from it."

The Role Of The Jews In European History.

We could begin by referring to Paul Rassinier, Drama Of The European Jews (1964), now republished by Historical Review Press, P.O. Box 612 Silver Springs, Maryland 20901, U.S.A. Rassinier was an anarcho-communist and founding member of the French Resistance. He was a prisoner of the Nazis in Buchenwald and Dachau concentration camps until release in 1945. In 1946, he was elected for a brief term to the French Chamber of Deputies.

Arthur Butz’s Hoax Of The Twentieth Century published also by Historical Review Press is a development of Rassinier’s work on the Nazi policies towards Europe’s Jews.

Another useful work in this area is The Jewish Mask from the Omni Christian Book Club of America.

Much has been written on the Jews in European history. The above cited book for example is correct in its sections dealing with Jewish antiquity and produces much material similar to the work of scholars with a Jewish background, such as Allegro, Koestler and Lillienthal. But it errs badly when discussing the ‘Jewish character’ and social ideas of the socialist and communist movements (both Marxist and non-Marxist). The flaw in analysis lies in making assessments based upon misunderstandings of various historical complexities which have not been relevant since the 1930’s (if certain opinions were ever really correct). Let alone relevant to those nations which were officially Marxist in Europe. (Refer to my ‘Social Revolutionary Nature’)

There is much anti-semitic propaganda dished up by the old-right, both in its traditional conservative and nazi/fascist forms. We have to confront it.

The writings of the controversial British historian, David Irving, are useful to answering the propaganda of anti-semitism. To the chagrin of anti-semites (and Zionists Jewish or gentile), David Irving's mother was a non-practising Jew and by rabbinical law, he qualifies under the Israeli 'Law Of Return' to become a settler/citizen - as does Aleksandr Rutskoy. The American editor and patron of Common Sense, Benjamin Freedman, was a former Jew who converted to Catholicism. Vladimir Zhirinovsky's biological father was a non-practising Jew. These four examples are of self-evident assimilation with all four being patriots to their own lands. All four are defenders of facts, or to paraphrase Freedman: "facts are facts".

Permit a broad statement: although many of the leaders of the Marxist Bolshevik movement were Jews, the Marxist cause was NOT an attempt of the Zionists to achieve any political world domination. Rather it was a product of very specific 19^th century Western issues; in as far as the Jews were concerned, it was product of a SPLIT (to use Winston Churchill’s phrase) in the Jewish community.

The bulk of the pre-Bolshevik Marxists of the European Social Democratic Movement, (and here I will refer specifically to those of them who were Jews) were ANTI-ZIONIST, and often European ethnocentrists. Marx himself was a pan-German imperialist and chauvinist and accused of it by the anti-German French socialists of the period. Marx’s German imperialist ideas were rabid enough to cause Nesta Webster, writer of "conspiracy" history to condemn Marxism as a German/Jewish plot!!! We can read N.Weyl’s Karl Marx: Racist for more here. The FACT seems that most of the Jewish Marxists (though not all) were emancipated Jews, secular and assimilated. Certainly they DID project many of their root-ideas; but the fact as cited stands.

I would say that if Marx were alive today Zionists psychotics would denounce him for anti-semitism and NAZISM (despite his Jewish ancestry) as they have done to many other anti-Zionist Jews including the former liberal Chancellor of Austria, Bruno Kreisky. I am sure the Simon Wiesenthals would be most active!!

Russian Bolshevism was not a single monolithic movement but rather an amalgam of movements and tendencies synthesized and dominated by the personality of another Marxist Vladimir Illich Ullyanov (Lenin). Lenin’s ethnic background was partly Swedish, part Finnic (Chuvash or pre-Slavic ‘aboriginal’ type which inhabited Russia, related to the Samoyeds of Siberia from whence Lenin derived his Mongoloid features), part German, part German-Jewish. Amongst the many factions within Bolshevism were Pan-Slav ethnocentrists and peasant socialists, who were more philosophically akin to Dostoyevsky than Marx. They had their origins in groups like ‘Narodnaya Volya’ (the Russian word Narod signifies both Nation and People similar to the German word Volk or the English word Folk; a related idea is the English word 'nation' derived of the Latin root word for 'nascent' or birth; nativity et al, thus one is born into the nation) or the National-Peoples Will (ie. the will of a specific people).

(Note: April 2008. Narodnaya Volya was reconstituted in December 2001 and led by veteran Russian radical nationalist, Sergey Baburin. On March 26 2007, Narodnaya Volya fused with much of the broad Rodina bloc to create a new party - Narodny Soyuz (National-People's Union/Alliance). Amongst its more prominent members is the former Vice President of Russia, Aleksandr Rutskoy. Baburin has held the post of Speaker of the Duma and his party has also hosted a delegation from the government of Hugo Chavez. This alliance will become very significant to Russia's national renewal and possibly that of the imminent Eurasian imperium.)

There were other Marxists of the Marx-Engels school of thinking who were desirous of creating a European Federation based on the solidarity of the respective working classes, a transnational union of ‘white’ proletariat. Plekhanov, an ethnic Russian, represented that trend of thought. Plekhanov had been Lenin’s mentor until the famous Bolshevik/Menshevik split, and his thinking had wide support, both Jewish and Gentile.

However, Lenin’s thinking became the dominant trend. Lenin’s goal was a totalitarian-Marxist-cosmopolitan one in that he aimed at a UNIVERSAL TRANSCENDENTAL STATE, a union of republics, an eventual ONE-WORLD REPUBLIC with a single cultural-political form. It was to implement a universal racial/cultural homogeneity, in a proletarian guise. The New Testament notion of 'there is neither Greek nor Jew' was interpreted as neither white nor black nor brown nor yellow, simply proletarians. It was such that the universalist homogenising imperative implicit in Christianity whereby there would be a global community of the faithful, became the community of the Marxist faithful.

Marx in the preamble to the Communist Manifesto (particularly in the preface to the Polish edition) acknowledged the principle of nationality. He desired a Federation of European communist nations under the hegemony of Germany. In this sense alone was he an internationalist. He did not promise the abolition of ethnic and national particularisms. Lenin only acknowledged this type of federation as a stepping stone to the "amalgamation" of all nations, races and peoples into the World Republic. Lenin’s dream was more akin to cosmopolitan Christianity (i.e. the universal Christian or Catholic Church embodying all of mankind) but interpreted in the light of dialectical materialism. Lenin’s dream, like that of the extreme world-homogenizing Christian fraction, is hostile to LIFE which demands the heterogeneity of races, peoples, nations and cultures.

Let us discuss this liberal cosmopolitanism in more detail. It seems important to our discussion of the Jews, of liberal values, of Marxism.

During the French Revolution a similar totalitarian cosmopolitan , but economically liberal and capitalist interpretation of classical liberal-democracy arose. But it was beaten down by those who saw the "fatherland is in danger" (le patrie en danger) and Democracy was harnessed to French ethnocentric nationalist ideals. During the American Civil War, the liberal-cosmopolitan leveler group appeared again under the leadership of the radical Republican Party. They used Abraham Lincoln’s assassination (Lincoln was a racial-nationalist) as a pretext to pursue a policy of the destruction of the old Confederacy during the dark period of "Reconstruction". They were defeated both in the South and North by American nationalist secret societies/militias. D.W. Griffith’s 1915 silent movie classic Birth Of A Nation tells us much here. The original book text of Margaret Mitchell's Gone With The Wind is faithful to the truth also. The relatively recent, Gods And Generals, starring Robert Duvall is also a useful film in so far as it demonstrates that the Confederacy was often both humane to their Negro slaves as well as being enemies of the New York plutocracy which controlled the Northern government.

The liberal cosmopolitan trend however never seems to rest in any time or any place. But he had to exercise great care in the West until 1945, the time of Fascism’s military defeat. As a consequence of Fascism’s ethnocentric-nationalist character, the distorter was able to brand all nationalism as "fascism" and therefore pursue a totalitarian programme to destroy all manifestations of European racial-nationalism. Of course, it could be pointed out that Hitler, Mussolini and the rest had as much opposition from non-nazi, non-fascist authoritarian-nationalists as from certain cosmopolitan forces (see my Social Revolutionary Nature as well as Douglas Reed, Prisoner Of Ottawa and Nemesis); it is a fact that the fascist movement was never synonymous with ethnocentrism or nationalism as such. It represented merely a specific community of ideologies related to the first fascism – that of Mussolini. Hitler saw Mussolini as his mentor saying: "it is uncertain that if there had never been Fascism, whether there would have been National Socialism". Indeed, Nazi ideology was never totally in synchronization with German Nationalist ideology; rather it was a fascism in the German context. In short, it was Hitlerism, just as Bolshevism was never Marxism as such, but Leninism.

In truth, the liberal-totalitarian attempt to equate Europid nationalisms with fascism and concentration camps – is finished! The silence into which this nationalism was compelled – is over! Truth is prevailing and "we" are returning in strength. Particularly, we have made gigantic gains in the former Socialist Bloc of countries (see Alexander Yanov, Russia’s New Right , Right-wing Ideologies In The Contemporary U.S.S.R., University of California, a study of various Russian nationalist ideologies). While the title is a misnomer (nationalism can be as much ‘left’ as ‘right’), the work is very useful. David Shipler, Russia: Broken Idols, Solemn Dreams, Mc Donald Futura Australia, develops Yanov’s information. (Kevin Coogan, Dreamer Of The Day: Francis Parker Yockey And The Post-War Fascist International, New York, 2000; in my Social Revolutionary Nature, I refer to other works regarding the transformations in post-1990 Russia).

In reality, there have been more concentration camps and mass murders perpetrated by totalitarian cosmopolitans (whether Christian liberal or "marxist") in the name of the one world ideal, than those "crimes" which can be laid at the door of nationalism, fascism included.

There could be "one-world", a multi-polar world which is OUR one-world, and not that of the totalitarian world homogenisers – be they Marxist, theist, atheist, liberal or fascist. Indeed, there have even been fascist one-worlders, particularly those of the "clerical-fascist" mould and "world Aryanisers" who want to destroy groups for "aesthetic" reasons. Whether it be the amorphous brown man dreamed up by liberal world-homogenizers as the future humanity, or the blond-haired/blue-eyed Aryan ideal of Hitlerism supplanting and exterminating all inferior races, or a world where everyone is genuflecting and handling rosary beads and ignoring and supplanting all other thought-processes through an Inquisition, they all arrive at the abolition of the natural cultural and biological diversity of humanity. This world-homogenizing tendency is therefore not exclusively an appendage to liberalism, Christianity or Marxism, but rather is an expression of every ideology that aims at overruling the natural diversity, that expression of the only true manifest divinity we can arrive at through empirical observation - and intuition. This little gem of information may shock them, but it nonetheless remains a fact!

The fact is that the One World of the cosmopolitans is a product purely of the intellect devoid of instinct. The alternative arises from the ‘powers’ latent in any creed of blood and soil as more recently developed by Professor Lev Gumilev in the U.S.S.R.. His The Biological and Geographical Conception of Ethnic History and Ethno-genesis And The Biosphere enjoyed wide circulation, particularly now after the collapse of the old regime. His conception remains one based on Natural Law. Gumilev's works are the principle inspiration for Gennady Zyuganov's Communist Party Of The Russian Federation, as well as that of several other nationalist groups in Russia. (Refer to Gennady Zyuganov's postulates on "the third road" in his political manifesto, My Russia. Armonk (New York): M.E. Sharpe, 1997.)

Global co-operation between all peoples, races, nations and cultures as DISTINCT ENTITIES is at the core of the New Age world-view implicit in the principle of Unity in Diversity (E PLURIBUS UNUM – UNUS UNORUM EST -- "one in the many and all in the one"). We are speaking of a system transcendent of economic or social systems, i.e. a REAL DÉTENTE based on the acceptance of the uniqueness of each component. A global solidarity could help avert nuclear war, pollution, soil erosion social/cultural decomposition of certain peoples etc. A global solution to these problems through national means! This ideology is implicit in the New Age orientated national-revolutionary groups in Western Europe and the Americas. They promulgate a THIRD POSITION in politics, neither Left nor Right, neither Marxist nor capitalist (see my ‘Social Revolutionary Nature’ and the forthcoming essay ‘What is Australian-Socialism?’).

The above world-view was anticipated by the seventeenth century Scottish parliamentarian, Andrew Fletcher of Saltoun, but at that time, the world was not mature enough to implement it. It is now the twenty-first century. An interesting interpretation of this progressive co-nationalist perspective can be found in Graham Williamson and T.P. Bragg, A Declaration And Philosophy Of Progressive Nationalism (2005). (Obtainable 'Livable Nation', C/- P.O. Box 4127, Hornchurch, Essex, RM12 4PJ, United Kingdom) As its authors themselves acknowledge, this is a pioneering work and an interpretation and not the final form - since there will be always many forms and interpretations of progressive nationalism.

"Show me a true patriot, and I will show you a lover not merely of his own country, but of all mankind. Show me a spurious patriot, a bombastic fire-eater, and I will show you a rascal. Show me a man who loves other countries equally with his own and I will show you a man entirely deficient in a sense of proportion. But show me a man who respects the rights of all nations, while ready to defend the rights of his own against them all and I will show you a man who is both a naionalist and an internationalist." Andrew Fletcher, 1653 -1716. The relevance of Fletcher's world-view to the contemporary New Age movement is self-evident by simply referring to A.R. Orage's New Age Magazine, 11 August 1910, Vo. 7, No. 15

The One World of the cosmopolitan is evolutionary-negative in that it represents an impossible desire to return to the "primordial chaos" (or undifferentiated mass that resonates with the protozoic soup) , whilst our concept is the Positive Constructive of the Imperative of Evolution. Our concept is therefore NATURAL.

Let us now return back to the matter of the Jews.

Naturally, many of the cosmopolitan Bolsheviks may have been secret Zionist cultural-political -imperialists (of the type the Apostle Paul liked to call the Judaisers of Christianity: so this lot sought to remodel Bolshevism) who saw in Bolshevism an attempt to proclaim the Ural Mountains the new Mount Zion on earth. They distorted the Bolshevik movement from its Russian roots to give it other messianic directions. From certain Pan-Slav underlying bases it did, for a long period, reflect the distorters values (see the works of John Jewell: for his then-current list of Soviet anti-Zionist publications). This tendency of the Russian Jews was long recognized in the Bolshevik movement. Lenin purged the Zionist "Bund" from the party as well as entering into conflict with the Zionists (so did Stalin). What Lenin began for totalitarian-Marxist-cosmopolitan reasons, Stalin finished for ethnocentric-nationalist reasons (but within the constraints of Marxist categories and dialectical materialism). Stalin’s "anti-cosmopolitan campaign" drove most rootless aliens out of the Communist movement (be they Jewish or Gentile) in the late 1940’s, leaving the state firmly under the hegemony of ethnocentric nationalist Gentiles.

The Talmud-inspired Zionist imperialists are distinct from certain Jewish cultural nationalists, although the latter have been often manipulated by the former who dream of the messianic possibility of a World Empire dominated by God’s Chosen People through proxy nations such as the United States. Two classic Soviet booklets dealt with this subject in precisely these terms (see: Ivanov's Caution Zionism! and Trofim Kychko'sJudaism Without Embellishment, as published by the prestigious Ukrainian Academy of Sciences). In recent times, notable persons such as Dr. Mahatir Mohammed of Malaysia and Professor Gennady Zyuganov of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (and former presidential candidate) - have reiterated this perspective. The Jewish nationalist desired the right to separate from the gentile world without animosity or chauvinistic intention. This legitimate right to self-determination was achieved in the creation of the state of Israel, but it was equally achieved through the formation of the Autonomous Region of Birobidzhan in the Soviet Union, or could have been realised by the proposal for a Jewish State in Madagascar. It must be remembered that long before Hitler advanced a Madagascan solution to the German-Jewish question, that solution was proposed by Jewish nationalists in the late nineteenth century.

However, the Talmud-inspired Zionist can feel only contempt for humanity, indeed a vicious hatred worse than the supposed excesses of Hitlerism. In his gospel, the Talmud, he postulates nothing but hatred for the goyim (the unclean Gentile cattle, the Zionist precursor of the Nazi untermenschen or sub-human ideology) who exist for no other reason than to be milked by chosen hands. As he ‘milks’, the Chosen awaits his messiah to manifest, after which he shall have numerous goy slaves and the wealth of the world will be delivered unto him. This Talmudism, combined with his desire to revenge himself upon the goyim for real and imagined wrongs, makes the Zionist an eternally unassimilable distorter. This fact is known to all: to gentiles , cosmopolitan and nationalist, to Jews, cosmopolitan and assimilated. It should be remembered that Ben Gurion, the first Prime Minister of Israel, defined Zionism "as the ceaseless struggle of a divinely chosen people against a campaign to dilute or exterminate them." It should be noted that Israel Abrahams, Chief Rabbi of South Africa, as quoted in the South African Jewish Times (September 1964) stated: "The call of assimilation, in all its multifacted aspects, is the soul destroying tragedy that quenches the altar fires of our faith and idealism, leaving only the cold ashes of a forgotten glory, of a rejected mission, of a trust betrayed." It is interesting that Ben Gurion and his Zionist fellows, both Jewish and Gentile, equate dilution/assimilation with extermination, therefore making the Zionist, of his own choice, unassimilable.

I refer the reader to Wilmott Robertson’s The Dispossessed Majority Cape Canaveral, Florida) as well as Francis Parker Yockey, The Enemy of Europe , Parts One and Two, (Liberty Bell Press, West Virginia) Though both authors belong to the American political Right (Robertson is a traditional conservative, Yockey an unorthodox neo-fascist intellectual), their work deserves to be considered even if not fully endorsed by New Age revolutionary intellectuals. The New Age ethical-socialist idea is neither Left nor Right in the traditional sense but transcends it, drawing on all political and philosophical traditions in keeping with historical facts. The same can even be said of being "eclectic" towards Nietzsche and Spengler.

Theodore Herzl said: "Every nation in whose midst Jews live is either covertly or overtly anti-semitic… Anti-Semitism increases day by day and hour by hour among nations (Author's Note: But, why?). Indeed it is bound to increase, because the causes of its growth continue to exist and cannot be removed (Author's Note: Why can't it be removed?)…"

In grasping this subject, we can turn to Leo Cooper, In The Shadow Of The Polish Eagle: The Poles, The Holocaust And Beyond, Basingstoke (Palgrave) 2000. This Jewish author alleges that General Anders and his fellows in the anti-Nazi Polish Home Army were opposed to the return of Jewish emigrants because of a belief that prior to 1939 they exerted a disproportionate influence in Polish economic, cultural and political life. The Home Army were also accused of liquidating left-wing partisans whose leadership was often made up of pro-Soviet proletarian Jews and by such actions hoped to avert the Sovietisation of Poland after the war. Yet, the Home Army was the recognised military arm of the Polish government in exile in London, subject to general Allied direction, particularly that of Churchill. Churchill understood the struggle that was occurring in the 'Jewish soul', dividing it between Zionism and internationalist socialism of all shades.

Herzl continued, addressing the World Zionist Congress in Basle, Switzerland, in 1897:

: "…Thus united we suddenly discover our strength …when we sink we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party, when we rise, there also rises the terrible power of the purse!!"

Maybe, that is why there is anti-semitism?!

For references to matters raised in this Part:

I conclude here with some endearing gems from the Talmud, the Zionist Mein Kampf, because Zionism/Talmudism is the politicisation, and therefore perversion of the Jewish bible (the Torah etc). The Talmud is made up of sixty three books and is often printed in about eighteen large volumes. Much of the Talmud was written by rabbinical sages between the years 200 A.D. and 500 A.D. and is not necessary to Judaism (which is older than the Talmud), and which therefore - can be dispensed with. Eight Catholic popes condemned the Talmud. Martin Luther, founder of the Protestant church, ordered it burnt, whilst Pope Clement VIII ordered it eternally proscribed. Neither Luther's nor Clement VIII's solutions to the Talmud were later shown to be compatible with the spirit of the Enlightenment. That which exists in the darkness must be exposed, and so the great French Caesar, Napoleon Bonaparte, summoned the Great Sanhedrin and asked them quite simply: 'please explain' the purpose of these statements. Being compelled to answer is to ensure that light prevails over darkness. As long as persons of Jewish confession constrain their belief-system and value-system to the pentateuch and the remainder of the Old Testament which they share in common with Christians, they are in one sense simply a sect within a broad 'Judaeo-Christianity', and not a 'problem'. They should be allowed to practise this confession in the same way as Western Civilization tolerates many other confessions compatible with its value-system. But the Talmudically inspired, be they of theistic or atheistic perspective, are incompatible with any host culture in direct consequence of the value system they espouse, as evidenced by the following. Again, we ask: 'please explain' in the event we fail to understand the purport of these Talmudic texts.

"Murdering goyim is like killing a wild animal".

Sanhedrin 59a

"Even the best of the gentiles should be killed."

Abordah Zara

"A goy who pries into The Law is guilty of death."

Sanhedrin 59a

"Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."

Yebhamoth 11b

"Jesus fornicated with his jackass"

Sanhedrin 105ab

"Jesus is in hell and is being punished by being boiled in hot semen. Christians are boiled in dung."

Gittin 57a

"It is permitted to kill a Jewish denunciator anywhere. It is permitted to kill him even before he denounces."

Choszen Hamiszpat 388

"Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."

Schabouth Hag 6d

"Jews must always try to deceive Christians."

Zohar 1160a

"Do not save goyim in danger of death."

Hilkkoth Akum 11

"A Jew may keep anything he finds which belongs to the Aqum (gentile/idolator). For he who returns lost property (to gentiles) sins against The Law by increasing the power of the transgressors of The Law. It is praiseworthy, however, to return lost property if it is done to honour the name of God, namely, if by so doing Christians will praise the Jews and look upon them as honourable people."

Choshen Ham 266 1

"The Jew is allowed to go to the Aqum lead him on, do business with him, to deceive him and take his money. For the wealth of the Aqum is to be regarded as common property and belongs to the first who can get it."

Choshem Ham 156, 5 Hagah.

"The money of the truly righteous Jew is more precious to them than their own bodies."

Sotah 12a

"You are human beings, but the nations of the world are not human beings but beasts." Baba Mecia, 114, b

"On the house of the goy, one looks as on the field of cattle."

Tosefta, Erubia, viii.

"We beg thee, O Lord, indict thy wrath on the Nations not believing in Thee and not calling on Thy name. Let down thy wrath on them and inflict them with Thy wrath. Drive them away in Thy wrath and crush them into pieces. Take away, O Lord, all bone from them. In a moment, indict all disbelievers. Destroy in a moment all foes of Thy nation. Draw out with root, disperse and ruin unworthy nations. Destroy them! Destroy them immediately, in this very moment.

(Pranaitas: Christianus in Talmudus Judeorum; quotations from Synagogue Judaica, p. 213. Minhagin, p.23; Croch Chaim, 480, Hagah) This above is the prayer said on the eve of the Passover.

"The estates of the Goys are like wilderness; who first settles in them has a right to them." Baba Batra, 54,b.

"If it can be proven that someone has given the money of Israelites to the goyim, a way must be found after prudent consideration to wiping him off the face of the earth."

Choschen Hamm 388,15.

"The property of the Goys is like a thing without a master"

Schulchan Aruch: Chozen Hamiszpat, 156, 5.

The Jew has struck his spade in the ground of the Goy; he has become master of the whole." Baba Batra, 55a.

" A Jew may rob a Goy; he may cheat him over a bill which should not be perceived by him otherwise the name of God would become dishonoured."

Schulchan Aruch Chozen Hamizpat, 348.

"The Son of Noah, who would steal a farthing ought to be put to death; but an Israelite is allowed to do injury to a Goy; where it is written, Thou shalt not do an injury to thy neighbour is not said, thou shalt not injure a Goy." Missa Sanhedrin, 57.

"Who took an oath in the presence of the Goys, the robbers, and the customs house officer, is not responsible." Tosefta Szebnot, 11.

"In order to annul marriages, oaths and promises, A Jew must go to the rabbi, and if he is absent, he must call three other Jews, and say to them that he is sorry to have done it, and they say: ‘Thou art allowed to’." (Schulchan Aruch, 2, 1.247.)

The Kol Nidre prayer of the Day of Judgment, that acquits beforehand Jews from the failure to fulfill all oaths, vows and promises:

"All vows, oaths, promises engagements and swearing which beginning this very day of reconciliation, we intend to vow, promise, swear and bind ourselves to fulfill, we are sorry for already, and they shall be annulled, acquited, annihilated, abolished, valueless, unimportant; our vow shall be no vows, and our oaths, no oaths at all."

Schulchan Aruch, edit 1, 136.

"If a Goy killed a Goy or a Jew, he is responsible; but if a Jew killed a Goy he is not responsible."

ibid., viii, 5.

"If a Jew be called upon to explain any part of the rabbinic books, he only ought to give a false explanation, that he might not, by behaving differently, become an accomplice in betraying this information. Who shall violate this order shall be put to death."

"Every Goy who studies the Talmud, and every Jew who helps him in it, ought to die."

Sanhedrin 59a Aboda Zora 8-6 Szagiga 13.

These quotations from The Talmud may explain why there has been throughout history constant condemnation of Talmudic Judaism. Amongst many great Western thinkers there has been a critical examination of Judaic texts. I include, as follows, three observations from famous products/precipitators of Enlightenment thought. Again, I reiterate, Judaism need not and should not be Talmudic, since it is the latter which is offensive and not necesarily the remainder of the theology:

"The Jews are nothing but an ignorant and barbaric people, which have for a long time combined the most loathsome avarice with the most abominable superstition and inexhaustable hatred of all peoples by whom they are tolerated, and through whom they are enriched." Francois-Marie Arouet (Voltaire).

"I decided to improve the Jews: but I do not want any more in my realm: indeed, I have done all to prove my scorn of the vilest nation in the world." Napoleon Bonaparte.

"There is a great danger for the United States of America, this great danger is the Jew. Gentlemen, in every land in which the Jews have settled, they have depressed the normal level and lowered the degree of commerial honesty. They have remained apart and unassimilated - they have created a state within a state, and when they are opposed they attempt to strangle the nation financially as in he case of Portugal and Spain. For more than 1700 years, they have lamented their sorrowful fate - namely, that they were driven out of their motherland, but gentlemen, if the civilized world should give them back Palestine and their property, they would immediately find pressing reasons for not returning there. Why? Because they are vampires - they cannot live among themselves; they must live among Christians and others who do not belong to their race.

If they are not excluded from the United States by the Constitution, within less than a hundred years they will stream into this country in such numbers they will rule and destroy us and change our form of Government for which we Americans shed our blood and sacrificed life, property and personal freedom. If the Jews are not excluded, within two hundred years our children will be working in the fields to feed the Jews while they remain in the Counting House gleefully rubbing their hands.

I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews forever, your children's children will curse you in your graves. Their ideas are not those of Americans even when they have lived among us for ten generations. The leopard cannot change its spots. The Jews are a danger to this land and if they are allowed to enter they will imperil your institutions - they should be excluded by the Constitution."

Benjamin Franklin, 1789, addressing the question of Jewish immigration during the debates of the American Constitutional Convention.

The quotation from Benjamin Franklin is particularly relevant today in terms of world politics since it is referred to by Osama bin Laden (see: bin Laden's declaration on this site). He uses it to show the reasons why the world may yet see a global conflageration betwen Islam and so-called Christendom. He says this would be a consequence of the Zionist domination of the United States of America. Since American political leverage operates over the remainder of the white world, and particularly within the Anglophone bloc, they can induce this 'clash of civilizations' that might otherwise, not occur.

PART SEVEN:

"I Haven't Come To Praise Caesar But To Bury Him".

"The evil that men do liveth after them; the good is often interred with their bones." (Shakespeare, ‘Julius Caesar’)

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its' natural manure." (Thomas Jefferson)

National Socialism, as Nazism or Neo-Nazism should not be necessarily equated with the idea of ‘nationally-specific socialism’ ie. a socialism within a nationalist (or tribalist or ethnic) context. The idea that has become popularly known as 'National Socialism' is specifically Hitlerism or Neo-Hitlerism (sic). Thus it was a doctrine limited by TIME and SPACE. It had its own unique historical, geo-political and bio-cultural origins and characteristics. Concentration camps, countless corpses and other 'crimes against humanity' may have been a few of its features but so were other specifics not so atrocious and even benevolent. But it was never a universal white man's creed as postulated by contemporary neo-nazis, and it was certainly never meant for Australia or New Zealand whose fate Hitler intended was no different from the multiracialist liberals who advocate an Asian destiny. In fact, Hitler said:

"The descendants of the convicts in Australia should inspire in us nothing but a feeling of supreme indifference. If their vitality is not strong enough to enable them to increase at a rate proportionate to the size of the territories they occupy, that is their own look-out, and it is no use their appealing to us for help. For my own part, I have no objection at all to seeing the surplus populations of prolific Asia being drawn, as to a magnet, to their empty spaces. Let them all work out their own salvation! And let me repeat – it is nothing to do with us.

Adolf Hitler, Feb. 7^th 1945.

The idea of a ‘national-socialism’ is however, transcendant of TIME and SPACE. It has existed universally from its most primitive form (i.e. primitive communism at the primary stage) even amongst Australian Aborigines, Melanesians, Polynesians, Negroes etc., through to a higher cultural form amongst various Europid and Mongoloid peoples (Celts, Teutons, Slavs, Berbers, pre-12^th Century Japanese, early Chinese, Amerindians) in the secondary pre-feudal stage of development. From the early pre-feudal forms, tribal-communism or tribal-socialism evolves into the national-socialism of the feudal form – the organic-national-body corporate or "bee-hive society". According to Herbert Spencer, a 19^th Century English sociologist, (he was torn between his desires for an ethical-socialist society and the inorganic bourgeois social-darwinist commercial society), Feudalism was the continuation of the tribal-socialist society which had undergone further cultural-political development and social articulation in the form of the growth of the authoritarian-aristocratic-state. He even claimed that the then-contemporary socialist and communist ideologies we aiming at the reforming of a feudal society. He argued that the modern states were overlays over feudal society where the predominantly agrarian feudal culture was revolutionized by industrialization giving the state a more "democratic" (i.e. meritocratic") basis for its leadership. A greater social-mobility and equality of opportunity had emerged to replace the ossifying effects of rigid class organization. (For a comprehensive appreciation of the schism in Herbert Spencer's analysis of history and his personal world-view, I recommend a search citing his name in relation to 'communitarian social-darwinism')

Between the feudal and industrial forms of State Socialism there is the period of social re-organisation (which may take decades or even centuries) during which society is more fluid and liberal as a prerequisite for permitting new dynamics (like technology) to reshape it. This anarchic period in which everything is challenged and nothing held to be absolutely valid is usually brief (historically speaking) since the perpetuation of this condition threatens the society’s very existence.

From anarchic liberalism and democracy evolves authoritarian liberal democracy (the Cromwellian Protectorate, the American and French revolutionary governments) or even socialist democracy.

This liberal phase of history belongs with the Indo-European speaking section of the Caucasoid group; this group seems to retain a penchant for cyclical periods where social and individual ‘rights’ are defined and re-defined. Rousseau’s ‘Social Contract’ and the American Constitution and Bill of Rights are simply recent recapitulations of patterns of behaviour present in the classical cultures of Greece and Rome echoing Indo-European antiquity. The battle of Runnymede and the consequent Magna Carta is another Anglophone cultural example of how Indo-Europeans through insurrection bring about cultural/social revolution in which the rights and obligations of subjects and citizens are clearly defined. Hamito-Semitic, Finno-Ugrian and High Mongoloid cultures seem to have moved from their feudal stages to advanced civilizations without an indigenous liberalistic period inspired from native-facts (Japan after the Meji Restoration, China, Korea, Aztecs, Incas etc. were all transmuted under the direct impact of Western imperialism). This fact has shaped much world history and is likely to influence things even more. The reality is that democracy (as westerners define it) has become a feature of state forms amongst non-Indo-European peoples only because of the great influence and power of this civilization.

As stated previously : "Democracy is the philosophy of Nature’s Nobles". It is a grand IDEAL which Indo-Europeans should maintain; but it should not have become an ideology for export. Cosmopolitans have pushed it onto others minus its essential authoritarian aspect and its racial base. Libertarian-levellers are still pirating this concept.

As Rousseau suggests, the type of Absolute Freedom which is posited as the final goal of liberal-democracy, belongs only to the psycho-biological type which is imbued with an inherent desire not to abuse it – by a sense of responsibility for the welfare of the Nation as a whole. Such persons are the exception and not the norm. They exist in every race, people and nation, and form its natural aristocracy. This aristocracy represents Vilfredo Pareto's 'contending elite'. They can bear the goals set by the NEW AGE IDEAL.

A nationally-specific socialism as an ethical socialism, was a feature of classical American and French democracy, and before that the Cromwellian state. Its first post-feudal form under Cromwell yielded to the economics-centred world view of the bourgeoisie. With its social-darwinist ethics, it waged the bourgeois class war. It ended as plutocracy: the dictatorship of finance capital. In response to the class war from above, the Marxist school of socialism responded with class war from below, its own version of social-darwinism. It sought the dictatorship of the proletariat over the bourgeoisie. Ethical-socialism can be defined as the essentially communitarian ethics ie. individual interests being subordinated to the interests of the community be it religious, regional, tribal, racial or national - in short, a civic religion. A comprehensive definition of ethical socialism by a person hostile to all forms of socialism can be found in Chapter 27 of Socialism: An Economic And Sociological Analysis by Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973), which is available on the Internet. For a complementary history of ethical socialism, refer to N. Dennis and A.H. Halsey, English Ethical Socialism: From Thomas More To R.H. Tawney, Oxford, 1988. Professor Halsey was Emeritus Professor at Nuffield College. The realtionship of Friedrich Nietzsche to the communitarian ethic is easily accessible by a simple internet search entitled 'communitarian ethic, Nietzsche'.

The hegemony of the English doctrine of "liberalism", the paid for creed of the plutocracy infected and distorted American and French democracy away from its ethical-socialist basis overwhelming it with the "shop-keeper’s" ideology (Napoleon’s phrase). Work should not simply be a means to accrue capital, but be rather, a life function and a pleasure. The bourgeois ideal is a twisted ‘will to power’ incompatible with the life-centred ‘will to form’ spoken of by Nietzsche as the mark of his ‘over-man’,

Prussia meanwhile was developing (through a process which restricted the "liberalizing" of the feudal structures) a modern industrial society based upon authoritarian structures and advanced social legislation. The Bismarck period consumated this process. Prussia evolved an ethical-socialist society. Whilst English children were dying of lung diseases brought on by chimney sweeping, or sweating in work houses for subsistence, Prussia had compulsory education, health insurance, pensions, and legalized unions. Social Democrats were able to achieve parliamentary representation to win social reforms. This progressive situation was both conservative and radical. It sought to conserve the best in the Prussian-German tradition whilst facilitating non-violent change through gradualness. That the programme worked can be shown by the fact that after twenty years of Bismarckian rule, Germany was able to challenge the hegemony of England and her plutocratic allies.

This "progressive-conservative" approach to State-Socialism had its British counterparts (the non-Marxist Fabians who were all ethno-centric, and patriotic within a culturally specific context, as well in favour of a Pan-European federation) and found echoes right throughout the white world. Despite what modern Fabian cosmopolitans may say (and right-wing fools), the founders of Fabianism (George Bernard Shaw, Sidney and Beattrice Webb, H.G. Wells etc) were all non-Marxist, ethnocentric-realists and in favour of authoritarian measures in the state; their philosophic roots lay in Nietzsche NOT dialectical materialism. Today’s Fabians are frauds and liars with no right to claim any part of the Fabian tradition. Indeed, today's Fabian Society has completely repudiated all formal adherence to an economic socialist objective in favour of laissez-faire economics and therefore in no way are they related to the origina